2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???

1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy

At this point, there's no doubt he didn't killed himself. The question is: Did they killed him, or is he free and alive ?
20260207_061008.jpg

I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.

Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
 
Has anyone else looking ran across any proof of male victims on any scale? We know Les Wexner and his businesses, specifically Abercrombie and Fitch were used as a front for trafficking both women and men, the files contain proof. We know that many of Jeffrey Epstein’s co conspirators in degeneracy were either bi or gay. We know they were involved in illicit parties. We’ve heard about their particular brand of perversion, in the case of people like Peter Thiel and other frequently mentioned big names. There is no world where we don’t have young male victims on scale with the female counterparts, So where are all the boys?


He's alive and well in Israel.

10 million people in the welfare state of Israel, the worlds most vile and degenerate Country. Most are probably the very worst types of criminals. The entire country is one huge high level criminal organization of degenerate, disease ridden inbreds. I feel like we should just let Iran and Lebanon bomb the shit out of them and fix many of the world problems.

In hindsight, helping take out Hitler was possibly one of the most retarded decision we’ve ever made.
 
Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
People always check images and videos out with AI, but I've never found an AI that can accurately identify anyone. Give them a picture and ask "who dis" and it will tell you it's obviously a picture of joe biden touring a car factory in PPE when it's actually doc brown leaning against his delorian in a labcoat. This kind of stuff AI is just useless at.

So where are all the boys?

Probably recruited back into the operation unless Spacey got to them first.
 
People always check images and videos out with AI, but I've never found an AI that can accurately identify anyone. Give them a picture and ask "who dis" and it will tell you it's obviously a picture of joe biden touring a car factory in PPE when it's actually doc brown leaning against his delorian in a labcoat. This kind of stuff AI is just useless at.
FWIW Grok was able to give a detailed description of the features and understand my question as pertains to the details on the image. Gemini similarly. Where they differ, I think, is in the system prompt — some are instructed to be more sceptical, and some to be more open.
 
I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???

1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy
1&2. pdf is image based (well i think its more of a printing format), to make the text selectable OCR is required (don't know if this is applicable across the board or just when using methods like print to pdf/scanners to create pdfs)
3, they released a bunch with just black boxes overlaying the text, even though it was already OCR'd and could be recovered by highlighting it and copying and pasting it to notepad, so yes.
4. there may be attachments that were not released on purpose so it is possible.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 8534559

I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.

Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
Bodies, especially softer parts like ears and the nose change over time. As an example, compare Robert DeNiro's profile around Taxi Driver to today. I am in the "Epstein didn't kill himself" (unsure of murdered or alive...but it wasn't suicide) but the evidence probably won't be visual, it will be instititional, from informants, or data trails.
 
1&2. pdf is image based (well i think its more of a printing format), to make the text selectable OCR is required
Many times I've dealt with PDFs which had selectable text, it's not necessarily image based.

It's really weird that the office monkeys (blessed be their souls) had scanned some weird looking text strings together with the rest of the e-mail, and didn't think it suspicious or dangerous. Maybe they did it on purpose, who knows.
 
Re: the jerky thing.

I imagine there is a lot of messed up things about Epstein but couldn't it just be a codeword for girls instead of meat. Coomers generally talk about girls like they are food.
That wouldn't explain keeping in the freezer / in the plastic bag with ice. They ain't talking 'bout no people, at least not living ones.
Some speculated it could be human placenta. Considering their obsession with children, longevity and possibly a breeding program, it seems plausible. That could be something they were farming. The same person said it's like jerky when cooked, I have no idea how they even know and I'm not sure I want to.
I know that in animal world mammal females often recycle placenta by eating it to reclaim nutrients. I could absolutely see these literal demons getting ideas about that.
Some also said blood, more specifically that of the children.
 
Interesting developing story: someone on Twitter/X claims to be Karyna Shuliak (Epstein's last gf whom he started dating when she was 15 or something) and is making various posts on the subject of Epstein.

What makes this interesting is that it says the account was created in 2017 and that the name has only been changed once, back in November 2017, at a time when no one really cared who she was. It seems unlikely this is really her, but I don't understand how someone would be able to fake that account info. Another possibility is that someone was able to hack an account with this name and take it over.

Telegram channel she is advertising: https://t.me/KarynaShuliak
https://x.com/KarynaShuliak (archive)


Karyna Shuliak twitter account.png Karyna Shuliak twitter.png
 
Interesting developing story: someone on Twitter/X claims to be Karyna Shuliak (Epstein's last gf whom he started dating when she was 15 or something) and is making various posts on the subject of Epstein.

What makes this interesting is that it says the account was created in 2017 and that the name has only been changed once, back in November 2017, at a time when no one really cared who she was. It seems unlikely this is really her, but I don't understand how someone would be able to fake that account info. Another possibility is that someone was able to hack an account with this name and take it over.

Telegram channel she is advertising: https://t.me/KarynaShuliak
https://x.com/KarynaShuliak (archive)


View attachment 8534681View attachment 8534682

This is FAKE. Anyone can change their username displayname on X and the username updated date won't change. I did it yesterday. You can try it yourself if you have an X account.
 
This is FAKE. Anyone can change their username displayname on X and the username updated date won't change. I did it yesterday. You can try it yourself if you have an X account.
Damn, that's so lame. In that case, this will probably turn out to be a Jeet crypto scam or something.
 
This is a 2013 email from Gregory Brown to Jeffrey Epstein.

Brown is talking about Obamacare. As a conservative and a constitutionalist, this has been a grip of mine and many others since it was implemented. It’s always been blamed on the democrats and Obama. I’m today finding out that it was actually the Heritage Foundation responsible for fucking our health care and insurance. Was Trump promising Republicans to fully repeal Obamacare, knowing that his Jewish controllers would never let that be a possibility. Trump has definitely lied and blamed democrats, knowing full well it’s his donors and backers who are responsible and profiting. Every single one of Trumps promises was a fucking lie … and in my opinion, his wife was / is high class prositute. 🤯

Heritage Foundation is a Zionist organization larping as a Christian Conservative organization. Most recently, they’re (or at least their chosen speakers at events) are telling those who are politically involved to push this new digital ID. That we should tell people who are worried about increasing surveillance that Palantir is for our own good and it’s the only way to solve illegal immigration and terrorism.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA01132813.pdf

IMG_3466.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???

1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy


View attachment 8534559

I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.

Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
i'm not a big fan of people doing the ear analysis based on that reference, especially when the lines are drawn to suggest a different ear shape don't make any sense.

earanatomy.png
i'll be using these anatomical terms to refer to some of the shapes.

helix.png
i've circled in yellow where someone outlined part of the helix to suggest it abruptly ends in a random dangly bit of cartilage even though it connects to the inner part of the ear (the cavum), it's just obscured by shadow.

helix1.png
same person outlines part of the antihelix to connect to the helix to the tragus directly using the part of the helix they "cut off" in the picture above, so it's not only anatomically implausible (the "cymba" for instance disappears since it exists as a fold between the helix and antihelix, and the antihelix isn't connected to the antitragus at all) but it also impossible given their understanding of what Epstein's ear looks like, in reality the antihelix would connect to the antitragus which would lead to the tragus like so (antihelix-antritragus-tragus in yellow, inner part of the helix in red):
helix2.png

while they essentially drew the ear shape like this:
ear1.png
ear3.png
 
I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???

1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy


View attachment 8534559

I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.

Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
It is the same ear and there is multiple pic of his corpse

1000002673.jpg
1000002677.jpg
epstein2a.jpg
1000003013.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000002674.jpg
    1000002674.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 78
  • 1000002674.jpg
    1000002674.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 91
This is FAKE. Anyone can change their username displayname on X and the username updated date won't change. I did it yesterday. You can try it yourself if you have an X account.
Not to mention if they are posting on x with an over 5k telegram channel which they aren't posting to, I'm not sure. Really we just gotta wait till X verifies it like with Epic.
 
The one that's dated earlier is missing numbers at the bottom (19-263 vs 19-???), so it seems to be an unfinalized version, possibly a draft.

Considering it happened that night and it could be an unsent message in the first place, it's not very strong evidence of anything.

We don't know that the draft was created the day before either, it could be an initial mistake, as in a benign situation (which most of this isn't, but just to compare it against), the document would have been made in the early hours of the morning and it's easy to mistake the date for the date it just was at 2 or 3 at night.
It did happen close to midnight as well so it might’ve been a case of an incorrect date due to timing.
 
Back
Top Bottom