"angry" gamers/critics

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
^Tbh i always figured Daria was like people 'round here the farms: calls bs on both the right and the left.

anyway regardless Daria's story is done. i don't see what new stories can they bring up since it all finished nicely. i suppose there's the thing of Jane being in the closet, but I don't think anyone would care about that, considering people prefer more popular characters like Cap or Elsa to be seen as gay over her.

Would Daria be a shitposter on pol?

I agree with you but I think that a one-off special, like the TV movies, focusing on an adult Daria could be interesting. Not a full on series just a one time special just like how Hey Arnold is getting a one time tv movie to wrap up all the loose ends.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KVMMFbuBGRA
I just don't think a Daria sequel would work tbh. I suppose if she tries to speak out against today's culture (against Twitter/instagram/internet celebrities, remakes, everybody suddenly going all "progressive" just to get asspats) she'd be seen as anti-millennial or a bigot.

And Animaniacs just doesn't work outside of 90s pop culture references...And Johnny Bravo? In the ultra feminist world we live in now? People would boycott it every five seconds.
I agree, some shows don't need to be remade or have sequels. Hell, Animaniacs hasn't aged well as it is. I'd hate to see what would happen if they tried to do it today. Especially since one of its major selling points was its animation.
 
I feel Strider often doesn't get the shows/characters he obsesses over. Like saying Daria should have a kid, or Animaniacs being "forgotten".

As I said, the character never demonstrated that she ever wanted to have children and she rarely had fantasies of being married. She fantasized about marrying Trent once and realized that he doesn't have his shit together. Another time she wrote of how the future will be in her family and she doesn't have children and may or may not be married. That was it. So her having a child would be very out of character.
 
And she wouldn't have children out of some weird feminist reason, but she always just seemed very non-conformist and not fitting into any social group at all. I think at times she accused her mother of being a workaholic and leaving her family behind.
 
So, watching Doug's Hunchback II review.

And the cartoon sperg in me isn't exactly pleased that he confused TMS (a company who barely worked for Disney after 1989) for Disney's in-house Japanese unit.

Then again, I wasn't entirely happy when they confused them for AKOM back in the Animaniacs retrospective. Me thinks that despite his gushing over Disney and modern CN shows, he doesn't exactly know much about animation.
 
Notice how he only considers "truly" bad the sequels to his favorite "flawless" films- (Hunchback and Beauty/Beast). It's kinda the same reason why he finds Fantasia 2000 "horrible".

I wonder the day Frozen 2 will come, and if it has a slight tiny flaw, he'll consider it the end of the world.
 
Last edited:
Doug doesn't know much about most things really.
And no amount of acknowledgement or "Fuck Ups" videos will ever hide that.

Notice how he only considers "truly" bad the sequels to his favorite "flawless" films- (Hunchback and Beauty/Beast). It's kinda the same reason why he finds Fantasia 2000 "horrible".
I mean I get people have their opinions, but man oh man I can't stand his backwards way of thinking. Besides, he prefaced this with "My fans warned me about this movie". Meaning he's only piggybacking off of popular opinion.
 
Then again, I wasn't entirely happy when they confused them for AKOM back in the Animaniacs retrospective. Me thinks that despite his gushing over Disney and modern CN shows, he doesn't exactly know much about animation.

The funny thing is that Doug did work as a graphic designer at one point. So you'd think he'd know animation but I guess not considering his prowess as a filmmaker.

Watching the Neil Breen double feature for Movie Night last night, I think the only "filmmaker" who could be as bad as Breen is the Walker brothers or the guys behind those parody movies like Date Movie, Epic Movie, and Meet The Spartans.
 
The funny thing is that Doug did work as a graphic designer at one point. So you'd think he'd know animation but I guess not considering his prowess as a filmmaker.

Watching the Neil Breen double feature for Movie Night last night, I think the only "filmmaker" who could be as bad as Breen is the Walker brothers or the guys behind those parody movies like Date Movie, Epic Movie, and Meet The Spartans.
Thing working against the Walker Bros. is that Seltzerberg had studio backing and Breen's looked upon as "So bad, It's good". Not even their co-stars (save Lewis and Matthew) have much positive to say about them and their lack of film skills.
 
The funny thing is that Doug did work as a graphic designer at one point. So you'd think he'd know animation but I guess not considering his prowess as a filmmaker.

Watching the Neil Breen double feature for Movie Night last night, I think the only "filmmaker" who could be as bad as Breen is the Walker brothers or the guys behind those parody movies like Date Movie, Epic Movie, and Meet The Spartans.
I disagree, Neil Breen's movies are funnier and more entertaining, regardless of how intentional they may be, than anything The Walkers put out.

Also, Doug's prone to making fun of Seltzerberg in his videos. You know what they say about glass houses.
 
I disagree, Neil Breen's movies are funnier and more entertaining, regardless of how intentional they may be, than anything The Walkers put out.

Also, Doug's prone to making fun of Seltzerberg in his videos. You know what they say about glass houses.

I'm not saying Breen isn't funny but I'm judging them by filmmaking talent. I.E. holding the camera in focus, editing, sound, etc. On that level Breen and the Walkers are about on par with each other.
 
I'm not saying Breen isn't funny but I'm judging them by filmmaking talent. I.E. holding the camera in focus, editing, sound, etc. On that level Breen and the Walkers are about on par with each other.
Fundamental difference is that Breen will actually use tripods, and his movies look more like movies than the sub-home video quality of the Walkers.
 
Last edited:
Even if Disney does give Elsa a girlfriend? (I doubt they would do that)

Dunno, Doug's lately been playing to the left but even he isn't that bought. He didn't think Moana or BH6 were good movies just because they starred minorities.

Although I suppose he might sleep easier thinking of Disney lesbians over an obese version of the Rock.
 
So, watching Doug's Hunchback II review.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hEq54RYXnVQ
And the cartoon sperg in me isn't exactly pleased that he confused TMS (a company who barely worked for Disney after 1989) for Disney's in-house Japanese unit.

Then again, I wasn't entirely happy when they confused them for AKOM back in the Animaniacs retrospective. Me thinks that despite his gushing over Disney and modern CN shows, he doesn't exactly know much about animation.
The worst part about this is that people ASSUME he's knowledgeable because he acts like it and take what he says as complete truth.

Then they go around spurting off his misinformation to a ton of people.

The only silver lining is when they push their misinformation onto actually knowledgeable people and get mocked into oblivion.
 
The funny thing is that Doug did work as a graphic designer at one point. So you'd think he'd know animation but I guess not considering his prowess as a filmmaker.
I am not sure he was a "graphic designer" but more of an illustrator/cartoonist?

Illustration and animation are not really the same thing.
I have worked in both and I can tell you they require different kinds/levels of knowledge.

In some kind of nutshell, illustration is about doing pretty individual drawings to accommodate a text or concept... and follow the vision of a single person.
While animation is about making a drawing move in a believable but appealing way (you cannot just draw a character in a pose and draw the inbetweens as you please), and unless you have the patience and energy to slave yourself for ages, this is a team work. Character design, backgrounds, screen composition, editing... you need to compromise a lot.

You tend to have free range as an illustrator, (but ya know, acquired taste and all) but as an animator, learning anatomy and "solid" drawings in order to make them believable in motion is important.

Some animators have managed to work well as illustrators (such as Greg Martin who did the Sonic the Hedgehog game covers), but I have rarely heard of the opposite.

Have you seen Doug's attempts at "animation" in his reviews? (Casper, Elephant in the Living Room, Spazzies, etc) It is extremely basic and stiff.
Maybe he could do better, but as far as I know, he has not shown a true knowledge of animation besides "open mouth, close mouth, drag character with Adobe Premiere".

Chad Rocco and Andrew Dickman are artists who know how to do actual animation, and you may have seen their work on Channel Awesome. They have been kinda out of the limelight these days, however...
 
I am not sure he was a "graphic designer" but more of an illustrator/cartoonist?

Illustration and animation are not really the same thing.
I have worked in both and I can tell you they require different kinds/levels of knowledge.

In some kind of nutshell, illustration is about doing pretty individual drawings to accommodate a text or concept... and follow the vision of a single person.
While animation is about making a drawing move in a believable but appealing way (you cannot just draw a character in a pose and draw the inbetweens as you please), and unless you have the patience and energy to slave yourself for ages, this is a team work. Character design, backgrounds, screen composition, editing... you need to compromise a lot.

You tend to have free range as an illustrator, (but ya know, acquired taste and all) but as an animator, learning anatomy and "solid" drawings in order to make them believable in motion is important.

Some animators have managed to work well as illustrators (such as Greg Martin who did the Sonic the Hedgehog game covers), but I have rarely heard of the opposite.

Have you seen Doug's attempts at "animation" in his reviews? (Casper, Elephant in the Living Room, Spazzies, etc) It is extremely basic and stiff.
Maybe he could do better, but as far as I know, he has not shown a true knowledge of animation besides "open mouth, close mouth, drag character with Adobe Premiere".

Chad Rocco and Andrew Dickman are artists who know how to do actual animation, and you may have seen their work on Channel Awesome. They have been kinda out of the limelight these days, however...
And it's obvious that Doug's not all that great an illustrator either. And just trying animating his scribbles only makes it worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom