US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Explains Tim Kaine. He was such a non entity I have to actively remember Hillary actually had a running mate in 2016 and didn't just do a one-woman show for her entire campaign.
I don't think the media gave him as much attention as they did to Kamala
 
View attachment 2378679
View attachment 2378680
Sure. And I'm a White man.
 
Explains Tim Kaine. He was such a non entity I have to actively remember Hillary actually had a running mate in 2016 and didn't just do a one-woman show for her entire campaign.
Maybe they wanted him around because of that and to make sure she won Virginia.
 
I don't think the media gave him as much attention as they did to Kamala
The one time I saw him in the debate, he tried to ape Trump's abrasiveness, but because he didn't have the substance to back it up, he just floundered to Pence. These people simply do not understand that Trump's bluntness is just a means to say what he wants.
 
And keep in mind, those numbers are WITH push-polling. These are the hand-picked, deliberately skewed polls.
Exactly, same with the recent Gallup poll. They oversample the shit out of Democrats and Biden still dropped 6 points in a month. In this poll about optimism, the biggest drop was with Democrats going from 93% to 71%, that says a lot. Even in these push polls, Biden is underwater with independents but his numbers stay afloat because of the oversampling of Democrats.
 
So I'm confused, why exactly was she booed? From my little bit of searching about her, she seems to have sponsored an election integrity bill signed by Ducey, and it makes no mention of her being a dissenting voice in the earlier attempt to push through a bill in April. Am I missing something?

From what I understand, she and one other republican senator voted no on a GA style election security law because she was against the chain of custody documentation. As in, having to show proof you hand it off to a person and it's written down. And then she tried some last minute "I want this" but never told the Senate leader in order to save face.

She also decided that the audit that is going on is just too much, because Orange Man bad. She tweeted this last night, which seems more like she's upset she's not the queen bee in the AZ GOP Senate.

Screenshot 2021-07-25 at 14-16-52 Michelle Ugenti-RITA on Twitter.png


Screenshot 2021-07-25 at 14-23-24 Michelle Ugenti-RITA on Twitter.png


She's now trying to play the RINO version of "I'm so conservative Trump and his cronies are just nowhere near what I want to do." Which is nothing.

She also tried to get a citizen journalist kicked out of the event last night after he asked her questions when she was boo'ed off the stage. Another example of being a tone deaf bitch.



It's amazing how much these people flail like swamp creatures with just the little bit of pressure and wondering why you won't do your fucking job.
 
Where did you get those pics of Hunter? and that little girl all slutted up? Jesus Christ, seeing that right after revisiting the nip tweak of that little girl makes me legitimately MOTI. Just... how? How the FUCK did this band of idiots ever make it within a hair's breadth of the WH? Rhetorical question, I know but DAMN.
I hope he loses his protection the moment Biden is no longer president. He's drug addled enough to make a stupid decision when his old man's status cant protect him.
I actually can answer this. The answer is No.

The VP had to fit a few criteria, some less obvious than others.

1: They had to be female.
2: They had to be non-white, the darker the better.
3: They had to be in a weak starting position so that they have to rely on the puppetmasters to stay in power.
4: They had to have presidential ambitions despite the above.
5: They had to be ethically skewed to accept the Corpse President.
6: They had to be legally clean, depriving Republicans of any serious ammo.

Stacey Abrams violates 6 for sure, debatably 4. The problem is they needed a candidate who fit this EXACT criteria. And there was only one option.
It all looks so dam ridiculous to the layman. They cant compromise on even one of those things to elect a person PALATABLE to the american public? And picking Biden for that matter.... Part of me wonders if it was fear or simple ignorance that prevented people from telling the higher ups how scrambled his fucking brain is.
 
The one time I saw him in the debate, he tried to ape Trump's abrasiveness, but because he didn't have the substance to back it up, he just floundered to Pence. These people simply do not understand that Trump's bluntness is just a means to say what he wants.
Reminds me of that survey where right-leaning people could understand left-leaning people while left-leaning people couldn't do the same.
 
I hope he loses his protection the moment Biden is no longer president. He's drug addled enough to make a stupid decision when his old man's status cant protect him.

It all looks so dam ridiculous to the layman. They cant compromise on even one of those things to elect a person PALATABLE to the american public? And picking Biden for that matter.... Part of me wonders if it was fear or simple ignorance that prevented people from telling the higher ups how scrambled his fucking brain is.
It makes sense when you contextualize the goal. This was an unseen Oligarchy wanting to create a puppet government, because Orange Man hurt them. So, 1 and 2 make sense as they need to pander to the woke crowd to get their vote and it's the only hardcore vote they had at thet point. 3 and 4 are to ensure the VP slot is someone they can control and handle, while also having the necessary ambition to stay on. If they are too strong, they can break the puppethood. If they lack the ambition, they can just say "Fuck this shit, I'm out" and it all falls apart. 5 and 6 then are requirements to prevent an explosion, 5 to ensure that nobody leaks the decline of Biden and 6 to ensure that the VP themselves can't be destroyed due to past fuckups.

Every criterion is -required-, not because of ideology but because of pure pragmatic reasons. Compromise even 1 of them and it's a loss.
 
My initial perception was the RINOs would exploit Trump's loss to purge the party of his supporters, but with the way the election got drawn out and the resulting energy it looks like the opposite is occuring. Like that woman earlier getting booed, the GOP has a load of reps who are totally out of step with their own constituents and are punished for it.

Why did the Democrats want Trump gone again? If he lasted till 2024 he'd be worn out, impotent (the deep state would quite easily continue to hamstrung him for another 4 years) and his ideology would've likely died with him.

What could Joe Biden provide them that has been worth blowing all of their political capital on?
No more mean tweets
 
a sketch of the type of future the country should build towards, distinct from what his predecessors and political foes offer. Meanwhile the GOP claim to be different to Democrats but adopt every narrative and piece of rhetoric from them sooner or later.
People post about the "pendulum swinging back" but "left-right-left-right" is still a forward march.

Thats why change will never happen. Thats why they absolutely dont want a third party, and Trump wasnt even that, he just touted himself as "anti-establishment" and that was enough to shake them to thinking its a repeat of some OWS grassroots shit.
I hope he loses his protection the moment Biden is no longer president. He's drug addled enough to make a stupid decision when his old man's status cant protect him.
Wont happen. I remember reading here about his niece being arrested and having to pay some fines for a bunch of crazy drug-lifestyle shit she got into in New York including assaulting her roommate and stealing her credit card and spending like 30 thousand dollars with it, and the more recent one was that she was driving while high on soma and xanax and drove right into a tree. That never came up. I mean I can get the "the events arent related, blahblah its not anything to do with the presidency" angle on paper--I know every presidents family has always had scandals that get swept away, but these ones are pretty blatant. And Hunter is the presidents direct kid so it does carry more weight, I guess/

His brother also, I think killed some single-father in a drunk driving incident in Florida a long time ago, he was found guilty and ordered to pay a fine and something like a million dollars, and he never did until up until the election or shortly after, and it never made headlines.

Somebody compared the Bidens to the Kennedys and theyre pretty right it seems.
 
The fact that mean tweets was complaint number one about Trump shows that he still managed be a competent president. That, or his critics were too blinded by their hatred of him to actually bust out the fine tooth comb.
I have a few disagreements with Trump's policy, but as a whole Trump was a shockingly competent president who proved to have significantly powerful chops with economic and foreign diplomacy policy. His internal diplomacy could use some work, but a lot of my issues with him ended up being "He needed more experience". And this comes from someone who voted for him through gritted teeth the first time simply because Clinton was way more likely to start a war.
 
Last edited:
I hope he loses his protection the moment Biden is no longer president. He's drug addled enough to make a stupid decision when his old man's status cant protect him.

It all looks so dam ridiculous to the layman. They cant compromise on even one of those things to elect a person PALATABLE to the american public? And picking Biden for that matter.... Part of me wonders if it was fear or simple ignorance that prevented people from telling the higher ups how scrambled his fucking brain is.
It's worse when you think about the fact that she was originally the establishment choice for the presidency.

I'm a lying retard who shits himself.
Hi Joe!
 
I have a few disagreements with Trump's policy, but as a whole Trump was a shockingly competent president who proved to have significantly powerful chops with economic and foreign diplomacy policy. His internal diplomacy could use some work, but a lot of my issues with him ended up being "He needed more experience". And this comes from someone who voted for him through gritted teeth the first time simply because Clinton was way more likely to start a war.
I think Trump's biggest problem was that he surrounded himself with either establishment snakes or open grifters. He never seemed to be able to assemble a team of loyal people he could actually delegate to.
 
People post about the "pendulum swinging back" but "left-right-left-right" is still a forward march.

Thats why change will never happen. Thats why they absolutely dont want a third party, and Trump wasnt even that, he just touted himself as "anti-establishment" and that was enough to shake them to thinking its a repeat of some OWS grassroots shit.
I was one who sperged constantly about this. And you are 1,000% right. Helps when they don't teach actual history in public schools. Nope. Just muh nigger slavery and muh eleventy gorillion.
 
Is there evidence or plausible reason for that claim? Somebody who would give a viable speech on global peace isn't somebody I think as a warmongering politician.
She outright called for a no-fly zone over Syria, which would require a full-scale invasion to enforce. She has prior been quite the advocate for military intervention in Haiti, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Libya. She generally has been a strong proponent for, and I quote, "coercive diplomacy" (2008 presidential debates). So yah, Hillary is a bit of a war hawk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom