AbominableTcho-Tcho
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2025
He's alive and well in Israel.At this point, there's no doubt he didn't killed himself. The question is: Did they killed him, or is he free and alive ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's alive and well in Israel.At this point, there's no doubt he didn't killed himself. The question is: Did they killed him, or is he free and alive ?
At this point, there's no doubt he didn't killed himself. The question is: Did they killed him, or is he free and alive ?
He's alive and well in Israel.
People always check images and videos out with AI, but I've never found an AI that can accurately identify anyone. Give them a picture and ask "who dis" and it will tell you it's obviously a picture of joe biden touring a car factory in PPE when it's actually doc brown leaning against his delorian in a labcoat. This kind of stuff AI is just useless at.Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
So where are all the boys?
FWIW Grok was able to give a detailed description of the features and understand my question as pertains to the details on the image. Gemini similarly. Where they differ, I think, is in the system prompt — some are instructed to be more sceptical, and some to be more open.People always check images and videos out with AI, but I've never found an AI that can accurately identify anyone. Give them a picture and ask "who dis" and it will tell you it's obviously a picture of joe biden touring a car factory in PPE when it's actually doc brown leaning against his delorian in a labcoat. This kind of stuff AI is just useless at.
1&2. pdf is image based (well i think its more of a printing format), to make the text selectable OCR is required (don't know if this is applicable across the board or just when using methods like print to pdf/scanners to create pdfs)I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???
1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy
Bodies, especially softer parts like ears and the nose change over time. As an example, compare Robert DeNiro's profile around Taxi Driver to today. I am in the "Epstein didn't kill himself" (unsure of murdered or alive...but it wasn't suicide) but the evidence probably won't be visual, it will be instititional, from informants, or data trails.View attachment 8534559
I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.
Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
Many times I've dealt with PDFs which had selectable text, it's not necessarily image based.1&2. pdf is image based (well i think its more of a printing format), to make the text selectable OCR is required
That wouldn't explain keeping in the freezer / in the plastic bag with ice. They ain't talking 'bout no people, at least not living ones.Re: the jerky thing.
I imagine there is a lot of messed up things about Epstein but couldn't it just be a codeword for girls instead of meat. Coomers generally talk about girls like they are food.
Interesting developing story: someone on Twitter/X claims to be Karyna Shuliak (Epstein's last gf whom he started dating when she was 15 or something) and is making various posts on the subject of Epstein.
What makes this interesting is that it says the account was created in 2017 and that the name has only been changed once, back in November 2017, at a time when no one really cared who she was. It seems unlikely this is really her, but I don't understand how someone would be able to fake that account info. Another possibility is that someone was able to hack an account with this name and take it over.
Telegram channel she is advertising: https://t.me/KarynaShuliak
https://x.com/KarynaShuliak (archive)
View attachment 8534681View attachment 8534682
Damn, that's so lame. In that case, this will probably turn out to be a Jeet crypto scam or something.This is FAKE. Anyone can change their username displayname on X and the username updated date won't change. I did it yesterday. You can try it yourself if you have an X account.
What isn’t a jeet scam at this point on the internet?Damn, that's so lame. In that case, this will probably turn out to be a Jeet crypto scam or something.
If onlyusing a human brain that doesn't hallucinate
i'm not a big fan of people doing the ear analysis based on that reference, especially when the lines are drawn to suggest a different ear shape don't make any sense.I'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???
1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy
View attachment 8534559
I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.
Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
It is the same ear and there is multiple pic of his corpseI'm so stupid I can't understand this whole thing about cracking redacted PDFs through recovering base64 embeddings using OCR ???
1. Why is there an unredacted base64-encoded plaintext of the emails, attached to a PDF of a non-text image scan of the e-mail?
2. Why do you need OCR to decode the base64? Is the base64 code attached as a picture/scan of the text? So it's an image of a base64 of a text?
3. Are the govt office monkeys so stupid that they forgot to remove it, or they don't know what base64 is in the first place? Why can't people who work with computers all day use a computer?
4. Will we get anything out of this? What's the chance we end up recovering unredacted e-mails? That would be crazy
View attachment 8534559
I'm not a forensic expert, but based on the ear itself it doesn't look like the same person. Bad quality, and many years between these photos, but ear shape, while it can stretch and squish, should not significantly/topologically change, and to me, it seems that these are 2 different persons.
Various AIs say everything between
- it's the same it's just age/shadows/quality/posture
- 50/50
- definitely different bodies
Not to mention if they are posting on x with an over 5k telegram channel which they aren't posting to, I'm not sure. Really we just gotta wait till X verifies it like with Epic.This is FAKE. Anyone can change their username displayname on X and the username updated date won't change. I did it yesterday. You can try it yourself if you have an X account.
It did happen close to midnight as well so it might’ve been a case of an incorrect date due to timing.The one that's dated earlier is missing numbers at the bottom (19-263 vs 19-???), so it seems to be an unfinalized version, possibly a draft.
Considering it happened that night and it could be an unsent message in the first place, it's not very strong evidence of anything.
We don't know that the draft was created the day before either, it could be an initial mistake, as in a benign situation (which most of this isn't, but just to compare it against), the document would have been made in the early hours of the morning and it's easy to mistake the date for the date it just was at 2 or 3 at night.