Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Gunt.Inc said:
Answer or does he need to be at least a tier three sub to your only fans.





I am just straight up asking are you willing to be in a omitted sexual or romantic relationship with a person under the age 14? not about how moral it is.
Click to expand...
if they have fully developed aka adult body then that's perfectly fine.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
if they have fully developed aka adult body then that's perfectly fine.
Click to expand...

Holy fuck this should be your favorite type of question yet you're over complicating it for some reason.

Let me ask this in a way you'll understand.

Yes/No? Do you @BoxerShorts47 want to have a sexual or romantic relationship with a person aged 14 or under? This is a literal Yes/No question.
 
Zeke Von Genbu said:
The man can answer a question wowzers. You just need to ask it 4 different times and keep simplifying it every time he gets lost.
Click to expand...
Because you're just trying to trap. Not all 14 yr olds are the same development / maturity. Some might look like the avg 12 yr old, others like 19. Age isn't a good proxy for development. I've been clear from day 1. I don't support pedophila but I don't think jailbait is any less more than 18 or w/e arbitrary age of consent limit you create.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
Because you're just trying to trap. Not all 14 yr olds are the same development / maturity. Some might look like the avg 12 yr old, others like 19. Age isn't a good proxy for development. I've been clear from day 1. I don't support pedophila but I don't think jailbait is any less more than 18 or w/e arbitrary age of consent limit you create.
Click to expand...

Literally all you had to say to the question was "no". People might not believe you, but that was the only answer you had to give to that question. How is that high IQ working out when you can't even see a simple yes/no question right in front of you?
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
No.
pedophilia = pre-puberty,
hebephilia = puberty
ephebophilia = post-puberty (adult)

and there are age ranges but they vary person to person so a one size fits all policy doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...

21686194_10159434502180387_5860680963634706009_n.jpg
 
Zeke Von Genbu said:
Literally all you had to say to the question was "no". People might not believe you, but that was the only answer you had to give to that question. How is that high IQ working out when you can't even see a simple yes/no question right in front of you?
Click to expand...
Look we need to lower the age of consent. Okay. Stop trying to trap me in stupid setups.
 
You're so fixated on numbers and definitions your brain rivals the smooth, water filled brain of Onision.

I'm gonna dumb it down for you real easy. Lowering age of consent won't make anyone want to get married more. Nothing except giving some kind of bonus to married couples like some kind of monetary benefit will make people want to get married more. You can't teach people to fall in love, there's no marriage education class that would ever be able to do that and make children decide to be pure little virgins until they find their one true love and stroll down the aisle like a fairy tale.

Sex ed is purely to let children know how not to fuck up because everyone knows kids will experiment. You have to have sex ed because you can't rely on every family to teach their children anything. Sex ed also includes teaching girls how to look after themselves on their period btw, which stops them getting toxic shock syndrome when they leave a tampon in for 2 days. If you think sex ed encourages sex you obviously haven't had a class where a teacher pulls out an HD image of a wart covered vagina or some syphilitic cocks. That's enough to convince anyone to use protection.

Oh, and lowering the age of consent will only allow older people to legally molest kids, because like it or not a child is more than just an age range. I mean young me was convinced that when you turned 25 you magically just became an adult. There's no arbitrary age that transforms you into an adult, physical maturity means nothing when it comes to the mental effects sexually abusing someone has on them.

No amount of law changes or policies will get someone to fuck you. I'm sorry you're a lonely incel but sometimes we just have to accept these things in life. Just buy yourself a loli onahole and imagine it's a 13 year old for you to dick.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
home schooling / community schooling.
Click to expand...
Fucking hell... Do you have any takes that aren't utterly retarded? My fucking sides...
A "person" who couldn't teach a child to chew their food with their mouth closed advocates for homeschooling?
You are the funniest nigger since Richard Pryor.
 
T_Holygrail_Jesuschrist 2 said:
So the age of consent should be 10 years old? Ok then.
Click to expand...
I already said it should be puberty. That is the most fair age.

Chicken Picnic said:
You're so fixated on numbers and definitions your brain rivals the smooth, water filled brain of Onision.

I'm gonna dumb it down for you real easy. Lowering age of consent won't make anyone want to get married more. Nothing except giving some kind of bonus to married couples like some kind of monetary benefit will make people want to get married more. You can't teach people to fall in love, there's no marriage education class that would ever be able to do that and make children decide to be pure little virgins until they find their one true love and stroll down the aisle like a fairy tale.

Sex ed is purely to let children know how not to fuck up because everyone knows kids will experiment. You have to have sex ed because you can't rely on every family to teach their children anything. Sex ed also includes teaching girls how to look after themselves on their period btw, which stops them getting toxic shock syndrome when they leave a tampon in for 2 days. If you think sex ed encourages sex you obviously haven't had a class where a teacher pulls out an HD image of a wart covered vagina or some syphilitic cocks. That's enough to convince anyone to use protection.

Oh, and lowering the age of consent will only allow older people to legally molest kids, because like it or not a child is more than just an age range. I mean young me was convinced that when you turned 25 you magically just became an adult. There's no arbitrary age that transforms you into an adult, physical maturity means nothing when it comes to the mental effects sexually abusing someone has on them.

No amount of law changes or policies will get someone to fuck you. I'm sorry you're a lonely incel but sometimes we just have to accept these things in life. Just buy yourself a loli onahole and imagine it's a 13 year old for you to dick.
Click to expand...
I find your mentally to be complete hypocrisy. You want kids to "experiment." You want them to have sex before marriage. But for some reason you think 14 yr old fucking a 15 yr is = 100% moral while 14 fucking 18 = pedophilia. Totally ridiculous and you're even implicitly admitting that you think a 14 yr old is mature enough to have sex so you have 0 argument for having the age of consent be above the age at which you think people can consent to sex.
 
Gunt.Inc said:
Look @BoxerShorts47 you can not be playing with hearts like this Icasaracht needs to know if you would have sex with him. If you have a boyfriend and can't you don't have to worry he is a loyal one and won't revoke his Only fans subscription. so answer the question
Click to expand...

Gunt.Inc said:
I'm sorry @Icasaracht I tried to set you and @BoxerShorts47 up but it seems he won't answer. You should try bleaching your skin white then I'm sure he will say yes.
Click to expand...
Seems pointless, since @Icasaracht posts like someone who has no functional external genitalia.
 
@Icasaracht Hey can you put all the puzzle pieces you hand out into a bag for all of us? You're just throwing them at us like some nigger ape and we both know that Boxy doesn't like nigger behavior. So at least follow his teachings by not being a nigger, it might be hypocritical coming from a nigger like him, but it'll improve your chances of being his VP.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom