🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Free the Pedos said:
The discussion of his physical abnormalities is obscuring the fact that he's a lolcow because of his narcissism and idiocy.
Click to expand...

Seeing as he's narcissistic, stupid, AND ugly, I think we're fine to make fun of all 3 as we do with all the other cows who are narcissistic, stupid, and ugly.

Speaking of, Russ is hideous and I would not have sex with him.
 
He's spent about $100 on having someone read through his legal ramblings. There will be blood.
Russ legal fiverr.png Russ legal fiverr1.png
 
He probably thinks that since he paid her she HAS to agree that he totes has PTSD and Taylor Swift should be his sex slave. Look guys, look! She's even a FEEEEEMALE law person and she agrees with me!

He's going to chimp when this doesn't go as he envisioned and she tells him to fuck off.
 
I highly doubt that Russ would enjoy living in a situation where w everyone wears masks and he blends in. His facial deformity is his identity, get out of jail free card, his pity bonus card, his excuse for why people don't want to be around him, his way to try and guilt them into it anyway, then accuse them of discrimination when they nope out. Every thing that doesn't go his way is blamed on discrimination. He'd be nothing in a world that didn't see his facial deformity.
 
badboy2000 said:
He's spent about $100 on having someone read through his legal ramblings. There will be blood.
View attachment 1281333View attachment 1281334
Click to expand...
Ah, I note he asked for help from a female and not a male. That way, in Russ's eyes, he's still the big law dude with a hot case, and some silly feeeemale spellchecked it for him. If the only help available had been male Russ wouldn't have bothered. A man wouldn't go weak at the knees over a brave man like ole gourdhead, fighting for what he believes in.

Which will it be, Kiwis?

A) Russ sues fiverr legal spellcheck lady because she said he had a good case and a bias judge dismissed it, or
B) Russ publicly and endlessly harasses fiverr legal spellcheck tease for leading him on by reading his legal papers, then refusing to meet up with him and suck him his penis?

My money's on B, because when was the last time Russ contacted a female he didn't want to fuck? Never, that's when. She answered his messages and even took his money. To Russ, that's a contract for sex.

Such a smart boy, getting el cheapo legal advice from fiverr. I'm sure it's absolutely legit. Russ trolls himself, it's amazing.
 
DrJonesHat said:
Oh boy, I smell another lawsuit when he realizes she's not just as good as a lawyer.
Click to expand...

Gristle, the NOTED paralegal, needed... another "paralegal" to look at HIS CLAIM! MY GOD Next he'll be telling people hes not as good as a lawyer and has no fucking clue what hes actually doing.
 
Except there's no social norm or expectations that Taylor Swift should suck the dick of narcissistic creeps. And even if there was some bizzaro world were there was, guess what? Even if she violated that she still wouldn't be in legal trouble. Stupid idiot.
 
Is Russ about to go to court with a THEORY that says Taylor didn't act the way Russ expected and destroyed him? Is that going to be his claim? I want so badly for him to serve her correctly so I can read about a judge tearing him to bits.
 
I read the Wikipedia article and the Business Insider article that captured Russ’s eye, (avoided the scholar articles) and for the life of me I cannot figure out how he thinks that fits into his case. Obviously, for normal humans it makes no sense in regards to his lawsuit, but even trying to think like Russ, I can’t figure it out.

He sued her initially based on the expectation he felt-she did nice things for others, therefore she had to do the same for him, and he suffered because she didn’t do them. It’s insane but I understand it.

The new theory suggests that the fact that the more disruptive something is, the more interesting it becomes, or how violating social norms and personal space has consequences for a relationship.

How does that fit his case? Even trying to lose 50 IQ points and think like a stalker tard, I can’t make sense of it.

One if the articles had the word arousal in it, maybe that’s all it took.

“How do you like them apples?“. Green, boomer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom