2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Again, Steve Bannon from late september 2018:
2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-01.jpg 2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-02.jpg
Bannon asks Epstein if he saw the Bill Maher show, Bannon was on it that day. Epstein is happy, and gives more tips on how to defend Trump on these shows.

2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-03.jpg 2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-04.jpg
Bannon says "Tell Burke they should make sure they ask Ford about her medications". This would be related to the Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing. Ford is obviously Christine Blasey Ford, and and I'm unsure who Burke is (Bill Burck maybe?), but it seems that it's an insider Epstein has contact with.

2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-05.jpg 2018-09-28_09-30_Steve_Bannon-06.jpg
Epstein sends what seems to be an image of or with a person that we can't see, Bannon says that he's the real deal. Epstein then says this person would like to introduce Bannon to the head of "their" (country's?) right wing party. Then what's odd is that in the same message Epstein talks about the person who will decide the Nobel peace prize. It is quite possible that these are two different people, because I assume this is another norwegian person that seems to be fairly close to Epstein, Thorbjørn Jagland, who was at that time in the norwegian Nobel committee. He is also a former prime minster for Norway for the labor party, so it would be odd if he wants to introduce Bannon to a right wing party leader.

This Nobel peace person could also be Terje Rød-Larsen mentioned in my former post. It makes more sense in the sense that Epstein seems to have recently introduced them to each other, but less in the way that I don't think Terje Rød-Larsen had direct power over the Nobel peace prize.

Either way, Epstein says "Donald's head would explode if he knew you were now buds with the guy who on monday will decide the nobel peace prize". I guess implying that Trump was quite intent on getting the prize back then as well. Epstein continues that he told him (presumably either Jagland or Terje Rød-Larsen) that Bannon should get the prize next year "when we settle China". Bannon corrects that to "Defeat China". Epstein then says he believes in "peace through vanquishment".

2016-06-28_Jagland_island.jpg 2017-04-16_Jagland.jpg 2018-06-24_Jagland_Churkin.jpg
These are emails between Epstein and Jagland. The last one is quite interesting where Epstein says that Jagland should tell Putin that Lavrov should contact Epstein for insight, presumably on Trump.

2018-01-25_Terje-01.jpg 2018-01-25_Terje-02.jpg
These are messages between Epstein and waht's presumably Terje Rød-Larsen, where the latter asks Epstein to help him get in contact with Bill Gates.

2017-05-27_Terje_arms_deal.jpg
Not sure what this is, but Terje forwards an email to Epstein about the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority investing in infrastructure.

2018-06-09_06-16_Terje-01.jpg 2018-06-09_06-16_Terje-02.jpg 2018-06-09_06-16_Terje-03.jpg
Epstein and Terje creates a message together to someone named Sebastian to vouch for Bannon. Says that Bannon still is one of the most influential people (this was sent in june 2018 ) and that Bannon is currently working closely with Victor Orban.
 
Last edited:
These are emails between Epstein and Jagland. The last one is quite interesting where Epstein says that Jagland should tell Putin that Lavrov should contact Epstein for insight, presumably on Trump.
Well fuck. Norway has a VERY bad history of pedophilia...



I mean it feels like every decade the "worlds largest pedo ring" gets broken up in norway. I don't have the autism today to post all the articles. If i recall correctly there is also a prince andrew connection with norway.
 
It's absolutely weird. Why does everyone involved keep flip-flopping and telling obvious lies about this shit?

I don't care if it hurts Democrats, I don't care if it hurts Republicans, if it hurts child rapists, I'm totally okay with it. Let the chips fall where they may.

This is something that shouldn't remotely be political or partisan, and the fact that it is shows that our entire society is degraded beyond belief.
It has to be political. There may be political figures from the left in the files, but there is just way too much material to think Trump isn’t involved.

I just want everyone who had dealings with this to be exposed.
 
TLDR: Marx was basically a regurgitator of other people's ideas and passed off his largely apolitical economic and dialectic theories as supportive of communism when they were just basic bitch observations at best.
Also he was fat and smelly and had boils all over him and treated service workers and pretty much anyone around him like shit.
 
Archive of the Bloomberg article cited for that article.
1764257785401.png
I'd recommend the Bloomberg article if for nothing else than that article being done by the guy who actually got the emails/replies.

The guy has been sending FOIA requests to the FBI and they're getting back to him. Some of the screenshots of the emails are in the article itself.
1764258934180.png
Most of the panic seemed to occur in March after Bondi didn't release the files so the FBI scrambled to look over them themselves and see what needed redacting.
A good faith read (assuming nothing shady, optimistic I know) is that they said, "we'll release." Were then made aware/realised that they were opening up a potential class action level of potential plaintiffs to sue the government so held off. If anyone in the files can claim being named resulted in reputational damage or some shit based on unsubstantiated claims coming from the files, they could probably claim negligence on the DOJ or FBI's part and make a bag.

Federal Tort Claims Act, 1946 (FTCA)
The Federal Tort Claims Act (August 2, 1946, ch. 646, Title IV, 60 Stat. 812, 28 U.S.C. Part VI, Chapter 171 and 28 U.S.C. § 1346) ("FTCA") is a 1946 federal statute that permits private parties to sue the United States in a federal court for most torts committed by persons acting on behalf of the United States. It was passed and enacted as a part of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946.
The FTCA was amended by the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, also known as the Westfall Act, following the Supreme Court decision in Westfall v. Erwin in which the Court had found a federal employee liable for negligence in their duties. The 1988 act amended the FTCA to make federal employees immune to tort lawsuits resulting from cases of negligence or omission in their duties, instead making the U.S. government the defending party under the FTCA, allowing the litigant to seek damages for non-constitutional violations.

Examples​

In 2020, a protester in Portland, Oregon, was hit in the forehead with an impact munition fired by a U.S. marshal during the George Floyd protests. The protester filed a federal suit for excessive force, but it was dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Mosman, who stated that the protester could still seek damages under the FTCA.

In 2022, a navy sailor successfully sued under the act after being hit by a vehicle driven by an active-duty military member, and received a $493,000 settlement.
A "tort":
A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act. Tort law can be contrasted with criminal law, which deals with criminal wrongs that are punishable by the state. While criminal law aims to punish individuals who commit crimes, tort law aims to compensate individuals who suffer harm as a result of the actions of others.
Potentially, it would maybe allow individuals to sue the government if they can claim the release of the files resulted in them getting screwed over or something. If the government dragged its feet on release, claimed to do everything it could to redact/hold files that prevented harm the best they could i.e. their due diligence, Then it gives potential plaintiffs less strength in arguing that a particular government agency personally fucked them over via negligence.
 
What's strangest to me about a lot of these emails is the suck-uppy tone directed toward Epstein by seemingly almost everybody. Emails and statements from people like Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky display this rapturous enthusiasm like you'd expect an underling to direct toward his boss when he wants a raise.
 
Epstein and Terje creates a message together to someone named Sebastian to vouch for Bannon. Says that Bannon still is one of the most influential people (this was sent in june 2018 ) and that Bannon is currently working closely with Victor Orban.
Sorry if someone already suggested this... but is it Sebastian Kurz, former chancellor of Austria?

Financial Times Article: New York Times Article: https://archive.is/knmVz
 
Last edited:
I think they should drop the files unredacted. To hell with the old pedophiles running the party. The GOP should belong to the next generation. They're more conservative, more aggressive, and smarter than any of Mitch McConnell's old RINO flock and Trump.
 
If this administration is able to correctly censor Donald Trump's name from all of the files as well as delete all the video evidence of Donald Trump raping 13 year old girls, then half the users of this website won't kill themselves.
 
Man, being rich must be so nice. Imagine having this island all to yourself and all you want to do is fuck kids. I know the reason they do it is because they get a high because they can and they think they can get away with it, but as a non-rich plebeian it still really does blow my mind all that they risk just to fuck children.

Also, who are these people? I can't tell if I am losing my mind but I feel like one of them looks like Stalin, and maybe another Hitler? The rest of them don't make sense for the theme so I don't think that's it.
1.JPG IMG_5337.JPG stlinmay.JPG maybehitler.JPG.webp
 
Man, being rich must be so nice. Imagine having this island all to yourself and all you want to do is fuck kids. I know the reason they do it is because they get a high because they can and they think they can get away with it, but as a non-rich plebeian it still really does blow my mind all that they risk just to fuck children.
When one can afford every legal/ethical earthly pleasure, I'd imagine hedonism would drag some to illegal/unethical activities. Similar to why some people are turned on by scat, rape or even cannibalism. The dopamine no longer flows from cruising yachts, penetrating grown women and eating filet mignon. The nobles want to have what lower society overwhelmingly says they cannot have, which is primarily stealing the purity of commoner children.
 
When one can afford every legal/ethical earthly pleasure, I'd imagine hedonism would drag some to illegal/unethical activities. Similar to why some people are turned on by scat, rape or even cannibalism. The dopamine no longer flows from cruising yachts, penetrating grown women and eating filet mignon. The nobles want to have what lower society overwhelmingly says they cannot have, which is primarily stealing the purity of commoner children.
still boggles the mind. if i could afford to wake up in a different city/country every day, drink wine and lounge on the beach, and have a personal trainer and cook to make sure i never go an ounce over my target weight i don't think i could ever imagine doing something to fuck it up.
 
still boggles the mind. if i could afford to wake up in a different city/country every day, drink wine and lounge on the beach, and have a personal trainer and cook to make sure i never go an ounce over my target weight i don't think i could ever imagine doing something to fuck it up.
Think about the "Porta Potty Parties" in Dubai. Rich Saudi oil baron heirs that could marry 9 different women instead choose to fly in beautiful white women from around the world to sexually exploit in the most depraved of ways. Like eating caca kind of depraved, or found in a ditch with a broken spine kind of depraved. I'm sure some of this debauchery is people with already "ecclectic tastes" being enabled though their wealth and influence, but I'm just as sure that some it is caused by dopamine insensitivity among people that already have any personal pleasure served to them on a silver plate.
 
I've just picked up a book on the Epstein case. It might interest the thread to know that, according to multiple girls sexually exploited by Epstein, he had a small and "egg-shaped" (or "lemon-shaped") penis.

This would raise suspicion that the "secret" Donald Trump tee-heed about in his letter to Jeffrey Epstein might be shared bonding over small penises.
 
Back
Top Bottom