Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Transgender woman Ava Moore Newry Northern Ireland gets £9,000 settlement from Debenhams
By Lara Keay For Mailonline
Published: 07:21 EST, 16 January 2020 | Updated: 09:14 EST, 16 January 2020

A transgender woman has won a £9,000 settlement from Debenhams after a sex discrimination case.

Ava Moore applied for a job at the department store in Newry, Northern Ireland in the weeks before Christmas of 2018.

She believes she performed well during the interview but there was a 'change in atmosphere' after she handed over her birth certificate, which stated her gender history.

Ms Moore also later received an anonymous email that suggested she didn't get the job because she is a transgender woman.

Debenhams settled the case, which was backed by the Equality Commission, without admitting liability.

She told the BBC: 'This job was exactly what I'd been looking for and I thought that I'd be really good at it,

'I felt that it didn't matter how hard I tried, or how well I performed at interview, it just seemed to me that my gender was more important than being able to do the job.

'What does my gender have to do with my ability to make sales?'

The Equality Act 2010 makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against current or prospective employees on the grounds of gender, sexuality, race, religion or a disability.

Ms Moore said the job rejection affected her confidence.

Debenhams said in a statement: 'We have agreed a settlement on the basis of no liability on the part of Debenhams.

'We are an equal opportunities employer, committed to promoting equality and diversity within the business and throughout the sector.

'Decisions on recruitment, training, promotion, and employment conditions are based solely on personal competence and performance.'

Maria Chadwick, Partner & Discrimination Department Manager at Stephensons Solicitors LLP, told MailOnline: 'The case of Ava Moore underlines how this type of negative approach remains a persistent problem, both in and outside of the work environment for the transgender community.

'This is widely reported to be a daily experience for most, leading to direct and indirect discrimination; even harassment whether intentional or otherwise, in the eyes of the law.

'Thankfully, the Equality Act does provide a measure of protection on the basis of sex and gender reassignment, though there are calls for this to be strengthened further.

'What is encouraging, in this case, is that such a familiar and influential high street name has reaffirmed its commitment to encouraging inclusion at all levels within its business, regardless of gender.

'The hope now is that other businesses, of all sizes, take note of their stance on this issue and follow suit.'

Troons take note: this case--where the store was apparently all set to hire the plaintiff until they learned she was transgender--is actual transphobia, and it is the kind of thing antidiscrimination laws are intended to address. When you attempt to redefine "transphobia" to include things like someone speaking or writing the name you were born with, or lesbians not wanting to have sex with penises, or stating that biological sex cannot be changed, all you do is make normal people decide that transphobia isn't so bad after all.
 
Eh 9000 is minimal go away money, I don’t think the troon was discriminated against. Only the troon’s word that they did well in the interview, and only the troon’s word that they got an “anonymous” email? Sure, troon, sure.
 
"misgendering by prison guards made her feel “uneasy,” “disrespected” and discriminated against"

A real tragedy the other prisoners were not allowed to make him feel "uneasy".
 
They couldn't tell from the sweat of wearing all the makeup he needed to hide he was a guy?
 
Troons take note: this case--where the store was apparently all set to hire the plaintiff until they learned she was transgender--is actual transphobia, and it is the kind of thing antidiscrimination laws are intended to address. When you attempt to redefine "transphobia" to include things like someone speaking or writing the name you were born with, or lesbians not wanting to have sex with penises, or stating that biological sex cannot be changed, all you do is make normal people decide that transphobia isn't so bad after all.

Yeah, this guy is full of shit. They weren’t “just about” to hire him, there was no offer on the table as he was still in the interview process. He got rejected from a retail job, that’s it.

You need only listen to this guy speak for two seconds to know he’s a man, no birth certificate necessary

 
Sorry for the screencap quality (not mine),but you appear to be right.
View attachment 1103853

It's really a trip how trannydom lets ugly, boring people pretend to be attractive and interesting. And since all trannies are brave and stunning, no one's allowed to deny their speshulness.

Edit:
Best of all? The judge is a You-Know-Who era bench appointment.
This seems to be a different case. Sorry. about that.
Nope. Same case. And I'm an idiot.

Trump-appointed judge rules trans people have no right to be called by their personal pronouns


How much longer until all the Troons in the Milky Way have an hero'd? Will they make it past the election?

If things ever get seriously uncomfortable for them, the vast majority will detransition. That's kind of the funny thing about flinging the door wide for perverts and sex offenders to flood in: the suicide rate among trannies will plummet because the grifters aren't any more likely to kill themselves than the rest of us.
 
courts that choose to use a trans litigant’s personal pronouns “may unintentionally convey tacit approval of the litigant’s underlying legal position.” In other words, he thinks it’s legally biased for a court to respect a trans person’s pronouns.

Makes sense to me. If a tranny commits rape with his penis, requiring court officers and witnesses (especially the victims) to call the piece of shit "she/her" absolutely perverts the legal process. Any court indulging that shit (let alone enforcing it like they do in the UK) shows how far into clown world we've fallen.
 
Anywhere I could find the actual opinion/documents? I'm interested to know if it's only for inmates, who by committing crimes have theoretically had most rights revoked, or if it's for the trans people in general.
Either way, this should be a good precedent against thought-crimes and the like. I don't want someone to be fined or whatever because they call Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner.
Words are not crimes. Nobody has any right to have other people call them something. It's just polite to do so, kind of like a nickname.
 
Good, no one should feel obligated to entertain the notions of a piece of shit like that guy.

And really, why does the LGBT community want to die on this hill? Think of the optics, fools.
 
When you attempt to redefine "transphobia" to include things like someone speaking or writing the name you were born with, or lesbians not wanting to have sex with penises, or stating that biological sex cannot be changed, all you do is make normal people decide that transphobia isn't so bad after all.

Troons do themselves no favors defining refusing to be raped by them as "transphobia." Imagine if black or any other equality activists had declared that what they were fighting was the horrible injustice of not being able to get laid.
 
Anywhere I could find the actual opinion/documents? I'm interested to know if it's only for inmates, who by committing crimes have theoretically had most rights revoked, or if it's for the trans people in general.
Either way, this should be a good precedent against thought-crimes and the like. I don't want someone to be fined or whatever because they call Bruce Jenner Bruce Jenner.
Words are not crimes. Nobody has any right to have other people call them something. It's just polite to do so, kind of like a nickname.


tl;dr - his name change wasn't legal, nearly every motion he filed was invalid, and there is no statute that requires judges use 'preferred pronouns.'
 
Back
Top Bottom