Alien: Covenant/Alien Series thoughts.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Given that Romulus confirmed the alien from the first movie survived, will another installment take place some time after Aliens to reveal the Queen also survived?
You could. But given that they picked up Ripley's original alien from somewhere in the vicinity of LV-426 and given they have the capability of locating something cold and non-radiating about 2m tall in Space, you would think that they could locate the giant ship on the planet just below them.

I gave them something of a pass on that plot hole in Aliens because it's clear (and logical) that there's some extreme compartmentalisation in The Company on something like this. It's entirely possible that Burke sending out Newt's parents to investigate the wreck is a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. Especially given the 50 year gap. However, them going to LV-426 shortly after the Nostromo blows up and having such capabilities to locate things, leaves some plot holes.

We know from Alien: Isolation that the original beacon the Nostromo followed has been turned off. That helps close the minor plot hole of people settling LV-426 and never finding the ship. And if the company's orders to Ash were contingency ones, e.g. they kick in AFTER chancing upon a signal, which also makes sense given the people sent were just regular folks and the whole operation has an improvised feel to it, then again we have the situation where Aliens makes sense with there being no follow-up. But Romulus has now introduced some because they know where the alien was picked up and they have the capability to locate Ripley's alien just floating around in the vastness so ought to be able to find the ship. Though I suppose with them not having the flight recorder yet (possible), you can maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe stretch it to them only searching for the alien and not searching the planet. Big maybe, though.

EDIT: The fact of them managing to find a 2m, dark, non-radiating body floating around on a wholly random vector, btw, just makes me think about Douglas Adam's rant about the size of Space in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

Also, the chances of the xenomorphy body neither burning up in the atmosphere nor spinning off into infinity but parking itself in an orbit for any length of time, seem unlikely but I've sperged enough on this.
 
Last edited:
if they could combine the Pulse Rifles with the Smart Gun's tracking system, why weren't they standard issue for the Colonial Marines?
If I remember correctly, they mentioned that it's a prototype gun. I can rationalize a prototype weapon being on a Weyland-Yutani research & development station as something they would keep for themselves especially for untrained personnel, but it's still stupid how the guy knew about it because of video games.
 
If I remember correctly, they mentioned that it's a prototype gun. I can rationalize a prototype weapon being on a Weyland-Yutani research & development station as something they would keep for themselves especially for untrained personnel, but it's still stupid how the guy knew about it because of video games.

Must've been playing the Alien universe version of WarThunder. Jam packed with government and corporate secrets!
 
I hugely enjoyed Covenant.

I know it was widely shat on, but it has its fans, and I'm among them.

Alan Dean Foster does a superb job in the novelisation in smoothing out the bumpier bits of the finished cut.
 
Why does every single story in the Aliens franchise always resort to copying story beats from the first two films? If I were in charge I'd make Alien 3 a miniseries legal-thriller all about Ripley, Newt, Hicks, and Bishop launching a class-action lawsuit against Weyland-Yutani after returning to Earth. No derelict spaceships, no bughunts, and no killings even (maybe.) I even have a tagline in mind!
"You think aliens are scary? Just wait 'til you meet our lawyers!"
 
And that some of them make me wonder about the continuity (if they could combine the Pulse Rifles with the Smart Gun's tracking system, why weren't they standard issue for the Colonial Marines?).
Because that's a load of horseshit. The Smartgun is a heavy bastard for a reason; the computational guidance and auto-aim systems are all lodged in the breastplates Drake and Vasquez were wearing, you actually need them in order to actually even use the fucking targeting system.

The loader arm also stores a large battery and heatsink since without them, the CPU will cook and it won't even boot up; it also allows you to make more fine-aimed adjustments. The top headset is purely the Infrared optics and screens, which also need power. The gun itself is pretty light, but longbarrelled to make it more accurate since the faster round and to give it even more range and armor piercing. The loader arm helps the operator make smooth and fine aim adjustments since it compensates its unweildiness.

For a film that flaps and flails its arms over memberberries and pretending to know the comics and shit, it's telling they didn't even read the Colonial Marines Technical Manual, which actually TALKS about the kit that the USCM use.
Also, I do have to wonder why no film has ever tried to do the more action-packed Colonial Marine angle seen in Aliens, given how it has been used in comics and video games since.
Alien 3's earliest scripts actually were somewhat similar to the Earth War arc of comics, where Hicks and Ripley would've had to essentially try and stop the Aliens from taking earth after more samples got loose. Its big set piece was to be a large fight between militarized powerloaders and several queens.

The tortured dev time killed that.

But the big reason you don't see them after AvP and AvP:R (which weren't good) are because it's Ridley Scott who produced the last few.
 
I've seen critics rip this thing to shreds. I don't really think it's that bad. Ending is dogshit, and the attempt to mix in the black goo is really not great. Characters have a few retard moments here and there, but overall I'd say it's above average compared to the slop they normally try and feed us.
 
A guy I trust about movies said it doesn't try and shit on its audience and the people involved have actually seen and respect the works that made it a beloved series.

But that's where anything good ends, everything else is retarded modern day cinema.
 
Why does every single story in the Aliens franchise always resort to copying story beats from the first two films? If I were in charge I'd make Alien 3 a miniseries legal-thriller all about Ripley, Newt, Hicks, and Bishop launching a class-action lawsuit against Weyland-Yutani after returning to Earth. No derelict spaceships, no bughunts, and no killings even (maybe.) I even have a tagline in mind!
"You think aliens are scary? Just wait 'til you meet our lawyers!"
There's even a diegetic reason why Ripley aged 50 years in 5, having to put up with WY.
 
I hugely enjoyed Covenant.

I know it was widely shat on, but it has its fans, and I'm among them.

Alan Dean Foster does a superb job in the novelisation in smoothing out the bumpier bits of the finished cut.
I respect you enjoying the movie but had to comment because I also read the novelisation and was greatly disappointed. I had hoped for a treatment that did exactly what you say - smoothed out the rough edges and filled in gaps. And felt I got none of that. It was very shallow, imo, and didn't add anything to the interior lives or the characters or their decision making that I could see.

A guy I trust about movies said it doesn't try and shit on its audience and the people involved have actually seen and respect the works that made it a beloved series.
This is correct. It has a lot of respect for the lore and whilst there are some plot holes (which I have lovingly detailed), there aren't outright contradictions. And not just to the movies but also I felt the Alien: Isolation game and perhaps even Free Leagues RPG which I consider one of the best compilations and attempts at self-consistency for the Aliens universe. The only standout is the pace at which the aliens develop which is very accelerated by original movies standards, but that ship sailed with Prometheus rather than with this movie.

However, whilst it doesn't crap on lore aficionados, it does crap on people who want not to be beaten over the head with forced nostalgia bait. I do think it's worth watching and enjoyable. Repeating myself from earlier but my best description is not that it is bad, but that it is flawed.
 
Last edited:
I respect you enjoying the movie but had to comment because I also read the novelisation and was greatly disappointed. I had hoped for a treatment that did exactly what you say - smoothed out the rough edges and filled in gaps. And felt I got none of that. It was very shallow, imo, and didn't add anything to the interior lives or the characters or their decision making that I could see.
This is a fair point. On reflection, I thought most of the characters were shallow retards or autists or autistic retards like Oram, so I think I brought a certain level of low expectation to the book on that front.

I liked Danny. She is obviously pretty cripplingly autistic and is only going along with this mental plan to go colonise some arse end planet because muh husband has decided to, but being a crippling autist lets her actually treat Walter like a person. There's a dangling thread there about whether technologically crippling the David model into the Walter model has left Walter with any capacity to form an emotional attachment to her, but it doesn't get all the airtime it needs to develop. Which, considering a large part of the prequels hinges on David, emotionally unstablised by Weyland, forming a deranged obsession with Shaw, is probably too interesting to leave unfinished like that. Walter isn't sure how much of his response to her is just programmed responses and how much is drive of his own, and it's something very interesting just left there.

There's kind of no explanation for why the rest of them are even on the fucking Covenant, and it's kind of sus that all these people who were specifically selected for being in existing marriages rather obviously have no kids. That was definitely something that needed explained. Like, Tennessee, Oram, these are people old enough to be fathers, and it's never hinted at as to why they aren't. Which is.... annoying, because it could have been tied up pretty quickly somehow. Even in terms of, part of their payment for the package is access to whatever tech they need to gestate the embryos they are shipping with them, or suchlike. Their emotional investment in taking on the voyage would be so much clearer if it was clear that this was the way they would build families, legacies.

Oram being a dim christfag is unfortunately so integral a plot mechanic you can't get around it. But he needed more depth than he gets. Being such an arsehole to Danny literally minutes after she's widowed is actually hard to believe, since a christfag has undoubtedly been around church enough to know how to handle the recently bereaved.

Its difficult to understand how some of these people passed selection for what is clearly a phenomenally expensive mission.

The book also isn't able to make the same use of visual imagery as the film, and that's where the film does so much heavy lifting. We never see that much of David's "lab" but what we do see very effectively conveys, very quickly, that he's gone completely fucking batshit mental, way more mental than the dialogue has him admit.

The thing about Ridley Scott is that he is devastatingly effective at showing, and only kinda half there in the telling.

He was also clearly considerably more interested across Prometheus and Covenant in exploring the issues around the creation of other intelligences and the attempt to control them in the form of the androids, rather in the aliens. Those are the bits of the prequels that are definitely best. Maybe he should have made a third Blade Runner instead, after all. I remain down for that. I thought Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2048 was an absolutely brilliant piece of filmmaking.

I didn't like Shaw's characterisation or Noomi Rapace's performance, so that was kind of an issue for me. I never was convinced she actually had all this "FAITH" and "BELIEF" about God and the engineers she was supposed to have. She mostly projected "deeply unlikable hysterical ass who is weirdly coddled by everyone around her".

Honestly both films fall off pretty badly whenever Fassbender isn't on screen. Those are great performances but the material around them doesn't quite always hit that level.

I would still like to know how the third film was meant to play out, but I'm sure it's not getting made now.
 
Covenent was raped by the studio and it seems like the initial vision when it was still called Paradise Lost was a totally different beast. There's clips and shit about David and Shaw going together to the Engineer's planet, but she was deleted from the actual movie in favour of I don't know.

Anyway, the origin of the aliens being engineers and black goo is crap. It was much better leaving the alien origin and space jockey origin to be a mystery.
 
This is a fair point. On reflection, I thought most of the characters were shallow retards or autists or autistic retards like Oram, so I think I brought a certain level of low expectation to the book on that front.
That probably helped! :) I'm finding this an interesting discussion. The fact that we clearly both have given quite a bit of thought to the same information but reach slightly different conclusions is an interesting thing to me, not an argument. Though we probably have more in common than we differ on.

I don't know if he just was phoning it in through laziness or was constrained from doing anything much with the storyline and characters through managerial oversight.

I liked Danny. She is obviously pretty cripplingly autistic and is only going along with this mental plan to go colonise some arse end planet because muh husband has decided to, but being a crippling autist lets her actually treat Walter like a person. There's a dangling thread there about whether technologically crippling the David model into the Walter model has left Walter with any capacity to form an emotional attachment to her, but it doesn't get all the airtime it needs to develop. Which, considering a large part of the prequels hinges on David, emotionally unstablised by Weyland, forming a deranged obsession with Shaw, is probably too interesting to leave unfinished like that. Walter isn't sure how much of his response to her is just programmed responses and how much is drive of his own, and it's something very interesting just left there.
That would have added a whole new layer to the movie if they presented that more as a theme and explored it. My cinema mainly just laughed at David showing Walter how to finger his flute. Homoerotic mirth amongst the people around me aside, that scene would have been much more interesting if Walter couldn't create, and David had gone beserk with rage at how they had mentally retarded his reflection. It would have added a kind of justification or at least rationalisation to his ensuring murder spree, or his destruction of Walter. Sort of like at the end of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest when Chief kills McMurphy because he'd rather McMurphy be dead than mentally crippled. Instead, David really just has the vaguest of motives.

For Danny, there was honestly nothing about her that made me warm to her. The same was true of Shaw who like yourself I felt little affection for and also disliked Noomi Rapace (sp?). Mild difference though was that with Shaw because she'd had an actual journey it had given me enough emotional investment to be annoyed and turned off when we find that after all that and her saving David, he tortured and murdered her.

Ridley Scott seems to me to just have a thing for the charismatic and enigmatic psychopath. Whether it be Roy Battey or David. In the former, Rutger Hauer has enough to work with to pull it off and redeeming motivation. Fassbender is also a good actor but there's nothing in David's actions or motivations to let him salvage the character.

Not even homoerotic flauting.

There's kind of no explanation for why the rest of them are even on the fucking Covenant, and it's kind of sus that all these people who were specifically selected for being in existing marriages rather obviously have no kids. That was definitely something that needed explained. Like, Tennessee, Oram, these are people old enough to be fathers, and it's never hinted at as to why they aren't. Which is.... annoying, because it could have been tied up pretty quickly somehow. Even in terms of, part of their payment for the package is access to whatever tech they need to gestate the embryos they are shipping with them, or suchlike. Their emotional investment in taking on the voyage would be so much clearer if it was clear that this was the way they would build families, legacies.
Yeah, this is a good insight and a serious lack once you point it out. At least do a little world-building. Starship Troopers has that little line in the shower scene where they're discussing why they signed up and one woman says "I want to have kids. And it's a lot easier to get a licence if you're a citizen". Say something about the why's here. Like it's easy enough to head-canon something about over-crowding or government limits or something. But you're right - a bunch of childless couples of that age could merit a line or two. And make us feel it. Show us books on child-rearing or a stack of empty cots or incubators or child clothes in a crate in storage.

See what good directors we would be? :)

Oram being a dim christfag is unfortunately so integral a plot mechanic you can't get around it.
See this is one of those funny you see two candles and I see a vase thing. I have the opposite reaction - they introduce it and do nothing with it. It's been a while - am I forgetting some way that it actually changes anything? The crew are prejudiced against him because he's a Christian (again - be brave, make the faith Islam, Mr. Scott) but their dislike of him could be for anything. It honestly more felt that Scott was just crapping on Christianity given ultimately we're only shown it lead to error and ultimately meaninglessness. He doesn't find peace through it, any "strength" he finds through it seems to only manifest as disregarding others. Like I say, it's been a while though - how is it integral to the plot? For me, it doesn't even fit thematically as despite the film being titled Covenant, the religious metaphors are just a mess in this movie.

But he needed more depth than he gets. Being such an arsehole to Danny literally minutes after she's widowed is actually hard to believe, since a christfag has undoubtedly been around church enough to know how to handle the recently bereaved.
Yeah, that was unbelievable. I mean that as I write it - it took me out of the movie because I couldn't believe it. Which returns me to the director just wanting to say "Christian = unfeeling".

And all this isn't coming from a place of me saying you can't criticize religion or should not, just that it really doesn't feel genuine or true to life. Like you say, you'd expect him to be familiar with this stuff.

The thing about Ridley Scott is that he is devastatingly effective at showing, and only kinda half there in the telling.
I think it's plain by this point in his career that Ridley Scott's mastery of composing a shot no longer offsets his ineptitude with story or, frankly, the datedness of his ideas. I'm surprised at myself for that last part - I love classic sci-fi, classic ideas. But Ridley Scott seems to think he can hold up some von Daniken Chariots of the Gods concept in Prometheus and carry everything on that. Whereas we're so familiar with it (and so much better at science than he is) that not only does it carry zero surprise for us by itself but we actually think it's a set up for some deeper twist. I guess there is supposed to be a twist: it's that our creators regard us as a mistake. But that being a twist relies on us assuming that this wouldn't be the case. Whereas I think modern Man takes it as a distinct possibility!


I didn't like Shaw's characterisation or Noomi Rapace's performance, so that was kind of an issue for me. I never was convinced she actually had all this "FAITH" and "BELIEF" about God and the engineers she was supposed to have. She mostly projected "deeply unlikable hysterical ass who is weirdly coddled by everyone around her".
Already said my piece on both the character and the actress. Frankly there's nothing you just said I disagree with.
Honestly both films fall off pretty badly whenever Fassbender isn't on screen. Those are great performances but the material around them doesn't quite always hit that level.
I liked his Lawrence of Arabia obsession and that most of the plot events can be summed up as David touches something he's not supposed to. But Prometheus to me is an inverse of Romulus. Romulus is a decent enough movie with some critical flaws. Prometheus is a critically flawed movie with some decent elements.

I liked Charlize Theron even if a crab would have survived the falling ship better than she did.

I would still like to know how the third film was meant to play out, but I'm sure it's not getting made now.
How far did it get? Is there a script out there?
 
Im not sure how much the ending was another case of some weirdo inserting their grotesque fetish or just idiots not communicating.

The mom is shown to lactate goo supposedly to breastfeed the hybrid yet the hybrid is already full grown/developed thus not needing said goo.
Somebody's hard drive needs checking
 
I don't know if he just was phoning it in through laziness or was constrained from doing anything much with the storyline and characters through managerial oversight.
I'm pretty sure he was bitter if we're talking about Covenant. He tried rather hard to divorce Prometheus from its Alien: Engineers days when he had Lindeloff rewrite it. He genuinely tried with Prometheus, which is why even though I shit on it a lot, I don't hate it.

I'd have actually been a lot more kind to it if he actually got his wish and divorced it completely from Alien barring a nod or two like he did with Bladerunner. My issues come with it being him playing in the ruins of a work he forgot wasn't his alone. Well that and a lot of characters acting stupidly but without the consistency of character that it requires for you to understand it.

When response wasn't to his liking, he got pissy about it. Covenant was a mixture of spite and resignation; he likely realized or was told he had to "play it safe" and that clearly blasted his booty. That negative emotion and contempt clearly bleeds into the film IMO, and why I pretty cleanly hate it. Hell, the husband character for NotRipley you only got if you watched shit he had outside the film... which is retarded.
 
1724379851066.png
Le 50% face... Broken branch, ancestor weep! EL OGRO DE LAS XÉNOMORPH.

He finna be posting r/hapas right now.
 
Given that Romulus confirmed the alien from the first movie survived, will another installment take place some time after Aliens to reveal the Queen also survived?
I'll also accept prequel(s) before Romulus of The Big Chap pinballing into different ships.
If just for the imagery of an Alien getting knocked around in space.
 
I'm pretty sure he was bitter if we're talking about Covenant. He tried rather hard to divorce Prometheus from its Alien: Engineers days when he had Lindeloff rewrite it. He genuinely tried with Prometheus, which is why even though I shit on it a lot, I don't hate it.

I'd have actually been a lot more kind to it if he actually got his wish and divorced it completely from Alien barring a nod or two like he did with Bladerunner. My issues come with it being him playing in the ruins of a work he forgot wasn't his alone. Well that and a lot of characters acting stupidly but without the consistency of character that it requires for you to understand it.

When response wasn't to his liking, he got pissy about it. Covenant was a mixture of spite and resignation; he likely realized or was told he had to "play it safe" and that clearly blasted his booty. That negative emotion and contempt clearly bleeds into the film IMO, and why I pretty cleanly hate it. Hell, the husband character for NotRipley you only got if you watched shit he had outside the film... which is retarded.
I agree with everything you said. But I was talking about the novelisation of Covenant by Alan Dean Foster. :)

I'll say one thing - all this discussion is making me want to run the Alien: RPG again.
 
I'm pretty sure he was bitter if we're talking about Covenant. He tried rather hard to divorce Prometheus from its Alien: Engineers days when he had Lindeloff rewrite it. He genuinely tried with Prometheus, which is why even though I shit on it a lot, I don't hate it.

I'd have actually been a lot more kind to it if he actually got his wish and divorced it completely from Alien barring a nod or two like he did with Bladerunner. My issues come with it being him playing in the ruins of a work he forgot wasn't his alone. Well that and a lot of characters acting stupidly but without the consistency of character that it requires for you to understand it.

When response wasn't to his liking, he got pissy about it. Covenant was a mixture of spite and resignation; he likely realized or was told he had to "play it safe" and that clearly blasted his booty. That negative emotion and contempt clearly bleeds into the film IMO, and why I pretty cleanly hate it. Hell, the husband character for NotRipley you only got if you watched shit he had outside the film... which is retarded.
Didn't he only connect it to Alien to please Fox after he grew desperate once he couldn't find a studeo or funding to make his original concept movie? It's what I'd heard, I don't know if it's true, but it's my impression of what I'd heard.

If it is true, then it seems like Scott was probably viewed as a one-trick pony who's main 'job' was to pump out Aliens stuff, and when Prometheus and Covenant didn't perform as expected, that one-trick pony got shipped out to the metaphorical glue factory.
 
Didn't he only connect it to Alien to please Fox after he grew desperate once he couldn't find a studeo or funding to make his original concept movie? It's what I'd heard, I don't know if it's true, but it's my impression of what I'd heard.
Not really. It was originally about the Engineers and the Space Jockey so it always took place in the Alien universe. The Engineers visited Earth and terraformed it using pyramid shaped atmospheric generators. Hence ancient cultures constantly building pyramids as tribute to the 'gods. Then the Engineers sent an ambassador to Earth who was crucified and became known as 'Jesus Christ'. Sometime in the future the Weyland-Yutani Corporation sends out ships to find the Engineers and discover their secrets and technology. When they get to a moon with the pyramid structures they find piles of dead Engineers who were infected or murdered and eventually find a lone Engineer in cryogenic stasis that freaks out when woken up and flees to Earth to kill humans out of revenge for being woken up when infected and now having no chance to be healed before his chest explodes.

It was an Alien versus Predator remake and Ridley Scott and his producers would copy a lot of the shots in the film as well nearly verbatim. But with Engineers as the ancient aliens instead of Predators. And the same story as the Weyland CEO seeking immortality inside the secrets contained in an ancient pyramid as well as a female scientist and explorer being the lead. But all Fox wanted to see was xenomorphs in the film and they hated the religious angle as well. Ridley said he didn't want xenomorphs as the 'alien was cooked' and overused in the franchise. Fox would not budge and also hated the whole 'Jesus was an Engineer' storyline and refused to allow that to even be hinted at in the film.

There were other lazy ideas in Alien Engineers. Like the black scarabs from The Mummy were all over the script but ended up being replaced with the black goo substance. In the original script the scarabs are crawling all over people and killing and infecting them. By the time Fox forced them to introduce xenomorphs the script is filled with face huggers and chest bursters and xenomorph style monsters practically every page and it reads like any other Alien movie.
If it is true, then it seems like Scott was probably viewed as a one-trick pony who's main 'job' was to pump out Aliens stuff, and when Prometheus and Covenant didn't perform as expected, that one-trick pony got shipped out to the metaphorical glue factory.
Ridley Scott seems to either have loved AvP and remade it in Prometheus and Covenent. Or just didn't want others to play around in the Alien universe and churned out enough movies to keep people from turning it into something like Paranormal Activity or Friday the 13th.
 
Back
Top Bottom