- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
In the United States District Court, for the Southern District Court of New York.
*EDIT* j/k. Jimmy's lawyer bungled it and the case got tossed out to State Court.
In the Supreme Court Of New York County, Index Number 653908/2023
Joseph Stephen Donaldson, by and through his LLC, Beast Investments and the Attorneys for the same, has filed civil action in the United States Federal Court. This lawsuit stems from the titular "Mister Beast Burger", which was established as a virtual dining concept.
Virtual dining is essentially a method for existing restaurants to adopt new brands through delivery apps like Grub Hub and Uber Eats. Users of the Apps would order the food through these apps, and the kitchens in these various stores would prepare and package the food using branded standards and ingredients. A nice idea in concept, but according to Mister Donaldson, it was a scam. It was sold as a means by which small businesses, particularily during the COVID pandemic, could stay in business by selling food through delivery apps.
In practice, according to the Plaintiffs allegations and causes of action, the defendant, Virtual Dining Concepts failed to maintain quality control, failed to pay Mister Beast anything for the relationship, and willfully breaches contract by using the Mister Beast Trademarks in foreign countries.
THE PARTIES
Plaintiff: Joseph (Jimmy) Donaldson, better known as Mister Beast. He has the second largest channel on youtube (after Pajeet Music Videos) and is the largest single content creator on the platform by subscribers. Kiwis who are not Zoomers may have been introduced to him due to the ongoing controversy involving one of his "bros", Chris (Christine) Tyson (ONION : CLEAR)
Defendant: Virtual Dining Concepts LLC, (Archive), a Limited Liability Corporation based out of Orlando Florida and Founded by Robert and Robbie Earl, a Father and Son team famous for founding the Planet Hollywood Restaurant chain, as well as ownership stakes in the Hard Rock Cafe.
THE DISPUTE
Seen here, a single slice of bacon over two burned patties and charcoaled bread. With the Mister Beast Logo in the background.
From the lawsuit itself.
The situation apparently became so widespread that Mister Beast was forced to publicly apologize on July 20th, 2023. In the apology, he admits "harsh lessons were learned".
This tweet followed an effort by Mister Beast to remove himself from the agreement with Virtual Dining Concepts amicably. Claiming he could not guarantee the quality of the product.
By all accounts, the behind the scenes efforts to end the business partnership failed, and as consequence this lawsuit was brought forth.
CAUSES OF ACTION
Beast Investments LLC alleges the following torts against them, perpetrated by Virtual Dining Concepts LLC.
1. Declaratory Judgement that the Contract between Beast Investments LLC and Defendants is VOID due to fraud
2. Breach of Contract. Defendants willfully and illegally broke contractual obligations.
3. Accounting Fraud. Defendants Willfully and illegally engaged in financial fraud against plaintiff, to hide financial obligations they were contractually obligated to pay to Plaintiff.
RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiff requests that
1, All obligations between Plaintiff and Defendant be voided.
2. That THE COURT initiate formal accounting of defendants finances.
3. Emergency Injunctive Relief, barring defendant from further use of Plaintiffs likeness.
4. Award for all royalties due plaintiff.
5. All other monetary relief due plaintiff
6. All other monetary relief due plaintiff under criminal statutes.
7. Pre and Post judgement interest on awards allowed by law
*EDIT* j/k. Jimmy's lawyer bungled it and the case got tossed out to State Court.
In the Supreme Court Of New York County, Index Number 653908/2023
Virtual dining is essentially a method for existing restaurants to adopt new brands through delivery apps like Grub Hub and Uber Eats. Users of the Apps would order the food through these apps, and the kitchens in these various stores would prepare and package the food using branded standards and ingredients. A nice idea in concept, but according to Mister Donaldson, it was a scam. It was sold as a means by which small businesses, particularily during the COVID pandemic, could stay in business by selling food through delivery apps.
In practice, according to the Plaintiffs allegations and causes of action, the defendant, Virtual Dining Concepts failed to maintain quality control, failed to pay Mister Beast anything for the relationship, and willfully breaches contract by using the Mister Beast Trademarks in foreign countries.
THE PARTIES
Plaintiff: Joseph (Jimmy) Donaldson, better known as Mister Beast. He has the second largest channel on youtube (after Pajeet Music Videos) and is the largest single content creator on the platform by subscribers. Kiwis who are not Zoomers may have been introduced to him due to the ongoing controversy involving one of his "bros", Chris (Christine) Tyson (ONION : CLEAR)
Defendant: Virtual Dining Concepts LLC, (Archive), a Limited Liability Corporation based out of Orlando Florida and Founded by Robert and Robbie Earl, a Father and Son team famous for founding the Planet Hollywood Restaurant chain, as well as ownership stakes in the Hard Rock Cafe.
THE DISPUTE
Seen here, a single slice of bacon over two burned patties and charcoaled bread. With the Mister Beast Logo in the background.
From the lawsuit itself.
The situation apparently became so widespread that Mister Beast was forced to publicly apologize on July 20th, 2023. In the apology, he admits "harsh lessons were learned".
This tweet followed an effort by Mister Beast to remove himself from the agreement with Virtual Dining Concepts amicably. Claiming he could not guarantee the quality of the product.
By all accounts, the behind the scenes efforts to end the business partnership failed, and as consequence this lawsuit was brought forth.
CAUSES OF ACTION
Beast Investments LLC alleges the following torts against them, perpetrated by Virtual Dining Concepts LLC.
1. Declaratory Judgement that the Contract between Beast Investments LLC and Defendants is VOID due to fraud
2. Breach of Contract. Defendants willfully and illegally broke contractual obligations.
3. Accounting Fraud. Defendants Willfully and illegally engaged in financial fraud against plaintiff, to hide financial obligations they were contractually obligated to pay to Plaintiff.
RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiff requests that
1, All obligations between Plaintiff and Defendant be voided.
2. That THE COURT initiate formal accounting of defendants finances.
3. Emergency Injunctive Relief, barring defendant from further use of Plaintiffs likeness.
4. Award for all royalties due plaintiff.
5. All other monetary relief due plaintiff
6. All other monetary relief due plaintiff under criminal statutes.
7. Pre and Post judgement interest on awards allowed by law
Attachments
Last edited:
