📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The effects on how genetics influence human behaviour is a pretty complicated subject in which most people don't understand, it would be better to keep poking fun at hideous troons.
 
Lmao at this troon thinking he’s the first troon ever to figure out how to register an account here. And if by “too normal” he means “posting like a Boomer” then well, he has a point.
 
1.jpg

People love to shout that anyone who doesn't unconditionally accept trannies has a "fifth grade understanding of biology", yet then go and give the most reductionist and disingenuously phrased descriptions of chromosomal disorders possible. I would be pretty pissed off if I had one of these legitimate disorders and then found out that people are using me to defend their decision to act out on their fetishes.

"Some unfortunate people have really fucked up sex chromosome mutations that render them 99% infertile, among other things. So how dare you claim that I, with normal XY chromosomes, could somehow NOT become a bimbo princess ditz womxn?!?!

I'm going to start acting like a retard in public and screaming on airplanes while collecting disability checks from now on. How dare you say I can't! Don't you know that some people are born with 47 chromosomes?!?!
 
I've just found this on Twitter. I don't recommend reading this while you're eating.

sexlifepostsrs1.png


sexlifepostsrs2.pngsexlifepostsrs3.png

Of course the Reddit jannies removed it.
 
Humans rape because sexual intercourse feels good. Not everything has to have an evolutionary benefit or have a genetic marker for it.

I also find the idea that "offspring of rapists grow up to be rapists and that is why rape did not die out" extremely flawed.

All of our base, biological behavior occurs because millions of years of evolution shaped us as an animal species to behave these ways. This in no way implies the behavior is justifiable or inevitable, many things we do are not. We have free will and all that. But the impulses are a result of evolution. Humans have always raped and murdered each other. It is not uncommon either.
Nature does not always mean something is good. It is just explaining why behavior occurs, simply because for some genes it enabled them to be successfully passed on. The genetics for "rape" not specifically, but the combo of aggression/impulsivity/dominance/control/lust tendencies (or whatever) that create a rapist may have been.

Any behavior from our ancestors that decreased their genes being passed on would have died out, and been very rare today.
 
More like "the whole Buffalo Bill" amiright?
$RHJ3Y80.mp4
No.
You've heard of titty skittles, now it's time for "fem&ms"
**Links Broken I am referring tot he troon in pink. That's also not her speaking shes lip syncing over something.

Always smile when I see a familiar face on the farms
 
Last edited:

"First of all in a sexual species..." *proceeds to list insects, birds, worms, reptiles, fish, slime mold? mushrooms?*
Are trannies a type of funghi?

Men also rape other men’s assholes. And dogs. And pre-pubescent children. And they don’t give up on that when they discover they can’t impregnate men or toddlers or dogs. There is absolutely no reason to think that men have ever gone around thinking oh wow, she might abort my rape baby, best not waste my time raping her. Lol.

That's not how our base instincts work. The point is we don't "think" rationally about them.
Anyways sociobiology is a bit much for this thread. At least in evolutionary biology, trannies are destined to become extinct
 
I've just found this on Twitter. I don't recommend reading this while you're eating.


Of course the Reddit jannies removed it.
This story came up earlier in the thread- It sounds highly accurate

The best part is when her pissed off troon spouse has a hissy fit because dilating his stink ditch hurts and he proceeds to smack her across the face with a bloody dilator and she consoles him...

Though I have dated trannies I want no part of anyone getting SRS. This woman pretty much confirmed the sum of all my fears about having anything to do with a post op.

Honestly I was with one that had fake tits and it was just... awful. Her tits didn't move freely they were just balloons stuck on a man chest. Very much Mr Garrison titty vibes.
 
Last edited:
Let's not be obtuse, men's deodorants do smell different from women's because men smell different from women. Men's deodorants also smell stronger than women's.
The difference is really not that great. Its sort of the same smell just more intense. I think this is another one of those Big Differences Between The Sexes that exist only in these peoples heads.
 
Anyway, this particular claim is not one I have heard before (although it seems like a reasonable extrapolation from what I do know and from the facts you mention) and wonder if it is your own. If you would change "enough opportunities for easily acquired food" as you wrote it to instead "not a cognitively demanding environment" then as I understand it your view would be fairly mainstream among the evo-psych community.

You flatter my ego by assuming that, but sadly I am going to have to say no LOL

I can't remember who originated it, but it was illustrated in a contrast between two known species of bipedal apes that co-existed in Africa... 3 million years ago: Homo erectus, our ancestor, and Australopithecus boisei, "the nutcracker man". Anyway, to give you a quick rundown - A. boisei walked on two legs, but behaved pretty much like a modern day gorilla. The species had specialized on eating one particular plant that grew in abundance then and there, so it was a pretty lethargic and unambitious ape that exhibited the same type of sexual dimorphism as a gorilla (it was more closely related to chimps, however). Whilst food was abundant, A. boisei thrived and easily outcompeted the much less robust H. erectus for territory. H. erectus in turn had to develop more creative ways for finding and acquiring food, which selected for intelligence over bulk and brute strength.

Then a change happened in the ecosystem, and the plants A. boisei had been dependent on disappeared. And guess what? So did they. H. erectus both 1. needed fewer calories, and 2. had been forced to become smarter, so they came up on top and set the ground for H. sapiens to behave similarly.

So the theory goes something like this: Diminished access to food ---> a less robust physique and increased cognitive capability are selected for ---> female pickiness arises due to survival of the tribe depending on these traits being expressed.

EDIT: I'll now add something that indeed is a theory of my own. Could it be possible that female mate selection was also driven at least in part by increasing cognitive skills driving a more refined sense of time and a greater understanding of the future? Chimps struggle with object permanence. They live in the here and now, and there is no real proof that they can conceptualize the future.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what the wives that help their husbands transition think after they inevitably leave them? Do they feel horror at what they participated in? Guilt about encouraging the loved ones delusions to a point where they willing mutilated themselves? It seems like it's a loose loose situation either
These are disgusting, these ppl operate like a cult how they brainwash everyone.
 
Back
Top Bottom