Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What happens if a lesbian happens to like the same things a typical man would? Luscious lips, fine figure, that kinda stuff.

"something something compulsory toxic masculinity disregard your opinion."
People like this were going to reboot xena and make her cover up. A series already known for having a large quantity of lesbian fans in all it's glory.

They don't give a shit. They just assume most of their critics are white men.
 
What happens if a lesbian happens to like the same things a typical man would? Luscious lips, fine figure, that kinda stuff.

They will make the argument that that doesn't matter because these characters were still designed to please a straight male audience, so it doesn't matter if lesbians happen to like them.
 
Last edited:
I'm reminded of an old joke that's now nearly a decade old, and is as true now as it was when it was told to me on 4chan ages ago.

Q: What's the difference between the "Family Values" religious whackjobs from the 90s and progressives?
A: The religious whackjobs actually did care about the children.

Badum-bish.
 
What is it with them and ponchos? The only people who wear ponchos are mexican bandidos and the chronically overweight.
 

I appreciate them adding more muscle mass to the body on the bottom one but the new design doesn't look too good. It's kind of bland. I'm not even a big fan of the first one either.

The top one is pretty bad though. Why the hell would you make a design like that with the Poncho? Ponchos only work with rouge or cold-habitat characters. Not with clearly dancer inspired outfits? How do you go from a tank top and long skirt to a poncho?
 
Last edited:
BABD sure loves ponchos and poofy pants. I am starting to wonder if it's because Ozzie does not have the art skill required to draw anything else.
 
Honestly, I just wish that more artists respond to this asshole the way George Kamitani (the dude behind Dragon's Crown) did to Jason Schreier:

ZSogvIJ.png
 
Why do they always edit the women's faces to be uglier? I thought they just wanted armor to be "practical" and "realistic" and the last time I checked faces don't have anything to do with how protective armor is.
 
BABD sure loves ponchos and poofy pants. I am starting to wonder if it's because Ozzie does not have the art skill required to draw anything else.
She went to art school. I don't know what the quality of art schools in Poland are like but I have not seen anything from her that I would consider professional grade.
 
They will make the argument that that doesn't matter because these characters were still designed to please a straight male audience, so it doesn't matter if lesbians happen to like them.

Actually, I think I've at least once seen the argument that even if the characters in question are designed to appeal primarily to lesbians, and the demographics show that they make up a large part, or even the majority, of the demographic that watches the show/buys the book, If even ONE man is tuning in to get a peek then it MUST BE SHUT DOWN.

Tis better a million women lose something than one man enjoy it.

Progressive "diversity" is all about exclusion of the "other"
 
I kind of want to introduce them to the outrageously skimpy characters in Girls Frontline (G41, SR-3MP, M37 Ithica, etc) and see what happens.


Same deal for the Sisters of Battle and the Repentia.
 
Why do they always edit the women's faces to be uglier? I thought they just wanted armor to be "practical" and "realistic" and the last time I checked faces don't have anything to do with how protective armor is.

Because women can't be attractive otherwise the ugly feminists will feel bad about themselves.
 
Back
Top Bottom