African-American Appreciation Thread - Not Actually an Appreciation Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
20251116_134321.png
There's 2 AAA rabbitholes I love going down.
1.) First hand accounts from teachers who taught at ghetto schools
2.) Japs accounts of niggers, specifically "servicemen" and their history in Okinawa
So best of both worlds here.
 
ChaosReignsOnSomeSaturday said:
View attachment 8177367
There's 2 AAA rabbitholes I love going down.
1.) First hand accounts from teachers who taught at ghetto schools
2.) Japs accounts of niggers, specifically "servicemen" and their history in Okinawa
So best of both worlds here.
Click to expand...
"There are differences between whites and Asians, but blacks are entirely different from both groups".

Genetics agree. Sub-Saharan blacks are total outliers from the rest of the human breeds. They're very literally a hybrid species of human + some more primitive hominid whose genetic lineage is nowhere to be found in any other population.
 
Cuntspiracy Man said:
replying "I would feel hungry, BUT I did eat breakfast" is not failing the breakfast question
Click to expand...
I disagree.

Including anything similar to "that didn't happen" as a portion of an answer to a hypothetical indicates that you don't understand the concept of a hypothetical.

You're familiar with the trolley problem, I'm sure:
trolleyproblemmeme.webp

The purpose is to facilitate a discussion about ethical dilemmas. If you keep interjecting with "but there are no people tied to any railroad tracks!!" then you're a retard. It doesn't matter if you say, "I guess I'd pull the level" first, before revealing that you're a retard.

The discussion of ethical dilemmas progresses from that first question, through alternate versions of the question, and includes interesting/important societal issues like "who is responsible for this person dying?" - questions that come up in the real world in situations like, for example, police shootings, where a civilian is accidentally hit.

A person who, at ever step, insists on adding "but that didn't happen" isn't following along AT ALL. They cannot participate in a discussion that's actually important to society.

It doesn't matter if they answered, "well, I guess I'd be responsible because in that hypothetical I pulled the lever .... BUT THERE WAS NO LEVER!!!" <--- still a fucking retard.

The breakfast question originates in a 4chan meme, and has no real-world importance or relevance that I know of, but the same principle applies.
 
byron said:
Including anything similar to "that didn't happen" as a portion of an answer to a hypothetical indicates that you don't understand the concept of a hypothetical.
Click to expand...
No, including it is just an addition, she clearly shows she understands the answer, no need to latch onto the one "correct" response you predetermined in your head, the fact she didn't crash is actually important in this instance unlike a purely theoretical question, the officer wasn't testing her IQ, her crashing is actually a possibility so responding with both "If I did, I would've done X" and "But I didn't" at the same time is valid in this instance
 
Last edited:
Cuntspiracy Man said:
No
Click to expand...
Yes. Including anything similar to "that didn't happen" as a portion of an answer to a hypothetical indicates that you don't understand the concept of a hypothetical.

Officer: "what would you have done if you had crashed?"
Her: "I would pay out of pocket" (good answer ...not a legal answer, but a syntactically good one) "but I didn't crash" (bad answer, suggesting the question is irrelevant - indicating that she doesn't understand its purpose)

Do you understand the purpose of the question?

Cuntspiracy Man said:
the officer wasn't testing her IQ
Click to expand...
Of course he wasn't testing her IQ! Do you understand what he was doing?

Officer: [given that you have no insurance] "what would you have done had you crashed?"

He's not testing her IQ. He's pointing out, in an awkward way, that insurance is a legal requirement.

When she adds "but I didn't crash" she is further reinforcing the fact that she is too retarded to understand what's going on. "I don't need to meet this legal requirement because I haven't crashed" is retard-speak.

It doesn't matter that you haven't crashed, you still have to obey the law! She's retarded, so her answer is essentially "it's okay that I'm not obeying the law, because this hypothetical hasn't occurred." It's the selfsame logic as "but I did eat breakfast"
 
Is “I would feel hungry” the only answer to the breakfast question that some fools will accept? My answer is always “I would feel exactly the same as I do now, since I did not eat breakfast this morning-“ is this considered failure? Am I a nigger?
 
Stick a fork in me, I am done. I had another, even more aggravating run-in with black excellence than what I recounted in my last post.

I work somewhere with public rooms/cubicles that you technically need to reserve, but only a few of them are locked. This enables a kind of "self-service" nature to these unlocked rooms so sometimes people will try their luck if they see a room unoccupied and will use it even if they don't have a reservation. I know it's not a great way of doing things, but I am there by myself and working within the system they have set up.

Let's say a room is occupied by a rando and someone with a reservation walks in? I'll go to the room, tell them they need to leave, they'll make up an excuse whilst packing up with haste. Keep in mind, these people without the reservations never ask for anything and are church mouse quiet, therefore not drawing attention until absolutely necessary, at which point they politely and apologetically leave. This was the norm, until my recent encounter with black excellence.

There are people doing group projects or streaming, so it's not like it's pin-drop quiet, but people try to keep the noise down and sometimes I will tell people to keep it down or to take their phone off speaker. People who put their phone on speaker in public drive me fucking crazy, so that is perhaps my personal bugaboo. Anyway, you can be a bit noisy within reason. Enter a gentleman who is listening to his shitty rap music on tinny speakers and also having a conversation on speakerphone. I politely ask him to turn down his music, which he does, but as soon as I am a couple of feet away from him, he turns the volume back up. "Oh great," I thought to myself as I turned back around, "this guy is going to be an asshole about this." Little did I know that this was just the beginning and that I was not dealing with an asshole, but in fact, a nigger.

Before I could even finish saying excuse me, this fool starts yelling at me about how there’s no rule written anywhere that says he can’t listen to music, that I need to not be so rude and should go back to my desk and figure out how to do my job. I’ll admit this caught me by surprise. I was nothing but polite and he immediately raised his voice and started insulting me. I couldn’t get a word in edgewise so I just left the room. He took this as him winning the battle so took to shouting, “DAS RITE DUMB WHITE BITCH, STUPID CRACKER BITCH.” Keep in mind, I’m no longer anywhere near him but instead of calming down he just started shouting even more loudly.

Fortunately, I might not have had a pithy zinger on hand, but there is a panic button under my desk to alert security that their help is needed. They are able to corral this moron but it took 15-20 minutes (and a few more security guards) to get him to finally fuck off and leave. Not without walking past me and saying, “You’re still a cracker bitch,” before he made his exit. Oh and we gon’ get sued for being raaaaaycist, because of course.

It's a travesty that you can't tell these so-called people to go act like a nigger somewhere else. Even when they are in the wrong, and they have to know that they are in the wrong, they'll drag the whole thing out and act like they're the victim. They have that police body cam energy even when there’s absolutely no need for it.

Edit: Forgot to mention that the lunchtime rowdy also didn’t have the room reserved and chimped out when the person who did have the room reserved showed up. “There’s no rule that says I need a reservation.” Uh, yes actually there is, not that it matters, dude probably can’t read anyway.

I will pick up shifts at a location that is a pain in the ass because I really could use the money, but I am not a bouncer, and with the online "study room" reservation system we have, I am forced to act like one. The least intimidating bouncer ever. On high-volume reservation days, they will give preference to people who haven't reserved a room more than once. I am assuming that this is because people who are off on the weekends usually have jobs, so they are most likely to actually reserve a room and show up. Sometimes, these people don't show up, and the regulars know that that is the length of the grace period for being late is 20 minutes. These regulars, who in my limited experience at least, can be pretty nasty, will demand that I block off the room for them, even if it's SUPER early in the day, where someone is most likely to try and make a same-day reservation. It's policy that we should not do that, but since I'm not there regularly, they assume that they can get away with whatever. The smart ones will use the room until I kick them out, the dumb ones will demand I block it off for them so that they can spread their crap all over the place without being disturbed. Guess who the dumb ones almost always are?

I am dealing with Person A, he is a man of the mystery meat persuasion and is one of the aforementioned PITA regulars who when I tell him that I will not block the room off for him, he starts spazzing out about how I need to do my job and that he pays taxes so I need to just reserve the room for him, post haste! He will not stop sperging and I will not yield, but I am being polite yet firm. Someone overhears our conversation and tells Person A to calm down and that he is "causing a disturbance." Person A continues sperging and I tell him that he is "entitled to 4 reservations a month" as is policy for our reservation system. The interaction unfolds similarly to the one described in the post above, with me hitting the panic button and everything. Pay attention to the above bolded phrases, as they will be relevant with Person B: The Negresse.

This is a black woman who I had dealt with earlier in the day, she had also exceeded her allotted amount of room reservation time. I could tell that she was unhappy when I said, "No" to her, but she didn't start complaining until the security guards showed up. Since they were black, I guess she thought, "Now's my chance to get this room and teach this honky a lesson." The two security guards are trying to tard wrangle this guy, who has been screaming at me for several minutes at this point and just being generally disruptive. As they are attempting to tend to this, she walks over and pulls one of officers aside, and right in front of me, as though I am not there, says this:

"You know, he may be causing a disturbance, but I was very disturbed by what she (points at me) had to say, she called him entitled. And he's not being entitled, we do pay taxes and if the room isn't being used, we should get to use it since we live here. I don't recognize her, she must be new, because when I come here with DOCTOR Huxtable, we never have a problem using an available room."

The security guard heard her out, then said something along the lines of, "I think there was a miscommunication, but he can't talk to staff that way..." They escorted him out and I got to look at the sour puss on her face for the rest of my shift. I was glad that they were near the exits at the end of the day, because I had already called my boss and told them to never put me at that location ever again, so I probably won't be seeing them again. Moreover, I wanted to thank them for dealing with that asshole but, I couldn't help myself, I also said, "What that woman said was inaccurate: I didn't call him entitled, I said he was entitled to 4 sessions a month."

You know how they responded? "But they were acting entitled." I don't know, it was a decent way to cap off my last shitty day working there.
 
DeeDee Megadoodoo said:
"There are differences between whites and Asians, but blacks are entirely different from both groups".

Genetics agree. Sub-Saharan blacks are total outliers from the rest of the human breeds. They're very literally a hybrid species of human + some more primitive hominid whose genetic lineage is nowhere to be found in any other population.
Click to expand...

I believe it goes thus...

Caucasians 2-5% Neantherthal

Asians 2-5% Neanderthal and Denisovan

Negroids 19% unknown ancient hominid and 0% Neanderthal or Denisovan

If I remember correctly, they have a good idea of what that unknown ancient hominid was and it was basically some sort of frenzied turd-flinging chimpanzee, unlike the Neanderthals and Denisovans, which were other types of human.

EDIT: Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman from the University of California in Los Angeles confirmed up to 19% archaic Hominid DNA in modern Africans. They have described the ancestor as a “ghost species” or quite possibly Homo naledi a “small-brained hominin” on the “African plains 250,000 years ago.”
 
Last edited:
Turquoise said:
I believe it goes thus...

Caucasians 2-5% Neantherthal

Asians 2-5% Neanderthal and Denisovan

Negroids 19% unknown ancient hominid and 0% Neanderthal or Denisovan

If I remember correctly, they have a good idea of what that unknown ancient hominid was and it was basically some sort of frenzied turd-flinging chimpanzee, unlike the Neanderthals and Denisovans, which were other types of human.

EDIT: Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman from the University of California in Los Angeles confirmed up to 19% archaic Hominid DNA in modern Africans. They have described the ancestor as a “ghost species” or quite possibly Homo naledi a “small-brained hominin” on the “African plains 250,000 years ago.”
Click to expand...

Given that description, have they cross-tested for Jeet?
 
I don't pretend to know anything about "nigger politics" in detail but I do know they embody crab bucket mentality if not in the "fuck y'all I got mine" mentality.
Seen here is infighting between them over reparations and being upset that the city of Chicago isn't giving every moon cricket in the city 60 bajillion dollars regardless if they're descendents of actual slaves or not.
 
DeeDee Megadoodoo said:
Genetics agree. Sub-Saharan blacks are total outliers from the rest of the human breeds. They're very literally a hybrid species of human + some more primitive hominid whose genetic lineage is nowhere to be found in any other population.
Click to expand...
I actually found a dude saying "Africans are the purest humans because whites and asians got Neanderthal admixture", when I posted a link to research showing that no, Africans too got DNA from other hominids, he went with "I was just joking"
 
Troon_Patrol said:
I'm still annoyed beyond words just the illegal firearm Treyvon Martin obtained was never explained properly.
Click to expand...
I don't know much about it other than what that investigative reporter got from Trayvon's text messages. He asked a friend for it with, "You got pipe?" or some shit. It's insane how much this case was responsible for in our nation:
1763371649790.png
He was buying Skittles and Arizona to drink lean, ffs. And it had nothing to do with Stand Your Ground. I hate these fucking organizations so much.

Christ almighty, this fucking loser kid got his parents a million dollars from the HOA or whatever? For fucking what?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom