🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Francis York Morgan said:
I'm also pretty confident that Ashleigh never existed. Too many inconsistencies and I think it's pretty obvious where he got the name "Ashleigh Banks" from since Sweets is terminally unimaginative.
Click to expand...

I completely agree. And then there's stuff like this:

"Now I know a thing or two about birth control; my ex was on the Pill."

Okay, uh, no. Jon knows nothing about The Pill. He's never had any experience with it. From what's been made publicly available, and just by looking at him, we can tell he's never been with a woman bedfully. To trust that "Ashleigh" was real to begin with already stretches credibility, but even if we give him the benefit of the doubt, Sweet has, to my knowledge, described one meeting with her that lasted for a good five minutes, to be generous.

And suddenly, from that and some phone calls, Jon the Untouched knows a thing or two about birth control.

The thing of it is, it's fairly transparent why he focuses on "Ashleigh" so strongly. This entire page of his blog goes on and on about his search for this mysterious woman, his insanely self-righteous rationalization of stalking her (he wants to protect other men from her wiles), and, naturally, condemnation of the ASU Herald. But, really, if you want to know the truth, if you really want to know why he's been after her so doggedly (relatively speaking) for all these years, look no further than the bottom of the page (emphasis mine):

Lonesome Jon said:
I want to stop her. I want to have my weekend with her. I want to love her, and I want her to love me again.
sad.gif
Click to expand...
 
I want to stop her. I want to have my weekend with her. I want to love her, and I want her to love me again.
sad.gif
Click to expand...
From now on, for me, Iconoclast has the voice of Mr. Plinkett.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
The thing of it is, it's fairly transparent why he focuses on "Ashleigh" so strongly. This entire page of his blog goes on and on about his search for this mysterious woman, his insanely self-righteous rationalization of stalking her (he wants to protect other men from her wiles), and, naturally, condemnation of the ASU Herald. But, really, if you want to know the truth, if you really want to know why he's been after her so doggedly (relatively speaking) for all these years, look no further than the bottom of the page (emphasis mine):
Click to expand...

I think this is a really interesting theory. But it does pose the question, why the multi-year campaign of smack-talking a real woman who has some points in common with "Ashleigh Bainks"?
 
Didn't he have another ex, the one after Ashleigh that he dated for six months before she returned? Maybe he's talking about her.
 
Bound2 said:
Didn't he have another ex, the one after Ashleigh that he dated for six months before she returned? Maybe he's talking about her.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he mentioned something like that a few times. I'm really just getting the idea that these two were just girls that he talked to at the campus and that he was the only one who thought this was "DATE". Because I can buy the absolute outline of an event that he talks about, but little else considering how desperate he is to kill any blame leading to him.
 
Bound2 said:
Didn't he have another ex, the one after Ashleigh that he dated for six months before she returned? Maybe he's talking about her.
Click to expand...
With the pill stuff? He's always said that "Ashleigh's" father was a lawyer (even though neither parent of the real woman he talks trash about has ever been admitted to the Arkansas bar). It would be weird if he was also claiming that "Susan" had a lawyer for a father.

Also, wasn't "Susan" supposed to be Sweetiepie's age? "Ashleigh" is several years younger in all his stories, which matches her being 30 in 2013.
 
Francis York Morgan said:
I'm also pretty confident that Ashleigh never existed. Too many inconsistencies and I think it's pretty obvious where he got the name "Ashleigh Banks" from since Sweets is terminally unimaginative.
Click to expand...

Personally I think "Ashleigh" existed in that she was a real woman that existed and maybe was on campus with him and he saw her once or twice or had a class with her and built up this entire narrative around her.

Somewhere in his creepy basement there is a wall that's covered in candid photographs of her taken while Sweets was hiding into the bushes. The things he has done in the presence of these photographs are unspeakable and would drive mortal men to madness.
 
Meowthkip said:
Personally I think "Ashleigh" existed in that she was a real woman that existed and maybe was on campus with him and he saw her once or twice or had a class with her and built up this entire narrative around her.

Somewhere in his creepy basement there is a wall that's covered in candid photographs of her taken while Sweets was hiding into the bushes. The things he has done in the presence of these photographs are unspeakable and would drive mortal men to madness.
Click to expand...
See this is what I'm thinking as well. Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt and say that they did date for an extended period of time, why the fuck does he know what she's doing now? That would make this even more pathetic.
 
DrChristianTroy said:
See this is what I'm thinking as well. Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt and say that they did date for an extended period of time, why the fuck does he know what she's doing now? That would make this even more pathetic.
Click to expand...

Precisely. If they actually had a relationship, it should be abundantly clear to Sweet by now that she's no longer interested.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
Precisely. If they actually had a relationship, it should be abundantly clear to Sweet by now that she's no longer interested.
Click to expand...
What I find creepiest is his assertion that she still goes to the college to score. First and foremost, why the fuck would he care? Not like I give a shit what my exes do. More importantly how is he finding out if he's banned from the campus? This implies that he's not only stalking her but breaking the laws of his precious college. Just a lot of creepy implications by the whole thing.
 
DrChristianTroy said:
What I find creepiest is his assertion that she still goes to the college to score. First and foremost, why the fuck would he care? Not like I give a shit what my exes do. More importantly how is he finding out if he's banned from the campus? This implies that he's not only stalking her but breaking the laws of his precious college. Just a lot of creepy implications by the whole thing.
Click to expand...
Near the college, he may have a few old frien-pfftHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
 
DrChristianTroy said:
What I find creepiest is his assertion that she still goes to the college to score. First and foremost, why the fuck would he care? Not like I give a shit what my exes do. More importantly how is he finding out if he's banned from the campus? This implies that he's not only stalking her but breaking the laws of his precious college. Just a lot of creepy implications by the whole thing.
Click to expand...

Eh, I wouldn't be shocked if he completely fucked up even more "journalism" due to pure confirmation bias combined with pathological ignorance. I mean, it's what caused him to come up with a liberal conspiracy designed around destruction through change, that Barry, God-President of America made TV and Lightbulbs pure shit, and that a college paper, which I'll note from an instructor who edits our paper says it's hard as shit to get people to acknowledge it exists, is powerful enough to make him unable to get a job. He's also stated that conservative outlets are the underdog in an area that tends to lean right.

You know, for a journalist, John "Burnsweet" Thumb makes the Daily Mail seem on the ball. And the Daily Mail makes shit up everyday and then attribute it to others because their writers and editors feel it's true.
 
He Sets Me On Fire said:
Precisely. If they actually had a relationship, it should be abundantly clear to Sweet by now that she's no longer interested.
Click to expand...
The real woman whose doxx are on his pathetic webpage is married, lives thousands of miles from Arkansas, and has adorable children.

My new theory is that the woman he's doxxed, who was a local high school student when Sweet Dee was in college, was dared by friends to make a flirty phone call to a guys' dorm. Sweet Georgia Brown may have made up all the rest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom