wait are you THAT stupid? do you think I'm saying Biden won all 50?
I'm saying that your bad faith shines through a hackneyed phrase that doesn't make any sense on any level. You
are that stupid for
repeatedly saying that Trump lost 50-0 when he (and his surrogates) only posed challenges in six states.
Yeah just give the senate to doorknock and obsoff. There's literally no reason for the runoffs its over.
If you really wanted to do a "HERE'S HOW TRUMP CAN STILL WIN" at this point, you would argue that the retention of the majority allows for the possibility of leaving votes from controversial states uncertified in the Congress.
Of course, you have to consider whether or not the GOP as it stands even deserves the opportunity to contemplate something like that. They (and that includes Trump) hardly tried to push back against the setups of the mechanisms that lost them this election, fraud or not. This exposed the GA governor and SoS as lazy at best and bedfellows with the opposition at worst. This exposed the Michigan GOP to be moribund and incapable of even simply supporting its workers in comparison to the MI DNC-- in fact, they all receive that kind of support in the major cities like Philly or Detroit. They'll spout their rank-and-file's favorite catchphrases, take their money, and then go back to slobbering over their special interests while screwing over that same constituency with no push back against the sociocultural march of the Democratic party and trade deals/national security acts that actively screw everyone over-- whether or not we realize it now or a few years down the line.
If you vote these people in for any reason, you'll have to continue to vote for them just to hold the line because they're not going to do anything to solidify what can be considered gain to the people that elect them. And if all you need is for the line of something easily done and undone to be held, then that's fine. But I don't expect a Republican Senate to take into account the controversies in these states in order to force a contingent election (not that they should, since they don't have any favorable court cases to point to as hard support, even if the majority of these were dismissed on standing or muh laches). I don't expect them to constitutionally fix the number of justices that can sit on the SCOTUS bench in order to avoid court packing. I don't expect them to not slobber over Big Business' nuts as it continues to choke out middle America and the middle class. I don't expect them to make a definitive push back against the cultural insanity that's boiling over.
I guess what I'm saying is that, if I lived in GA, I wouldn't be motivated to vote.
defendent kawyer struggling to answeer questions about clerks filling out the witness info.
Expect dismissal because muh laches.
Or standing.
And if they do have undeniable standing, they'll just write a court order to have someone take a sledgehammer to plaintiff's lawyer's kneecaps and then dismiss the case because they're a cripple that can't stand.
