For the impregnation part, I'm sure Homestuck fans can figure something out involving buckets.
📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
I can kind of see getting pregnant without penetration, though obviously this requires a male involved. If you aren’t careful with the semen, and using a condom, it could get to the vaginal entrance, and then you just need one determined sperm to reach the egg.
But this still requires a male, as I said. And these idiots are both trying to deny biology (female penis is different from male penis, sex is chosen but gender is innate), while also throwing a fit about sex being a fact no matter how much they wail (MTF can still impregnate women until they’ve been sterilized, females bumping uglies with females will never cause pregnancy).
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Ugh disgusting. Every lesbian who is still on r/Al after this is either brainwashed by troons or just there to watch the dick shaped trainwreck.
Al is a cesspit filled with penises.
I don't have the screenshot on hand, but I've seen someone call men "penis havers" or something to that effect when discussing abortion, and someone else got mad because "that implies trans women are privileged when they are oppressed when it comes to reproductive rights and only cis men are the issue" or something.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
Instead of deconstructing all the possible “third gender” concepts in different cultures, which they will not even have the patience to listen to, question why a long history would legitimise something. Especially mentioning ideas that not only wokes would agree on, but that most sane people agree on. Such as, slavery has long roots in history, but that does not make it good. Racism and sexism have existed in many different cultures throughout history, but it's still not acceptable in the modern society. As such, transracial, transabled and transgender are all equally appropriative, not to mention physically impossible and insane.
Pretty sure the photos are just the wrong way around. The nose looks fine, everything else not so much.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
I think there's few true lesbians on the subreddit, and agree that if they are, they're just there to troll or like you said, to watch the trainwreck. Any "lesbian" who's on there is probably a bisexual or straight woman who just wants the lesbian label, because being bisexual or straight is too boring and not special enough, I'm guessing.
Time for the sub to be filled with dozens of posts whining about how 'unsafe' they feel on r/al because they were reminded lesbians don't like dick again, despite it being troon pandering 99% of the time already.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2020
I fear no man, but that thing scares me.
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
There's nothing to de-construct. Almost every 'third gender' concept when you trace it's roots back is the result of cultures putting their gay people, usually men, into a separate category in order to properly regulate them. While woke culture has added modernized woke concepts to all these terms they aren't correct to the historical basis. These words and groups were historically created specifically with the intent of othering those who fit that category usually because, in historical context, reproduction and growing the tribe was incredibly important so those who did not contribute to that endeavor needed to be placed aside to not interfere with the bulk majority doing so.
There words may have been 'reclaimed' in modern day but their historical roots typically give them a negative connotation.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
That is exactly what I meant by deconstructing, what you did there. You just deconstructed the concept of third genders, as people have done multiple times in this thread. I just think that people may find it easier to disagree and claim you have misinterpreted something regarding that, than it is to compare it to other historical ideas they probably disagree with themself. Instead of lecturing them, questioning why something having historical roots gives it validity could help them rethink and come a conclusion themselves, which people always have an easier time digesting. This obviously does not apply to troons themselves, as they don't care for either of these arguments, but more meant for naive liberals who haven't dared question troon ideology. I'm just suggesting to encourage that, asking questions.
Edited a typo
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
Famous trans icon Oscar Wilde 
- Joined
- May 26, 2020
What?? There's revisionism, then there's this bullshit. What the fuck?
You know what? I honestly don't care what these smoothbrained fetishists want to call themselves (or each other in their hugboxes, for that matter), but when they start applying their fucked up taxonomy to people who are unable to respond to it, that's too far. Doubly so, when they're seeking to normalise themselves at their victim's expense. Stack the hats up, I guess; I'm unselfconsciously MATI from this.
Allo Vera
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2019
“Vulva” was actually trending on U.K. Twitter yesterday because some account, in the name of inclusivity, referred to women as “vulva people”. Not even “people with vulvas”.
Vulva people.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2019
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
Used to be a massive TAZ sped, and there was a canon trans character. It wasn't super woke or in your face but kind of out of place for a DND podcast
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2020