🐱 Alex Jones Just Lost 2 Sandy Hook Cases

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alex-jones-lost-two-sandy-hook-cases_n_61561020e4b008640eb1d56a


Infowars host Alex Jones has lost two of several lawsuits filed against him by relatives of Sandy Hook victims after he routinely failed to comply with requests to produce documents related to his involvement in spreading lies about the deadly shooting.

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble on Monday issued her ruling for default judgments against Jones in two different cases, which means he and the conspiracy-theory-spewing outlet Infowars have been found liable for all damages and a jury will now be convened to determine how much he will owe the plaintiffs. The new rulings became public Thursday.

In the filings, Gamble eviscerated Jones and reasoned that default judgments should be ordered because “an escalating series of judicial admonishments, monetary penalties, and non-dispositive sanctions have all been ineffective at deterring the abuse,” caused by Jones’ unwillingness to turn over documents related to the cases, the Texas judge ruled.

The ruling — which is often referred to in Texas as a “death penalty sanction” for a party unwilling to comply with court orders — is a rarity in the legal world. Jones, who is now on his seventh lawyer in these cases, had years to provide documentation requested by the court, including internal company emails.

HuffPost was the first to report the start of Jones’ Sandy Hook legal woes in 2018 when parents Leonard Pozner and Veronique De La Rosa filed a defamation lawsuit related to Jones’ continued lies that the 2012 school shooting that left 20 children and six adults dead was a “false flag” hoax filled with “crisis actors.”

Pozner and De La Rosa’s 6-year-old son, Noah, was killed in the shooting. In the years since, the parents have dealt with continued harassment from those who followed Jones’ lead and claimed the shooting was faked.


They’re not the only ones. In total, nine families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook shooting have leveled lawsuits against Jones and Infowars for the damage he and his outlet caused. Since then, Jones has lost multiple legal battles in his many lawsuits and was ordered to pay nearly $150,000 in legal fees in 2020 for failing to provide discovery documents for the plaintiffs.

It was Jones’ continued refusal to hand over discovery documents that led to Monday’s rulings against him in a lawsuit brought on by Pozner and a separate lawsuit by parent Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse, was also killed in the shooting. Pozner, De La Rosa, and Lewis are being represented by Texas law firm Farrar & Ball, who told HuffPost that they are “not surprised by the Court’s decision.”

Jones’ most recent lawyer, Brad Reeves, told the Austin-American Statesman earlier this month that a default judgment against Jones would be a “hugely excessive” response to his discovery failures. Judge Gamble felt otherwise:

“Furthermore, in considering whether lesser remedies would be effective, this Court has also considered Defendants’ general bad faith approach to litigation, Mr. Jones’ public threats, and Mr. Jones’ professed belief that these proceedings are ‘show trials’,” the court rulings read.

Lawyer Bill Ogden with Farrar & Ball told HuffPost that Gamble’s default judgment ruling is “a bit of a myth” in the legal world.

“We learn about death penalty sanctions in law school as more of a theory, and it’s almost unheard of to have them handed down in a case like this,” Ogden said in an emailed statement. “However, the Sandy Hook cases are unique. It is extremely rare that a party (Alex Jones and Infowars) is ordered by the Court to comply with discovery, is sanctioned for failing to obey with the Court’s multiple Order(s), and then continues to blatantly disregard the Court’s authority by continuously refusing to comply.”

While Jones has now claimed he no longer believes the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, the damage had already been done. In 2017, Florida woman Lucy Richards was sentenced to five months in prison for sending threats to Pozner.

“You gonna die,” Richards told Pozner in one recorded voicemail message. “Death is coming to you real soon.”
As part of her sentence, Richards was ordered not to access Infowars.
Jones’ cataclysmic court losses are unsurprising to those who have followed his cases. In a 2019 deposition, Jones was unable to recall basic facts about the school shooting, including the date that it happened.
“I talk four hours a day, and I can’t remember what I talked about sometimes a week ago,” Jones said in the deposition.
Reached by phone Thursday, Jones’ lawyer, Reeves, told HuffPost he had no comment regarding the decision.
“I haven’t really analyzed [the rulings], so I don’t know exactly what is going to happen,” Reeves said.
 
Only someone desperate to pretend they have knowledge of something would feel insecure enough to defend it in response to a random shitpost in an unrelated topic.

So predictable.
 
From what I understand, Alex has already conceded he was incorrect about Sandy Hook. Regardless, I used to dismiss a lot of what he says, now I listen and take it with a serious dose of salt. He's been proven right, partially, more times than not; at least since I started listening to him when he was embraced by liberals. You know, back when liberals were anti-government?
When was he even partial right?.

The only people who like Alex Jones are tinfoil wearing conspiracy theorist and retarded poltispergs. From him claiming everything is satanic and the Democrats are sacrificing people to satan, supporting a day of rope for all the "traitors" and by tratiot he means any one that he disagrees with politically. Also him saying conceded his mistake after years of painting a target on the families of the sandy hook victims and survivors, is not enough.

I am sorry, but what the fuck is wrong with people in this thread. If you support Alex Jones in this case you most also agree that he did the rights thing with helping to haras the families of the dead children and survivors.
 
As do I. I'm disagreeing and taking a stance of why.


Okay, this is going in circles. I shall take my leave and observe from afar and take my fence-sitting elsewhere. My page is open if you want to continue.

View attachment 2586521
Comes in, says a bunch of stupid shit, fence sits, leaves after losing his argument, and is a movie gif poster. (Really its the gif posting that is the most egregious)
 
This is interesting and all, but tell me: can I pull the same trick against Cenk with 2 Armenians duct-taped to a jew?
 
You are right and if i stand outside your home with a sign that says "LurxTrawler" rapes children and someone attacks you, then we both agree i am not involved in any way.
No one reasonable would take it seriously.

You really wouldn't be under any sane legal system. You might open yourself up to libel charges because you said something specifically damaging about this individual in public, and even then it would be hard to pin it on you in a lot of jurisdictions because you might actually believe that he did rape children. Imagine the trouble which would be caused if people, for example, would be open to heavy handed application of libel law for accusing Catholic priests of molestation without hard proof. It would have had an enormous dampening effect on victims coming forward and being supported.

Jones didn't even say that these kid's parents did anything illegal or especially damaging from what I've read, so the analogy doesn't even hold. He just came up with an odd theory that the US government faked a shooting, and even explicitly told people not to harass the families involved. Overall I couldn't see the families winning this case if it actually went to trial. Rachel Maddow prefaced defamatory, crazy conspiracy statements with 'literally' and was still able to wriggle her way out of it.
 
You really wouldn't be under any sane legal system. You might open yourself up to libel charges because you said something specifically damaging about this individual in public, and even then it would be hard to pin it on you in a lot of jurisdictions because you might actually believe that he did rape children. Imagine the trouble which would be caused if people, for example, would be open to heavy handed application of libel law for accusing Catholic priests of molestation without hard proof. It would have had an enormous dampening effect on victims coming forward and being supported.

Jones didn't even say that these kid's parents did anything illegal or especially damaging from what I've read, so the analogy doesn't even hold. He just came up with an odd theory that the US government faked a shooting, and even explicitly told people not to harass the families involved. Overall I couldn't see the families winning this case if it actually went to trial. Rachel Maddow prefaced defamatory, crazy conspiracy statements with 'literally' and was still able to wriggle her way out of it.

Well i have a odd theory that LurxTralwer rapes and eats babies. We all know this to be true and the government is trying to help LurxTrawler rape more baby's for satan. Don't harass him, but the government want LurxTrawler to rape babies and it is fucking horrible and disgusting and GOD wants someone to put a end to it, but dont harass LurxTrawler the Baby rapist.

Saying "dont harras someone" is not going to do shit when you are spewing lies about people and claiming they do horrible shit.
Alex Jones Deserves to get sued for his libeles charges against their people and this situation.

Now i don't know about Rachel Madow, i don't know who that is and i don't give a shit because the law is never fair so who know how it would work out and the leves of conspiracy they claimed and who there target was.

Also let us pray for god to help stop LurxTrawler and all his baby raping and have God help put a end to all the evil of LurxTralwer the baby rapist.
 
Anyone who unironically listens to Alex Jones and believes what he says as the word of the lord is a lolcow.
Anyone who starts crying, pissing, shitting, and setting businesses on fire whenever they are reminded of Alex Jones' existence is a lolcow.

The only way to win this particular game is not to play, but watch from the sidelines as two groups of retarded manchildren fight on a message board over whether or not there's any validity to a defamation lawsuit over some fat retard talking about how kids in an elementary school are just midgets in costume getting hit with paintballs. Sandy Hook is now America's holocaust, except instead of being arrested you'll just get sued by rich suburban moms who are upset that their little kid didn't get to live longer than a nigger, growing up to be as broke and miserable as we all are. Instead of making an ass out of yourself because Mr. Buy-My-Water-Filters has to pay up, just point and laugh at how much of a clusterfuck the last three years of this were.
 
Huh, maybe Alex Jones WAS on to something with this Sandy Hook shooting. I'm going to research further into it.
 
When was he even partial right?.

The only people who like Alex Jones are tinfoil wearing conspiracy theorist and retarded poltispergs. From him claiming everything is satanic and the Democrats are sacrificing people to satan, supporting a day of rope for all the "traitors" and by tratiot he means any one that he disagrees with politically. Also him saying conceded his mistake after years of painting a target on the families of the sandy hook victims and survivors, is not enough.

I am sorry, but what the fuck is wrong with people in this thread. If you support Alex Jones in this case you most also agree that he did the rights thing with helping to haras the families of the dead children and survivors.
Dude, you're literally on a website that Twitter is paying money to DDoS because according to the narrative we're "helping to harrass" trannies, furries, the disabled, and anyone else in a victim group. You right now are the equivalent of Alex Jones, and I have to seriously ask why, if you think what he did was so wrong, are you doing the exact same thing he did on this website, beyond just standard leftist "rules for thee" hypocrisy?
 
Dude, you're literally on a website that Twitter is paying money to DDoS because according to the narrative we're "helping to harrass" trannies, furries, the disabled, and anyone else in a victim group. You right now are the equivalent of Alex Jones, and I have to seriously ask why, if you think what he did was so wrong, are you doing the exact same thing he did on this website, beyond just standard leftist "rules for thee" hypocrisy?
I get that you get sexual pleasure out of drinking lead paint, but you got to stop it is not a good lifestyle choice.

Even among some of the most retarded takes on this site this is the most retarded. This includes a thread with several racial insults, jew jokes, spic jokes, nigger jokes and who knows what else and you are still they dumbest fucker in this thread.

Yes i am acting like a extreme version of Alex Jones, that was kind the point you dumb retarded nigger.
 
I never bought into the whole conspiracy thing but what the actual fuck?
I never looked into it either. But when google implemented the earliest version of "recommended info" for search terms on youtube, they started with controversial topics; in fact topics where I think the official story was false in each case. Of the 15 terms that had a recommended info, 9 of them I could prove to be at least partly false. Sandy Hook was one I didn't know anything about, but it was one of the 15 terms. I ended up presuming there was something being covered up for each of these.

If you ask me, considering Infowars' history, AJ was there more to poison the well than to help give the accurate version, and there probably was more going on with Sandy Hook.

----

Anyways, I've done a bit of a dig around and here's the stuff I'd look at/into if anyone wants to go down rabbit holes. I don't vouch for the sources or their veracity; they should be taken as rumors not truth, unless you can verify them. I really know fuck all about sandy hook besides that there was some shady stuff with some people that looked like crisis actors. This dude I linked was the only one I could still find, but I have seen others somewhat suspicious in relation to sandy hook.
But these vids are now gone:



Here is a link that was dead but still could be retrieved on waybackmachine. I've archived it:

Some interesting claims from that link:
Victoria Soto Facebook Page was created 4 days before the Sandy Hook shooting. Also “Our Heart are with Sandy Hook” was created 3 days before the shooting. The website “Sandy Hook Elementary Victims Fund” was created 1 days before the Sandy Hook shooting.

Here is an old conspiracy chan image:
sandyhook.jpg

So if anyone wants to go down that rabbit hole and share what you find that'd be cool. I'm not interested enough in sandy hook to dig into it, but I'd be curious what one would find.

Last thing is that there was a DNA match to a convicted killer on the card that the shooter was supposedly carrying. Again verify for yourself, I'm really skimming the info more than looking closely at it and this post may include planted red herrings (without my knowledge).

dna report.png
 
Anyways, I've done a bit of a dig around and here's the stuff I'd look at/into if anyone wants to go down rabbit holes. I don't vouch for the sources or their veracity; they should be taken as rumors not truth, unless you can verify them. I really know fuck all about sandy hook besides that there was some shady stuff with some people that looked like crisis actors. This dude I linked was the only one I could still find, but I have seen others somewhat suspicious in relation to sandy hook.
But these vids are now gone:

Maybe one of these videos was re-uploaded on Bitchute or Odysee.
 
Back
Top Bottom