- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
Like someone ran over a male Cher impersonator with a steamroller.
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
Janae Rose has a similar speech impediment to ADF. Maybe being trans and the inability to pronounce the "T" sound are genetically linked...
Underestimated Nutria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 2, 2019
Thanks for responding. Good point about the infanticide. I wonder if most women find it difficult to bond with their "rape babies" or if the hormones sort of overwhelm everything.
As for your elaboration -- you made some interesting points. And I'm being careful here as I don't want to embarrass myself by claiming expertise I do not have! I am very interested in the subject but my university studies involved very little on evolution and zero on anything even related to evo-psych. Anyway, this particular claim is not one I have heard before (although it seems like a reasonable extrapolation from what I do know and from the facts you mention) and wonder if it is your own. If you would change "enough opportunities for easily acquired food" as you wrote it to instead "not a cognitively demanding environment" then as I understand it your view would be fairly mainstream among the evo-psych community.
Yes, I think our stereotypical SJW would struggle immensely against the idea that evolution in humans arises in large part from women getting what they like. Maybe my favourite example here is the baculum, or penis bone. I guessed women either wanted a more a honest signal of health (impotence not being correlated with anything good) or were turned off by erect but unengorged cocks. And of course the absurd size of the human penis in comparison with other primates is itself an indication that women were very fussy about their mates. In Africa, especially.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
The fiancé got engaged to a woman. Most people aren't cool with their spouse just up and changing genders. So if your fiancé is a straight man and you randomly one day say "From now on I identify as a gay man and want to be on hormones" he's probably going to tell you to hit the bricks sooner than later. Or some variation of "that's nice, but I'm not gay so this is probably not going to work."FTM feels the wall approaching and wants to troon out, husband and kid get in the way. The comment section says unanimously: "He's abusive, leave him, your kid will thank you for destroying your marriage!!"
r/ftm - In desperate need of some support/advice/anything - 27, gay ftm, with a kid and an unaccepting cisgender fiancé
34 votes and 14 comments so far on Redditwww.reddit.com
Some highlights:
View attachment 1961422
He knows you are an airhead and this is just another stunt for attention, like so many others youve likely pulled in the past. So he just ignores it.
Tbh this is a symptom that he shouldnt ignore.
View attachment 1961423
Re the dehodorants: why would he oppose you using mens dehodorants? They dont smell that different from womens and no one is going to notice you are using mens dehodorants. Maybe your husband isnt as hetero as you like to think he is.
Re gym: he has more sense than you do but ofc you are too lazy for that, so youd rather just take hormones and cut your tits off so you can get the approval and validation without working for it like you think men get just for being men. In your bubble this is probably true, but the real world doesnt work that way and men from those kinds of circles tend to do really badly out in the real world.
View attachment 1961426
As if this mysogynistic twat gives a shit about her daughter.
Re financial dependence, maybe the problem here is the very unhealthy relationship you have with what you think femininity is? Just a thought.
It reminds of that FtM who complained they weren't being invited to Girls' Night anymore and the friends basically said, "You told us you were a dude now, so yeah, why would we invite you?"
Criticallacitirc
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
"People low key fucking with me cause I'm charismatic and shit. "
They speak like the characters in idiocracy.
road timber
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2021
a lot of troons want to have it both ways; they know what their biology is and where they used to belong and what challenges they still face on that basis since most of them don't pass, so they think they can dip back into it if they really need to, but according to their own logic, they shouldn't be doing that anymore. a lot of trans people feel genuine fear and strife trying to fit in as the group that they simply aren't and were never socialized into as well, leaving them between a rock and a hard place, no matter how hard they try. it causes a lot of cognitive dissonance that sometimes leads to identifying as nonbinary or bigender or something on top to retain that aspect and signal to their friends that they can still do the things they used to do, when the whole thing could have been completely avoided in the first place. it's just fucking confusing for everyone involved.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
Let's not be obtuse, men's deodorants do smell different from women's because men smell different from women. Men's deodorants also smell stronger than women's.
People on cross sex hormones uniformly smell like a burst sewer pipe. The fact that this troon even thinks of using deodorant at all is admirable.
It is also, sadly a self own because women have more sensitive smell receptors compared to men, and that is why she is raising such a stink (lol) over it.
Rape is a strictly human construct, and a lot of animal mating behaviour can be seen as rape in a human lens (eg chickens). I believe there are theories that neolithic humans abandoned rape offspring.
Another thing that is a strictly human construct is abandonment of young. The majority of mammalia straight up eat their rejected offspring.
I wouldn't claim to know about the stats for these things, but general consesus seems to be that the chemicals responsible for "bonding" fire off close to due dates, and there is a high margin of error, enough that we can categorise all the different ways it can go wrong.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Other animals can also spontaneously abort their offspring if they're under stress. Humans have really fucked-up reproduction (look into how our placenta works for some nightmare fuel) and one theory for why that is is that our ancestors DID abort and abandon rape-babies.
Crentist
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
In addition to the issue of sterilization, puberty blockers can cause life-long sexual dysfunction (inability to become aroused or experience orgasm).
Imagine being so fucked in the head that you think a child/teenager capable of truly comprehending what it means to give up your ability to ever have a family or a healthy sex life as an adult.
Not to mention that by troons’ own logic, the outcomes are poor. Puberty blockers result in micro penises, leaving insufficient tissue for what would be considered “the gold standard” (fuckin lol) of SRS.
poggers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
The fact humans still rape means that somewhere along the line it became evolutionarily beneficial to do so. Men who raped passed their genetic material on. If all or most women abandoned or didn't bond with rape-babies, then rape would not have been beneficial and the behavior would have died out. I would hazard a guess that in long ago times it really wasn't seen as a problem, it was just how (some) men were. The same way as people used to kill each other on the regular. Humans were a violent species from the start
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2020
This is kind of old milk, but hey, ya know, whatever. I've seen this troon pop up here and there, so I wanted to document his past biggest kerfuffle. One tranny's spergout caused an 8 month long debate among atheists about what is and isn't transphobic, and who is or isn't transphobic.
EoT continued trying to get some more shit spinning, including an attempt to get Matt Dillahunty, the president of the ACA, cancelled for violent transphobia. But, the atheists were all shitted out. EoT now stirs shit up with bigger twans creators. Most notably Contrapoints, Jerry Peet and Sophie Labelle.
At some point, Contrapoints pissed off the enbies. I don't remember how, but pissing off enbies is as easy as not liking Steven Universe. Because of this, Contrapoints released a video about being cancelled. EoT released a 40-something minute long video critisizing Contra's cancellation vid. In the transcript he reveals having been a furry, to the surprise of no one. In this video, he says Contrapoints is a big meanie transphobe because he played a 6 second clip of Buck Angel, the gender crit ftm porn star. Surprisingly, Breadtube seems to have taken this accusation with more salt than the atheist community had, and were actively skeptical of EoT's accusations. Almost no shit was stirred.
EoT made a couple videos about Jerry Peet, but that fizzled out as well with almost no shit stirred. Maybe the other narcissists can sense when a narcissist is trying to latch.
Most recently, EoT is taking shots at Sophie Labelle. With a tweet thread, EoT calls out Labelle for being disgusting. This is the most normal I've seen him act, so I expect this will give him a broader platform, since other troons are boosting this thread in particular. That's why I wanted to go through this whole backstory in this much length. I highly anticipate more content from this one.
EssenceOfThought, or Peter/Ethel, is a white dude with long hair who lives in India, but he's oppressed because he has ladybrain. He makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community from the perspective of an unchecked narcissist.
Rationality Rules, or Stephen Woodford, is another dude with long hair, but he knows he's a dude. He also makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community and does so from the perspective of someone with basic reading comprehension.
In March 2019, Rationality Rules made a video about trans women in sports, pointing out some basic fact like... the fact that males generally outperform females in sports. He fully toed the line that trans women are women and all that, but he happened to include some clips from people who were calling the innocent twans gorls men. One clip was one from evil, evil Joe Rogan, who bathes in trans blood like some kind of modern Bathory. He also made a mistake where he said that the effects of HRT don't counter any advantage that male puberty might confer, and then made a comparison between a female and a male that hadn't undergone HRT.
EssenceOfThought made a series of videos in response. In the first one, he says that Woodford is a transphobic meanie alt-lite poopy head. He makes much of the mistake Woodford made regarding the HRT comparison and the Rogan clip. At one point in the video he asserts that Woodford made the video purely to attack trans women. From then on, his position was that Woodford was a violent transphobe, and that anyone who supported or didn't denounce Woodford was also a violent transphobe.
After this, the Atheist Community of Austin-- a nonprofit that runs some podcasts and call in shows for atheists-- decries Woodford as a transphobe, right after featuring him on their podcast. The atheist community in general began picking sides, with one side standing behind EoT and the other side loosely going, "is this a real problem?" After community backlash, the ACA retracts this.
Woodford released an apology vid and tried to clarify his stance. He took down the original vid and donated the ad rev from it to some tranny charity. EoT decided it's not good enough. Makes some thin connections to Trump. Says Woodford is responsible for the removal of trans people's human rights. He also says that Woodford's donation and demonetization of the video wasn't enough, because he didn't credit EoT for the idea of doing this. Then he brings up Rachel Oates.
Rachel Oates is a redhead youtuber cis oppressor, and a friend of Woodford. In response to a possible blocklist of people who support Woodford, Oates said she ought to be put on it, because she believes she can be friends with people she disagrees with, and she advocates for finding common ground between those who believe EoT's accusations of transphobia and people with above room temperature IQ. The blocklist was from a secret atheist troon facebook group that was made to protect against Woodford's general existence, so EoT decided this was a transphobic attack. All the other atheist troons on twitter demanded that Oates call out Woodford, which she refused to do. EoT began accusing Oates of also trying to strip trans people of their rights.
Later on, in yet another twitter spat, EssenceOfThought tells someone to "do the world a favor and exit it." What they allegedly meant to say was "leave Woodford's Evil Transphobia Cult" which makes more sense in context. Some especially fragile people, including Oates, took this as suicide bait. Oates wanted an apology. At some point here, EoT blocked her. She again asked for an apology and asked for one of her followers to ping him so he could see it. This has been presented by those who support EoT as sending her subscribers to harass EoT, which is, as you may have guessed, violent transphobia. EoT tweets about Oates being a transphobic bigot, an opportunistic vulture, and says she has trans blood on her hands. EoT also called her a shit spewing sewer mouth, a lying piece of shit, and a bigot in general. Oates responds with a video of her cutting her wrists. I can't find the fucking vid, but here's the tweet thread she released it on.
EssenceOfThought accuses her of using self harm to silence trannies. If that worked, my arms would be pure scar tissue. I'd just sit on twitter with a veggie peeler. Can only find screenshots of this.
And here's why I mentioned that he's white in the beginning:
After realizing this wasn't a good look, EoT released a two page statement where he said he hadn't seen the video until later, and that he called the cops to do a wellfare check on Oates. And how he wouldn't have sent those meanie tweets if he'd known Oates was painting her apartment red. Oates is fine, and now focuses on fighting shitty poetry published by internet celebrities.
EoT then began attacking the ACA directly, by accusing them of voting in two of Woodford's "drinking buddies" on to the board. In a video, he suggested that there was a concerted effort of Woodford's fans to rig the board election to make sure the ACA stays transphobic.
The words of a completely sane individual:
A lot of people who were invested in this trans narrative walked out. Here's a collection of transcripts. None of them have notability now that they left the ACA, which is very funny. They've attempted to form the Progressive Secular Alliance. Never heard of it? No one else has, either.
Rationality Rules, or Stephen Woodford, is another dude with long hair, but he knows he's a dude. He also makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community and does so from the perspective of someone with basic reading comprehension.
In March 2019, Rationality Rules made a video about trans women in sports, pointing out some basic fact like... the fact that males generally outperform females in sports. He fully toed the line that trans women are women and all that, but he happened to include some clips from people who were calling the innocent twans gorls men. One clip was one from evil, evil Joe Rogan, who bathes in trans blood like some kind of modern Bathory. He also made a mistake where he said that the effects of HRT don't counter any advantage that male puberty might confer, and then made a comparison between a female and a male that hadn't undergone HRT.
EssenceOfThought made a series of videos in response. In the first one, he says that Woodford is a transphobic meanie alt-lite poopy head. He makes much of the mistake Woodford made regarding the HRT comparison and the Rogan clip. At one point in the video he asserts that Woodford made the video purely to attack trans women. From then on, his position was that Woodford was a violent transphobe, and that anyone who supported or didn't denounce Woodford was also a violent transphobe.
After this, the Atheist Community of Austin-- a nonprofit that runs some podcasts and call in shows for atheists-- decries Woodford as a transphobe, right after featuring him on their podcast. The atheist community in general began picking sides, with one side standing behind EoT and the other side loosely going, "is this a real problem?" After community backlash, the ACA retracts this.
Woodford released an apology vid and tried to clarify his stance. He took down the original vid and donated the ad rev from it to some tranny charity. EoT decided it's not good enough. Makes some thin connections to Trump. Says Woodford is responsible for the removal of trans people's human rights. He also says that Woodford's donation and demonetization of the video wasn't enough, because he didn't credit EoT for the idea of doing this. Then he brings up Rachel Oates.
Rachel Oates is a redhead youtuber cis oppressor, and a friend of Woodford. In response to a possible blocklist of people who support Woodford, Oates said she ought to be put on it, because she believes she can be friends with people she disagrees with, and she advocates for finding common ground between those who believe EoT's accusations of transphobia and people with above room temperature IQ. The blocklist was from a secret atheist troon facebook group that was made to protect against Woodford's general existence, so EoT decided this was a transphobic attack. All the other atheist troons on twitter demanded that Oates call out Woodford, which she refused to do. EoT began accusing Oates of also trying to strip trans people of their rights.
Later on, in yet another twitter spat, EssenceOfThought tells someone to "do the world a favor and exit it." What they allegedly meant to say was "leave Woodford's Evil Transphobia Cult" which makes more sense in context. Some especially fragile people, including Oates, took this as suicide bait. Oates wanted an apology. At some point here, EoT blocked her. She again asked for an apology and asked for one of her followers to ping him so he could see it. This has been presented by those who support EoT as sending her subscribers to harass EoT, which is, as you may have guessed, violent transphobia. EoT tweets about Oates being a transphobic bigot, an opportunistic vulture, and says she has trans blood on her hands. EoT also called her a shit spewing sewer mouth, a lying piece of shit, and a bigot in general. Oates responds with a video of her cutting her wrists. I can't find the fucking vid, but here's the tweet thread she released it on.
EssenceOfThought accuses her of using self harm to silence trannies. If that worked, my arms would be pure scar tissue. I'd just sit on twitter with a veggie peeler. Can only find screenshots of this.
And here's why I mentioned that he's white in the beginning:
After realizing this wasn't a good look, EoT released a two page statement where he said he hadn't seen the video until later, and that he called the cops to do a wellfare check on Oates. And how he wouldn't have sent those meanie tweets if he'd known Oates was painting her apartment red. Oates is fine, and now focuses on fighting shitty poetry published by internet celebrities.
EoT then began attacking the ACA directly, by accusing them of voting in two of Woodford's "drinking buddies" on to the board. In a video, he suggested that there was a concerted effort of Woodford's fans to rig the board election to make sure the ACA stays transphobic.
The words of a completely sane individual:
A lot of people who were invested in this trans narrative walked out. Here's a collection of transcripts. None of them have notability now that they left the ACA, which is very funny. They've attempted to form the Progressive Secular Alliance. Never heard of it? No one else has, either.
EoT continued trying to get some more shit spinning, including an attempt to get Matt Dillahunty, the president of the ACA, cancelled for violent transphobia. But, the atheists were all shitted out. EoT now stirs shit up with bigger twans creators. Most notably Contrapoints, Jerry Peet and Sophie Labelle.
At some point, Contrapoints pissed off the enbies. I don't remember how, but pissing off enbies is as easy as not liking Steven Universe. Because of this, Contrapoints released a video about being cancelled. EoT released a 40-something minute long video critisizing Contra's cancellation vid. In the transcript he reveals having been a furry, to the surprise of no one. In this video, he says Contrapoints is a big meanie transphobe because he played a 6 second clip of Buck Angel, the gender crit ftm porn star. Surprisingly, Breadtube seems to have taken this accusation with more salt than the atheist community had, and were actively skeptical of EoT's accusations. Almost no shit was stirred.
EoT made a couple videos about Jerry Peet, but that fizzled out as well with almost no shit stirred. Maybe the other narcissists can sense when a narcissist is trying to latch.
Most recently, EoT is taking shots at Sophie Labelle. With a tweet thread, EoT calls out Labelle for being disgusting. This is the most normal I've seen him act, so I expect this will give him a broader platform, since other troons are boosting this thread in particular. That's why I wanted to go through this whole backstory in this much length. I highly anticipate more content from this one.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
I think it's high time women are granted the ability to evolve corkscrew vaginas like ducks or self-abortion methods like foxes. Though, this wouldn't be necessary if men would also just stop raping.
poggers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
I think it's high time women are granted the ability to evolve corkscrew vaginas like ducks or self-abortion methods like foxes. Though, this wouldn't be necessary if men would also just stop raping.
Teeth was a good movie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2016
Not in the tranny thread! You'll give the surgeons ideas!
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Blue's Clues said LGBTQIA+ rights!
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
Biden's education initiative is complete!
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2019
"I did actually infiltrate their site and I was talking with some people. I ended up getting fucking baand which is crazy but they basically told me I got banned because I, like I'm not fucking, like I'm too normal basically, like I'm not fucking weird. And like cause there's like some fucking people on there that, like, are trans and are allowed to be on there cause they're batshit crazy like one other person has like their own thread."
Oh hun, no. You didn't infiltrate anything, you made an account the same way anyone can. You didn't get banned for being too normal or for being trans, you got banned because you were derailing this thread by doing stuff like posting your Instagram.
"People low key fucking with me cause I'm charismatic and shit. "
There are not enough
in the world for this sentence.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Have some TikToks, I'm on a kick.
This is content children should be seeing. Yep. This is normal.
More like "the whole Buffalo Bill" amiright?
No.
You've heard of titty skittles, now it's time for "fem&ms"
This is content children should be seeing. Yep. This is normal.
More like "the whole Buffalo Bill" amiright?
No.
You've heard of titty skittles, now it's time for "fem&ms"
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
Humans rape because sexual intercourse feels good. Not everything has to have an evolutionary benefit or have a genetic marker for it.
I also find the idea that "offspring of rapists grow up to be rapists and that is why rape did not die out" extremely flawed.
Until relatively recently in human history, women often didn't survive pregnancies altogether, and children often did not survive past the age of 5-6.
The reason most human societies historically have a "rape culture" wherein we shun the female victim is because rapes often left the female victim infertile.
How did this batshit segue come about anyway?!
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
Men also rape other men’s assholes. And dogs. And pre-pubescent children. And they don’t give up on that when they discover they can’t impregnate men or toddlers or dogs. There is absolutely no reason to think that men have ever gone around thinking oh wow, she might abort my rape baby, best not waste my time raping her. Lol.