I don't think he gets paid, he just goes in depth explaining why the show is shit.
And the show really IS shit, especially the writing.
I agree it's bad, but my contention with Creetosis' Fallout tv show videos is how
he goes about it.
When you make a point about something, you then need to point to evidence corroborating the point, and then explain how the evidence supports the point.
However the order is switched with those videos. The evidence appears on screen, they find a point (complaint), then try to explain why it's a valid complaint to make.
But the evidence can be incomplete, because the issue might get resolved or overwritten after a minute more of playtime that might make the initial complaint moot. The fusion core complaint stuck out to me because as being especially bad with that video. There's
0 intuition employed on how/why something is done. If you can't intuit how/why the Ghoul has a fusion core on him at the beginning after the end of Season 1, then you're either retarded or being wilfully dense just to make the complaint valid.
A bunch of Brotherhood in full power armour were killed by him at the end of season 1.
Mauler's EFAP streams (at least they used to, I don't know what they do nowadays) display the same issue as observable in Creetosis' videos on Fallout. There's complaining on an incomplete scene, then it's a cointoss whether it was premature or not because it can get resolved immediately after. They'll even ask whether something they're complaining about will come up again, landing on, "probably not," because if it
does come up again, then the complaint is rendered pointless because if the complaint is "why?" then the answer just comes later.
It can be fun to complain and mock something live as you watch it, but if you're going to make present it to people can you actually edit it, or keep it running while you talk so you don't try to turn a nitpick into a meaningful point? Just keep it rolling, don't pause it whenever you have 1 minor complain to make and drag it out for 10 minutes. Pause it if you actually have something of worth to say. If you want to give a true review of it thereafter, you can do so, but you don't gain anything by attempting to critique an incomplete picture in real time.
Jlongbone does this but better.