Argue with @NoBueno about Flat Earth

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more traction yet. Here, @NoBueno - I'll throw you a bone.
Respectful discussions on this topic are quite rare, friends. I'd suggest there's more to this than one may (think they) know. Humoring ideas doesn't suddenly brand one a heretic. Just have some fun with it.:)
 
Fek said:
I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more traction yet.
Click to expand...
The heliocentric model idea is one of the core underpinnings of modern lexicon, that would then cascade into then entertaining the possibility that everything they told you is a lie. And they don't believe such a massive fraud could ever be perpetuated, or that the people at the top have such control. So to them, it's absurd on it's face. Not even worth engaging with.
 
If anyone is actually curious about the shape of the earth, and is skeptical of cameras in space and at high altitude because of fisheye, CGI, or other arguments, here's something for you:
When accurately and precisely triangulating between survey points, the angles will add up to slightly more than 180 degrees. Of course, flat triangles with more than 180 degrees of interior angle are impossible. That's because these aren't flat triangles, they're spherical triangles. These spherical excess values, which are a precise measurement of Earth's curvature, pop up well over 100 years ago in geodetic survey papers. These are professional resources that were used for precision navigation, not some kind of public affairs piece. None of this stuff was publicized, it was just going on in the background building the foundations of early modern navigation and communication.

If you want to, you could start triangulating points yourself with a plum-bob and a surveyor. You'd figure out pretty quick that the Earth's curvature is there and you can't ignore it.
 

Attachments

  • transcontinental-triangulation-and-the-american-arc-of-the-parallel.pdf
    transcontinental-triangulation-and-the-american-arc-of-the-parallel.pdf
    41.6 MB · Views: 34
  • IMG_20250628_223736.webp
    IMG_20250628_223736.webp
    130.6 KB · Views: 17
AntiSchwuletteAktion said:
If anyone is actually curious about the shape of the earth, and is skeptical of cameras in space and at high altitude because of fisheye, CGI, or other arguments, here's something for you:
When accurately and precisely triangulating between survey points, the angles will add up to slightly more than 180 degrees. Of course, flat triangles with more than 180 degrees of interior angle are impossible. That's because these aren't flat triangles, they're spherical triangles. These spherical excess values, which are a precise measurement of Earth's curvature, pop up well over 100 years ago in geodetic survey papers. These are professional resources that were used for precision navigation, not some kind of public affairs piece. None of this stuff was publicized, it was just going on in the background building the foundations of early modern navigation and communication.

If you want to, you could start triangulating points yourself with a plum-bob and a surveyor. You'd figure out pretty quick that the Earth's curvature is there and you can't ignore it.
Click to expand...
So then why do you think China, the US, and Russia co-operate on this?
 
pollution jim said:
This is the most retarded video i've ever seen

look up "datamoshing"
Click to expand...
So datamoshing is how the cup of water was sitting on the table or the guy dropped in like he was on a greenscreen okay, ill remember that for next time
 
The evidence that he earth is flat is honestly right under our noses: it's because the earth is able to hold all the fatasses in america just fine. We'd be on a course towards the sun if it was round!
 
It has always been a pretty interesting debate to watch, makes me wish I understood more of what was being talked about.
 
NoBueno said:
The heliocentric model idea is one of the core underpinnings of modern lexicon, that would then cascade into then entertaining the possibility that everything they told you is a lie. And they don't believe such a massive fraud could ever be perpetuated, or that the people at the top have such control. So to them, it's absurd on it's face. Not even worth engaging with.
vKHyFUPz0M9pbu0C.mp4
Click to expand...
Why is Tom Holland trying to sell me on his flat earth app
 
Toolbox said:
Why is Tom Holland trying to sell me on his flat earth app
Click to expand...
Spooderman didn't pay enough, I guess.
I like the examples in the video. Oh, the Suez canal is straight with no curvature correction, airplane pilots fly straight without tilting the nose down once to correct for curvature!
That's a pretty basic physics fail, but well, physics are all a lie to these people anyway.
 
Have you read the book of Enoch? @NoBueno

1 And from thence I went to the ends of the earth and saw there great beasts, and each differed from the other; and (I saw) birds also differing in appearance and beauty and voice, the one differing from the other. And to the east of those beasts I saw the ends of the earth whereon the heaven 2 rests, and the portals of the heaven open. And I saw how the stars of heaven come forth, and 3 I counted the portals out of which they proceed, and wrote down all their outlets, of each individual star by itself, according to their number and their names, their courses and their positions, and their 4 times and their months, as Uriel the holy angel who was with me showed me. He showed all things to me and wrote them down for me: also their names he wrote for me, and their laws and their companies.
Click to expand...
Enoch 33
https://archive.ph/R5ZhN
 
NoBueno said:
I feel like if they won't accept observational evidence, they won't accept woo woo
UEpwHfDOEO4Sc6lf.mp4
Click to expand...
You literally had someone give you observational evidence that you're wrong:
AntiSchwuletteAktion said:
If anyone is actually curious about the shape of the earth, and is skeptical of cameras in space and at high altitude because of fisheye, CGI, or other arguments, here's something for you:
When accurately and precisely triangulating between survey points, the angles will add up to slightly more than 180 degrees. Of course, flat triangles with more than 180 degrees of interior angle are impossible. That's because these aren't flat triangles, they're spherical triangles. These spherical excess values, which are a precise measurement of Earth's curvature, pop up well over 100 years ago in geodetic survey papers. These are professional resources that were used for precision navigation, not some kind of public affairs piece. None of this stuff was publicized, it was just going on in the background building the foundations of early modern navigation and communication.

If you want to, you could start triangulating points yourself with a plum-bob and a surveyor. You'd figure out pretty quick that the Earth's curvature is there and you can't ignore it.
Click to expand...
Your response was to show a video of the ISS because you're not interested in an actual discussion. Go back to gooning to models and pretending it has anything to do with you looking into the yacht girl thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom