Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Radfems are about as qualified to speak for women as incels are to speak for men.

Also Protein world adverts might be banned in the UK because they triggered bitter fatties

https://archive.is/yHxcm
 
Last edited:
Ruin said:
Radfems are about as qualified to speak for women as incels are to speak for men.

Also Protein world adverts might be banned in the UK because they triggered bitter fatties

https://archive.is/yHxcm
Click to expand...

I don't think they will considering they made 4 times the profit of the advertisement simply by their word of mouth.

What were they ever going to do? Boycott a brand they were never buying in the first place because its target audience is people who want to look sexy on the beach rather than people who don't care about that?
 
AnOminous said:
We can blame furries for this. That or the dickwolves.
Click to expand...
i looked up the incident a bit, and from what i understand, it's multiple women saying the logo promotes rape
i still want to hear their logic behind it though
i think Connecticut is being overrun with dog fuckers
also making a new avatar, say bye to sir raven.
 
Yawning Bulbasaur said:
View attachment 25149
Click to expand...
One can only wonder how the logo itself would even reference rape.

ZehnBoat said:
i looked up the incident a bit, and from what i understand, it's multiple women saying the logo promotes rape
i still want to hear their logic behind it though
i think Connecticut is being overrun with dog fuckers
also making a new avatar, say bye to sir raven.
Click to expand...
Some may as well say it promotes rape because they just follow what they hear. Others say it promotes rape possibly because some of them have the possiblity of wanting to have sex with a dog. Really, this sort of thing can show one what the universities can have, people who think having a flag up will promote ntaionalis (which in some cases can hold some ground though that is as much as a chemist being a drug dealer for knowing chemical compounds) or that a logo of some animal promotes sexual assault.
 
i'm sorry for bringing up the stupid husky logo story again (last time i swear :c)
but i think i just figured out the logic behind the "it's rape" argument
the logo is staring at the viewer head on
that's it, that's literally it
in the mind of these people, staring at someone is "rape" (i mean everything is rape to them, but looking at someone is the most rape kind of rape).
they see the logo and think the dog is eye raping them. having people look at them is the horrible trauma women must go through (:_(
in other words, they want to fuck a dog
 
GREEDY FIREMAN said:
View attachment 25155
Click to expand...
You forgot the photoset attached to the post.

4-inch monster.png
 
Did... did the second guy really just support raping women?
 
ZehnBoat said:
i looked up the incident a bit, and from what i understand, it's multiple women saying the logo promotes rape
Click to expand...

I demand to know the personal histories of anyone for whom the mere sight of a wolf inspires thoughts of rape.

Because I think they got something going on. They ought to share with the class.
 
Oglooger said:
View attachment 25179
Click to expand...

Anyone who abuses a holiday that is basically about eating food with your family and chooses to use it to act like a complete shitbag should be shamed, publicly.

Nobody in my family would ever do dumb shit like this. And if they did, we'd mock the fuck out of them until they either cried and ran away or else joined the rest of us in the feast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom