- Joined
- Mar 26, 2013
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same with Phoenix Point. They promised keys for GOG and Steam, then went back on what they promised. If Steam REALLY wanted to be dicks about it they could pull a Peter Thiel, secretly fund class action suits against any companies that did this shit and make other publishers and devs too scared to do the same thing. Frankly I don't see why they don't.https://youtube.com/watch?v=IX-LXI7UbB4Tyler brings up a point I didn't think about. The devs at 4A games debatably did something illegal by effectively creating a "bait and switch" with Steam by promising the game would be on Steam and advertising/promoting it that way and then pulling it off the store at the last minute. Which potentially violates consumer anti-trust laws. I'm not sure the specifics and I'm not a lawyer or well versed on advertising/consumer law. But it's at the very least highly unethical.
EXTREMELY bad P/R. That's why. Bear in mind that Steam has negative press for being a monopoly in the PC gaming space. This would just be seen as Steam trying to legislate their monopoly.Frankly I don't see why they don't.
They will most likely end up doing this if Epic's store starts taking more games than Valve ends up getting. Like I guarantee if Epic successfully convinces Bethesda to make The Elder Scrolls 6 a Epic store exclusive they will start doing it. That could easily tip the scales in Epic's direction. Valve has the money to outbid Epic but this is a losing strategy as the best course of action is to do what they historically did to competition and make really good video games that people want. And they aren't doing that.Hell, with Steam's money they could go the exclusivity route themselves. But they don't, possibly because they know what a long term PR nightmare that is and how unbelieveably douchey to boot.
So long as they didn't actively get caught, it probably wouldn't hurt them too much.EXTREMELY bad P/R. That's why. Bear in mind that Steam has negative press for being a monopoly in the PC gaming space. This would just be seen as Steam trying to legislate their monopoly.
Highly doubt they're going to do that, though. Bethesda's got their own shitty launcher now, why would they need Epic? I mean, they didn't put FO76 on Steam, but that may simply be because they knew exactly what would happen in terms of user reviews.They will most likely end up doing this if Epic's store starts taking more games than Valve ends up getting. Like I guarantee if Epic successfully convinces Bethesda to make The Elder Scrolls 6 a Epic store exclusive they will start doing it. That could easily tip the scales in Epic's direction. Valve has the money to outbid Epic but this is a losing strategy as the best course of action is to do what they historically did to competition and make really good video games that people want. And they aren't doing that.
Tencent money. I'm just speculating here but this would easily be a massive prize for Epic to have. Absolutely no boycott would ever happen. Bethesda games sell truckloads at launch. The way I'd speculate they'd do a dual release on their own launcher and Epic, and not Steam.Highly doubt they're going to do that, though. Bethesda's got their own shitty launcher now, why would they need Epic?
I think Bethesda may have reservations about getting involved in something that could easily lead to more bad PR for them after FO76. TESVI being exclusive to the epic store would cause a MAJOR upset, though they've already released their own games on their own platform before so it might not cause as big a splash as it otherwise could.Tencent money. I'm just speculating here but this would easily be a massive prize for Epic to have. Absolutely no boycott would ever happen. Bethesda games sell truckloads at launch. The way I'd speculate they'd do a dual release on their own launcher and Epic, and not Steam.
Yeah, but I'm not so sure. After Fallout76 people seem to realize all the shady shit Bethesda was doing for all these years. I'm just surprised, it took this big of a fuck up to see through.bsolutely no boycott would ever happen. Bethesda games sell truckloads at launch.
TES 6 regardless of any controversy will sell truckloads regardless of what launcher it's on. Fallout 76 is an exception since it was effectively a multiplayer spinoff. TES 6 is a highly anticipated game that is expected to make Skyrim levels of hype when it gets properly announced.Yeah, but I'm not so sure. After Fallout76 people seem to realize all the shady shit Bethesda was doing for all these years. I'm just surprised, it took this big of a fuck up to see through.
This will NEVER happen.As for this practice, I think it may stop people from preordering some games, which is bad for business, but good for said people.
That's not what I meant. For years Bethesda used the same engine, released games in half-working state, dumbed down RPGs to shooters, but everybody was pretending like nothing happens. But after Fallout 76, suddenly, more and more people talk about Bethesda doing this shit for years. I don't say, that they will boycott it, I'm just saying, that exclusivity announce will get more hate, that it could.Fallout 76 is an exception since it was effectively a multiplayer spinoff.
That's a bad example. Every game after the other badly underperformed.Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem, Mass Effect 3
It doesn't matter how many high profile failures there are people still preorder games en-mass. When the Outer Worlds comes out expect a mass of preorders for it regardless of launcher. Preorders are a universal constant in today's market because consumers are impulsive. This is why Farmville made billions of dollars by just forcing you to wait a few minutes and letting you pay to skip the wait.That's a bad example. Every game after the other badly underperformed.
I genuinely don't understand this point of view, it's a strategy they're employing as a new competitor to break into a market with one extremely dominant player, you have to employ special tactics to be able to do that. There's nothing wrong with what they're doing. If it's a bad strategy then it won't pay off for them and they'll lose out long-term. If it's a good strategy and it gets them a permanent foothold in digital video game distribution then I predict they will stop doing it after they have that secure position in the market. Microsoft and Sony largely don't do the exclusive thing anymore, timed exclusives, yes, but aside from Bloodborne I can't think of any big exclusive games for current-gen systems. It's just an entry strategy and it seems to be working from where I'm standing.
It's because they know the only reason people will use their launcher is if they frontload it with exclusives. What they're hoping for is eventually people will just switch entirely to the Epic store and buy all of the non-exclusives there too.I don't understand how Epic Games thinks inflating their sales by forcing people to buy from them is a good idea long term.
Posts like yours make me wish for a "God, I hope not" rating.Sadly I think this will work too.
The way i see it. I always try to have low expectations. This way I'm let down less often and surprised more oftenPosts like yours make me wish for a "God, I hope not" rating.