The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Got a fucking bad vibe from this guy as soon as he starting seeming agitated just discussing his own job.

Then he started showing off his Twitter detective-tier knowledge. Fucking boot him. Dude doesn't know what he's talking about.
 
"Mr. Floyd had a fantastic heart!"
"High blood Pressure only becomes a big problem after 30/40 years of having it"

Guess for a grand a day you really can get them to agree with anything.
 
Are they really saying that this doc watching the video is okay because he treats patients via telemedicine now? Every honest doc will tell you telemedicine is not a substitute for actually assessing a patient in person.
 
Meat Target said:
"No evidence of heart disease."

What kind of cardiologist misses arteries THAT clogged with cheese?
Click to expand...
Holy fuck. We've got this, plus the Pulmonologist endorsing smoking. Fuck this health shit, I'm gonna start smoking a pack a day and eating fast food for every meal.
 
And here I thought Floyd's heart was enlarged from being extremely unhealthy but apparently he just had a big heart from being such a gentle giant, thank Science.
 
You can tell this guy is a fucking retard.
No, examining video of a patient describing their symptoms and cooperating with you is not the fucking same as examining video evidence from a police bodycam. He's wondering why didn't Floyd talk about his palpitations or dizziness.

Are you serious? Going from "totally fine" to "dizzy and passing out" is fucking exactly what happened in the video.
 
Trying Too Hard said:
Would it be optimistic to assume that the jury can see through this guy's bullshit?
Click to expand...
shiggy.png
 
The Nameless One said:
Defense is asking for jury sequestration because a black guy got shot by police last night and there were mostly peaceful clashes with police. The defense thinks it emphasizes how the jury might be persuaded to make a verdict based on fear of causing a riot if the public disagrees.

EDIT: the prosecution says "nah, don't worry about it."
Click to expand...
Nelson describing the "mostly peaceful clashes with police" as "fairly extensive civil unrest" is one of my favorite phrases this morning.

But also, the prosecutor on the "reliability" of Hall's testimony, and how it's self-serving was pretty funny. Did anyone else catch the smirk on his face and the obvious effort at skirting around, "Dis nigga a liar"? Seems counsel and the persecution are on the same page with that one.

Also, "In all fairness, he was a Texan lawyer." in regards to Hall's public defender.
 
Bonanza Jellybean said:
His voice and inflection reminds me of Fred Savage and makes it hard to try to take him seriously. The things he's actually saying make it impossible.
Click to expand...
He also has manic eyes of someone who's trying REALLY hard to convince you of something against your own self interest
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom