This means Trump has either failed at his FBI duties, or Johnson was talking out of his ass.
Johnson already admitted he was talking out of his ass. It's a moot point already.
It's all a silly argument to be making. The disinformation crew is already trying to grind the turning gears again. This time it's patheticallly obvious. The argument is "it's just a photoscan anyone could've made in 5 minutes and it's not even his signature."
To disprove the second point first because
The signature is just his first name. It's a near match to the ones he's done that have been posted in other threads, and someone posted one that was similiar to it in this thread. Now, I'm not
@GlupShitto, I haven't spent hours looking at Trump's signature on a MASS PRODUCED PRESIDENTIAL AWARD THAT THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN GET ACROSS THE US, but maybe i can explain something. THE SIGNATURE YOU ARE LOOKING AT IS A MASS PRODUCED COPY THAT TRUMP PROBABLY LAZILY SIGNED ONCE AND HIS TEAM SAVED AS A JPEG.
Now then, on top of that it is a signature with his surname as well. Without the last name it's not going to look the same.
Here's the one posted from the other thread that a tard highlighted for me as proof that it's not his signature.
It's a near match. Signatures are not exactly the same every time, as we age things will change, even given some situations our signature might be messier. The signature on the bottom is clearly used on something official. Something you would take the extra second to focus and make sure you don't make a mistake. It's crisp, clean, and even looks like he took more time to do it. The one on top, the one on the bottom of the Epstein letter, is not precise. It looks like something quickly scribbled at the bottom of a note you'd pass to a friend, rather quickly and personally. The tail at the end comes down and shoots off because he's hurrying in the signature, where as the official one pulls off sooner since he's signing slower and able to give it that extra accent. It's not unbelievable it's his signature. It's not unbelievable it's authentic. We're not gonna know because something like this just absolutely tanks every narrative he and his team have come up with, so his team will do the damndest to completely try to push it out of the public conscious.
Now onto the first point: IT'S A PHOTOCOPY.
Yes it's a photocopy.
A photocopy taken directly from the birthday book full of other signatures that was gifted to Epstein and now released thanks to the subpoena from the House. (
archive)
This isn't some cheap job quickly slapped together by the Wall Street Journal. It's part of a collection of the book that was collected *from* Epstein's house in the process of the investigation. It's a real document. Unless you believe the House of Representatives is now producing or procurring completely falsified evidence this document exists. Even the message itself is very 90s Trump in style. It reads like a cheap cologne commercial. I don't know if he had a scent back then but just look at some of the ads he's been in. Read the lines like a cheesy 90s commercial and the entire thing makes sense.
At the time Trump was doing a lot of rebranding and was in a ton of commercials, TV shows, and movies. This would've been something he might've joked about with Epstein at a time. "Gee Don, I turn on my TV and see you on every channel."
I want all the other ones in the book. I'd like to see all of the people that sent him a card. I think the only other one that's been mentioned is Derschowitz and his was creepy too.
