US Vice Presidental Debate - Cop vs Neocon

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
WELCOME TO THE 2020 VICE PRESIDENT DEBATE!!!
skynews-kamala-harris-mike-pence_5120284.jpg


Time: Starts at 6pm-7:30pm PST / 8pm CST-9:30pm CST / 9pm-10:30pm EST

Where to watch:

Kiwifarms stream:

Location: University of Utah in Salt Lake City

Moderator: Susan Page, the Washington bureau chief for USA Today


A new campaign front on Covid-19​

It is difficult to overstate how much this debate has been shaped by the Covid-19 pandemic, from President Trump’s hospitalization with the disease to the last-minute skirmish between the Biden and Trump camps over whether Mr. Pence — who has interacted with White House advisers who have since tested positive for the coronavirus — should stand behind a protective plexiglass screen.
Mr. Pence, as the head of White House task force on the coronavirus, will presumably be pressed to account for the faltering White House response to a pandemic that has killed over 200,000 people in the United States. Since returning from the hospital, Mr. Trump has sought to recast the entire discussion on the pandemic, arguing that the virus is in fact not that serious and that Americans should continue to live their lives.
Will Mr. Pence carry Mr. Trump’s argument to Ms. Harris and the American public Wednesday night? Many polls suggest that it defies the fears of most Americans struggling to navigate the pandemic.
Mr. Pence is also likely to be pressed to defend Mr. Trump’s actions since his illness was diagnosed — leaving the hospital against the counsel of many medical professionals, minimizing the threat of the virus and dramatically removing his mask when he returned to the White House. The president has offered himself as evidence that Covid-19 can be beaten; does Mr. Pence agree with that?

For Mr. Pence, it’s not simply a matter of embracing an argument that the president thinks might help him win re-election. This is almost certainly Mr. Trump’s last campaign. At 61, Mr. Pence is looking at continuing his career in politics. How he handles those questions could end up defining him for a long time.

How does Harris finesse attacking Trump?​

Vice-presidential candidates have only two things to accomplish in a debate: Defend the person at the top of your ticket. And attack the person at the top of the opposition ticket.
But that basic rule of thumb got a little more tricky for Ms. Harris. With Mr. Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis and him just being back at the White House after three nights in a hospital, harsh attacks against an ailing president might be politically unwise. The Biden campaign pulled down its negative advertising attacking Mr. Trump as soon as he disclosed his diagnosis. Joseph R. Biden Jr. has stepped carefully in talking about the president.

Ms. Harris, a former prosecutor and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has established her credentials as a tough interrogator with her questioning of officials like William P. Barr, the attorney general. She knows how to make a case. But can she attack Mr. Trump’s handling of the virus — which has come to define his presidency — without veering toward an overly personal attack on a president battling a potentially lethal disease?

It means threading a needle. Ms. Harris was an inconsistent debater during the Democratic primary — she had some good moments, and some not-so-good moments before she dropped out. She has never stepped onto a this prominent a stage.

How does Harris handle going off script?​

Ms. Harris, most often remembered for her “that little girl was me” debate moment with Mr. Biden during the primary, is talented at delivering the slashing-when-prepared debate lines. That is, after all, the same skill set that she developed as a prosecutor and that elevated her during Senate committee hearings to star status among Democrats as she has bore in on Republican witnesses.

To that end, Ms. Harris arrived in Salt Lake City last Friday — the same day Mr. Trump was checked into the hospital — to begin her on-the-ground debate preparations. Karen Dunn, who readied Senator Tim Kaine to debate against Mr. Pence four years ago, is leading those efforts, which have also included Rohini Kosoglu, Symone Sanders and Liz Allen. Pete Buttigieg, who has played the role of Mr. Pence in Ms. Harris’s preparations, was spotted in town as well.
But debates are not set pieces and Ms. Harris will have to defend not just her own record but also Mr. Biden’s — and no candidate can be prepared for every eventuality, no matter how many index cards she studies, especially in 2020.
“This time it will be about requiring some level of knowledge — if not mastery — of Joe’s record, the Vice President Mike Pence’s record, Trump’s record and then of course defending my own record,” Ms. Harris said on Hillary Clinton’s podcast last week. “So that’s different.’’
Notably, Mr. Biden has undertaken some public rehearsals for his debates, including two televised town halls. Ms. Harris has been mostly cloistered since joining the ticket. The debate will be, by far, the most freewheeling exchanges of her time as vice-presidential candidate.

How race and gender play​

Mrs. Clinton, the only woman to serve as a major-party presidential nominee, warned Ms. Harris, in so many words, about the corrosive role that sexism will play onstage.

“You should also be prepared for the slights, the efforts to diminish you, you personally, you as a woman, who is about to be our next vice president,” Mrs. Clinton said on her podcast. “So I do think there will be a lot of maneuvering on the other side to try to put you in a box.”

Academic studies have shown that women face different barriers in terms of public perception, and Ms. Harris is not just a woman but also the first woman of color on a major-party ticket.

Jennifer Lawless, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia who has studied gender dynamics, said that women generally had to show they were capable of standing up to “being bullied” but that Ms. Harris faced an extra hurdle.
“Because she is also a woman of color, she also has to walk that ‘Don’t look too angry’ line,” Ms. Lawless said. “These are cliché. But they’re cliché because they’re true.”
The mild-mannered Mr. Pence is unlikely to bully or even directly broach any gendered lines the way Mr. Trump might. But the impact of audience perception remains.
For months, the Trump campaign has tried to raise doubts about Mr. Biden’s fitness while attempting to cast Ms. Harris as its true foil, the real — and more liberal — power center in a potential Biden White House.
“She symbolizes everything that ‘Make America Great Again’ wants to push back on by virtue of being a Black woman,” Ms. Lawless said.

Attack or defend?​

In 2016, Mr. Pence had a clear three-step strategy every time his vice-presidential rival, Mr. Kaine, attacked Mr. Trump. He offered a quick defense of Mr. Trump (Step 1); moved quickly to talk about the aspirations of a Trump presidency (Step 2); and swung into an attack on the Democrats (Step 3).
But striking the balance between attack and defend could be a particular challenge for Mr. Pence this time.
For one thing, after four years, there’s more to defend. This would have been a much different debate nine months ago, when Mr. Pence could have talked about the humming economy, job growth and a generally confident electorate. Now, Mr. Pence is going to be talking about the pandemic, the failure so far of Congress and the White House to come up with a stimulus plan and an economy that has gone off the rails.
For another, Mr. Trump has not had much luck attacking Mr. Biden so far; the former vice president has proved an elusive target, certainly when compared with Mrs. Clinton. Perhaps Mr. Pence will have more success.
But he has a third task as well: attacking Ms. Harris. Mr. Trump’s efforts at portraying Ms. Harris as a stalking horse for more liberal policies, who would be the power behind a Biden presidency, has resonated with the right. But those voters were already with Mr. Trump. The task for Mr. Pence is to make them resonate with any remaining undecided voters.

A preview of 2024?​

Almost every vice-presidential debate is about two elections at once: the current one and the one that will follow — because so many vice presidents, and vice-presidential candidates, eventually run for president. (A quick recent list: John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, George H.W. Bush, Al Gore and, of course, Mr. Biden.)
This face-off is especially significant because of how soon both Mr. Pence and Ms. Harris could be leading their parties, given the ages of Mr. Trump (74) and Mr. Biden (77) and the specter of the coronavirus, from which Mr. Trump continues to recover.

Mr. Biden has already talked about himself as a “bridge” to the next generation of Democratic leaders. If he wins, he will be enabling Ms. Harris to cross that bridge as the first among equals among Democrats vying for that leadership mantle.
Mr. Trump has evinced no interest in transitioning out of power or the spotlight, but Mr. Pence is widely believed to have presidential ambitions of his own. The former governor of Indiana has treated his vice presidency mostly as an exercise — often a difficult one — to maintain zero political daylight between himself and Mr. Trump. But plenty of other Republicans are already circling around the 2024 election and seeking the mantle of Trumpism; Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas has been building his profile, and the former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley was recently in New Hampshire.

Competitors:

Senator Kamala Harris

kamala-harris.jpg



Vice President Mike Pence
1037d09778d6c83f7ea0c0174ba627bd4a-mike-pence.rsquare.w1200.jpg



After the debates a poll will be posted on who you think won this debate. Just as a reminder, on October 15th there will be a Second Presidential debate providing that Trump can make it still, although I doubt Biden or his team would feel comfortable with Trump in the room. Have fun.


Presidential debate thread-
Night one

Previous Democratic debates-
First Democratic debate (two nights)
Second Democratic debate
Third Democratic debate
Fourth Democratic debate
Fifth Democratic debate
Sixth Democratic debate
Seventh Democratic debate
Eighth Democratic debate
Ninth Democratic debate
Tenth Democratic debate
Eleventh Democratic Debate

Democratic primary results-
Super Tuesday
Mini-super Tuesday
 
Last edited:
Lmao my mom and her friends mad that Trump's getting a lot of supporters from Hispanics "after everything he said to them." That and calling pence and trump a motherfucker for not immediately doing anything about covid in January since "they knew in January."
I love how people have clearly never actually known Hispanics.

The ones that came here legally or fled Cuba usually have some manner of contempt for people that completely skip the process.

Even Cuban refugees back in the day had to sit around in camps (basically giant warehouses with some office cubicle dividers and cots) and wait to be processed.
 
Someone please help me understand this because it's been wracking my brain and is very alarming to me.

Why didn't Kamala just lie about packing the supreme court? She lied about every other thing - why not just lie again? Is there a big voting base that WANTS the supreme court packed?? It's just odd to me that THIS is the one thing neither Biden of Harris want to answer yet they have no problem saying Trump called soliders suckers even when it's been debunked to hell and back.

Why is this the hill they want to die on?

It's a Sophie's Choice. I'm sure the threat of stacking the court motivates Republicans, including those that might otherwise stay home on Trump, and probably turns off a lot of independents.

However, they deified Ginsberg and scaremongered the shit out of her vent replaced. If Barret gets in, with out the promise of the Stacking the Bench Nuclear Option, they're radical base will be demoralized to having already lost.
 
The way the media harangues about the fly on Pence's head shows how little grasp they have on even bad attempts at humor. This is them being incomprehensibly mad over a lack of ammunition.
 
Those are called Pingos. They're not caused by methane explosions, but by repeated freezing and thawing of small underground lakes. There are thousands of them all over the far north or Eurasia.

A pingo is formed when water gathers in an underground pocket and then freezes during the winter, which raises a mound above the ice. As the water freezes and thaws, the mound becomes more pronounced, and eventually collapses in the centre, forming a neat crater that often, but not always, has a shallow ridge around it. The collapse can be quite sudden and loud, which is where the story of "explosions" come from.

Methane has nothing to do with it, and they have been forming for as long as the permafrost has existed.
Eco dooming from the usual suspects aside, methane propagation from thawing permafrost is a real issue but there isn't much we can do about it. The methane that is being and would be released isn't from the melting process per se, it's from the delayed decomposition of thawed out organic matter. You hear stories of beautifully preserved mammoths buried in the permafrost because the process of putrefaction has been halted for millennia by the ice. If the permafrost thaws through then everything that was preserved by it starts fuming up and off-gassing. This is a gradual process and doesn't (typically) result in explosive releases of gas. I won't completely discount explosive release, but it's like Lake Nyos. Sure stratified lakes in off-gassing volcanic features exist but it takes an alignment of the perfect conditions for one to undergo a limnic eruption like Lake Nyos.

If Kamala made the assertion that pingo craters and the normal knobby look of kame and kettle topography is caused by climate change driven methane explosions then that puts the final nail in the coffin of the "party of science" conceit once and for all.
 
Last edited:
"Hurr during durr...Pence had a fly land on his head."

What was he supposed to do? What would you prefer: him wave his arms around like a goddamn lunatic, or stay calm and composed at a slight nuisance?
 
i like how people on social media are like KAMALA IS STRONG WAMMIN AND DONT GIVE NO SHITS
but a white guys says no and suddenly OMG EBIL HUWITE MANZ HURT MY KWANG ;_; ;_;!!!
I think Filipovic specifically went after how Pence communicated with the moderator because she understood that complaining about how he treated Kamala would make Kamala look weak.
 
I've seen some funny jokes about the fly, but the fact that the fly is dominating coverage from the debate rather than the performances is telling.

If Kamala did well, they'd talk about it. If Pence did poorly, they'd be pounding it into the dirt. They've got nothing from this, so, uh...FLY! Look at the fly!
 
Did I accidentally travel back to the 17th century? What is this superstitious bullshit?
I'm noticing this a lot lately, the anti-Trump zealots are starting to sound an awful lot like Pat Robertson types screaming about how we deserve hurricanes and earthquakes for being tolerant of gays but instead it's that we deserve the pandemic because we're fascists.
 
I'm noticing this a lot lately, the anti-Trump zealots are starting to sound an awful lot like Pat Robertson types screaming about how we deserve hurricanes and earthquakes for being tolerant of gays but instead it's that we deserve the pandemic because we're fascists.

Further evidence that the PC left has turned into the new Religious Right.
 
Calling democrats racist and attempting to play their game is missing the forest for the tree. Racism is nothing more than the personalizations to the larger group of idiots that can't look past their own interests. It is getting two sides of fools to hate each other and claiming to the larger side that the smaller one is oppressing them, then offering an outlet to punish them. They can find more racism as easily as targeting someone who looks the part, harassing them viciously so they not only hate democrats but vote against them, and getting their own to take it personally through tribalism. It is done because it cannot be stopped just as sure as any sanctioned trolling, it works as effectively as on any public forum, and will not be fixed because it wholly functions to create demand that would otherwise not be there. They are a culture of hate with their leadership providing the acceptable targets. Never the less, calling them racist when they define it is just asking them to shift the goal posts to cater to an already willing popular vote. You are not inverting the momentum so long as the point of racism is to punish you.
 
I still think the fly is a deepfake; they learned from their floating zit fuckup.
 
Last edited:
Rewatching this debate without it being very early in the morning. 2nd watching only highlights how badly Kamala did. Maybe there is a level of bias but on both second runs of the 1st and VP debate, both times the Dem candidate performs worse than the 1st time I watched. Example, Pence ducks question and returns to a point he wants to hammer in, Kamala duck the same question by talking about herself, her upbringing and how she shares values with Biden. At least when ducking the question, Pence addresses something people probably care about. Also, as am not doing running comments here and focusing on the video, he clearly gets under her skin a lot more than I remember, or she walks into traps that shakes her up. For a prosecutor and lawyer, she gets rattled pretty easily.

I think the news cycle about the fly says a lot about her performance. She has only confirmed in my mind that she is a liability to Biden's campaign. They really are banking on "vote blue no matter who".
 
I love this attempt to frame Kamala Harris as a strong woman while simultaneously going for the damsel in distress defense after my boy Pence pounced on her.
It's true that only mush minded, wake up at 1:00 pm MSM watchers fall for this crap.
 
How can Kamala claim to know what Biden is thinking about? He probably doesn't even know what he's thinking about, ffs.
Joe says. Joe thinks. Joe knows. Joe has a plan. Joe enjoys sandwiches without mayo.

She almost sounds like she's talking in the third person.
Because, by the transitive property, Kamala Harris is the Democratic Party.
 
Back
Top Bottom