7/23 Court Date

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I like how he opens his letter by listing his mental disorders.
Having those mental disabilities doesn't automatically make one less credible per se, but advertising them in a letter that really has nothing to do with you - right off the bat - seems to be odd at best.
 
Last edited:
It's like a reverse Sympathy for the Devil.

Please allow me to introduce myself. I have ADHD. And Autism. And plus, I'm an asshole.
 
More importantly, though, someone writing a judge (the wrong judge btw) in a case telling the judge what to do has NO STANDING to do that.

Only someone with skin in the game, like a party to the case, has any position even requesting a judge do anything in the case. There's a way to do that. It's called a "motion." Someone who is a lawyer in the case has to do that.

Some random moron who feels triggered by the fact that things are happening in a legal case that has sweet fuck-all to do with him has no STANDING to make any requests at all, much less retarded demands.
 
It seems his ego forces him to post all the boilerplate responses he's received too. Too bad the judge's reply (if any) will be another one of those
I'd be surprised if there was a reply at all. I think the second most likely reaction after ignoring it would be for the judge to mention it to counsel and politely ask the PD to make sure Chris isn't behind it.
 
It's like a reverse Sympathy for the Devil.

Please allow me to introduce myself. I have ADHD. And Autism. And plus, I'm an asshole.

Please allow me to poop myself
I'm a sperg of whose been disgraced
I've been trolled for a grand number of years
And have makeup smeared on my face
 
Imagine the judge's face if they go down the rabbit hole and find shecameforcwc.
Isn't that the pic Chris drew of him fingerbanging Megan, the one he drew with absolutely no provocation from outside sources save for trying to prove how hetero he was?
 
Isn't that the pic Chris drew of him fingerbanging Megan, the one he drew with absolutely no provocation from outside sources save for trying to prove how hetero he was?

Yeah, it was a response to all of the Chris is Gay stuff that appeared in his ED article. While this was provoked for trolls, the picture itself was ALL his idea. There were a number of ways he could have responded and he chose to humiliate Megan by producing "She Came For CWC", posting it on ED, then revealing the identity of the 'mystery woman' (Megan) in the picture.

http://sonichu.com/cwcki/She_Came_for_CWC
 
I'm sure no one cares, but my sibling and I are talking about going to the October date. Sib loves the entire saga, and has been reading on it. Good thing I know how to look pro in court, ha.

Will be quite easy to blend in. Sib and I have a bit of a drive there, so we're making arrangements over the weekend. I'm excited, hope others are there too.
Sib actually wants to go into law, so we wouldn't be lying if we're there to observe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am embarrassed to say this, but I have plans to be up and down the East Coast in the fall and I am thinking of structuring it in part so I can attend. I will be working digitally until January at least, so I figure "why not"? It's been 5 years, I might as well see what rotten watermelons and Brittney Spears smell like in person.
 
Should be fine then. I'm sure you understand the obvious reasons why I brought it up. I doubt you're the type to pull a julay. I'm a law student of sorts myself.

Completely. I'd talk more about the plan, but don't think it's a good idea to do it openly or so early. This is also like, my 5th post, so I totally get it.

I am embarrassed to say this, but I have plans to be up and down the East Coast in the fall and I am thinking of structuring it in part so I can attend. I will be working digitally until January at least, so I figure "why not"? It's been 5 years, I might as well see what rotten watermelons and Brittney Spears smell like in person.
That's how I'm looking at it too. If you plan to go, let me know or someone, I guess.

I think the planning should go somewhere privateish, but that's me. Then again, what's more to plan than McDonald's and court?
 
The more people on the team we're trying to put together, the better. So far, it's just me and the other past field agents. But if we could get more people who know how to behave themselves and not be total fucking weens, then this should make for a pretty epic coordinated intel gathering effort. Perhaps the biggest in Christory! (okay maybe I'm getting ahead of myself on that one, but seriously, this could be like a small Kiwicon)
 
More importantly, though, someone writing a judge (the wrong judge btw) in a case telling the judge what to do has NO STANDING to do that.

Only someone with skin in the game, like a party to the case, has any position even requesting a judge do anything in the case. There's a way to do that. It's called a "motion." Someone who is a lawyer in the case has to do that.

Some random moron who feels triggered by the fact that things are happening in a legal case that has sweet fuck-all to do with him has no STANDING to make any requests at all, much less retarded demands.

Could he have filed an amicus curiae? Do cases like these even warrant them?
 
It'd probably be best to organize privately. Though maybe some people have the same idea as you, so who knows what it'll be like.

I'll be going. Fellow Kiwis can recognize me as I'll be wearing my "I Enjoy Vagina" T-shirt.

Who is The Lady In Red?

And I will serenade her with this (while wearing my T-shirt):


No, but for rls I may go.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom