🪦 Deceased Amanda/Amelia Baggs / witharoundsmoothstone / ballastexistenz - moonfaced malingering autistic "activist"/SJW

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think its crazy that post mortem there’s people who still believe her act and laude her as a autism/disability advocate. I’m sure there’s a ton of individuals who actually are autistic, living their lives day to day that could be actual spokespersons. But no, Melanie took her scam to the grave and no one can talk ill of the dead brainfried munchie.
 
Something about her is unsettling.

I’m not sure if it’s the facial hair or the way she presents herself
its everything, she was just nasty; physically/aesthetically, and personality wise.

I think its crazy that post mortem there’s people who still believe her act and laude her as a autism/disability advocate. I’m sure there’s a ton of individuals who actually are autistic, living their lives day to day that could be actual spokespersons. But no, Melanie took her scam to the grave and no one can talk ill of the dead brainfried munchie.
yeah i noticed how the so called autistic community really tout her as legit, and heaven help you if you tell them - even while presenting proof and info, about amandas many charades and false ''disabilities'' and that everyone has been played by this crazy chick , BUT at the same time, i notice how no one on YouTube does any vids on her, even the many who are calling out the disorder/disability fakers on tiktok and the like, no one will mention amanda, even though shes the queen of disability faking online and livin' that lie. She started this mess in the late 90s on blogs and when youtube came about she , ( and shelly H. aka droooopy ) took off , hit the ground running with it, and the others who were in the so called neurodivery movement and who went to hings like the ''autreat'' autistic retreat conventions.
 
all this time we have shared so much about Amanda baggs, and her faking her so called disabilities, im surprised no one mentioned this woman in Michigan who was equally as crazy, her name was Shelly H. if memory serves me right, but this is one of the people Amanda claimed copied her, but it seems like Amanda copied her, or a bit of both, anyways, they both hated each other and Amanda claimed Shelly '' droopy'' was stalking her lol, also this droopy chick also used to have many youtube vids where shed show off how '' autistic'' she was, and yes she had infant toys and acted like a child, acted as if she was so severely disabled, and infantile, but yet blogged and made vids very similar to amanda baggs, and that Thomas wood guy among others. Shelly took down her vids when people started questioning her, actually around 2010, 2011 or so: roughly around the same time frames that amanda really started her biggest downfall; but her old blog still remains, in fact Amanda showed me this when i knew her and was pushing the point saying '' yeah, see? she copied me'' look at her writing''

Someone as far gone as Baggs pretended to be wouldn’t care if someone “copied” their antics. Unless they’re Chris
 
I think its crazy that post mortem there’s people who still believe her act and laude her as a autism/disability advocate.
The New York times article that was written right after she died summarizes years of people that knew her in person going on record to say she was lying in two sentences
"Part of that attention was skepticism about Mx. Baggs’s claims. Autism online forums can be caustic, with sharp divisions among various factions, and the harshest detractors have accused Mx. Baggs of being a fake."
With a link to a blog. If you read this and didn't know anything about the story you would assume it was just some random internet trolls screeching into the void and not personal former friends of hers. Great journalism guys! Really deserve being considered the leading journalist outlet in the world.

The whole thing is completely retarded. No one wakes up as a low functioning non verbal autistic. You are born with autism. It doesn't magically appear at age 30.
 
The whole thing is completely retarded. No one wakes up as a low functioning non verbal autistic. You are born with autism. It doesn't magically appear at age 30.
Some disorders do manifest later in life or due to a trigger, like schizophrenia. I don't think A M Baggs was one of these cases.
 
Some disorders do manifest later in life or due to a trigger, like schizophrenia. I don't think A M Baggs was one of these cases.
I read through all the evidence on that tiny font blog the other day. It sounds pretty clear-cut and well-documented by contemporaneous witnesses with no significant reason to lie or exaggerate that she induced a psychotic break/schizophrenia in herself by abusing psychedelics. Sounds like she was on her way to having a disorder in that family beforehand and she just hit the gas and crashed through the front window of Schizo Inc. But, did she continue to have (untreated) schizophrenia after that? Less certain. She may have had a one-off psychotic episode that dragged on and was difficult to treat and then when she began to come out of it she wanted to retain the feelings associated with being a psychiatric patient/disabled and began fabricating symptoms. Eventually she settled on autism because it was on the upswing as a topic and she was clearly a bright and well-read woman other than being batshit insane and having a compulsion to gain attention through lies.

Whatever was wrong with her (clearly something was) it wasn't autism. She could have gotten away with saying she had Asperger's and comorbid schizoaffective disorder, that may be close to accurate especially given her giftedness, eccentricity, and the brother who seems to have Asperger's. But I guess that wasn't attention-grabbing enough. Also at a loss for why she cultivated the deliberately repulsive physical habitus that goes well beyond both what you may see from fat bulldykes and unkempt mental patients.
 
that she induced a psychotic break/schizophrenia in herself by abusing psychedelics.
I had this exact same thought reading about her time in college. People with undiagnosed psychotic disorders can trigger them accidentally through using weed and psychedelic's. The issue with this theory is she has never come across as a schizophrenic to me. Schizos have a very unique way of typing massive paragraphs of word salad and I've never seen Amanda do that. She was articulate and well written from her earlier posts to the day she died. She never seemed schizophrenic to me.
 
I had this exact same thought reading about her time in college. People with undiagnosed psychotic disorders can trigger them accidentally through using weed and psychedelic's. The issue with this theory is she has never come across as a schizophrenic to me. Schizos have a very unique way of typing massive paragraphs of word salad and I've never seen Amanda do that. She was articulate and well written from her earlier posts to the day she died. She never seemed schizophrenic to me.
It's possible for someone to have a true, full-blown psychotic episode and then never be psychotic again. This is especially the case when the psychosis is induced by substance abuse. So that could be what happened to her. I agree she does not sound like a schizophrenic, and the level of plotting, scheming, and calculating involved in seeking attention (not to mention the craving for spotlight itself) is not typical to someone with untreated schizophrenia which will involve a lot of executive functioning problems, thought disorder, avolition and asociality. Sometimes the negative symptoms of schizophrenia will look similar to some cases of autism- someone sitting and staring into space trapped in their own compulsive thought loops. But that doesn't really seem to be her issue either.
 
Someone as far gone as Baggs pretended to be wouldn’t care if someone “copied” their antics. Unless they’re Chris
oh no, you should have seen the back n forth '' wars'' Amanda and this Shelly woman had, both of them were both faking, but were arguing that one was copying the other, and supposedly Shelly threatened Amanda, and Amanda made sure that Shelly was banned from the stupid '' autreat'' conventions, Amanda even got legal aid to help her and she was manipulative enough to convince the legal aid that Shelly was '' stalking and harassing '' her it was so pathetic .

At least there's a silver lining when a lolcow passes away: their lolcow suffering ends (assuming no afterlife horrors).
and we can be more vocal getting the truth out about her now because shes not around to try and sue people for ''harassing her'' and '' spreading rumors'' about her , yes amanda was no stranger to screaming lawyer, when people attempted to call her on her crap, same for hows he screamed lawyer when another faker accused Amanda of copying and stalking her, and the other girl did the same thing, accused Amanda of stalking and copying her as well LOL it was a mess, i was in vermont and i knew her and socialized with her during this, as this was right before i started seeing through all the BS and realized amanda was nothing but a fraud / munchie.
 
So she changed her name legally from Amanda to Amelia, right?

Why?
she had changed her name throughout life, her real name(s) as well as her various screen names for online stuff, her excuse to do this stuff was '' stalkers'' shew as changing her name(s) each time people started seeing, and pointing out, holes in her story, and calling her on her crap, she would hide behind the guise in that scenario as she was being '' harassed''. when people like Shelly H and a couple others at various points in life accused her of copying them, or stalking them, shed change her name and say the reason was SHE was being stalked and her life was being copied . throughout the time i knew her i would refuse to call her by her '' new names'' and i even told her that i know you as Amanda and that is who you are, plus im so used to your real name, she was pretty okay with that because , number 1, she had no clue that part of my reasoning was i thought it was complete insanity, but she thought it was just because it was hard for me to remember so she '' accommodated'' me LOL but she was annoyed and even said at one point that, by calling her Amanda i was ''putting her in danger''

so, yeah, this was one of the many things that made me start digging deeper and it was not long after that basically the other shoe dropped and i saw everything , i was at the time completely mind-blown ! everything hit so fast, one thing after another, of ''aha'' moments that her whole ruse unraveled, and even after a few years, even more and more things came to light as you all see in her blogs and pictures as she morphed yet into different disabilities and illnesses.
 
I read through all the evidence on that tiny font blog the other day. It sounds pretty clear-cut and well-documented by contemporaneous witnesses with no significant reason to lie or exaggerate that she induced a psychotic break/schizophrenia in herself by abusing psychedelics. Sounds like she was on her way to having a disorder in that family beforehand and she just hit the gas and crashed through the front window of Schizo Inc. But, did she continue to have (untreated) schizophrenia after that? Less certain. She may have had a one-off psychotic episode that dragged on and was difficult to treat and then when she began to come out of it she wanted to retain the feelings associated with being a psychiatric patient/disabled and began fabricating symptoms. Eventually she settled on autism because it was on the upswing as a topic and she was clearly a bright and well-read woman other than being batshit insane and having a compulsion to gain attention through lies.

Whatever was wrong with her (clearly something was) it wasn't autism. She could have gotten away with saying she had Asperger's and comorbid schizoaffective disorder, that may be close to accurate especially given her giftedness, eccentricity, and the brother who seems to have Asperger's. But I guess that wasn't attention-grabbing enough. Also at a loss for why she cultivated the deliberately repulsive physical habitus that goes well beyond both what you may see from fat bulldykes and unkempt mental patients.

Nah. She wasn't a Schizo. She was an imitator of disabled people with a diaper fetish (she liked to be changed), This could be interpreted as extreme malingering or some type of trans-ableism (person who wants to become disabled at any costs). She did this charade for over 20 years until she accidentally killed herself from an infection related to a feeding tube she didn't need.
 
Yeah, having read through this thread and watched videos of her and read her writing I don't agree at all with the assessment she was schizophrenic or psychotic at all. I think she was a deeply attention craving person who for sure had some real mental issues but not even close to what she claimed. I think it started as her just seeking attention and then developed into her actually believing she was suffering from the illnesses she claimed to have. Like she gaslit herself into really thinking she was severely mentally ill and that slowly degraded her mind.
 
Yeah, having read through this thread and watched videos of her and read her writing I don't agree at all with the assessment she was schizophrenic or psychotic at all. I think she was a deeply attention craving person who for sure had some real mental issues but not even close to what she claimed. I think it started as her just seeking attention and then developed into her actually believing she was suffering from the illnesses she claimed to have. Like she gaslit herself into really thinking she was severely mentally ill and that slowly degraded her mind.

An example of her writing style. She pretty much seemed to talk about illness in a very similar way as every other munchie. I agree about the ''attention seeking aspect''.

Screenshot 2022-10-16 07.36.36.png

I think she knew what he was doing the entire time. They all do.

She even trooned out at the end of her life in another attempt to catch onto a trend. She craved attention.
 
Nah. She wasn't a Schizo. She was an imitator of disabled people with a diaper fetish (she liked to be changed), This could be interpreted as extreme malingering or some type of trans-ableism (person who wants to become disabled at any costs). She did this charade for over 20 years until she accidentally killed herself from an infection related to a feeding tube she didn't need.
i never knew she liked to have her nappies change, gross! ...
- she always told me she wore them out of need and that she could not stand those baby fetish type folks, even after i knew everything she did was a ruse, i thought she worse the nappies because she was lazy and that, wearing nappies in her mind signified more ''proof of just how disabled she was'' you know, more so called symptoms to play up: i didnt think it was a creepy fetish for her, but at this point it wouldn't surprise me in the least with her. smh
 
Probably extremely late and gay but I've just read a book called Dying to be Ill by Marc Feldman and he talks about Amanda in it, although he changed her name to Natalie Johnstone. It's a really good book about different cases of Munchausen/by proxy/by internet so I thought I'd mention it here in case anyone else was interested.

(It was on zlibrary but apparently the US government just shut that down. Fuming.)
 
Probably extremely late and gay but I've just read a book called Dying to be Ill by Marc Feldman and he talks about Amanda in it, although he changed her name to Natalie Johnstone. It's a really good book about different cases of Munchausen/by proxy/by internet so I thought I'd mention it here in case anyone else was interested.

(It was on zlibrary but apparently the US government just shut that down. Fuming.)
Fascinating. Thanks for the rec!
 
Probably extremely late and gay but I've just read a book called Dying to be Ill by Marc Feldman and he talks about Amanda in it, although he changed her name to Natalie Johnstone. It's a really good book about different cases of Munchausen/by proxy/by internet so I thought I'd mention it here in case anyone else was interested.

(It was on zlibrary but apparently the US government just shut that down. Fuming.)
whhaaat ? really? so, he changed her name, im assuming he described things that were very detail specific to Amanda baggs ? im intrigued, i want to read this as well, this son fascinating in itself, but if the book actually mentions Amanda baggs ( with name changed) as an example. holy shit ! :O
 
whhaaat ? really? so, he changed her name, im assuming he described things that were very detail specific to Amanda baggs ? im intrigued, i want to read this as well, this son fascinating in itself, but if the book actually mentions Amanda baggs ( with name changed) as an example. holy shit ! :O
She would have been alive when he wrote it so maybe it was to spare her more negative publicity, but this is the strange thing: he changed her name but didn't change any of the other identifying details about her - anyone googling the name of the video + autism would have found her Wikipedia page anyway.

Most of the other anecdotes are semi-anonymous, with the exception of high-profile cases like Gypsy Rose Blanchard.
(Also I made a mistake in my last post: he called her Natalie Johnston, not Johnstone)

Screenshot_20221108-035241_Moon+ Reader Pro.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom