Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm not trying to achieve anything here. I literally just tried giving my opinion and people don't like it.
It's not so much about having a differing opinion that is disliked, it's more that you are staunchly against the opinions that don't agree with YOU.

If you say "I like blue."

And someone else says "I don't like blue, I like red."

You jump into speculation territory and try and explain why your opinion is the right way to look at things, why red ISN'T all it's cracked up to be, and then pulling random tidbits from other places in an attempt to bolster your point.

It's crap like that which plants you squarely in the camp of white knighting Phil. You've done it pretty much at every turn. Not only just proverbially putting your fingers in your ears and saying "Nah nah nah I can't hear you", but you claim to have gone through someone's kiwi farms usage history as if that were a way to make anything you say mean more than anyone else who dissents.

If you want to share an opinion, we're all open to it. Most kiwis may laugh at you because you think stupid (in their eyes), but this is one of the few places still remaining where you can have a different view and not be gestapo'd on the spot. The problem comes where you plant your foot in the dirt and choose to die on a hill for a view that is either categorically wrong or procedurally wrong, and rather than saying "agree to disagree", you defend your position like your life was on the line.

Fucking seriously. You claim to have taken a screenshot of the usage history of someone browsing a forum on Christmas day. If that's not grasping at straws to try and get one over on someone, I don't know what is.

Tl;Dr - If you have a different opinion, great. Don't care. If you continue to argue that your different opinion is "right" and everyone else is wrong, this is murky water. If you argue that your opinion is right and attempt to support your claim because someone browsed kiwi farms on Christmas day, well... You're pants on head retarded. And are clearly at home in Phil's group of blinded supporters.
 
It's not so much about having a differing opinion that is disliked, it's more that you are staunchly against the opinions that don't agree with YOU.

If you say "I like blue."

And someone else says "I don't like blue, I like red."

You jump into speculation territory and try and explain why your opinion is the right way to look at things, why red ISN'T all it's cracked up to be, and then pulling random tidbits from other places in an attempt to bolster your point.

Ok, but I genuinely don't see what's wrong with jumping into possible speculation in other areas. I'm not even arguing, I genuinely don't see what's wrong with saying "well, there might be another reason for this".

I can see how it is coming across to you guys now, but here is how I see the things I post:

KF User: Phil does X, that's really dumb

Me: I wonder if X is reasonable. I know other people who do X.

KF User: You're an idiot white knighting Phil.

It's crap like that which plants you squarely in the camp of white knighting Phil. You've done it pretty much at every turn. Not only just proverbially putting your fingers in your ears and saying "Nah nah nah I can't hear you", but you claim to have gone through someone's kiwi farms usage history as if that were a way to make anything you say mean more than anyone else who dissents.

But I'm not putting my fingers in my ears. As you said, and I 100% agree, I'm just speculating other reasons for my own entertainment. I genuinely had no intention of white knighting phil. There's not a way for me to prove that.

As for going through Kat's posting history: he made a claim that I spent my Christmas day white knighting for Phil. His argument was that I don't have a life and I spend all my time on Kiwifarms. So I looked on his posting history to see if he did the same thing.

Why is it okay for him to insult how I spend my time, but if I point out he is spending even more time than me, it's somehow wrong? I really don't understand that.

If you want to share an opinion, we're all open to it. Most kiwis may laugh at you because you think stupid (in their eyes), but this is one of the few places still remaining where you can have a different view and not be gestapo'd on the spot. The problem comes where you plant your foot in the dirt and choose to die on a hill for a view that is either categorically wrong or procedurally wrong, and rather than saying "agree to disagree", you defend your position like your life was on the line.

This never is a hill for me to die on. As I said above, I'm just speculating as to other reasons. It escalates when 10 different people dogpile on me instead of explaining that "hey im wrong".

I can say with 100% certainty that one of my posts on the WWE champions thread said that with the new evidence of the line app, I believed it was more than likely DSP. I also know in that thread there were people who responded to me calmly and I responded to them saying I agreed with their points. Why is none of that taken into account, and only the argumentative stuff I say taken into account?

Fucking seriously. You claim to have taken a screenshot of the usage history of someone browsing a forum on Christmas day. If that's not grasping at straws to try and get one over on someone, I don't know what is.

Tl;Dr - If you have a different opinion, great. Don't care. If you continue to argue that your different opinion is "right" and everyone else is wrong, this is murky water. If you argue that your opinion is right and attempt to support your claim because someone browsed kiwi farms on Christmas day, well... You're pants on head retarded. And are clearly at home in Phil's group of blinded supporters.

I'll say this again, although I have already made it explicitly clear. I am not a support of Phil. I don't like Phil. I made a full post explaining why I didn't like Phil, which multiple people saw and responded to. I am just giving different opinions/reasons.
 
Ok, but I genuinely don't see what's wrong with jumping into possible speculation in other areas. I'm not even arguing, I genuinely don't see what's wrong with saying "well, there might be another reason for this".

I can see how it is coming across to you guys now, but here is how I see the things I post:

KF User: Phil does X, that's really dumb

Me: I wonder if X is reasonable. I know other people who do X.

KF User: You're an idiot white knighting Phil.

It's annoying because you haven't taken the time to see if your speculation has already been considered and addressed. This was especially true in the WWE Champions thread where literally every thing you suggested had been suggested multiple times, examined, and found to be lacking/unlikely. Differing opinions are fine, but willfully uninformed yammering is grating.
 
I really don't understand
Oh, everyone knows you don't understand. It's clear as day.

But that's cool. And if that was all you said, instead of white knighting Phil (cause, like it or not, that's exactly what you are doing), nobody would give two shits. All the other stuff you state comes down to sounding like the second child that gets yelled for writing on the wall with mashed potatoes (khet weeps at that thought).

Why can he do it, but not me!?! Why can they say stuff, but not me!?! Why can't anyone just listen to my arguments and acknowledge they mean something!?! Listen to me... Ree!!!
 
It's annoying because you haven't taken the time to see if your speculation has already been considered and addressed. This was especially true in the WWE Champions thread where literally every thing you suggested had been suggested multiple times, examined, and found to be lacking/unlikely. Differing opinions are fine, but willfully uninformed yammering is grating.

My very first post here was a speculation that I immediately went back and edited to say I was wrong. I encourage you to go and look if you don't believe me.
 
I agree with Sharpie. Phil was just scratching his leg. Howard and John hate money. Panda turned 18 the day they started talking. Phil is good at games and is entertaining. Phil never begs for money. His sauce is delicious. You are all wrong.

I was blind. I didn't know how great Phil was because those damn lawnmower sounds. LSB's cult was taking hold of me. Thank you for showing me the light.

Fucking retard.
 
I agree with Sharpie. Phil was just scratching his leg. Howard and John hate money. Panda turned 18 the day they started talking. Phil is good at games and is entertaining. Phil never begs for money. His sauce is delicious. You are all wrong.

I was blind. I didn't know how great Phil was because those damn lawnmower sounds. LSB's cult was taking hold of me. Thank you for showing me the light.

Fucking retard.

Please point out my posts where I said any of those things.
 
@sharpie, you came to a place that openly and unashamedly shits on Phil for fun and are acting like you are surprised that you are receiving backlash for doing the opposite. It would be like going to a Black Lives Matter forum and telling them that there could be other reasons for cops to shoot black men other than racism and then screeching: "OH OH SORRY I THOUGHT THIS PLACE WAS ALL ABOUT DIVERSITY MY BAD".
 
@sharpie, you came to a place that openly and unashamedly shits on Phil for fun and are acting like you are surprised that you are receiving backlash for doing the opposite. It would be like going to a Black Lives Matter forum and telling them that there could be other reasons for cops to shoot black men other than racism and then screeching: "OH OH SORRY I THOUGHT THIS PLACE WAS ALL ABOUT DIVERSITY MY BAD".

That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
 
That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
Screenshot_20201227-134948_Google.jpg
After a google search, cops only shoot black men because they are black.

Quit making up lies.
 
That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
Good for them. This isn't a social movement or whatever, this is a website to make fun of eccentric people on the internet. The South American tribe analogy you made earlier isn't far off. This is a place with it's own culture and history and way of interacting with each other, you've presented an opinion that goes against what most people here think, the natural response is to call you inflammatory names. Nobody is saying you can't have your opinions, and nobody is saying you can't post them either, they are just calling you a faggot for having them. But you are welcome to continue. It's just how we operate here.
 
That's a fair point, but even BLM (at least some of them) listens to the other reasons cops shoot black men.
Let's talk man to man. Hope my english is good enough you'll understand(That is not an irony).

The way you communicate doesn't fit any point you are trying to put out. It's like anytime, you try to join any social group, you have to have realistic expectations about that group.

You tried to come here, start shitposting and expect respect. Obviously, that's not the way this place functions.

That's why you get niggerednecked, niggerfaggoted and all.
 
Let's talk man to man. Hope my english is good enough you'll understand(That is not an irony).

The way you communicate doesn't fit any point you are trying to put out. It's like anytime, you try to join any social group, you have to have realistic expectations about that group.

You tried to come here, start shitposting and expect respect. Obviously, that's not the way this place functions.

That's why you get niggerednecked, niggerfaggoted and all.

That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
 
That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
What did I imagine? you can read thoughts now?

Someone said that 6 hours was too long, and i found recipes, including one that was not in a crock pot that took that amount of time. I also included a reddit link saying how crock pots and stovetop cooking are functionally equivalent.

My christmas was fine. Congratulations on 1906 messages, majority of which are dedicated to Phil. Very positive shit brother.

While you're absorbing what 'the Zeitgeist of the board' is if you could do me a favor and link to a reddit thread in each of your posts so that I can have the opportunity to educate myself on why you are correct and how important it was for you to share your thoughts with everyone I think we would get along better :)

I'm glad your Christmas was 'fine'. What did you get? Did you get to spend time with your family?
Also, thank you for your kind congratulations on my 1,906 posts, that was very thoughtful. 1,907 posts now ;)

I dedicate this post to Philip Paul Burnell. All rights reserved.
 
That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
its kiwi farms you're allowed to post your opinions, doesn't mean we wont call you a nigger for it though
 
That's fair, but If I post something that goes against the zeitgeist of the board, then people should just agree or disagree or argue against what i said. Rather, what happens is that i'll post something, then 1 person responds to the actual content, and then 10 more people will respond insulting me.
The 1 person responding to the actual content are the ones that are arguing against what you said, and the 10 people insulting you are the ones disagreeing with you. The problem is that you need to learn how to translate Kiwifarms into English. "Fuck you faggot" means: "Sir I respectfully disagree", and "Kill yourself nigger" translates to: "Our discussion is over, good day sir".
 
To no one really,
I'm pretty sure the people here are some of the most tolerant motherfuckers to exist in this world because I could swear I just read about three pages of the same post going "No one respects me" and still by some magical feat or out of boredom people are still being rather shockingly civil and its funny as hell really.

Thanks~
 
Back
Top Bottom