Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
f749f33f1a85f8e072757c514b1f9acc.png


"We could accomplish neither jack nor shit for 8 years so Orange Man Bad."

Ben regardless of what you might think, this kind of statement doesn't make you look intelligent.
"Yes We Can"
"Actually we could have if we wanted, but we didn't really feel like it."
 
Well, Christianity has a few things going for it which run counter to SJWism:
1) SJWism is about performative value - virtue signalling is more important than being truly virtuous. Being a Christian is about embodying the love and virtues of Christ and expressing them in genuine ways.
2) SJWism is about dragging people down and creating divides to access power and exert your will. Christianity is about loving all people and seeking to elevate everyone into light of God's Grace through love and charity.
3) SJWism is about eternal damnation with no hope of redemption; once accused of SJW-sins you are guilty, branded for life, and must die. Christianity offers a path to redemption from all sin for those that would repent and turn away from evil and into the light of God.

Christianity is about ten million times kinder, more accepting, and morally progressive than SJWism ever could be and I would gladly strangle a dozen SJW adherents to death before I'd lay a finger on a devout disciple of Christ.
Please... Christians practically invented virtue signalling...
 
Nobody, except for the starving North Koreans and some of the less enlightened people in the south want Korean Reunification.
What is much more likely is Trump getting the Norks to officially end the war and agree to make the current border permanent. But he's also as likely or more so to just get strung along by the Pilsbury Dictator.
Its extremely likely Kimmy is only playing nice with Trump to wring concessions from China.


China does not want a reunified Korea; North Korea is a welcome buffer state, and gives them an opportunity to play Good Cop.

The US does not want a reunified Korea, as within 10-20 years Korea would start focusing on their own interests, likely send most of the US presence there packing, and the US would lose a valuable strategic counter weight to China (in short: China could probably take out Okinawa, and they could probably neutralize our forces in SK, but they would likely be unable to accomplish both).

The South Korean Government wants a Reunification PROCESS to feather their cap (and for a crazy dictator to stop pointing howitzers at their capital), but they don't want reunification. The Norks are bunch of brainwashed exceptional individuals with rotting infrastructure; The highest quality things in the country were built by Soviet Russia, so have a nice long hard ponder on what that means. South Korea's population is about 50 million, North Korea is 25 million. So after reunification, your country is now 1/3 malnourished xenophobic exceptional individuals who've had some of the worst media care. It would just completely destroy SK economically for likely decades after, not including the political chaos that would result.

And the North Korean government and military most definitely don't want reunification because even if they somehow find an Obama-level cuck for negotions who will bend over and give them full immunity from the crimes against humanity they commit on a daily basis, and they somehow aren't just murdered by the people they oppressed, they sure as hell aren't going to be voted into office or enjoy the same power they have now.

This also doesn't count the vast, VAST psychological and probable physical harm that the North Korean people would suffer. The Soviets had at least been walking back their more oppressive policies before the wheels fully came off and it was still a shock to people to suddenly have choices in life.
Norks would not only be going from Zero to Freedom, but they would quickly discover everything they had been make to believe about the world outside of North Korea was a complete fabrication. Food and alcohol would be cheap and plentiful, and they would be unprepared for the amount of illegal drugs suddenly on offer.
I agree. Reunification is not best for anyone. But I don't think there is much to worry about a non dictatorship North Korea aligning itself with China. Their biggest commonality now is their authoritarian governments. In a way, it's like Mongolia, only more extreme. Mongolia's best asset is the fact that it lies directly between two countries neither of which wants the other to have it. Well, North Korea also borders China and Russia, but also a major US ally, South Korea. Everyone has an interest in a denuclearized and neutral North Korea.

America doesn't want a Chinese puppet state directly bordering South Korea. China doesn't want Russia to have access to the Yellow Sea. Russia and China don't want an even stronger American influence in Asia. So this is a prime place for mutual cooperation between the three powers.
 
Please... Christians practically invented virtue signalling...
“Take heed that you do not do your charitable deeds before men, to be seen by them. Otherwise you have no reward from your Father in heaven. Therefore, when you do a charitable deed, do not sound a trumpet before you as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory from men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly.”
As for the Norks, what I expect to happen is that the NK government tries to introduce the new way of doing things slowly, turn each new freedom into a gift, so that by the time they realize that they were fucked over for decades, they’ve enjoyed their new freedoms for a while already and don’t riot. Tearing off the bandage all at once will see backlash, but slowly introducing reforms will make the public thank the government.
 
so that by the time they realize that they were fucked over for decades
They know exactly what's going on. Nobody is brainwashed at all. The civilians act the way they do because if they don't they and their entire family get sent to prison camps that make Soviet gulags look hospitable.
 
All this reminds me of something...

Hey @eternal dog mongler, do you still think your little boy Biden can beat Trump, especially considering his performance the recent Democrat candidate "debates"?
 
All this reminds me of something...

Hey @eternal dog mongler, do you still think your little boy Biden can beat Trump, especially considering his performance the recent Democrat candidate "debates"?

At this point I think it's pretty much immaterial if voters, or at least Democrat voters, actually want Biden. It's pretty much obvious that the party bosses already have their pick and it sure as hell ain't Delaware's favorite son.
 
So apparently the TDSNPCs are having a field day cooing over various US embassies choosing to display support for Pride Month in ways other than flying the flag outside on the flag pole, calling it a wonderfully subversive use of the letter of the directive to spit in Trump's eye. (Which is, of course, the important thing... not support for LGBT, but trying to make Orange Bad Man feel bad.)

Any attempt to point out that the embassies are doing exactly what Trump told them they should do is just met with spergouts about what a racisthomophobebigotNazi Bad Orange Man is.
 
So apparently the TDSNPCs are having a field day cooing over various US embassies choosing to display support for Pride Month in ways other than flying the flag outside on the flag pole, calling it a wonderfully subversive use of the letter of the directive to spit in Trump's eye. (Which is, of course, the important thing... not support for LGBT, but trying to make Orange Bad Man feel bad.)

Any attempt to point out that the embassies are doing exactly what Trump told them they should do is just met with spergouts about what a racisthomophobebigotNazi Bad Orange Man is.
That's still going on? I thought Pride Month was over.
 
Opinion polls changed by 1% per 25k retweets? Ain't no fucking way. These clowns could at least make the lie believable and say 0.1% or even 0.5%. But moving polls a full percentage point? Yeah, ain't no fucking way.

16 million people watched Kamala Harris publicly humiliate Joe Biden in their debate and he dropped about 10% in the polls. Are they really calling that the equivalent of only 250k retweets?
824003
 
Please... Christians practically invented virtue signalling...

No, it was Moralists that invented Virtue Signaling. They go back many years, even before the ancient Greeks. There were probably Cavemen who were complaining about how decadent the art Oog drew on the cave wall was and how badly it was going to corrupt the young Cavelings. The reason Christianity is notorious for its moralists is because it's been around for a looooong time (societies that discourage cousin marriage and encourage fruitfulness within wedlock tend to have high social trust and a healthy birthrate, who knew?) and has had a long time to generate many infamous ones. We've also had a recent period of particularly noxious Moralists called the Religious Right. Give it about 20 years, and when people think of the term "Moralist", they won't be thinking of a hairsprayed, suit-wearing man swinging a Bible around on TV, they'll be thinking of a pudgy girl in a purple buzzcut and a bearded vegan in a My Little Pony T-shirt screaming at people to check their privilege.
 
Opinion polls changed by 1% per 25k retweets? Ain't no fucking way. These clowns could at least make the lie believable and say 0.1% or even 0.5%. But moving polls a full percentage point? Yeah, ain't no fucking way.

16 million people watched Kamala Harris publicly humiliate Joe Biden in their debate and he dropped about 10% in the polls. Are they really calling that the equivalent of only 250k retweets?
View attachment 824003
1% is also within the margin of error.
 
Opinion polls changed by 1% per 25k retweets? Ain't no fucking way. These clowns could at least make the lie believable and say 0.1% or even 0.5%. But moving polls a full percentage point? Yeah, ain't no fucking way.

16 million people watched Kamala Harris publicly humiliate Joe Biden in their debate and he dropped about 10% in the polls. Are they really calling that the equivalent of only 250k retweets?
View attachment 824003

This reminds me of how right up until 2016 the left was constantly and openly complaining that the system was rigged because election spending literally translated into votes, and they saw the Republicans as the "rich old white men" party who could clearly outspend them. It was not at all uncommon for them to just outright say that yes, whoever bought more ads was going to win the election.

Of course I guess once Hillary outspent the RNC to an insane extent and still lost they had to start coming up with alternatives.
 
Give it 10 years.
Shit will be too fucked by then and some posting here might not live to see the end of Virtue Signaling Decade Pride Decade...

No, it was Moralists that invented Virtue Signaling. They go back many years, even before the ancient Greeks. There were probably Cavemen who were complaining about how decadent the art Oog drew on the cave wall was and how badly it was going to corrupt the young Cavelings. The reason Christianity is notorious for its moralists is because it's been around for a looooong time (societies that discourage cousin marriage and encourage fruitfulness within wedlock tend to have high social trust and a healthy birthrate, who knew?) and has had a long time to generate many infamous ones. We've also had a recent period of particularly noxious Moralists called the Religious Right. Give it about 20 years, and when people think of the term "Moralist", they won't be thinking of a hairsprayed, suit-wearing man swinging a Bible around on TV, they'll be thinking of a pudgy girl in a purple buzzcut and a bearded vegan in a My Little Pony T-shirt screaming at people to check their privilege.
True. But on a related note, it might've been funny to see the first human who tried to censor breasts.

"Grug... Why you make naughty carving of healing witch lady on stone tablet? She heal us and is proud woman, so least we can do is be showing respect to her which will then be followed by tribal worship. Also cave cubs might see her bongos. Think of the cubs Grug."
824162
 
Last edited:
This reminds me of how right up until 2016 the left was constantly and openly complaining that the system was rigged because election spending literally translated into votes, and they saw the Republicans as the "rich old white men" party who could clearly outspend them. It was not at all uncommon for them to just outright say that yes, whoever bought more ads was going to win the election.

Of course I guess once Hillary outspent the RNC to an insane extent and still lost they had to start coming up with alternatives.
Well they'll be right in 2020. The Trump ads will translate into votes for Trump. And the Dems' ads will translate into votes for Trump.

Those dumb motherfuckers are gonna intentionally run ads talking about open borders, illegals getting free healthcare, slavery reparations, federally mandated busing and allowing abortions of fully developed babies up to the instant of birth. And they'll be proud of them too. They'll think to themselves, "America can't wait to vote for this! We can't lose with this platform."

Of course when they lose, they'll consult among themselves and determine their loss was due to Russia meddling again, voter supression, gerrymandering, right wing propaganda, racism, sexism, fascism, Nazism, religion, privilege and stupidity. But as for themselves? Blameless.
 
Opinion polls changed by 1% per 25k retweets? Ain't no fucking way. These clowns could at least make the lie believable and say 0.1% or even 0.5%. But moving polls a full percentage point? Yeah, ain't no fucking way.

16 million people watched Kamala Harris publicly humiliate Joe Biden in their debate and he dropped about 10% in the polls. Are they really calling that the equivalent of only 250k retweets?
View attachment 824003
>MSM article about Trump
>And Russia
>and 2016 pools

oh boy, it's like a trifecta of truthfulness

from the study
It seems unlikely that 25,000 re-tweets could influence one percent of the electorate in isolation
 
Back
Top Bottom