2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Probably late fake and gay but the Wexner emails near the back are disturbing.
IMG_1844.jpeg

IMG_1846.jpeg
 
Not Funny said:
If they're all going around fucking kids why are they documenting everything and taking pictures of themselves? Are they ALL retarded?
Click to expand...

Forced high trust society. If you're fucking kids with me you're not gonna tell the cops you saw me fucking kids while you too were fucking kids. Let me take some pictures of you fucking kids and you take pictures of me fucking kids so we will keep our mouths shut forever and ever.

JoeBidenSniffMe said:
Turn out this picture was just Michael Jackson and his kids. Which is fuck up when the DOJ redacted Jackson kids face without any explanation by law.
Click to expand...

Kid is a minor. They blur minors. That's the only explanation. Also it's a different photo than what was published. It was taken by either Epstein or Maxwell and it was part of evidence that was collected.

That's it.
 
Feel free to nuke this if it's too off-topic, but I thought this was some topical humor that should amuse both sides of the house.
601974307_10240540389709342_4602260835732224797_n.jpg
 
Taser Confetti said:
I don't know about Feds but I can speak for my state's police - the CSAM/kid fucking squad is a volunteer force. They're only allowed to do it 6 months at a time and get mandatory counseling. Truly the most thankless job on Earth.
Click to expand...
The eternal reward however.

What if the military handled crap like this? Protecting kids is the same as protecting a country. No offspring, no future, no country.
 
The Morning Visitor said:
It's in flagrant violation of the Massie/Khanna discharge petition, and subject to possibly 20 years in prison.
View attachment 8307867
View attachment 8307868
View attachment 8307872
(Massie's Tweet/Archive)

If they're redacting bullshit to protect reputations of politicians and public figures, they're in violation of federal law. And Fox News apparently confirmed they're redacting bullshit to protect reputations of politicians and/or public figures.

Whomst the fuck are they protecting? Mahatma Ghandi? Mother Teresa? Mister fucking Rogers' estate? Big Bird? Who's the most wholesome person, that if revealed to be a child rapist, could cause our Democratic Republic to crash and burn?
Click to expand...
Ehud Barak (former Israeli pm) reportedly did some violent shit to Virginia G -- so bad that it switched off all the grooming mind fuckery epstein did to her.

Trump. Im not saying he was in as deep as Clinton but we know they knew eachother and hung out sometime. I bet my bottom dollar there is high up pressure to redact anything that could cast a bad light on him but in an unofficial way.

Clinton. I don't think they'll ever release the full Clinton files but they're releasing some extra photos to embarrass and redirect public attention.

And probably a shit ton of eu politicians lol.
 
SirCliveSinclairdabbing said:
I was more going along the line of thought what did he do with Les’s kids that disturbed Les.
Click to expand...
He probably said something gross about them, like that they'd make good masseuses or a half joke that they should come live on his island. Some casual thing that to anyone who knows Epstein would set off the loudest sirens to protect the children. (Unless they want to barter with the children, then things go in a different direction)

If my many decades of living in this world have taught me nothing else, it's that those kinds of people always tell on themselves. Little things that if you don't know you might miss. It's like a game to some of them, to say something "innocent" just to see the look on your face.
 
D-X-G-X said:
I believe a lot of these redactions could, hypothetically, be unredacted with some clever AI algorithms. Seems like something LLM is basically made for. Not that I'd know anything about it.
Click to expand...
Not if they redacted it properly. You can't give a computer a black box and have it pull the original text from the aether.
I guess it could interpret what could be in the black box by taking into account the unredacted text and the size of the redacted line but that's equivalent to us just guessing. Unless ofc the model has access to the unredacted documents (so no public model, but I bet the AI for gov has it.)
 
Endless Blabbery said:
View attachment 8313295
Click to expand...
is that fucking carpet under the bidet?

That room is just really damn cursed. The fucking cat picture doesn't help.

Edit : after further inspection I don't think this is carpet. Looks kind of wooden? Also where does the TP go after usage, I doubt it's getting flushed in the bidet?
 
Last edited:
clickbait said:
Kid is a minor. They blur minors. That's the only explanation. Also it's a different photo than what was published. It was taken by either Epstein or Maxwell and it was part of evidence that was collected.

That's it.
Click to expand...
I think the DOJ or whatever pajeet temps they hired misunderstand the guidelines for what is allowed to be witheld.
  1. Pictures or identifying information of victims that did not go public like Giuffre or Farmer.
  2. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material). Our government is not going to publish child porn for public viewing.
  3. Any information that could compromise an ongoing investigation.
Unless Jackson's kids were pimped out by Epstein, they're not victims of sex trafficking and their pictures being released do not compromise an ongoing investigation. The pictures we see of Michael Jackson, Bill Clinton, Diana Ross and Jackson's kids are not sexually explicit in any way and do not constitute CSAM.

So why would they redact them?
 
Last edited:
Rat Friend said:
is that fucking carpet under the bidet?

That room is just really damn cursed. The fucking cat picture doesn't help.

Edit : after further inspection I don't think this is carpet. Looks kind of wooden? Also where does the TP go after usage, I doubt it's getting flushed in the bidet?
Click to expand...
Pretty sure that's carpeting, you can see a bare footprint or hand print on the right side next to the water damage on the wall.
 

Attachments

  • 1766425036381.png
    1766425036381.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 150
How do those of you saying he was just some rich guy explain him investing with Thiel? Sure, you might be able to say Eppy wanted to get close to smart people to seem smart. But Thiel wasn't well-known for a long time and is clearly a DoD intel asset moving resources around for the creation of a very intense police state.
 
Map of the Epstein residence in Manhattan.
The alphabets on the map represents different sections labelled by the FBI, and in different photos of the house you will notice those same alphabets plastered all over.

A-Bill Clinton painting - 1st floor
1766417280355.jpeg

P-Massage room (discerned by the white lamp) - 3rd floor
1766420918011.jpeg1766420989896.jpeg

Q-Dressing room(?) with the sex paraphernalia (discerned by the pink couch). - 3rd floor.

1766421448105.jpeg1766421682093.jpeg
Basement:
1766418348760.jpeg

1st floor:
1766418375760.jpeg

2nd floor:
1766418418895.jpeg

3rd floor:
1766418476696.jpeg

4th floor:
1766418499580.jpeg

5th floor:
1766418518580.jpeg

6th floor:
1766418533814.jpeg

From the pictures and the map itself I figured a few things out.

2nd floor is both Epstein's (L) and Ghislaine's (O) offices, Identified by a taxidermy of her dog beside the fireplace.
. 1766424814323.jpeg
The entire 3rd floor is basically a sex dungeon, as seen in the examples for section P & Q even the guest room (V&U) as they have much larger sofas and cuckstools, and plenty of them.
V
1766460394951.jpeg
U
1766460438052.jpeg

The 4th floor is both Epstein(X) and Ghislaine's bedroom(W), and they do not seem to sleep together. Made apparent by their bedside tables with the farthest from the exit being empty
Ghislaine's Bedroom(W)
1766425546904.jpeg
Epstein's Bedroom(X)
1766425657106.jpeg


On the 5th floor section AA, BB, CC, DD are exclusive to the girls that happen to stay there.
Apparent from very ordinary furniture, cat toys and one of the girls owning a cat.

1766426643559.jpeg 1766426769062.jpeg


EDIT: Adjusted image placements to make it less wonky for phone users, added images and elaborated a bit more on the 3rd floor, and included the floor numbers in the examples.
 
Last edited:
The Morning Visitor said:
I think the DOJ or whatever pajeet temps they hired misunderstand the guidelines for what is allowed to be witheld.
  1. Pictures or identifying information of victims that did not go public like Giuffre or Farmer.
  2. CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material). Our government is not going to publish child porn for public viewing.
  3. Any information that could compromise an ongoing investigation.
Unless Jackson's kids were pimped out by Epstein, they're not victims of sex trafficking and their pictures being released do not compromise an ongoing investigation. The pictures we see of Michael Jackson, Bill Clinton, Diana Ross and Jackson's kids are not sexually explicit in any way and do not constitute CSAM.

So why would they redact them?
Click to expand...
I dont like giving the us gov credit but Bondi DID say victims OR minors in her speech and twitter
 
This shit is slowly becoming a Grade A cognitohazard and it's not even at the best part. If you fill in the blanks based on what's presented so far, the implications will tie your stomach in knots. No wonder the DOJ panicked and deleted over 400 pages they had published.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom