I don't really understand what you are trying to achieve here.
I'm not trying to achieve anything here. I literally just tried giving my opinion and people don't like it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't really understand what you are trying to achieve here.
It's not so much about having a differing opinion that is disliked, it's more that you are staunchly against the opinions that don't agree with YOU.I'm not trying to achieve anything here. I literally just tried giving my opinion and people don't like it.
It's not so much about having a differing opinion that is disliked, it's more that you are staunchly against the opinions that don't agree with YOU.
If you say "I like blue."
And someone else says "I don't like blue, I like red."
You jump into speculation territory and try and explain why your opinion is the right way to look at things, why red ISN'T all it's cracked up to be, and then pulling random tidbits from other places in an attempt to bolster your point.
It's crap like that which plants you squarely in the camp of white knighting Phil. You've done it pretty much at every turn. Not only just proverbially putting your fingers in your ears and saying "Nah nah nah I can't hear you", but you claim to have gone through someone's kiwi farms usage history as if that were a way to make anything you say mean more than anyone else who dissents.
If you want to share an opinion, we're all open to it. Most kiwis may laugh at you because you think stupid (in their eyes), but this is one of the few places still remaining where you can have a different view and not be gestapo'd on the spot. The problem comes where you plant your foot in the dirt and choose to die on a hill for a view that is either categorically wrong or procedurally wrong, and rather than saying "agree to disagree", you defend your position like your life was on the line.
Fucking seriously. You claim to have taken a screenshot of the usage history of someone browsing a forum on Christmas day. If that's not grasping at straws to try and get one over on someone, I don't know what is.
Tl;Dr - If you have a different opinion, great. Don't care. If you continue to argue that your different opinion is "right" and everyone else is wrong, this is murky water. If you argue that your opinion is right and attempt to support your claim because someone browsed kiwi farms on Christmas day, well... You're pants on head retarded. And are clearly at home in Phil's group of blinded supporters.
Ok, but I genuinely don't see what's wrong with jumping into possible speculation in other areas. I'm not even arguing, I genuinely don't see what's wrong with saying "well, there might be another reason for this".
I can see how it is coming across to you guys now, but here is how I see the things I post:
KF User: Phil does X, that's really dumb
Me: I wonder if X is reasonable. I know other people who do X.
KF User: You're an idiot white knighting Phil.
Oh, everyone knows you don't understand. It's clear as day.I really don't understand
It's annoying because you haven't taken the time to see if your speculation has already been considered and addressed. This was especially true in the WWE Champions thread where literally every thing you suggested had been suggested multiple times, examined, and found to be lacking/unlikely. Differing opinions are fine, but willfully uninformed yammering is grating.
Actually you made 3 posts on Christmas day, checkmate. Good thing I took a screenshot.my 1 post that i made on Christmas Day
I agree with Sharpie. Phil was just scratching his leg. Howard and John hate money. Panda turned 18 the day they started talking. Phil is good at games and is entertaining. Phil never begs for money. His sauce is delicious. You are all wrong.
I was blind. I didn't know how great Phil was because those damn lawnmower sounds. LSB's cult was taking hold of me. Thank you for showing me the light.
Fucking retard.
I don't read your posts because they aren't entertaining to me. But I'm pretty sure you said all those things.Please point out my posts where I said any of those things.
@sharpie, you came to a place that openly and unashamedly shits on Phil for fun and are acting like you are surprised that you are receiving backlash for doing the opposite. It would be like going to a Black Lives Matter forum and telling them that there could be other reasons for cops to shoot black men other than racism and then screeching: "OH OH SORRY I THOUGHT THIS PLACE WAS ALL ABOUT DIVERSITY MY BAD".
Good for them. This isn't a social movement or whatever, this is a website to make fun of eccentric people on the internet. The South American tribe analogy you made earlier isn't far off. This is a place with it's own culture and history and way of interacting with each other, you've presented an opinion that goes against what most people here think, the natural response is to call you inflammatory names. Nobody is saying you can't have your opinions, and nobody is saying you can't post them either, they are just calling you a faggot for having them. But you are welcome to continue. It's just how we operate here.That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
Let's talk man to man. Hope my english is good enough you'll understand(That is not an irony).That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
Let's talk man to man. Hope my english is good enough you'll understand(That is not an irony).
The way you communicate doesn't fit any point you are trying to put out. It's like anytime, you try to join any social group, you have to have realistic expectations about that group.
You tried to come here, start shitposting and expect respect. Obviously, that's not the way this place functions.
That's why you get niggerednecked, niggerfaggoted and all.
That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
What did I imagine? you can read thoughts now?
Someone said that 6 hours was too long, and i found recipes, including one that was not in a crock pot that took that amount of time. I also included a reddit link saying how crock pots and stovetop cooking are functionally equivalent.
My christmas was fine. Congratulations on 1906 messages, majority of which are dedicated to Phil. Very positive shit brother.
its kiwi farms you're allowed to post your opinions, doesn't mean we wont call you a nigger for it thoughThat's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
The 1 person responding to the actual content are the ones that are arguing against what you said, and the 10 people insulting you are the ones disagreeing with you. The problem is that you need to learn how to translate Kiwifarms into English. "Fuck you faggot" means: "Sir I respectfully disagree", and "Kill yourself nigger" translates to: "Our discussion is over, good day sir".That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.