Law Backpage has been seized

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://archive.is/wReed
Banner3.jpg


We have just lost cabin pressure.

Null said:
Backpage was seized because the Communications Decency Act was amended to allow LEO to pierce the veil and come after hosts and services when users had broken the law. This may seem trivial, but the CDA's safe harbor provisions is what enables every site that exists and allows user-generated content to be self-published.

4chan? At risk. 8chan? At risk.
Encyclopedia Dramatica? At risk. Kiwi Farms? At risk. Every other web forum? At risk.
Facebook, Google Plus, YouTube, Twitter, Gab? At risk.

If the CDA continues down this path we will see our largest export (culture and technology) be swiftly transplanted to other countries with safe harbor provisions.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
SugarSnot said:
Ahh obscenity laws. Gonna post some SFW comics from an artist buddy of mine who just got thrown back into prison because he refused to stop drawing loli stuff and post it on chan-boards. Just know that it's a huge red flag when you can't even draw obscene stuff from imagination and post it on forums for such things. When websites don't allow that then they are slip-sliding fast.
View attachment 420971 View attachment 420973 View attachment 420976 View attachment 420977
Click to expand...

What sort of fucking sicko goes to jail for being a pedo, keeps drawing child porn, and ends up back in jail? And what sort of fucking moron defends the fucking sicko saying it's a slippery slope to getting arrested for changing a baby's diaper?
 
CWCchange said:
From the last century in the United States, yes. But nativism isn't a term exclusive to one place and time. The old cliche that history repeats itself still applies, to some extent.
Click to expand...
When I'm specifically talking about this century's history heavily resembling last century's, I think it's quite clear exactly what I'm talking about.
 
DragoonSierra said:
and does it work? if so good for them
Click to expand...
Not sure about that
Fieman said more than 100,000 Playpen registered users visited the site while it was under the FBI’s control. The Justice Department said in court filings that agents had found “true” computer addresses for more than 1,300 of them, and has told defense lawyers that 137 have been charged with a crime, though it has so far declined to publicly identify those cases.
Click to expand...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...sharing-thousands-child-porn-images/79108346/
 
This incident is another tiny tiptoe towards the human cattle farm.

We keep moving into the nightmare, inch by inch.
 
DragoonSierra said:
and does it work? if so good for them
Click to expand...
No, and the agents who work those schemes are pedophiles who continuously steal and publish the federal child pornography database.

Sorry sperg. This shit doesn't work and it doesn't justify the continuous depression of our rights to privacy and speech. Here's a lifehack for you: if you ever see a law that includes the words "child pornography" or "child [sex] trafficking" in the long title, it has nothing to do with helping children.
 
Null said:
The federal agencies own very large child pornography sites that they justify by saying it's used to catch pedophiles in trades. This isn't conspiracy: they do this.
Click to expand...

Wouldnt it be considered entrapment for them to set up Honeypots essentially? I know its the gov. So they can just do whatever the fuck they want but I always wondered if it would be considered that in the real world
 
The feds used CP and terrorism the same way they used to use organized crime and communism as a bogeyman. They overreach because who's gonna step up and challenge it? "What, do you LIKE children being abused? Are you a fucking PEDO??? No? Good, then sit down and shut up."

Then you start to notice those same powers and authorities that are used for the 'extreme' being used for the mundane (RICO being a great example of this) because the Constitution was not written in a way that sensibly allows it to be ignored for some crimes but not others. You don't even have to bother convicting people most of the time, all you have to do is threaten them with the charge and they'll fold.

Bryan Dunn said:
Wouldnt it be considered entrapment for them to set up Honeypots essentially? I know its the gov. So they can just do whatever the fuck they want but I always wondered if it would be considered that in the real world
Click to expand...

It's not entrapment unless you're basically tricking someone into committing a crime. So if you set up a webpage for 18+ girls but put a 17 year old in there without it being at all apparent and then went "Gotcha!" that would probably be entrapment. But if you can show people are going to your site looking for illegal shit they're generally screwed. It's sorta like an undercover cop asking you if you've got drugs to sell. Unless they twist your arm it's legal.
 
Bryan Dunn said:
You said earlier when they use terms like child sex trafficking etx. It has nothing to do with kids. What exactly does it have to do with then? Search and seizure juat to have that ability then?
Click to expand...
Do you actually care or are you just quoting me because you fucking cum when I acknowledge you exist
 
Bryan Dunn said:
Wouldnt it be considered entrapment for them to set up Honeypots essentially? I know its the gov. So they can just do whatever the fuck they want but I always wondered if it would be considered that in the real world
Click to expand...

A key element of entrapment is persuading someone to do something illegal which they wouldn't do without your urging. If you're visiting what you think is a legit child porn site or dark net drug market, you've gone looking for it and chosen to visit it on your own without any persuasion on the part of the site operators.
 
Null said:
Do you actually care or are you just quoting me because you fucking cum when I acknowledge you exist
Click to expand...

I actually give a shit. This type of stuff is really bad imo and ironically the lther day me and a RL friend were talking about honeypots due to a recent video I made and he also stated the same thing you were saying but never explained it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom