2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
VisaMallgoth said:
Epstein isn't known for doing as far as we know.
Click to expand...
Close enough?
1766359547476.png
 
This is old news, but with so many asking how he came to his wealth, I think it's relevant to move the conversation forward.


It's an interview with Whitney Webb on epstein who uses her super autism to piece together the most accurate picture of epsteins life she can give.

My butchered summary from my trash memory, Whitney doesnt believe that the child trafficking was his main source of income. it was something he just did for fun and to supplement the other ways he blackmailed people. the real way he got his money was by helping powerful people commit tax fraud and then illegal arms trafficking with places the US said it was illegal to sell weapons too. Essentially, she lays out a convinving case for epstein being part of a global mafia. the interview is 3 hours long, but its full of great info and is really worth listening too.

Edit: I forgot her most interesting take. she doesnt have solid evidence for this, but she thinks the pedo stuff was allowed to surface to take him out. Epstein fell on the bad side of someone powerful in this group by helping the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia come to power when the cia wanted someone else to come into power. He was allowed to be exposed. no one in power actually cares about pedos. she talks about it at around the 2 hour mark.
 
Last edited:
WelperHelper99 said:
I'm not surprised Michael Jackson was talking to Epstein.

Now this is the crazy shit
Click to expand...
He was there once to buy a house who happened to be owned by epstein. Not everyone who happens to have a picture with epstein or in his log books or whatever is a child fiddler. Epstein had his fingers in many different things other than child pedophilia.
 
thebananaonion said:
He was there once to buy a house who happened to be owned by epstein. Not everyone who happens to have a picture with epstein or in his log books or whatever is a child fiddler. Epstein had his fingers in many different things other than child pedophilia.
Click to expand...
Michael Jackson talking to Epstein is not the only reason why a lot of people strongly suspect that he was a pedophile.
 
Steak Tartare said:
I think it is meaningful to hear from the horse's mouth that Trump was aware that sex trafficking was happening on his property, orchestrated by his long term friend. This goes against what the President has been putting forth for his own narrative.

I am going through older emails because I have not looked at them myself, and I do not know which have been out a while and which are fresh. https://www.jmail.world is a new search tool that I find useful. V open to the notion that Wolff is unreliable, and if I really am bringing up ancient news I have no problem with a janny deleting extraneous posts of mine.
The better question is why are you and @gaysexenjoyer handwaving away a connection between the sitting president and a ring of pedophile elites?

(also so I'm not over-shitting up the thread, I have not seen evidence to suggest Trump was a diddler and I am not claming that he is. Rather, that Trump was aware of this happening and involved in this world for years as Epstein's friend, only taking action when the news caught wind of it.)
Click to expand...
No one gives a shit what you think
 
Cybork said:
I forgot her most interesting take. she doesnt have solid evidence for this, but she thinks the pedo stuff was allowed to surface to take him out. Epstein fell on the bad side of someone powerful in this group by helping the current crown prince of Saudi Arabia come to power when the cia wanted someone else to come into power. He was allowed to be exposed. no one in power actually cares about pedos. she talks about it at around the 2 hour mark.
Click to expand...
Calling it now: we're going to find out Epstein and CIA infighting was behind the Las Vegas Shooting, when it gets declassified in 2075.
 
merpalerpaherp said:
Bro ya'll need to go take the who's a bigger retard arguing somewhere else, I don't wanna backread 25 pages if they're remotely close to the last three.

Anything substantial get released? Haven't had the time to sit and read documents or anything really. I saw something about Trump sucking nipples or some shit?
Click to expand...
Use the highlights feature to navigate dude nobody is gonna give you a personal summary. And the only thing of less value than the arguing is the multiple posts asking people to stop. They wont and your post is also a waste of bandwidth.

The highlights feature is specifically to allow you to carch up on long threads quick.
 
Last edited:
Dagoth AMOGUS said:
Marvin I’m a bit surprised you didn’t see this. You’re normally on top of information.

I don’t have the unblocked image on hand but this is the tweet

View attachment 8315518

(not my phone, i saw this on a news site and saved it from there)

Click to expand...
Never trust anyone who has a certain bias with epstien files information, especially without sources. whether trump is guilty or not, (I wouldn’t be surprised if he was) but that is to be seen. Some people were quoting meidas touch earlier in the thread these people are pulling out anything to finally get their orange antichrist. After denying the list existed a year ago.
 
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
Disagree, I think the people who put this shit together were just incompetent and didn't know the photo was innocuous and assumed the kids were victims.
Click to expand...
It looks more to me like they very intentionally focused on Clinton and MJ in particular. Clinton for obvious reasons, and MJ because public opinion on him is mixed with many thinking he was a pedo as well. I think they were intending people to go "oh obviously they're all evil pedos it's MJ and Clinton and we don't need to look into this further."
 
R00T said:
It looks more to me like they very intentionally focused on Clinton and MJ in particular. Clinton for obvious reasons, and MJ because public opinion on him is mixed with many thinking he was a pedo as well. I think they were intending people to go "oh obviously they're all evil pedos it's MJ and Clinton and we don't need to look into this further."
Click to expand...
You're overthinking things heavily, there's about 4k documents and 90% of them are just pictures of his estate, and only about 170 out of those 4k are fully redacted. You're only seeing what people are talking about, because whats inside most of them is very boring so far.
 
Last edited:
Barleys said:
You're overthinking things heavily, there's about 4k documents and 90% of them are just pictures of his estate, and only about 170 out of those 4k are fully redacted. You're only seeing what people are talking about, because whats inside most of them is very boring so far.
Click to expand...
and the idea is to have people focus on specific things rather than go rooting through them. it's very blatant with how they're releasing the files and the attitudes around it. notice that multiple people and media companies have specifically focused on the MJ photo. they don't want to release the files. they want to release a narrative about the files.
 
R00T said:
and the idea is to have people focus on specific things rather than go rooting through them. it's very blatant with how they're releasing the files and the attitudes around it. notice that multiple people and media companies have specifically focused on the MJ photo. they don't want to release the files. they want to release a narrative about the files.
Click to expand...
No people are showcasing those specific things because that's the only thing of interest right now. I could show you thousands of pictures of just interior decorations because thats mostly what it is. The same thing happened with the emails, 90% of them were casual conversations or talking about finances, so the 10% people did focus on was all the same people. Would you say those emails were purposefully released to focus on Bannon, Wolfe, and the like 5 other people of note in them?
 
Barleys said:
You're overthinking things heavily, there's about 4k documents and 90% of them are just pictures of his estate, and only about 170 out of those 4k are fully redacted. You're only seeing what people are talking about, because whats inside most of them is very boring so far.
Click to expand...
Careful, the internet sluts will get mad at you for pointing that out
 
Last edited:
To the unnamed men and women in government who had to look at hundreds and perhaps thousands of pictures of CSAM and abused kids, I pray you have a restful nights sleep.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom