US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Click to expand...
Gehenna said:
I wouldn't characterize it as "Taking it out on their tenants". Mortgages and property taxes are fucking -expensive-, and a full year of being unable to recoup anything from those investments likely would break the bank for the majority of landlords. So it's not taking it out on them, it's literally just trying to play catchup before bankruptcy hits.

It is quite literally an unwinnable situation for both parties. If the landlord does it, the tenants have to pay out the ass, and the landlord is vilified, If the landlord does not, they enter bankruptcy, and the tenants are kicked out when the house is liquidated.
Click to expand...
I posted this in another thread.

northstar747 said:
So I had a moment today that just broke me.

I have rental house and I work with/for a management company. Fuck being a land lord. In march my tenant was short 1/4 of the rent. In April he was 100% short. But had applied to with the local housing authority for rent relief. Me and him fill out the papers and send them off.

10 weeks later I havent been paid. I called up the authority and was merely told "its processing and that takes awhile.

I dont know if this tenants is like other people i ve seen who got the biden buck and unemployment benefits.

But the house authority merely telling me its "processing" as opposed to say telling me how many steps are in the process what step we are on and a very very soft time frame till all the steps are completed basically broke my confidence that I will ever get paid.

Tomorrow I will call the tenant and explain that I will be taking my house off the rental market he will get his 60 day notice at the end of the month. which will be good timing because covid protections run out on the end of september (besides alot of the protections dont apply to single family homes if its going to be taken off the market)

Normally I would hate myself and other landlords because in this town there is no inventory and doing this to someone is putting a very real hardship on them.

On the other hand I just traded a 1980 honda scooter to a plumber to fixed his backed up swear line.

In my head I imagine telling the tenat that even if he barrows from family to get caught up I m still taking back the house. I ll just live there and air b n b the place I m at now. And that its going to be impossible for him to find another house at that price. what I really really want to get through his head though is that the goverment rent relief fucked him because again I just dont believe I ll get paid and I dont want nor do I have to deal with this shit.

Sorry I just needed to vent.
Click to expand...
 
Gehenna said:
We are about 70% white, actually. And you know literally nothing about voting demographics.

Edit: To expand: The only racial group to vote almost completely down party lines are Blacks and even they don't do it completely. Non-Cuban Hispanics vote 1-2, Asians more towards Republicans, etc. Contrary to the myth, more than just White people vote Republican.
Click to expand...
70% is counting Mexicans, Middle-Easterners, Jews, and Cubans.

Asians vote predominantly democrat too which is how I know you're full of shit. For someone on the inside you're not great at reading Poll/election data or understanding demographics.
_92349606_us_elections_2016_exit_polls_race_624.jpg

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219
Keep in mind even subtracting Latinos, it's still counting most middle-easterners and Jews as White. But let's be fair here. We'll give them both White status—both demographics vote primarily for democrats.
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent
60.1%
Click to expand...
 
DicksOutForChauvin said:
70% is counting Mexicans, Middle-Easterners, Jews, and Cubans.

Asians vote predominantly democrat too which is how I know you're full of shit. For someone on the inside you're not great at reading Poll/election data or understanding demographics.
View attachment 2363810
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219
Keep in mind even subtracting Latinos, it's still counting most middle-easterners and Jews as White. But let's be fair here. We'll give them both White status—both demographics vote primarily for democrats.
Click to expand...
You caught me on bad wording, I grant that. When I said more towards republicans I meant in comparison to Hispanics. That was my bad, as reading it again I can see two readings there. Also, I'll cop to being off on this one more generally. I was going off the Wisconsin Asian numbers and assuming they were reflected nationally. I was wrong, it does appear that nationally they trend about-ish equal to Hispanics.

That being said, you were still wrong about it being under 50% whites, and you are being -very- generous with your apparent assumptions about the number of Jews and those from the Middle-East. There are a total of about 6 million jews in the U.S. making a grand total of ~1.8%. The Middle-Eastern numbers are a bit higher at about 10 million. In total, making up ~5%.

So even using the absolute smallest demographics we can, ousting out anyone who isn't of European stock. You come out to ~55%.

Either way, you have 55% of the population that will split to Republicans reliably and from there its a bit under a third Hispanics and Asians which each make up a combined total of ~ 25%

That right there is 39.15% of the population. By comparison, the democrats with that same demographic pool have 36.6. Even if I throw the -entire- black vote to them it only brings them up to exactly 50%. And yah, with the other that'd put them over reliably, right?

Now we get back to why I say you don't understand demographics.

All of that? All of it assumes every state has exactly the same demographics and that their voting patterns match the national average perfectly, and that everyone votes the same amount.


This isn't true and its why your statement is bad.

Take for example my fuckup above of assuming the Wisconsin average for Asians was the same nationally. Here in Wisconsin, the Asian vote is more split. Still in Democrat favor, but much closer.
 
JosephStalin said:
Tomorrow makes six months of the Biden regime.

God help us.
Click to expand...

Gehenna said:
You caught me on bad wording, I grant that. When I said more towards republicans I meant in comparison to Hispanics. That was my bad, as reading it again I can see two readings there. Also, I'll cop to being off on this one more generally. I was going off the Wisconsin Asian numbers and assuming they were reflected nationally. I was wrong, it does appear that nationally they trend about-ish equal to Hispanics.

That being said, you were still wrong about it being under 50% whites, and you are being -very- generous with your apparent assumptions about the number of Jews and those from the Middle-East. There are a total of about 6 million jews in the U.S. making a grand total of ~1.8%. The Middle-Eastern numbers are a bit higher at about 10 million. In total, making up ~5%.

So even using the absolute smallest demographics we can, ousting out anyone who isn't of European stock. You come out to ~55%.

Either way, you have 55% of the population that will split to Republicans reliably and from there its a bit under a third Hispanics and Asians which each make up a combined total of ~ 25%

That right there is 39.15% of the population. By comparison, the democrats with that same demographic pool have 36.6. Even if I throw the -entire- black vote to them it only brings them up to exactly 50%. And yah, with the other that'd put them over reliably, right?

Now we get back to why I say you don't understand demographics.

All of that? All of it assumes every state has exactly the same demographics and that their voting patterns match the national average perfectly, and that everyone votes the same amount.


This isn't true and its why your statement is bad.

Take for example my fuckup above of assuming the Wisconsin average for Asians was the same nationally. Here in Wisconsin, the Asian vote is more split. Still in Democrat favor, but much closer.
Click to expand...
The idea that Latinos can't be white is astounding, as they have all the same racial diversity as we Anglos. Cubas an incredibly white island of mostly Spanish, French, and done Italian stock, while Argentina is 90%, mostly Spanish Italian, French, and German. Even Mexico is at least 10% white, they just don't leave because they're rich enough where it makes no sense for them to emigrate.
 
Shield Breaker said:
No, as someone who is around religious conservatives, here's how it was explained to me: They didn't give up on anything; conservative Christians just feel Democrats don't even try to to pretend they don't hate Christians these days. There are men in my church who refused to vote for him in 2016 who were in 2020 because the other side scared them.
Click to expand...

I’m a religious conservative and voted for Trump twice.

We don’t vote for him because hes godly. Hes not and we arent either, thats why we are Christians.

We voted for him because his ideal world and policy agendas don’t involve us being extinct with our kids forcibly brainwashed.

Devout Christians are primarily looking for politicians that will respect their beliefs and give them a quiet life to raise their kids and spread the Gospel.

Trump can snort blow off a hookers ass in his spare time (he probably has) for all we care.
 
soy_king said:
The idea that Latinos can't be white is astounding, as they have all the same racial diversity as we Anglos. Cubas an incredibly white island of mostly Spanish, French, and done Italian stock, while Argentina is 90%, mostly Spanish Italian, French, and German. Even Mexico is at least 10% white, they just don't leave because they're rich enough where it makes no sense for them to emigrate.
Click to expand...
I'll give you Cubans. I'm originally from Florida so I've spent a lot of time with that people, but even then a lot of Cubans only just fit into that Castizo sort of look that the 10% of Mexicans you're referencing fall into. Then again, we consider Sicilians White these days so I guess we can given Cubans a pass. Mexicans though?
 
DicksOutForChauvin said:
I'll give you Cubans. I'm originally from Florida so I've spent a lot of time with that people, but even then a lot of Cubans only just fit into that Castizo sort of look that the 10% of Mexicans you're referencing fall into. Then again, we consider Sicilians White these days so I guess we can given Cubans a pass. Mexicans though?
Click to expand...
If you go to Mexico City, you'll be surprised how many blondes and white people you'll see there. There's also a massive Mennonite community of blonde Germans in the Yucatan of all places. Yes, there are a lot of white people in Mexico, but they tend to be richer than the Mestizos and Indios who you usually see coming over
 
soy_king said:
The idea that Latinos can't be white is astounding, as they have all the same racial diversity as we Anglos. Cubas an incredibly white island of mostly Spanish, French, and done Italian stock, while Argentina is 90%, mostly Spanish Italian, French, and German. Even Mexico is at least 10% white, they just don't leave because they're rich enough where it makes no sense for them to emigrate.
Click to expand...
Lol, “white” as a term seems to have lost all meaning.
 
HumanHive said:
Lol, “white” as a term seems to have lost all meaning.
Click to expand...
And what does it mean then? Are we still going by 19th Century definitions and excluding everyone not from Britain south of the Tweed, east of the Rhine, west of the Oder, north of the Akps, and west of Finland?
 
soy_king said:
If you go to Mexico City, you'll be surprised how many blondes and white people you'll see there. There's also a massive Mennonite community of blonde Germans in the Yucatan of all places. Yes, there are a lot of white people in Mexico, but they tend to be richer than the Mestizos and Indios who you usually see coming over
Click to expand...
Only a liberal would think that being white isn't a thing south of the American border. Go to Brazil and tell a white person they're actually not white and in the same ethnic class as black Brazilians. That "ethnic" Brazilian might beat you up. The whiter you are in Latino countries, the higher class you generally are, as well. Wealthy, white Latinos don't identify with Mayan dirt farmers or the black inhabitants of Rio's slums.
 
soy_king said:
And what does it mean then? Are we still going by 19th Century definitions and excluding everyone not from Britain south of the Tweed, east of the Rhine, west of the Oder, north of the Akps, and west of Finland?
Click to expand...
The best way is to dismiss it entirely and go by ethnic definitions. Celts are not Germanic, slavs are not italic, etc etc. You only insist on “white” as a term out of misplaced pan-europism.
 
HumanHive said:
The best way is to dismiss it entirely and go by ethnic definitions. Celts are not Germanic, slavs are not italic, etc etc. You only insist on “white” as a term out of misplaced pan-europism.
Click to expand...
What are Americans and White Hispanics then? Outside of some regionalized admixtures, most of White America is some sort of mix based mostly on shared religious identities.
 
soy_king said:
What are Americans and White Hispanics then? Outside of some regionalized admixtures, most of White America is some sort of mix based mostly on shared religious identities.
Click to expand...
Not fucking “white”, that’s for sure.
Just accept that to the rest of the world, “white” America is a joke.
 
Ita Mori said:
For real. America doesn't need more conservatives; it needs more Americans who love their nation and their history.
You want more conservatives? Keep importing the Mexicans.
They go to church, have fear in God, generally have a decent work ethic, and feel grateful to have a chance to make it in America (their children are another story).
None of that matters when they vote blue and for their progressive policies, because to them this isn't their home so much as their opportunity to make money to live and send back home.
Conservatives will not save America, specially when the majority of them aren't citizens.

Now unless Brandi Love was making an ass of herself and flashing tits everywhere and citing her favorite scenes, I agree that giving her the boot was too much.
If she was there attending as an average guest and keeping to herself, who cares what she does? It says just as much about you to recognize her from the crowd as it does about what she does.
A reason the DNC and neo-liberals win is because they welcome any group and turn them into useful idiots.
If nothing else, it helps to have more and more voices scream your cause. You can always discard them later if they prove a liability, which the DNC does.
Trying to win in a noble way is the death of conservatives and the GOP.


They don't follow traditional values though.
Mitt Romney claims to be a man of God yet agrees with people who at worst hate his God and at best mock his beliefs as primitive.
Donald Trump is about as conservative as wearing a miniskirt to church.
TPUSA is a grift entity like Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire who will not hesitate to betray their words if it comes to Israel or other interest groups.

The DNC prides itself as the liberal party that values freedom and the individual over all, yet works with and platforms figures and groups that betray those ideals. Despite this, they win.

While I agree that harlots, trannies, and fags are all things that must not be promoted as positive or endorsed, the GOP and conservatives are not in a situation to be turning people away.
They allowed their political rivals to overtake and control every relevant institution in the country. How much more can they afford to lose?

If Kiwis who claim themselves conservatives adhere so strongly to their beliefs, why vote Trump?
Trump is not a conservative and never was.
Any conservative voting Trump is either making a Faustian deal that will backfire or is a willing hypocrite if the woman with the fake tits who sucks cock for a living is a step too far.

I repeat, this is not an endorsement for the coomstar. Simply that desperate times call for desperate measures. She doesn't have to be your friend nor do you have to like her. But you do need her support, even if only as a useful tard.
You can reject caviar when you're on top. You'll happily eat McDonald's leftovers when you're broke.


He's ultimately still an old White man. Not cool or hip with the kids.


Then don't fucking make her one. She wasn't a speech host or a VIP guest.
Having her there as a normal attendee isn't a bad look on you. If asked/hassled by the media, you can simply state that she's there of her own free will and that your conference turns no one behaving themselves away.

Conservatives are lying to themselves thinking that half the country that voted for Cheeto man think like them, the same way progressives lie to themselves that twitter and r/politics represents popular sentiment.
Porn is lucrative for a reason. I'd wager conservative men jerked off to her more than liberals/progressives did in the last 10 years. Normie sex is so passe.

Again, her presence doesn't make her an ambassador for your cause.


Works every time, don't it, Chucky?


You're way past the point of entryism. That was something you should've done in 1964.
Right now you're mere decades away from extinction. You need allies. Keyword: allies, not necessarily friends or butt buddies.
The ones who should be applying strict gatekeeping are the neo-libs who hold pretty much all the cards.
When they were the underdogs, they welcomed any ally who shared a disdain or opposed the Republican status-quo.

If you do not grasp how dire your situation is, remember that a considerable part of your populace think your flag is oppressive and your constitution disposable.
A harlot with a gun is better than a Mormon who refuses to throw a punch.


I fucking hate the fact Orange man didn't throw journalists off Air Force One and validate their libel.


"I suck cock for The Lord™"!!
Lol how does that even work?
Is it weird I can imagine Pope Francis actually welcoming her and cheering her on?


View attachment 2362859
:cryblood: Fix your fucking teeth...
Click to expand...
we moved on from free market, top to bottom economic conservatism of old to the populist, government has a duty serve the citizen first form of conservativism.

we dont want or need whores because theyre antithetical to our cause. and we dont need allies that back whores because they're compromised by their weaknesses. big tent is a horseshit mentality that doesnt accomplish much. the left eats their own all the time, and i say this as a veteran of the great meme war (201st Psychology Division, 2nd MPC Brigade, 5th battalion "the Mlad LARPERS" - we created memes like rapefugee that dribbled down to the /pol/lacks) .

guess what? even if conservatives lose elections, we'll always have our church and communities. your desparation cry to win them probably comes from a placeof isolation.
 
JambledUpWords said:
Gas prices wouldn’t have doubled if President Turnip Brain decided to not cancel Keystone. Outsourcing oil is how you get price increases of it, and for a country that has ample supply of oil, it’s a dumb move.
Click to expand...
Canceling Keystone had no impact on us "Outsourcing" oil (I mean hell, it was coming from Canada regardless).
What it did do was require that said oil be transported to the states via train/truck instead of a pipeline, which is why gas prices went up - to give Warren Buffett's transport company a cut of the revenue.
 
Some of you sound like my boomer relatives trying to justify leaving the younger people with a country that is increasingly less free and less white. The Republican party already routinely shits on the interests of white people while we're still the voting majority. I can't see that getting any better once we're a minority. And what's with the fixation on votes for the GOP anyways, what is this a CPAC speech?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom