2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Apologies for being a retard but I read a file last night which documented an alleged victim's conversations with a therapist called Dr Silberg. The victim in question had been abused at Jeff's NY home when she was very young. Her Jewish foster parents had taken her there. She reported that there were many young girls (children) coming and going from Jeff's NY house.

Years later, when she went to the authorities, it seems that someone in the Epstein camp sent her some photos of abuse taking place, either to scare her or mess with her. A section of one of the photos is provided in the files. It shows a man on a turquoise couch and there is a window in the background. The mullions and scenery outside the window match up with Jeff's NY pad. Several screenshots from Google street view are provided to back up this conclusion. The man on the couch is raping a child but that part of the photo is not visible.

A description of another of the photos is provided in the document. The photo is said to depict a group of men torturing a 5 year old (her age is not disclosed in the document I read but apparently is elsewhere) and there is blood running from her mouth and vagina. She has bruising and cuts on her body. Another partly censored photo showed a victim on a flight "back to Israel", beaten and bruised. I highly doubt she hailed from Israel originally.

This is in the files. Photographic evidence of the worst shit imaginable at Jeff's house and still the MSM is talking about hand jobs from 17 year olds.

Perhaps someone less retarded than I can link the file in question. Or give me a 'late' emoji or something.

EDIT: Found it. Read it with your eyes closed.
So they sent her incriminating photos of them allegedly raping her to intimidate her? Does this seems far-fetched and retarded to anyone else? Does the supposed rape photo even take place in Epstein's apartment or is she just claiming it does? Far as we know it could be some men completely different just sexually assaulting a victim not connected to Epstein. How do we know she isn't just lying for money now? She claims that she got the photos sent to her by some random messages in 2019 right when this story was blowing up. That seems odd and too coincidental for me.
 
World run by pedos
Cult family lines
Blood rituals
Murder and cannibalism
Pizza codes
Scamdemics

David Icke will be looking for a new job at this rate.
 
there's a statement finding Epstein dead in his cell dated August 9th, a day before Epstein was found dead (August 10th, 6:30 AM).

august9.png
EFTA00013180

same statement with date changed.
august10.png
EFTA01649666 (same statement without redactions found at EFTA00152188).

incompetence? cover-up? you decide.
 
At this point, there's no doubt he didn't killed himself. The question is: Did they killed him, or is he free and alive ?
 
there's a statement finding Epstein dead in his cell dated August 9th, a day before Epstein was found dead (August 10th, 6:30 AM).

View attachment 8534204
EFTA00013180

same statement with date changed.
View attachment 8534205
EFTA01649666 (same statement without redactions found at EFTA00152188).

incompetence? cover-up? you decide.
The one that's dated earlier is missing numbers at the bottom (19-263 vs 19-???), so it seems to be an unfinalized version, possibly a draft.

Considering it happened that night and it could be an unsent message in the first place, it's not very strong evidence of anything.

We don't know that the draft was created the day before either, it could be an initial mistake, as in a benign situation (which most of this isn't, but just to compare it against), the document would have been made in the early hours of the morning and it's easy to mistake the date for the date it just was at 2 or 3 at night.
 
@ManBehindTheCurtain

All valid questions. It seems she provided photos of herself and the lawyers seem satisfied that it was her being abused. Was it Epstein's house? The lawyer is asking the authorities if they are able to confirm the turquoise couch and view from the window. I suppose her case would (I say would, they might not want to investigate) hinge on whether or not they can match these things to Jeff. And yes, it does seem retarded that they'd send those photos to her.
 
Re: the jerky thing.

I imagine there is a lot of messed up things about Epstein but couldn't it just be a codeword for girls instead of meat. Coomers generally talk about girls like they are food.
 
@ManBehindTheCurtain

All valid questions. It seems she provided photos of herself and the lawyers seem satisfied that it was her being abused. Was it Epstein's house? The lawyer is asking the authorities if they are able to confirm the turquoise couch and view from the window. I suppose her case would (I say would, they might not want to investigate) hinge on whether or not they can match these things to Jeff. And yes, it does seem retarded that they'd send those photos to her.
Her story just doesn't add up. Her parents take her to some foster parents and not her brother to get some unspecified treatment, she proceeds to get abused and says nothing to her family when they retrieve her. Then she suddenly remembers all the abuse she suffered in 2019 when talking to a therapist coincidentally around the exact same time the Epstein story starts to blow up? Really?

Of course the lawyers will go along with it. They're lawyers and they want settlement. See the Anouska De Georgiou case with Epstein. She essentially retconned her entire history with Epstein.
 
Her story just doesn't add up. Her parents take her to some foster parents and not her brother to get some unspecified treatment, she proceeds to get abused and says nothing to her family when they retrieve her. Then she suddenly remembers all the abuse she suffered in 2019 when talking to a therapist coincidentally around the exact same time the Epstein story starts to blow up? Really?

Of course the lawyers will go along with it. They're lawyers and they want settlement. See the Anouska De Georgiou case with Epstein. She essentially retconned her entire history with Epstein.

I believe it was her parents who were getting treatment. Drug addicts?

She provides a photo of herself and her foster dad Mike together. Mike is also in the group torture photo.

So she was at least in the presence of a sicko.


.... if I'm reading it correctly
 
Re: the jerky thing.

I imagine there is a lot of messed up things about Epstein but couldn't it just be a codeword for girls instead of meat. Coomers generally talk about girls like they are food.
Situation is beyond fucked that one horrifying suggested interpretation is more desired than the alternative.
 
I believe it was her parents who were getting treatment. Drug addicts?

She provides a photo of herself and her foster dad Mike together. Mike is also in the group torture photo.

So she was at least in the presence of a sicko.


.... if I'm reading it correctly
Why did they take her brother then? Also they leave their daughter with a random couple to get treatment as opposed to some family they trust? Also she never says anything about it until after the big article in that Orlando newspaper? Seems fishy to me.
 
Her story just doesn't add up. Her parents take her to some foster parents and not her brother to get some unspecified treatment, she proceeds to get abused and says nothing to her family when they retrieve her. Then she suddenly remembers all the abuse she suffered in 2019 when talking to a therapist coincidentally around the exact same time the Epstein story starts to blow up? Really?
I know nothing about this particular case besides what you just wrote, but honestly, both paths sound plausible.

Any child that requires foster parents is in a vulnerable position to be abused. Abusers typically have methods to prevent the abused kid from talking freely.

In cases with famous and/or powerful people, it's a asynchronous power situation. But public allegations and other accusers offers a safety in numbers (unless it's kevin spacey who you are accusing, I suppose).

Good therapists can help unpack abuse situations and see them more clearly (many abused think they were responsible for their traumatic experience).
 
there's a statement finding Epstein dead in his cell dated August 9th, a day before Epstein was found dead (August 10th, 6:30 AM).

View attachment 8534204
EFTA00013180

same statement with date changed.
View attachment 8534205
EFTA01649666 (same statement without redactions found at EFTA00152188).

incompetence? cover-up? you decide.
I think this was already highlighted way back when. I'm certain its just a template that some member of staff uses and they have to update the header date manually in microsoft word and its just a common paperwork mistake.

It would be more damning/worth something if there was actual metadata indicating the file was created or modified the day before he died. But you can put any date you want in Microsoft Word and also sometimes people's computers are in different timezeons or have the wrong time set or its just as simple as a Microsoft Word template.

If your local church/council/sports club has ever sent you something with the wrong date, its about the same.
 
I also found a pattern with a anon person who seems to have dined with JE and KS Between 7th jan 2013 - 9th Jan 2013. Mentioning this person got sick.


Don’t know who this anon is, but KS sends this email after her appointment with Marcia.

Re:​

DOJ 11​

K

Karyna Shuliak<Karyna Shuliak>
to
Jan 7, 2013 8:57 PM
star_border
I've heard you're still very sick, wish you fell better soon! rest, eat, d=ink a lot and laugh:)
<>
to Karyna Shuliak
Jan 9, 2013 4:40 PM
star_border
Thank you. It's starting to break away. I hope you guys have been having fun=there! Miss you.
Sent from my iPhone
Note: “Miss you!” This sounds and writes like the old e-mail KS had from a lady on her “solo ski trip”


Is this about that ANON who was sick in early Jan? Seems to be a “virus”
7392 of 8310

(no subject)​

DOJ 11​



████████████████████████████████████████><████████████████████████████████████████>>
to Jeffrey Epstein, ██████████ Karyna Shuliak
Feb 5, 2013 6:18 PM
star_border1
Lyn also had the virus, I was with her at 71st last monday and she was sick the day after


And then i found an email JE sent to a ANON on 7th jan 2013

(no subject)

DOJ 11​

View attachment 8533614

Jeffrey Epstein<jeevacation@gmail.com>
to
Jan 7, 2013 5:35 PM
star_border
215 steak,, thnnks


------------

From this is found that they may have had people around for dinner? Something was wrong with the "steak" and people got a virus.

Was this the swine flu outbreak? I found emails in there where Epstein was talking about many of his employees being sick with a swine flu. lol @ a group of Jews getting swine flu.
How is Fred? It's just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding a school for his son.
do we know who Fred and Joe are? I was thinking Joe Walsh and Fred Gutenberg but it doesn’t fit. Joe Walsh does have Alzheimer, but Fred doesn’t, so it is reversed.
believe it was her parents who were getting treatment.

To me it read that her brother was getting treatment. The foster parents were an older couple, maybe the parents thought their daughter was safe? Maybe this girl stayed quiet because the family dynamics with a sick brother and all the chaos? I’ve seen firsthand how having one very sick child can deeply affect the other child negatively. To me, I don’t find it unusual she would not speak of this to her parents during such upheaval. Both because of deep shame and upsetting the family during this time.

It’s suspicious that we have the same family names popping up over and over again. Apparently, being an evil child abuser is hereditary.

The people this girl was supposedly fostered with is
IMG_3462.jpeg
IMG_3465.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom