Space Jam A New Legacy - From Black Panther to Bugs Bunny

[Oats12345]

Thats is both the worst and best thing I have seen all day

Here is to white supremacy

View attachment 2384865



The fact that famous books like this and some of Stephen King has some of the most disgusting and cringiest shit that somehow was allowed by the editors and publishers makes me think MY editor is full of shit over my writings...

Stephen King literally had child porn in IT. Hence why I can't stand when he acts all high and mighty when talking about other people.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Ready Player One the book still has that crown

“I would argue that masturbation is the human animal's most important adaptation. The very cornerstone of our technological civilization. Our hands evolved to grip tools, all right—including our own. You see, thinkers, inventors, and scientists are usually geeks, and geeks have a harder time getting laid than anyone. Without the built-in sexual release valve provided by masturbation, it's doubtful that early humans would have ever mastered the secrets of fire or discovered the wheel. And you can bet that Galileo, Newton, and Einstein never would have made their discoveries if they hadn't first been able to clear their heads by slapping the salami (or "knocking a few protons off the old hydrogen atom"). The same goes for Marie Curie. Before she discovered radium, you can be certain she first discovered the little man in the canoe.” ― Ernest Cline Ready Player One​

Reddit loves RPO so much that I don’t even see the same people that talk this well about Space Jam: A New Legacy. In fact, has there even been any positive reactions on Reddit to LeBron’s movie?

Or at least ones that don’t make them sound like shills?

 

[BrunoMattei]

Reddit loves RPO so much that I don’t even see the same people that talk this well about Space Jam: A New Legacy. In fact, has there even been any positive reactions on Reddit to LeBron’s movie?

Or at least ones that don’t make them sound like shills?

WTF is this? Animals masturbate, that doesn't mean it directly lead them to figuring out quantum mechanics. FFS.

 

[RainwaterDrop]

Ready Player One the book still has that crown

Who the fuck saw this pile of horseshit and thought it fit for publishing?!

WTF is this? Animals masturbate, that doesn't mean it directly lead them to figuring out quantum mechanics. FFS.

That thing is possibly one of the worst books ever put to print!

 

[Uranus Pink]

One thing that amazes me is how nobody thought to try and revive drive-in theatres during the coof.

Central Texas had been going through a drive-in revival a few years before the coof became known to the normies. And the drive-ins were of the few theaters that weren't closed down when the normies were running around in their prisons homes screaming the sky is falling, the sky is falling.

 

[CapricornusRex]

Central Texas had been going through a drive-in revival a few years before the coof became known to the normies. And the drive-ins were of the few theaters that weren't closed down when the normies were running around in their prisons homes screaming the sky is falling, the sky is falling.

I'm envious, I live in a city that actually had two drive-ins and one of the lots was never used for anything after. They could have easily reused it which would have made going to movies interesting again.

 

[The Cunting Death]

To be honest, the fact studio interference did that really confirms my theory that Warner Bros is probably a movie studio that has possibly reached levels of stupidity that makes Sony look like Steven Hawking. Most of their 2010 film outings they put a lot of investment in are based on really dumb ideas and are out of touch.

The best example of Warner Bros being stupid is that they made a green lantern movie because they thought people loved the 2008 Iron Man movie solely because of the plane sequence.

Hell I won't be surprised they'll blame 2D animation for Space Jam 2 not doing so well as Warner Bros is known for blaming dumb shit for their movies failing far more often than other studios.

Tbh WB best films this last decade were things that were complete afterthoughts

Edge of Tomorrow
Midnight Special
Blade Runner 2049 (yeah I know Sony released it elsewhere but WB released it here)
Inherent Vice
Pacific Rim
Her
The Accountant
JOKER

I know a few of those are blockbusters, but they're co-productions, not the films they've been putting all their eggs in one basket for.

 

[BrunoMattei]

Tbh WB best films this last decade were things that were complete afterthoughts

Edge of Tomorrow
Midnight Special
Blade Runner 2049 (yeah I know Sony released it elsewhere but WB released it here)
Inherent Vice
Pacific Rim
Her
The Accountant

I know a few of those are blockbusters, but they're co-productions, not the films they've been putting all their eggs in one basket for.

You forgot Joker .

 

[The Cunting Death]

You forgot Joker .

Yeah I'd add that in, especially since its been revealed that WB deliberately tried to sabotage it

 

[Product Placement]

To be honest, the fact studio interference did that really confirms my theory that Warner Bros is probably a movie studio that has possibly reached levels of stupidity that makes Sony look like Steven Hawking. Most of their 2010 film outings they put a lot of investment in are based on really dumb ideas and are out of touch.

The best example of Warner Bros being stupid is that they made a green lantern movie because they thought people loved the 2008 Iron Man movie solely because of the plane sequence.

Hell I won't be surprised they'll blame 2D animation for Space Jam 2 not doing so well as Warner Bros is known for blaming dumb shit for their movies failing far more often than other studios.

For Blockbusters, 010-2020 WB had stuff like Mad Max Fury Road, Blade Runner 2049, Edge of Tomorrow, so one of the better line up and in no way worse than Sony especially Amy Pascal era sony.
Not to say WB hasn't been dumb, here are a few of the fuck ups from that era not even going into the whole DCU mess
Green Lantern, wasn't a bad idea to make a movie especially after Iron Man did well, but the movie was just shit and the sad thing is, I think would have done better if the cgi suit didn't look so awful, the eyes look even creepy on the movie posters and was all anyone could talk about in the lead up rather than the movie its self.

Lego Movie: First does well, then they milked the shit out of it too fast, had they space them out and didn't do the lego ninjago, pretty sure Lego Movie 2 would have done well and they wouldn't have lost the license

Fantastic Beasts movies: they brought back David Yates the blandest director of the Harry Potter movies, but people seemed to enjoy the first movie until the ending, with people being burnt out on Johny Deep playing weirdos at the time and people not wanting it to tie into Harry Potter in some big way. They could have course-corrected on the follow-up by making the series just stand-alone movies but they didn't and it made $150 million less.

The 15:17 to Paris: Soon as Clint Eastwood wanted to cast the real people in the movie, should have cancelled the movie after that.

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: King Arthur movies haven't been hits for a long time, and on top of that they got Guy Ritchie to try and update it, end production feels like something that would have come out in the early 2000s and pretty clear from this and Aladdin that Guy Ritchie isn't good at heavy special effect movies. You would think WB would have looked at the other attempts to update classic British stories and realised the market isn't there for them. Also was planned to be a cinematic universe.

The Legend of Tarzan: this wasn't a total flop, issue is the movie is very bland and dull, and it's pretty much all on the directing which is David Yates. I feel like you just replaced him but kept the script, cast and such the same you could get a much more entertaining movie.

Jupiter Ascending: Do the Wachowski's have dirt on WB. Matrix ended in 2003 at this point, and they had yet to make another hit for WB within all that time. A script reading should have been all that was needed for WB not to go forward with this movie.

Transcendence: Pretty clear WB thought Wally Pfister who was the cinematographer for most of Nolan's movies would well be the next Nolan with this movie, on face value it seemed like a safe bet. But the script itself had good ideas but wasn't good itself, was way over budget ($150 to $100 million for something that should have been mid-budget) and cast Johny Depp when people were starting to get sick of him, also worth noting Johnny Deep got $20 million for this. It pretty much killed Wally Pfister career in making movies, which is sad because he didn't do an awful job himself.

Jack the Giant Slayer: A $200 million Jack and Beanstalk movie, why on earth would anyone think that is a good idea, I'm shocked it even grossed $197 million at the box-office,.

I honestly could make similar lists for most of the big studios. However, an issue I found common in WB is that they will have a hit such as San Andreas ($110 million budget vs $475 million gross), Rampage ($120-140 million budget vs $428 million gross) and Detective Pikachu ($150 million budget vs $433 gross), all these movies have been profitable, well-liked by general audiences and the teams behind them have wanted to make follow-ups, but they never seem to get past the starting line. I don't get leaving that type of money on the table, not like any of them need a deep script or anything but yet if San Andrease which came out in 2015 gets a follow up now, would anyone even care now 6+ years would have passed?

But to your point about 2d animation, unless it was a monster hit which with covid it never was going to be, doubt 2d animated movies for the cinema were ever on WB plans.

 

[Oats12345]

For Blockbusters, 010-2020 WB had stuff like Mad Max Fury Road, Blade Runner 2049, Edge of Tomorrow, so one of the better line up and in no way worse than Sony especially Amy Pascal era sony.
Not to say WB hasn't been dumb, here are a few of the fuck ups from that era not even going into the whole DCU mess
Green Lantern, wasn't a bad idea to make a movie especially after Iron Man did well, but the movie was just shit and the sad thing is, I think would have done better if the cgi suit didn't look so awful, the eyes look even creepy on the movie posters and was all anyone could talk about in the lead up rather than the movie its self.

Lego Movie: First does well, then they milked the shit out of it too fast, had they space them out and didn't do the lego ninjago, pretty sure Lego Movie 2 would have done well and they wouldn't have lost the license

Fantastic Beasts movies: they brought back David Yates the blandest director of the Harry Potter movies, but people seemed to enjoy the first movie until the ending, with people being burnt out on Johny Deep playing weirdos at the time and people not wanting it to tie into Harry Potter in some big way. They could have course-corrected on the follow-up by making the series just stand-alone movies but they didn't and it made $150 million less.

The 15:17 to Paris: Soon as Clint Eastwood wanted to cast the real people in the movie, should have cancelled the movie after that.

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: King Arthur movies haven't been hits for a long time, and on top of that they got Guy Ritchie to try and update it, end production feels like something that would have come out in the early 2000s and pretty clear from this and Aladdin that Guy Ritchie isn't good at heavy special effect movies. You would think WB would have looked at the other attempts to update classic British stories and realised the market isn't there for them. Also was planned to be a cinematic universe.

The Legend of Tarzan: this wasn't a total flop, issue is the movie is very bland and dull, and it's pretty much all on the directing which is David Yates. I feel like you just replaced him but kept the script, cast and such the same you could get a much more entertaining movie.

Jupiter Ascending: Do the Wachowski's have dirt on WB. Matrix ended in 2003 at this point, and they had yet to make another hit for WB within all that time. A script reading should have been all that was needed for WB not to go forward with this movie.

Transcendence: Pretty clear WB thought Wally Pfister who was the cinematographer for most of Nolan's movies would well be the next Nolan with this movie, on face value it seemed like a safe bet. But the script itself had good ideas but wasn't good itself, was way over budget ($150 to $100 million for something that should have been mid-budget) and cast Johny Depp when people were starting to get sick of him, also worth noting Johnny Deep got $20 million for this. It pretty much killed Wally Pfister career in making movies, which is sad because he didn't do an awful job himself.

Jack the Giant Slayer: A $200 million Jack and Beanstalk movie, why on earth would anyone think that is a good idea, I'm shocked it even grossed $197 million at the box-office,.

I honestly could make similar lists for most of the big studios. However, an issue I found common in WB is that they will have a hit such as San Andreas ($110 million budget vs $475 million gross), Rampage ($120-140 million budget vs $428 million gross) and Detective Pikachu ($150 million budget vs $433 gross), all these movies have been profitable, well-liked by general audiences and the teams behind them have wanted to make follow-ups, but they never seem to get past the starting line. I don't get leaving that type of money on the table, not like any of them need a deep script or anything but yet if San Andrease which came out in 2015 gets a follow up now, would anyone even care now 6+ years would have passed?

But to your point about 2d animation, unless it was a monster hit which with covid it never was going to be, doubt 2d animated movies for the cinema were ever on WB plans.

I thought it was cool Clint Eastwood wanted to cast the actual guys in 15:17 to Paris. People give that decision to mich shit.

 

[A Grey Cat]

People are stealing the heads off the Lebrons View attachment 2382194

Oh great what's funzo up to this time?

 

[Product Placement]

I thought it was cool Clint Eastwood wanted to cast the actual guys in 15:17 to Paris. People give that decision to mich shit.

Have you seen the movie, they may be heroes but they are not actors, and unless you are making a documentary you need people who can act. But you are wrong, when people got to see the movie that decision got so much shit in fact the main thing most reviews gave the movie shit for. Don't blame the guys however, it's on Eastwood and WB this one.

 

[Oats12345]

Have you seen the movie, they may be heroes but they are not actors, and unless you are making a documentary you need people who can act. But you are wrong, when people got to see the movie that decision got so much shit in fact the main thing most reviews gave the movie shit for. Don't blame the guys however, it's on Eastwood and WB this one.

But that's the thing Clint Eastwood usually doesn't cast A-list actors in his movies. So when he decided to get the actual guys to play in it, I thought it was a interesting directing choice. They weren't that bad in my opinion I seen professional actors who have done worse.

I dont care what mainstream media says these days their praise anything that isn't gay or tranny. I thought the movie was good and the guys weren't that bad. What do you want Hollywood soyboys playing the parts in the movie?
We can agree to disagree.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

For Blockbusters, 010-2020 WB had stuff like Mad Max Fury Road, Blade Runner 2049, Edge of Tomorrow, so one of the better line up and in no way worse than Sony especially Amy Pascal era sony.
Not to say WB hasn't been dumb, here are a few of the fuck ups from that era not even going into the whole DCU mess
Green Lantern, wasn't a bad idea to make a movie especially after Iron Man did well, but the movie was just shit and the sad thing is, I think would have done better if the cgi suit didn't look so awful, the eyes look even creepy on the movie posters and was all anyone could talk about in the lead up rather than the movie its self.

Lego Movie: First does well, then they milked the shit out of it too fast, had they space them out and didn't do the lego ninjago, pretty sure Lego Movie 2 would have done well and they wouldn't have lost the license

Fantastic Beasts movies: they brought back David Yates the blandest director of the Harry Potter movies, but people seemed to enjoy the first movie until the ending, with people being burnt out on Johny Deep playing weirdos at the time and people not wanting it to tie into Harry Potter in some big way. They could have course-corrected on the follow-up by making the series just stand-alone movies but they didn't and it made $150 million less.

The 15:17 to Paris: Soon as Clint Eastwood wanted to cast the real people in the movie, should have cancelled the movie after that.

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: King Arthur movies haven't been hits for a long time, and on top of that they got Guy Ritchie to try and update it, end production feels like something that would have come out in the early 2000s and pretty clear from this and Aladdin that Guy Ritchie isn't good at heavy special effect movies. You would think WB would have looked at the other attempts to update classic British stories and realised the market isn't there for them. Also was planned to be a cinematic universe.

The Legend of Tarzan: this wasn't a total flop, issue is the movie is very bland and dull, and it's pretty much all on the directing which is David Yates. I feel like you just replaced him but kept the script, cast and such the same you could get a much more entertaining movie.

Jupiter Ascending: Do the Wachowski's have dirt on WB. Matrix ended in 2003 at this point, and they had yet to make another hit for WB within all that time. A script reading should have been all that was needed for WB not to go forward with this movie.

Transcendence: Pretty clear WB thought Wally Pfister who was the cinematographer for most of Nolan's movies would well be the next Nolan with this movie, on face value it seemed like a safe bet. But the script itself had good ideas but wasn't good itself, was way over budget ($150 to $100 million for something that should have been mid-budget) and cast Johny Depp when people were starting to get sick of him, also worth noting Johnny Deep got $20 million for this. It pretty much killed Wally Pfister career in making movies, which is sad because he didn't do an awful job himself.

Jack the Giant Slayer: A $200 million Jack and Beanstalk movie, why on earth would anyone think that is a good idea, I'm shocked it even grossed $197 million at the box-office,.

I honestly could make similar lists for most of the big studios. However, an issue I found common in WB is that they will have a hit such as San Andreas ($110 million budget vs $475 million gross), Rampage ($120-140 million budget vs $428 million gross) and Detective Pikachu ($150 million budget vs $433 gross), all these movies have been profitable, well-liked by general audiences and the teams behind them have wanted to make follow-ups, but they never seem to get past the starting line. I don't get leaving that type of money on the table, not like any of them need a deep script or anything but yet if San Andrease which came out in 2015 gets a follow up now, would anyone even care now 6+ years would have passed?

But to your point about 2d animation, unless it was a monster hit which with covid it never was going to be, doubt 2d animated movies for the cinema were ever on WB plans.

My point about 2D animation was more that Warner executives would ignore most of the criticism for the movie and blame one of the more insignificant aspects of it. Warner Bros has a history of making dumb scapegoats for why people don’t like certain movies like with Batman v Superman in how they think people just didn’t like that it had a dark tone which is why Joss Whedon directed the theatrical cut of Justin League.

 

[Product Placement]

My point about 2D animation was more that Warner executives would ignore most of the criticism for the movie and blame one of the more insignificant aspects of it. Warner Bros has a history of making dumb scapegoats for why people don’t like certain movies like with Batman v Superman in how they think people just didn’t like that it had a dark tone which is why Joss Whedon directed the theatrical cut of Justin League.

Disney did that, The Princess and the Frog cost $105million grossed $269, so did it okay not amazing, but around what even their cgi movies did that came before it. Then they put out Winnie the Pooh the same day as the last Harry Potter movie and it flopped, however, the movie in between both of them was Tangled which was Disney first big hit since the 90s animation-wise, so they blamed 2d animation and went all in 3d rather than look at other reasons.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

Disney did that, The Princess and the Frog cost $105million grossed $269, so did it okay not amazing, but around what even their cgi movies do before it at the time. Then they put out Winnie the Pooh the same day as the last Harry Potter movie and it flopped, however, the movie in between both of them was Tangled which was Disney first big hit since the 90s animation-wise, so they blamed 2d animation and went all in 3d rather than look at other reasons.

Disney also has a history of doing this shit that Warner Bros does, I’m talking about Warner especially when it’s more frequent on their end when they make retarded excuses for their failures

 

[Product Placement]

Disney also has a history of doing this shit that Warner Bros does, I’m talking about Warner especially when it’s more frequent on their end when they make retarded excuses for their failures

Reminds me of something else I heard, that IT got its budget cut and nearly was cancelled because Poltergeist remake which poster was a clown face flopped at the box office thus people don't want horror movies with clown in them, note WB didn't even do that movie it was MGM and Fox which makes the dumb reasoning even worse.

 

[The Cunting Death]

Jack the Giant Slayer: A $200 million Jack and Beanstalk movie, why on earth would anyone think that is a good idea, I'm shocked it even grossed $197 million at the box-office,.

I did see it in theaters, but only after a comic convention and I had done everything I wanted to there, so it was a complete afterthought in my book.

It's one of the few movies I saw in theaters where I remember next to nothing about it
In other words, bland in the worst ways possible

 

[The Last Stand]

People are stealing the heads off the Lebrons View attachment 2382194

It''s actually an improvement.