2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not convinced. Even if you relied on CNN for your news if you don't admit these graphs and the video from Georgia don't show enough evidence of ballot stuffing to justify an investigation I don't think you're arguing in good faith.

View attachment 1792759View attachment 1792760

Now it's true you've got a First Amendment right to claim any shit you feel like, good faith or not. However, that doesn't mean I have to listen to you.
You got a license for that opinion gov?

Also those graphs were shown as misleading bullshit weeks ago, get with the times grandpa the current cope is all about dominion and HERES HOW THE SENATE CAN STILL MAKE TRUMP WIN.
 
Dude, if this is legit, then he can go to HR and report it. If they do nothing, he can take legal action for them creating a hostile work environment. This is why it's so hard to believe this. Unless he's so cucked he won't stand up for his rights.
Why do you think I agreed with 31 that centrist to an extent are gay. Dude, is a passive guy that just talks with people that's it. All he wanted was ramifications for the guy to be held accountable for work, he's not some mean spirited cretin wanting a guy to lose his livelihood, you know the exact same thing I made a point about of before my spiel began. If he was just called out and disciplined in the work place no harm no foul, but nothing happened.
It probably went like this:

Friend: BLM are just a bunch of thugs, looters, rioters and joggers
Black guy: What?
Friend: Blue lives and all lives matter!
Black guy: *flips off friend*
My friend never talked about any specific politicians, groups, presidents. The most political thing about him is a fence sitting position. (Right wing good left wing good, extremist bad on both sides)That's it. Also why does your idea of a centrist compose of being literal right leaning stances (Blue Lives Matter concepts) and truth, let's not pretend BLM isn't a bunch of thugs looters and joggers.. On that note, if you think flipping off people would rile up people lol you've got to be kidding, what is the workplace a 1980's comedy?

It's pretty bad trolling at that point.
 
>blue states supporting red states
Nigga you haven't seen California. They aren't self-sustaining at all and they are at the brink of bankruptcy. Not to mention they import most of the energy from other states. California is a prime example of a blue state.
California makes more money for the fed than it receives in federal assistance. Its got an economy the size of France’s. That’s pretty self sustaining.
 
tfw.jpg
 
I'm not convinced. Even if you relied on CNN for your news if you don't admit these graphs and the video from Georgia don't show enough evidence of ballot stuffing to justify an investigation I don't think you're arguing in good faith.

View attachment 1792759View attachment 1792760

Now it's true you've got a First Amendment right to claim any shit you feel like, good faith or not. However, that doesn't mean I have to listen to you.

It's just as disingenuous to claim BLM isn't violent. And it's coming from the exact same set of people.
Retard, your failure to understand that PRECINCTS REPORT WHEN THEY FINISH COUNTING THE VOTES and that TYPOS HAPPEN was proven retarded on November 4.
 
All you have is your friend’s word for it, and There are three sides to the truth. If he’s being unfairly singled out for his political beliefs, he can take it up with HR. I work for a die hard Trumper, and as a dirty lib you know what I do? Not talk about politics. It’s inappropriate in the workplace and your friend is a sperg.
Or because ur a coward that only acts tuff when corporations back you lulz 👨‍🦽
 
>blue states supporting red states
Nigga you haven't seen California. They aren't self-sustaining at all and they are at the brink of bankruptcy. Not to mention they import most of the energy from other states. California is a prime example of a blue state.
Girl, don't even start when you've got Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, the Dakotas, the Carolinas, West Virginia, Louisiana, Wyoming, Montana, Alaska...should I go on?
 
Nigga you haven't seen California. They aren't self-sustaining at all and they are at the brink of bankruptcy. Not to mention they import most of the energy from other states.
Yeah, it's pretty tiresome people keep claiming that CA and NY are bailing out the red states when the latter grow all the food.

It's pretty bad trolling at that point.
I think there needs to be a version of the Linux Fault Threshold for the trolls in this thread. I'm not sure what that would be.

https://web.archive.org/web/2003102....org/public/stories/2001.10.2.33542.4010.html
The important concept to bear in mind when discussing software issues with Linux apologists is the "Linux Fault Threshold". Clever use of this concept helps you to avoid losing your temper with someone who might actually be able to render practical help, while ensuring that you give the correct dose of venom (60cc of scorpion juice, administered per anem with a rusty syringe) to the vast crowd of mindless apologists who just want you to use their pet operating system because it makes them feel good and gives them something to boast about on Slashdot. I provide this as a service to all the blind, alcoholic, incontinent grandmothers out there who appear to be installing Linux without any trouble if the Slashdot comments on any article remotely related to user interface design are to be believed.

The Linux Fault Threshold is the point in any conversation about Linux at which your interlocutor stops talking about how your problem might be solved under Linux and starts talking about how it isn't Linux's fault that your problem cannot be solved under Linux. Half the time, the LFT is reached because there is genuinely no solution (or no solution has been developed yet), while half the time, the LFT is reached because your apologist has floundered way out of his depth in offering to help you and is bullshitting far beyond his actual knowledge base. In either case, a conversation which has reached the LFT has precisely zero chance of ever generating useful advice for you; it is safe at this point to start calling the person offering the advice a fucking moron, and basically take it from there. Here's an example taken from IRC logs to help you understand the concept.
 
Troll = people who don't agree with you. How many times do you faggots need to be told the farms isn't your hugbox? Make another gay DM thread.
 
Troll = people who don't agree with you. How many times do you faggots need to be told the farms isn't your hugbox? Make another gay DM thread.
Its been really sad to see people clutching pearls on a trolling website, claiming that there are dang dirty trolls posting.
It was so pathetic, they reported so many people for "trolling", that Null had to post in this thread telling the faggots to stop reporting posts.
 
Girl, don't even start when you've got Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, the Dakotas, the Carolinas, West Virginia, Louisiana, Wyoming, Montana, Alaska...should I go on?
Those states don't have a lot of people but they don't spend as much as the blue states. They don't have high taxes and they have agriculture. Some of those states have companies settling over there because they offer tax incentives. It's easy to start a business in those states. They have cheap house prices which is reasonable to move there if you came from a place with high taxes. And we're seeing that with Californians. Wonder why...
 
That's pretty pathetic, because procedure is the easy part. If your lawyers can't even get it together to abide by the Court system, they are incompetent. They should be laughed out, and rightly so.
Why you gotta hate on Trump's lawyers, bro?

Just because Jenna Ellis couldn't hack it prosecuting traffic offenders in a DA's office doesn't mean she isn't fit to run the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES's supposedly 'important' legal campaign.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom