I think it would have to be a federal lawsuit since their residence is in CA and would be suing The Gunt in VA. It would cost more than Ralph has in his savings and could take 3-4 years if The Gunt would fight it. From some of the lolsuits I follow, it would take ~$10k just to file the initial filings.
That's absolutely right. Ralph could at least let Faith use his debit card on amazon or something fun! It's tough being couped up too, it's not like she can't Uber to the mall once and a while.
its a hell of a lot on a personal level for everyday life but its not weinstein levels of fuck-the-rules money
wouldnt the argument be that she wasnt able to consent with her mental state? i dont know if there is precedent for that in revenge porn cases though
This is a long running joke about ralphs retarded understanding of money. This is the same guy who will brag about making a few hundred bucks in a day. I assure you, $50k to ralph is a lot of money, that's what's funny about this.
Maybe he really did have 50k in the bank, but he was just holding it as part of Dax's money laundering scheme.
I feel honored to have been screencapped and tweeted. Thank you Mr. Vickers!
If you paid 200k to collect 20k, you're a fucking retard.
That's a great point. First of all: Inflation is about 3% per year, which means money loses 3% of value in one year, and a whopping nearly 30% of value in ten years. letting money sit in the bank is fucking retarded. Second: The only way to really fight inflation is in fact to invest money in various ways. Gold, Stocks/Bonds, IRA, Crypto, etc.
>tfw I'll never be called a retard by Mr. Vickers
And he's a felon too
Oh yeah, this tells me he's just going to apply heat until Ralph is fully roasted. He knows a civil suit would be pointless and if a criminal suit doesn't pan out he'll just keep up the pressure until Ralph capitulates and runs away.
Lolsuits make boomers of us all.
If Ralph actually got sued, he'd end up streaming about it and bitching every day and I think that would be fucking hilarious.
If he is so inclined he could still sue Ralph just to ruin him. It might be a costly way of seeking revenge, but that 50k isn't going to get Ralph very far and then he's gonna be in the shit, assuming Mr Vickers wins. And he could; if he can show that Ralph leaked that video maliciously, and that he had a grudge against Mr Vickers, and Mr Vickers has suffered even a dollar of damages from his behaviour, then he has a case.
Think about all those inevitably incorrect Nicky Rackets takes we'd get! I'm salivating at the thought of years of lukewarm takes and hashtags
You're assuming he watched the tape. I think we'd all agree with needing confirmation of whether he did or didn't.
Has even one of his predictions ever panned out? The thing about Rekieta is he doesn't act like a real lawyer, real lawyers won't touch stuff that isn't in their specialization. Rekieta will just fake his way through talking about shit he has no experience with.