Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
Archive
In an 11-page ruling issued yesterday, Trump-appointed Judge Kyle Duncan of U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals deadnamed a trans inmate and denied her request to have her female name used on her incarceration records. He also denied her request to have prison guards use female pronouns when referring to her.
The inmate, Kathrine Nicole Jett, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for child pornography in 2012, came out as a trans woman and began hormone replacement therapy in 2015, and had her name changed by a Kentucky state court in 2018. She said misgendering by prison guards made her feel “uneasy,” “disrespected” and discriminated against because of her gender identity.
However, Duncan’s ruling against Jett fell largely along technical merits. He claimed that the inmate’s name-change documents had falsely claimed residence in Kentucky even though she was incarcerated in a Pennsylvania penitentiary at the time. Duncan added that her request was neither issued 14 days after sentencing nor to correct a clerical error, as required by the legal protocol.
While Duncan admits that some federal courts and prisons have used a trans inmate’s personal pronouns as “a courtesy,” he wrote that there’s no federal statute or rule requiring courts or judicial figures to use pronouns other than those matching the gender a litigant was assigned at birth.
He wrote, “If a court were to compel the use of particular pronouns at the invitation of litigants, it could raise delicate questions about judicial impartiality which ‘assures equal application of the law.'”
While acknowledging that many courts are debating trans rights, Duncan said courts that choose to use a trans litigant’s personal pronouns “may unintentionally convey tacit approval of the litigant’s underlying legal position.” In other words, he thinks it’s legally biased for a court to respect a trans person’s pronouns.
He also wrote that if he granted Jett’s request, then other inmates could require judicial figures to use more modern gender-neutral pronouns like xim, xyr, eir, hir, and faerself.
In the past, Duncan has called transgender people “delusional.” Before becoming a judge, he served as a lawyer in numerous LGBTQ rights trials — taking the anti-LGBTQ side each time.
--
Nice to see the alphabet people defending the rights of a convicted pedophile.
In an 11-page ruling issued yesterday, Trump-appointed Judge Kyle Duncan of U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals deadnamed a trans inmate and denied her request to have her female name used on her incarceration records. He also denied her request to have prison guards use female pronouns when referring to her.
The inmate, Kathrine Nicole Jett, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for child pornography in 2012, came out as a trans woman and began hormone replacement therapy in 2015, and had her name changed by a Kentucky state court in 2018. She said misgendering by prison guards made her feel “uneasy,” “disrespected” and discriminated against because of her gender identity.
However, Duncan’s ruling against Jett fell largely along technical merits. He claimed that the inmate’s name-change documents had falsely claimed residence in Kentucky even though she was incarcerated in a Pennsylvania penitentiary at the time. Duncan added that her request was neither issued 14 days after sentencing nor to correct a clerical error, as required by the legal protocol.
While Duncan admits that some federal courts and prisons have used a trans inmate’s personal pronouns as “a courtesy,” he wrote that there’s no federal statute or rule requiring courts or judicial figures to use pronouns other than those matching the gender a litigant was assigned at birth.
He wrote, “If a court were to compel the use of particular pronouns at the invitation of litigants, it could raise delicate questions about judicial impartiality which ‘assures equal application of the law.'”
While acknowledging that many courts are debating trans rights, Duncan said courts that choose to use a trans litigant’s personal pronouns “may unintentionally convey tacit approval of the litigant’s underlying legal position.” In other words, he thinks it’s legally biased for a court to respect a trans person’s pronouns.
He also wrote that if he granted Jett’s request, then other inmates could require judicial figures to use more modern gender-neutral pronouns like xim, xyr, eir, hir, and faerself.
In the past, Duncan has called transgender people “delusional.” Before becoming a judge, he served as a lawyer in numerous LGBTQ rights trials — taking the anti-LGBTQ side each time.
--
Nice to see the alphabet people defending the rights of a convicted pedophile.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
15 years for child pornography? I have a name for them: scum.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
USA! USA!
This ruling comes as a relief after the BS we've seen from the UK, honestly. I know we're different countries, but trends still tend to flow from one to another sometimes. I can only hope that further court rulings accept this case as precedent (which is how our legal system generally works, but you never know).And who was the beautiful lady who demanded that the court respect her very feminine pronouns?
Of course.
Apparently, he was allowed to use his lady-name as a "secondary name," but that wasn't enough for him. He "felt like" he was being discriminated against when others used male pronouns, despite not actually experiencing any discrimination (which rights of his were infringed on? what material necessities or comforts was he denied?), and on that basis pushed for total control over others' language and got shot down.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
That's weird, why would a pedo troon out once he was caught? What he has to gain from aligning himself with a protected social class....?
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
I assume it’s a ploy to get transferred to a women’s prison.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
I forgot this one:
‘Xemself,’ ‘Eirself,’ and ‘Verself’: U.S. Appeals Court Nixes Gender Neutral Pronouns
A federal appeals court summoned a “parade of horribles” Wednesday when it refused a transgender prisoner’s request to be addressed with the pronoun that reflects her female gender identity.www.forbes.com
This is pretty big. "no authority permits a court to require litigants, judges, court personnel or anyone else" to use preferred pronouns. Not only do BS pronouns hinder communication, they "may unintentionally convey [the court's] tacit approval of the litigant’s underlying legal position.”
Interestingly, this case is ALSO about a pedo who tried to transition in prison. Hmm.
Edit:
Best of all? The judge is a You-Know-Who era bench appointment.
Nope. Same case. And I'm an idiot.
Trump-appointed judge rules trans people have no right to be called by their personal pronouns
Trump-appointed judge rules trans people have no right to be called b…
archived 18 Jan 2020 16:49:44 UTC
How much longer until all the Troons in the Milky Way have an hero'd? Will they make it past the election?
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 20, 2016
Plot twist: ship all of them to the same prison so they can be among female inmates.
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
I'd like to see the sources for this. My bet is that he probably referred to somebody who was having a psychotic break as delusional or something equally banal.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
Pretty BASED, Ngl.
Glad to see someone who has the sanity to incriminate these people probably.
Glad to see someone who has the sanity to incriminate these people probably.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
I have to respect the way the Dollar Tree employee still squared off to the troon. I think what really caused him to go nuts was that he got a bit of push back, I'm willing to bet it was a relatively rare experience for him.
As a POI discount stores, have minimal staffing. So when that employee stood up to him, it wasn't as if 20+ staff were there to back her up.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
Archive
Transgender “Woman” Assaults And Spits On Dollar Tree Employee After Being Caught Shoplifting
Transgender “Woman” Assaults an Spits on Dollar Tree Employee After Being Caught Stealing . Woonsocket , RHODE ISLAND. Park ave Dollar tree . Woonsocket figh...www.youtube.com
videoplayback.mp4
Macho Ma'am gives him a 5/10 for trying to steal his schtick.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2016
Something awful must be going on at that prison, look at the suicide rates!
TopCat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
Transgender woman Ava Moore Newry Northern Ireland gets £9,000 settlement from Debenhams
By Lara Keay For Mailonline
Published: 07:21 EST, 16 January 2020 | Updated: 09:14 EST, 16 January 2020
A transgender woman has won a £9,000 settlement from Debenhams after a sex discrimination case.
Ava Moore applied for a job at the department store in Newry, Northern Ireland in the weeks before Christmas of 2018.
She believes she performed well during the interview but there was a 'change in atmosphere' after she handed over her birth certificate, which stated her gender history.
Ms Moore also later received an anonymous email that suggested she didn't get the job because she is a transgender woman.
Debenhams settled the case, which was backed by the Equality Commission, without admitting liability.
She told the BBC: 'This job was exactly what I'd been looking for and I thought that I'd be really good at it,
'I felt that it didn't matter how hard I tried, or how well I performed at interview, it just seemed to me that my gender was more important than being able to do the job.
'What does my gender have to do with my ability to make sales?'
The Equality Act 2010 makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against current or prospective employees on the grounds of gender, sexuality, race, religion or a disability.
Ms Moore said the job rejection affected her confidence.
Debenhams said in a statement: 'We have agreed a settlement on the basis of no liability on the part of Debenhams.
'We are an equal opportunities employer, committed to promoting equality and diversity within the business and throughout the sector.
'Decisions on recruitment, training, promotion, and employment conditions are based solely on personal competence and performance.'
Maria Chadwick, Partner & Discrimination Department Manager at Stephensons Solicitors LLP, told MailOnline: 'The case of Ava Moore underlines how this type of negative approach remains a persistent problem, both in and outside of the work environment for the transgender community.
'This is widely reported to be a daily experience for most, leading to direct and indirect discrimination; even harassment whether intentional or otherwise, in the eyes of the law.
'Thankfully, the Equality Act does provide a measure of protection on the basis of sex and gender reassignment, though there are calls for this to be strengthened further.
'What is encouraging, in this case, is that such a familiar and influential high street name has reaffirmed its commitment to encouraging inclusion at all levels within its business, regardless of gender.
'The hope now is that other businesses, of all sizes, take note of their stance on this issue and follow suit.'
www.dailymail.co.uk
By Lara Keay For Mailonline
Published: 07:21 EST, 16 January 2020 | Updated: 09:14 EST, 16 January 2020
A transgender woman has won a £9,000 settlement from Debenhams after a sex discrimination case.
Ava Moore applied for a job at the department store in Newry, Northern Ireland in the weeks before Christmas of 2018.
She believes she performed well during the interview but there was a 'change in atmosphere' after she handed over her birth certificate, which stated her gender history.
Ms Moore also later received an anonymous email that suggested she didn't get the job because she is a transgender woman.
Debenhams settled the case, which was backed by the Equality Commission, without admitting liability.
She told the BBC: 'This job was exactly what I'd been looking for and I thought that I'd be really good at it,
'I felt that it didn't matter how hard I tried, or how well I performed at interview, it just seemed to me that my gender was more important than being able to do the job.
'What does my gender have to do with my ability to make sales?'
The Equality Act 2010 makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against current or prospective employees on the grounds of gender, sexuality, race, religion or a disability.
Ms Moore said the job rejection affected her confidence.
Debenhams said in a statement: 'We have agreed a settlement on the basis of no liability on the part of Debenhams.
'We are an equal opportunities employer, committed to promoting equality and diversity within the business and throughout the sector.
'Decisions on recruitment, training, promotion, and employment conditions are based solely on personal competence and performance.'
Maria Chadwick, Partner & Discrimination Department Manager at Stephensons Solicitors LLP, told MailOnline: 'The case of Ava Moore underlines how this type of negative approach remains a persistent problem, both in and outside of the work environment for the transgender community.
'This is widely reported to be a daily experience for most, leading to direct and indirect discrimination; even harassment whether intentional or otherwise, in the eyes of the law.
'Thankfully, the Equality Act does provide a measure of protection on the basis of sex and gender reassignment, though there are calls for this to be strengthened further.
'What is encouraging, in this case, is that such a familiar and influential high street name has reaffirmed its commitment to encouraging inclusion at all levels within its business, regardless of gender.
'The hope now is that other businesses, of all sizes, take note of their stance on this issue and follow suit.'
Transgender woman gets £9,000 settlement from Debenhams
Ava Moore (pictured) applied for a job at the department store in Newry, Northern Ireland in the weeks before Christmas of 2018.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
Must not be doing too bad in there if the thing you're most worried about is the guards making you feel icky over being called the "wrong" pronouns.
Also prisoners don't have the same rights, so quit your crying, buttercup.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2019
And it usually works. In the uk, Karen White, a convicted rapist and child abuser was transferred to a women’s prison with a mother and baby unit.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Reduce recidivism? I'd only accept it as some mitigating factor in parole if it reduced it to zero. Otherwise you have to go though the parole process like everyone else, ideally just serving your full term.
The one on the left looks like a dude with too much botox.
This.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
I'm pretty sure Jesus saw that video, and he was like, "yup, I knew I hid that self-destruct feature in there somewhere".