💼 Careercow Jamie Lynn Marchi / Jamie Perez / marchimark / She Devil - Wants Vic's head and balls, but not his papers; Cucked by a Chicken Sandwich

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Stoneheart said:
The most disturbing part of this is that she uses marchi mark, thats a racist, antiasian dogwhistle.
marki mark is known for almost beating a chinaman into his grave.
Click to expand...
Marchi "Kill The Nigger" Mark

844552
 
Stoneheart said:
The most disturbing part of this is that she uses marchi mark, thats a racist, antiasian dogwhistle.
marki mark is known for almost beating a chinaman into his grave.
Click to expand...

It was a Vietnamese dude, but yeah. Actually two Vietnamese dudes, he got away with the first. The first he just attacked for no reason at all. The other he blinded in one eye. In both cases he was yelling racial slurs at them.

ETA: the second time he was telling the slurs to the cops because that's how little of a fuck he gave.

Ironically, he now often plays cops.
 
I'm going to make the bold assumption that we'll never see Jamie's deposition.

Funimation's TCPA probably won't be concluded until late August (Hearing is on Auguest 15th, and the judge still needs to craft a ruling on it).

Jamie probably files her TCPA before her deadline. If it succeeds, she's out of the case. If it fails, I bet you the next day she's talking settlements.

EDIT: Now that I think about it, she could be deposed in relation to the other defendants, I guess?
 
Even if she's not in the case she can be deposed. Anyone with knowledge of facts that may be relevant to the case can be deposed. That's why Lemonhead wanted to depose Nick over the GoFundMe since he was trying to work some angle on that.
 
AnOminous said:
It was a Vietnamese dude, but yeah. Actually two Vietnamese dudes, he got away with the first. The first he just attacked for no reason at all. The other he blinded in one eye. In both cases he was yelling racial slurs at them.

ETA: the second time he was telling the slurs to the cops because that's how little of a fuck he gave.

Ironically, he now often plays cops.
Click to expand...

I liked him as Melvin Smiley in The Big Hit.

A hardcore hitman with co-dependency issues and tries to be polite to girls; whether he's saving their lives or kidnapping them.

Just so happens the girl they kidnap is asian. Odd...
 
DrearyDoomguy said:
Wait. Even if she did have real proof and that were how getting attorney's fees worked, wouldn't she just use up all the money on food? She's gotta have a pretty rigorous diet to sustain all those gains she's boasting. Not to mention the cost of insulin...
Click to expand...

The more I read those tweets by her, the more I'm convinced that this woman has some serious mental health problems.
I can't wait for her depo, that will be fun, that's for sure.
 
GenericReviewerDraco said:
So Jamie's deposition was done on the 12th...wonder when Nick will get the vids. Then again based on how generally stable her gay bar lawyer is, she might not be a laugh track after all.
Click to expand...
Wait, where did you hear that? Funimation's TCPA has frozen all discovery, including Jamie's depo.

If anything, we're not getting until late August when Funimation's TCPA is ruled on.
 
OneHandClapping said:
Wait, where did you hear that? Funimation's TCPA has frozen all discovery, including Jamie's depo.

If anything, we're not getting until late August when Funimation's TCPA is ruled on.
Click to expand...
Technically incorrect. A TCPA is party-independent, Funimation, Monica Rial, Ron Toye, and Jamie Marchi are all independent defendents, meaning any motion they present tot he court only applies to them. Rial and Toye ahve jointly signed their defenses, making them a single entity and have failed to file a TCPA, Jamie Marchi has been quite and has not yet presented a TCPA and thus can be deposed and any evidence is required that has been asked for, Funimation HAS filed a TCPA, which only counts for them and if it passes would only pull them out of the case not the other independent defendants.
 
Gehenna said:
Technically incorrect. A TCPA is party-independent, Funimation, Monica Rial, Ron Toye, and Jamie Marchi are all independent defendents, meaning any motion they present tot he court only applies to them. Rial and Toye ahve jointly signed their defenses, making them a single entity and have failed to file a TCPA, Jamie Marchi has been quite and has not yet presented a TCPA and thus can be deposed and any evidence is required that has been asked for, Funimation HAS filed a TCPA, which only counts for them and if it passes would only pull them out of the case not the other independent defendants.
Click to expand...
Discovery is frozen for the entire case, not just individual defendants. It's designed to prevent people having to spend stupid amounts of money on discovery. Funimation having the right to be present for the deposition of all parties means that if the deposition were to go through it'd undermine the entire purpose of the discovery freeze. It's why Monica and Ron's legal team are wasting money trying to depose Nick, despite it almost certainly never going to be allowed since the rule they're using for the limited discovery allowance doesn't readily apply to them.
 
Gehenna said:
Technically incorrect. A TCPA is party-independent, Funimation, Monica Rial, Ron Toye, and Jamie Marchi are all independent defendents, meaning any motion they present tot he court only applies to them. Rial and Toye ahve jointly signed their defenses, making them a single entity and have failed to file a TCPA, Jamie Marchi has been quite and has not yet presented a TCPA and thus can be deposed and any evidence is required that has been asked for, Funimation HAS filed a TCPA, which only counts for them and if it passes would only pull them out of the case not the other independent defendants.
Click to expand...

That's not quite the case. Although the TCPA is party-independent, the way the law is written means that any party's TCPA motion will stay discovery for the entire lawsuit, so currently Marchi cannot be deposed.

However, she would still need to file her own TCPA motion within the required time frame or she would waive the ability to do so later, because Funimation's TCPA doesn't stop the clock on her filing date. From the stream last night, a lot of the questions her lawyer asked seemed to be aimed and getting Vic to admit that certain tweets weren't defamatory or contained no statement of fact in and of themselves. I don't know how well that will hold up when the tweets are viewed in the context of the larger conversation, but it's apparent that's what he's going to attempt.

Probably the best thing that Marchi has going for her is that she can't be deposed before any TCPA she might file. Both Ron and Monica ruined any chance that they (and maybe Funimation as well) had of getting the lawsuit dismissed. However, if she did want to submit a TCPA motion, she probably needs to do so soon. I know that she managed to dodge service and drag her heels for quite a while, but eventually the deadline will drop. Hopefully her lawyer is smart enough to demand payment up front for doing a TCPA motion, because she's probably even more broke than Ron/Monica.
 
Far Queue said:
From the stream last night, a lot of the questions her lawyer asked seemed to be aimed and getting Vic to admit that certain tweets weren't defamatory or contained no statement of fact in and of themselves. I don't know how well that will hold up when the tweets are viewed in the context of the larger conversation, but it's apparent that's what he's going to attempt.
Click to expand...

I found Marchi's lawyer shockingly refreshing after all these depos. He had a clear plan, it made sense, it applied to the case, and he asked questions to gather testimony supporting his intended theory. It's amazing how low the bar dropped for the KickVic side that basic competence is enough to stand out.

Like you said, I don't think it will stand up long term. Vic correctly pointed out that you can't tell what's going on without the original tweets in the thread, but the lawyer was adamant about sticking to the limited context of the single tweet. That gets him some quotes to use as a flimsy basis for TCPA, but any jury or judge watching that video will see through the ploy immediately.

(That performance probably contributed to Ty coming out of the depo "giddy" about how well it went; Vic just saved Ty a lot of time arguing about the meaning of Vic's "agreement" and the tweets' context.)

Maybe there's something unique to the Texas TDMA letters or treatment of individual statements that Marchi can exploit here? Like getting half of the individual statements dismissed, to reduce potential damages in half, even if the overall context is still defamatory?
 
Harvey Danger said:
Maybe there's something unique to the Texas TDMA letters or treatment of individual statements that Marchi can exploit here? Like getting half of the individual statements dismissed, to reduce potential damages in half, even if the overall context is still defamatory?
Click to expand...

The way the case was filed (joint and several liability) means that all defendants are collectively on the hook for any judgement against them and that they would need to collectively agree on responsibility.

From what Nick said, the likely outcome is that because most of those pissants are poor, Funimation ends up footing the bill (or most of it) and then likely has to sue the other defendants in order to recover the portion that they owe individually.

Maybe that lets Marchi argue that she should owe less, but it just sounds like prolonged legal battles for the lot of them in that case once they all start fighting amongst each other.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom