IliterateNerd77
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2024
The victim passed away 3 months after the attack
TOTAL RAPIST DEATH!Probably felt he did nothing wrong. Although I wouldn't be surprise they'll do a 180 and gas-light us about how they knew George was a scumbag and wanted him in jail. I remember when black twitter, was comparing Kyle Rittenhouse to OJ Simpson, as if they always wanted him jailed. I remember when black Americans swept for OJ just like they're sweeping for black criminals, including George Floyd. Nevermind that the Rittenhouse case is the only case, I know of where black twitter, sided with a white guy shouting the N-word.
I think the takes of "he can't claim self defense because he provoked the attack with words" is a very dumb take, because I've seen that take be used to excuse Islamic terrorists murdering people for drawing the prophet Mohammed. (Quick disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer) I think Chud should get a self defense claim, even if the attacker, attacked him because he was offended by Chud's "hate speech". However, in some of the videos, it doesn't look like Chud is simply yelling the N-word to be offensive/provocative, it looks he seeking a violent confrontation. It's one thing if you're yelling the N-word and black people confront you or attack you out of nowhere, it's another when you're yelling the N-word and harassing black people, while saying it. The latter looks like he's seeking a violent confrontation even if he just was shouting curse words at them.
I mean his chances of a self defense case succeeding drops when he's deliberately trying to provoke a violent reaction. When it comes to self defense, you got to think really hard about what to do and not do, while you have that luxary. Keep in mind that "provocative speech" is a grey area, legally speaking. Personally, I've never heard of a real life self defense case where the victim was attacked for saying the N-word, before shooting and killing the attacker. So I don't really know how this hypothetical case could go.
On one hand, you have people arguing that being provocative or hateful, excuses any violent reaction to said person, because (the attacker is not the government), while on the other, you have people arguing that provocative/hate speech doesn't justify murder or assault, and to do so is victim blaming. Then you have cases like Draw Mohammed, where people are being provocative, not just for the sake of it, but also to spite a international terrorist group. One could make the bold argument-using the logic of Tyler Robinson apologists-that MLK is provocative and that his own assassination was a consequences of his "I have dream" speech.
Not sure what is meant by this? Isn't Caeser the smart one in planet of the apes?An angry triggered black person posted this meme in response:
The point here is, "AKTUALLYYYY it's white people who look like chimpanzees!!" - and to make this claim, they juxtaposition old people's lips with those of chimpanzees. It's funny because they had to make sure to clip out the noses, else the comparison would be ruined.
I noticed that in a lot of videos of black people jumping white people, it's almost never a fair one-on-one fight. It requires 4 to 8 black guys just to beat up one white guy. Not sure how this is proof of superior combat strength, instead of weakness and poor fighting skills.
Last edited:
