Science Autism can be reversed, scientists discover - Trial with two non-identical twin girls also found symptoms can be reduced to an indistinguishable level

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Published: July 20th, 2024
Source | Archive

TELEMMGLPICT000386131214_17214864999230_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bH...png
Severe autism can be reversed and symptoms reduced to an indistinguishable level, scientists have discovered.

Two non-identical twin girls in the US were found to have a level of autism at 20 months old that required “very substantial support”.

A groundbreaking trial saw their parents and a team of medical experts create a bespoke two-year programme of interventions designed to help the children thrive and flourish as much as possible.

Scientists say the programme was successful, with both girls undergoing “dramatic improvements” in the severity of their symptoms.

The progress of one of the girls, described only as Twin P, was heralded as “a kind of miracle” by one of the paediatricians. Twin P scored a 43 out of 180 on the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist scale in March 2022 and this was reduced to just four by October 2023.

“One of the twins’ symptoms were reversed to the point of being indistinguishable from children who had never had a history of autism symptoms,” Dr Chris D’Adamo, study author from the University of Maryland, told The Telegraph.

“This twin’s functions are comparable to those who never had an autism diagnosis.”

The other girl, known as Twin L, had more severe autism aged 20 months, scoring 76, and this was reduced to 32 a year and a half later.

“[This twin] improved dramatically, but not quite as much,” said Dr D’Adamo.

Improvements unlikely to be undone​

The scientists do not use the term “cure”, but believe the improvements are unlikely to be undone over time.

“Because autism is a developmental condition, one can safely say that once they have overcome the developmental aspects of autism and returned to a typical developmental trajectory, they are very unlikely to exhibit the common symptoms of autism again,” said Dr D’Adamo.

“Symptoms that could return might be more along the lines of things like anxiety, gastrointestinal issues, sensory issues, but not necessarily the behavioural aspects of autism.”

The twins underwent behavioural analysis, speech therapy and a strict gluten-free diet and nutrition programme as part of the trial to reduce inflammation.

The diet was casein-free, a protein found in milk; low-sugar; had no artificial colours or dyes; zero ultra-processed foods; primarily organic; and locally sourced.

The girls were also given daily supplements for omega-3 fatty acids, multivitamins, vitamin D, carnitine, and others.

‘No singular cure to reverse symptoms’​

Writing in the study, published in the MDPI journal Sexes, the anonymous parents said they knew there would not be a “singular cure” to reverse the symptoms and instead the programme focused on alleviating the “total load” on the children.

“Despite sharing similar genes and identical conception, gestation, birth experience, and post-natal factors - as well as benefiting from consistent nurture, home environment and family dynamics - each daughter presented an ASD diagnosis entirely uniquely,” they write.

“Conventional statistics have stacked the odds against the ability to recover a child from an ASD diagnosis.

“Our approach was therefore focused on following a nonconventional, holistic understanding of each daughter’s individual needs, exploring root cause and designing customised support.

“We committed to being highly involved in all the interventions we explored, educating ourselves and advocating for what we felt was best for our children.

“Most importantly, our experience as parents has been the desire to create and maintain a profound and loving bond with each of our daughters - and to remain parents, not practitioners.

“Through this approach, we have witnessed the radical recovery of one daughter - who presents today as a joyful, engaging, spirited, extremely bright four-year-old.

“We remain steadfast in our support for our other daughter whose progress has also consistently amazed us and has reminded us that recovery is possible at each person’s individual pace.”

The case study is published in the Journal of Personalized Medicine.
 
The progress of one of the girls, described only as Twin P, was heralded as “a kind of miracle” by one of the paediatricians. Twin P scored a 43 out of 180 on the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist scale in March 2022 and this was reduced to just four by October 2023.
So they were probably just mis-diagnosed and when they grew up normal they declared their "treatment" was what did it when it likely did nothing at all, something that is easy to do when you diagnose them at fucking 20 months of age.
 
Last edited:
I read the paper the other day - I was thinking about posting it. Just a couple of things I thought.
1. It’s a case study, and so it’s not something that’s been replicated.
2. The kids were twins, born from a donated egg in a surrogate, from older sperm (dad was 51) and had a bad birth. So there’s a strong possibility that this is more developmental delay or birth issues from IVF/surrogacy/old sperm than autism.
3. They threw so many interventions at the kids that it will be impossible to pick one out. Which yes is kind of the point, that a multifaceted approach worked, but still, it’s not replicable.
 
Sounds too early to prove anything. What happens if one of them relapses and starts making 10 hour documentaries about speedrunning exploits?
 
But we've known for years now that early intervention can significantly help with autism symptoms. The only real meaningful difference here is that in this particular case they were able to see significant improvement in a case they deemed to be severe. It's interesting I guess, but not really worth an entire article.
 
There have also been studies that where a third of children no longer met the diagnostic criteria for autism after a few years with standard interventions, how can we be sure that the girls didn't just get over whatever symptoms they were displaying?
 
Hasn't the autism symptoms being able to be reduced to basically almost nothing been a known thing for awhile? I mean back in the 2000s I remember lots of kids that had autism, specifically High functioning/aspergers got therapy and counselling to treat it instead of being told "Oh no! yuu can't help yourself because AUTISM!!!! you're NEURODIVERGENT!!!'
This is like watching people that destroyed the last several decades of medical and mental health research for an easy criticism shield rediscover that no, it's NOT untreatable and most of it comes from you yourself being unwilling to try and figure out the shit you didn't instinctually pick upon due to how your brain developed. The claim it'll cure/remove it is fucking retarded because it's tied to brain development. On paper you still got the tism, but it's not really noticable.
 
Last edited:
The original study for those interested:

As @Otterly pointed out, it's a case study of two non-identical twins with concerned parents who tried anything and everything. They consulted both pseudo-scientific practitioners and medical avenues (including genomic tools not mentioned in the article). This is all the kind of shit millions of parents do when their children are diagnosed with a chronic illness.
Some of these methods do have promise. But the fact that these two twins are exceptional in their recovery should be seen as evidence of a low-to-nonexistent success rate.
 
Autism is nothing but an excuse to never learn how to behave like a normal human being. Yes it takes a bit of effort to regulate the things you do and say. I understand it's easier to just not give a fuck and do and say whatever you want but it's an extremely useful skill to be able to regulate your behaviour. If you struggle with this, try fucking harder.
 
Specific subtypes of autism already are known to do this naturally.

Autism practitioners know exactly the signs to look for to find these subtypes (they are extremely specific, like the subtype of kids who display affection but have highly retarded receptive language and don't even come to their own names while also being able to read and count from an exceptionally early age like 1-2). These kids score in the most severe ranges of autism if tested in the 2-3 age range, but by 5-6 are typically much more mild cases, and by 10-12 display fairly typical if "quirky" social behaviors.

Autism centers love to tell you it never gets better on its own and you always need intensive therapies. They also go out of their way to look for kids who they can showcase as a miracle that could definitely only have happened with their therapies.
 
Autism is nothing but an excuse to never learn how to behave like a normal human being. Yes it takes a bit of effort to regulate the things you do and say. I understand it's easier to just not give a fuck and do and say whatever you want but it's an extremely useful skill to be able to regulate your behaviour. If you struggle with this, try fucking harder.
It irritates me when people say this like this.
Sure, autism may be overdiagnosed as a result of such broad diagnostic thresholds as to make the term seemingly meaningless, but are you gonna watch this with a straight face and say there's nothing intrinsically wrong with this guy?

 
It irritates me when people say this like this.
Sure, autism may be overdiagnosed as a result of such broad diagnostic thresholds as to make the term seemingly meaningless, but are you gonna watch this with a straight face and say there's nothing intrinsically wrong with this guy?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j4PTf7LgsIE
Yeah. That's a dude who was never taught how to control his behaviour. That's years of being allowed to do whatever the fuck he wants with zero repercussions. I do believe that person could have not ended up like that if his mom and any other adults in his life hadn't been so fucking useless. Also, how many drugs is that guy being prescribed? I've seen first hand how fucked some of those drugs make people.
 
I don’t even know what autism diagnosis means anymore. And this is from someone who is around a lot of verified autists (from non verbal to “I don’t think you’re even autistic” levels.)

So, grain of salt. I’ve seen too many girls misdiagnosed with autism.
 
Yeah. That's a dude who was never taught how to control his behaviour. That's years of being allowed to do whatever the fuck he wants with zero repercussions. I do believe that person could have not ended up like that if his mom and any other adults in his life hadn't been so fucking useless. Also, how many drugs is that guy being prescribed? I've seen first hand how fucked some of those drugs make people.
Would more competent parenting have improved his outcome? Probably. But attributing non-verbal levels of stunted development to bad parenting is beyond ignorant. If a normal child is around speaking people, it will learn to talk.

I don’t even know what autism diagnosis means anymore. And this is from someone who is around a lot of verified autists (from non verbal to “I don’t think you’re even autistic” levels.)

So, grain of salt. I’ve seen too many girls misdiagnosed with autism.
The girls in this study were evaluated as "level 3," essentially meaning they were expected to turn out a lot like the guy in the video I posted above. Though misdiagnosis shouldn't be ruled out.
 
Back
Top Bottom