Asexuality

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Is asexuality a legit sexuality?

  • Yes

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • Nope

    Votes: 137 40.5%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 29 8.6%
  • Who gives a fuck?

    Votes: 118 34.9%

  • Total voters
    338
Is not wanting to have sex really that debilitating on one's life? ... I personally don't think so. But I'm no expert.
I agree with you, but there are a suprisingly high number of men who think something is wrong with a woman who doesn't want sex. Back in high school, a senior in my class was going out with someone in their second year of college. She didn't want to have sex for obvious reasons, but he decided to ask a forum about that. There were a lot of responses along the lines of "you should try to do it with her even if she doesn't want to" or "you should break up with her". Perhaps it is the teenage hormones speaking to these people, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are people who legitimately think having sex will cure not wanting to have sex.
 
I guess it doesn't occur to this incel that they don't have to associate with anyone that they don't want to. Just don't have sex and shut up about it and the whole "problem" goes away.

Then how do they get attention for being special?

I hate how everyone has to "come out" as something now.

I agree with you, but there are a suprisingly high number of men who think something is wrong with a woman who doesn't want sex. Back in high school, a senior in my class was going out with someone in their second year of college. She didn't want to have sex for obvious reasons, but he decided to ask a forum about that. There were a lot of responses along the lines of "you should try to do it with her even if she doesn't want to" or "you should break up with her". Perhaps it is the teenage hormones speaking to these people, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are people who legitimately think having sex will cure not wanting to have sex.

I think a lot of people really only care about their own boundaries and hope you have the same. If you deviate they need to fix you. Try to have sex with her even if she doesn't want to? What's wrong with these people. If she is not interested then find someone else.
 
Or, it could be medicinally-induced. There are men (more estrogen due to obesity and moobs) and women with PMMD.
With so many doctors eager to prescribe every medication under the Sun to every kid nowadays, there's an argument for Asexuality, not like "Vaccines made my kid Autistic", but it's an explanation.
 
I think a lot of people really only care about their own boundaries and hope you have the same. If you deviate they need to fix you. Try to have sex with her even if she doesn't want to?
I cannot agree more. She was seventeen and he was twenty at the time. Some people need to stop assuming that everyone who has a lower libido than themselves is asexual.
 
Sorry than I unburied that thread and if it's not the right thread to mention it but hat blog was mentioned https://archive.ph/oj9Ld on the Deviantart horrors thread and I saw the profile of the webmaster who claimed then he's asexual, for some unknown reasons, it reminds me of Lucas and LFJ... :story:
Yeah, they refer to themselves as a twink and are beefing with Club-Dreamiverse, Menslady125, and who they associate with due to their mostly pedophilic/cyberbullying/spamming actions, fyi
 
I guess asexuals don't have the right not to have sex... or the right not to hear "don't worry, you'll still find that special someone one day".

1688552823459.png
 
One thing I've noticed that bugs me:

Once something becomes an identity group, the signal to noise ratio about the topic goes straight to zero. It might be interesting to know about what asexuals are like, it's prevalence, what sort of things cause it, etc,; but the only thing's you'll find anymore are the ANSI-standard identity talking points with halfassed palette swapping, people pretending for social identity points, and other nonsense.

Same thing with "autism". Is autism really a "spectrum?", or does it have some sort of Mendelian discreteness to it? This would be something interesting to know, and I'm sure a real answer to the question, one way or the other *exists*, but how would you ever find it amid all the pretending and bullshit? (If something is caused by a single sort of mutant gene being present, you ether have it, have it (recessive), or don't have it. Something being a continuous "spectrum", like adult height, means that it's a sum of tons of independent influences. )

Somewhere along the line, not being a social-chad, a personality type, and a crippling brain malfunction that causes people to rock in corners all got blended together by internet drama queens.
 
While I'm sure there are some genuinely asexual people out there, I think in general it's just a term that people use online to ascribe sexual identities to regular personality traits for internet oppression points. Like the prevalence of aromantic/asexual (or aroace as the kids say) online is too damn high and they're almost universally just people with social anxiety/awkwardness. It's like trying to make autism a sexual identity, which I'm sure some people already do.
 
Do you know how many absolute whores featured on this website have claimed to be asexual? It's like some kind of weird form of compensation for a lot of them and a way to seem special, and I'm guessing the individual in that tweet featured above falls into that category.

And anyways, I doubt most actual asexuality in the modern day is a static feature, it's probably just people who are depressed/anxious or generally unhealthy, or who have a completely warped sense of exactly how the entire process is supposed to work and thus assume there's something disordered about them because they don't behave like whatever the freaks they see online and in the media do.

Asexuality isn't some sexual identity no matter how much certain people try to insert it into the LGBT+alphabet, it's mostly a temporary state induced by a person's environment and current physical status.
 
I'm sure there's people who fake asexuality, for example it's the easiest way to acquire LGBT victimhood status while not being some flavor of cock sucker.

Otherwise I think people who are genuinely asexual just have some sort of condition resulting in an undeveloped part of the brain responsible for sexuality, and/or hormonal imbalances.
 
I have been on medication that removed most desire in the past, but it is really difficult for me to imagine anyone who doesn't want sex by default. I'd seriously lean towards them having some kind of issue, be it physical or mental.

If you identify as asexual you should get checked out by a doctor and/or a therapist. Maybe they don't find anything, but imagine waking up at 50 and realizing you weren't actually asexual and wasted all that time.
 
Last edited:
I guess asexuals don't have the right not to have sex... or the right not to hear "don't worry, you'll still find that special someone one day".

View attachment 5193392
If anything, the idea of being “asexual” at a Pride March is hypocritical by nature. You claim to not have sexual attraction over people , yet you support or hang out with some of the most highly sexualized and sexually addicting people that possibly advocating for swinging and casual sex with no responsibilities toward others?

Most of this is a fad, and it’s also insulting to people who may have actual physical problems maintains their testosterone/estrogen levels which could make the, unable to have children.

If anything, the real reason why this could be looked as absurd is when PP decides to seriously believe this all to further their agenda onto people wanting to have to stable and healthy familial relationships:


IMG_6217.jpeg IMG_6218.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom