Pedophilia Debate Thread - What are your thoughts on people who masturbate to neko shotas?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What's your opinion?

  • Send them all to the gas chamber!

    Votes: 269 73.7%
  • If they don't fuck real children, they're alright in my book.

    Votes: 81 22.2%
  • There is nothing wrong with pedophilia and kids can consent to sex.

    Votes: 15 4.1%

  • Total voters
    365
I don't mean to be anti democrat or anti semitic, but everyone who's for hurting little kids should be killed.
 
1. If we consider free will to be a myth, why would the aristocrats be exempt? What they do would also be based on their genes instead of their thoughts. And why should we trust them not to be criminals? Our current crop of aristocrats seems fond of kiddy diddling.

2. Nobody agrees on what the best state of a society is. This solution would lead to genocide and civil war.

3. That's naively hopeful. Some people have shown they can't be reformed.


Truth is, no one is sure what to do. Teenage sexuality is a moral grey area. The age of consent is just the best solution we've come up with.
Firstly, I am pro-genocide. Anyone who thinks certain types of people should be killed is pro-genocide.

1. Certain traits are good, and we can say they're good. Moral nihilists can sit around and talk about how objective morality doesn't exist but nobody cares what they have to say and their mental traits are dysgenic. You select the aristocrats based on good traits.

2. The people who can't make positive claims about what is best would obviously have no say in the direction society moves.

3. Reform is impossible. This was a joke based on what we do now.
 
Firstly, I am pro-genocide. Anyone who thinks certain types of people should be killed is pro-genocide.

1. Certain traits are good, and we can say they're good. Moral nihilists can sit around and talk about how objective morality doesn't exist but nobody cares what they have to say and their mental traits are dysgenic. You select the aristocrats based on good traits.

2. The people who can't make positive claims about what is best would obviously have no say in the direction society moves.

3. Reform is impossible. This was a joke based on what we do now.

1. Who would chose who the aristocrats are? How would they make sure the aristocrats aren't larping sociopaths or don't become corrupt as time passes?

2. What's a positive claim? Everyone would have an opinion on what traits are undesirable and when the country was at its best but nobody would agree. People would then flee to a different country or begin killing each other. It's not the pedophiles who would get genocided, it's whichever group loses the civil war. There's also a high chance the aristocrats who suggested the purge in the first place would get assassinated.
 
1. Who would chose who the aristocrats are? How would they make sure the aristocrats aren't larping sociopaths or don't become corrupt as time passes?

2. What's a positive claim? Everyone would have an opinion on what traits are undesirable and when the country was at its best but nobody would agree with each other. People would then flee to a different country or begin killing each other. It's not the pedophiles who would get genocided, it's whichever group loses the civil war. There's also a high chance the aristocrats who suggested the purge in the first place would get assassinated.

1. This would have to be an emergent order, it's not something that is actually going to happen, unfortunately.


2. What's a positive claim? It sounds like this " I assert that people who torture animals should be removed from the gene pool "
 
I know of a few people who have served their time and who take their their therapy very seriously.

I also am aware these people are the vast minority, and the Internet is only making that situation a billions times worse.
 
I hate the title of this thread, because there should be zero debate. Can we change it to "Here's a bunch of of pedophiles, let's laugh at them"?
 
I would say pedophiles get the rope but that's too good for them. They need to be nailed to a tree and skinned alive.
 
death.jpg
 
I hate the title of this thread, because there should be zero debate. Can we change it to "Here's a bunch of of pedophiles, let's laugh at them"?
I really wanna know which janny was the one who put that gay spooky red text at the top "pls dont be mean to the child rapists".
 
I really wanna know which janny was the one who put that gay spooky red text at the top "pls dont be mean to the child rapists".

Screen shot that because I'm not seeing it.
 
Obviously anti-pedo and diddling kids. But I'm really sick of pedophilia being an excuse for people to excessively moralfag. People seem to get a pleasure from hating pedos that itself boarders on sexual. That being said, if someone told me they were into lolicon, I'd probably avoid hanging out with you.
 
I fucking hate loli anime and MAPs with a burning passion.

SO sick and tired of the fucking Neonazis ranting about gays and trans people predating on minors, while they're thinking of fucking an underage "waifu". The fucking race-mixing Asian-loving Neonazi bastard hypocrites, man. Bunch of sexual tourists and fucked up bigoted prejudiced weirdos. There's so much bigotry and filth in the World, so much moral disease.

I think I should basically buy a baseball bat and stop debating online. I feel irreversibly disgusted by all the filth I saw within the bloody Alt Right.
 
Back
Top Bottom