Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
W person cow said:
Actually some lady kiwifarmer did out themselves, and I rescinded the endorsement just like I said I would.
****
By the way, I would like to thank the Academy for Brianna's current 24% of votes.
The "anti-Lynch vote" is 18%
5% voted for Voehl. 18-5=13
so Wu got 24%. 13 were the automatic "anti lynch vote".
The other 9% were either my campaigning, or Wu's. Considering we all know who did more work, I would say that means I got her...
a bump of 9%. In other words I increased her vote totals by about 70%, getting her about 5,000 extra votes.
While being paid shit money. Doh!
But also, you're welcome :) :)
And all you jokers who thought she couldn't crack 10%, nyah nyah!
And it didn't give her control of the FBI either. Lynch still got 70%
I'm excited to see what I can do for an ACTUAL progressive next time! Although they will have to ACTUALLY pay me on time, this time lol.
Cheers to all your fun Kiwi jokes and memes :)
Click to expand...
I don’t really think you had much of an impact considering people admitted to voting for Wu because they thought he was a different woman or Asian. There’s an undercurrent of ousting incumbent dems, I think people just voted for someone “not Lynch” and voted for the female sounding candidate.

If any of them had seen actual pictures or Brianna in person, I think the vote would have been far less. Also, if any of the news outlets had done their job and investigated his lies.

Edit: Lynch didn’t even acknowledge Brianna’s existence for 2 years. He still hasn’t, he doesn’t care.
 
Sissy Galvez said:
I don’t really think you had much of an impact considering people admitted to voting for Wu because they thought he was a different woman or Asian. There’s an undercurrent of ousting incumbent dems, I think people just voted for someone “not Lynch” and voted for the female sounding candidate.

If any of them had seen actual pictures or Brianna in person, I think the vote would have been far less. Also, if any of the news outlets had done their job and investigated his lies.

Edit: Lynch didn’t even acknowledge Brianna’s existence for 2 years. He still hasn’t, he doesn’t care.
Click to expand...
If not for me, Brianna would have got herself disqualified from the ballot about 10-11 different ways, and would have had zero votes.
So in a way, one could say the whole 24% was me.
But I only want to lay claim to about 9%.
Factors like you listed above are indeed another 13 points of the votes she got, in my analysis. The "not Lynch" vote. Chris Voehl's 5% was the rest of the 18 points of "Anybody but Lynch".
The rest is either me, Brianna's "campaigning", my friends, and/or Brianna's media knack. I like to think me.
Will explain the data behind this in the morning.
Thanks for an amusing ride and for voting me third place after Stephen Lynch and Adolf Hitler :)
Yes I agree Lynch never publicly acknowledged Brianna, nor did I ever hear him even say her name. Nor should he have, probably.
 
W person cow said:
If not for me, Brianna would have got herself disqualified from the ballot about 10-11 different ways, and would have had zero votes.
So in a way, one could say the whole 24% was me.
But I only want to lay claim to about 9%.
Factors like you listed above are indeed another 13 points of the votes she got, in my analysis. The "not Lynch" vote. Chris Voehl's 5% was the rest of the 18 points of "Anybody but Lynch".
The rest is either me, Brianna's "campaigning", my friends, and/or Brianna's media knack. I like to think me.
Will explain the data behind this in the morning.
Thanks for an amusing ride and for voting me third place after Stephen Lynch and Adolf Hitler :)
Yes I agree Lynch never publicly acknowledged Brianna, nor did I ever hear him even say her name. Nor should he have, probably.
Click to expand...

You have quite the inner Chad warren.
In not going to say you didn't do anything, credit were it's due I'd say you got her on the ballet but you weren't alone in doing so.
Your friends went out their collecting signatures with you when you were to shy to do so, Briannas twitter followers signal boosted her efforts (admittedly in a very limited circle and couldn't vote for her) her poorly made ads were made by someone and others served the campaign after you parted ways.
It's not all about you Warren, by your own admission Briannas narrative is you only got the job because you were a pity diversity hire and got future endeavoured for being a screw up.
 
Last edited:
Okay true other people did help a ton, but I worked my butt off and did some significant stuff there.
Haha I don't know about "pity" though. I think that part was more of an excuse not to pay me.
Not sure what a Chad is exactly. Lots of people did work very hard though especially Kate and Frank.
 
W person cow said:
Lots of people did work very hard though especially Kate and Frank.
Click to expand...

And yet your insisting that 24% is down to you.
Maybe it would have been 25% if you were more confident in talking to black people rather than sitting on your hands and waiting for your moment.
Maybe the campaign would have been more successful if you had actually managed Brianna and got her to actually got her to follow up the leads you got her.
Maybe the campaign would have been better if (radical idea) she actually hired professionals to do it for her rather than here opponents "cousin" he she thought could get her the dirt.
I'm not trying to be a dick Warren but that's how you access a project. The compliment sandwich "I did this right,I fucked this up but atleast we did this".


But atleast you found some confidence in yourself out there getting signatures and selling people on an idea, good for you, atleast someone learned something.
 
I agree. But then if a frog had wings, maybe it wouldn't bump its ass a hoppin'
Nobody is going to manage Brianna
And I am glad Brianna did not hire "professionals" so I got to learn some things.
And having met the professionals, they ain't so hot. I almost am one now, pretty much.
It's kind of like one of those jobs that are really kind of easy but everyone thinks is magic.
Like coding, for example :)
MMX said:
And yet your insisting that 24% is down to you.
Maybe it would have been 25% if you were more confident in talking to black people rather than sitting on your hands and waiting for your moment.
Maybe the campaign would have been more successful if you had actually managed Brianna and got her to actually got her to follow up the leads you got her.
Maybe the campaign would have been better if (radical idea) she actually hired professionals to do it for her rather than here opponents "cousin" he she thought could get her the dirt.
I'm not trying to be a dick Warren but that's how you access a project. The compliment sandwich "I did this right,I fucked this up but atleast we did this".


But atleast you found some confidence in yourself out there getting signatures and selling people on an idea, good for you, atleast someone learned something.
Click to expand...
 
W person cow said:
Actually some lady kiwifarmer did out themselves, and I rescinded the endorsement just like I said I would.
****
By the way, I would like to thank the Academy for Brianna's current 24% of votes.
The "anti-Lynch vote" is 18%
5% voted for Voehl. 18-5=13
so Wu got 24%. 13 were the automatic "anti lynch vote".
The other 9% were either my campaigning, or Wu's. Considering we all know who did more work, I would say that means I got her...
a bump of 9%. In other words I increased her vote totals by about 70%, getting her about 5,000 extra votes.
While being paid shit money. Doh!
But also, you're welcome :) :)
And all you jokers who thought she couldn't crack 10%, nyah nyah!
And it didn't give her control of the FBI either. Lynch still got 70%
I'm excited to see what I can do for an ACTUAL progressive next time! Although they will have to ACTUALLY pay me on time, this time lol.
Cheers to all your fun Kiwi jokes and memes :)
Click to expand...

No, you’re responsible for 100% of her votes because, as you pointed out, she wouldn’t have gotten on the ballot and/or would have been disqualified a dozen different ways were it not for good ol “inexperienced” Warren Lynch.
 
@W person cow ,

You got Wu on the ballot in a primary during an off-year election. That is in itself worth a victory lap. Whether it was a good idea is a completely different question, but you accomplished it. The fact is that the state parties like to make party primaries hard to get into and 3rd party candidates extremely unlikely. The laws are written to place a series of difficult hoops to restrict the people on a ballot.

You either have to be well connected, organized, or an extremely hard worker to overcome these hurdles. You did have a lot of help, but there are lots of campaigns with scores of volunteers that can't organize to even get on a ballot on their first try. Often qualifying involves a series of very small time windows to screen people out. Its because of this that a lot of campaigns fail to even launch their first time because of qualifying. You helped Wu accomplish this on the first try. No one can take it away from you.

Personally, I could barely believe she qualified on the first try. That one process usually removes a large percent of the people that want to run for office. I expected her to fail there, tbh.

The question then becomes, why waste all your effort again on someone like Wu? You clearly could organize people despite any other flaw you have, but it may be that you are a poor judge of your potential clients as well as working out fair contracts for yourself.
 
SunLightStreak said:
You got Wu on the ballot in a primary during an off-year election. That is in itself worth a victory lap. Whether it was a good idea is a completely different question, but you accomplished it. The fact is that the state parties like to make party primaries hard to get into and 3rd party candidates extremely unlikely. The laws are written to place a series of difficult hoops to restrict the people on a ballot.
Click to expand...

Don't suck his dick too hard. He only got 500 signatures. The rest Wu paid for.
 
@W person cow you've mentioned several times that Brianna would have disqualified herself several times from the ballot but the only example I noticed was her reluctance to give out her address, please elaborate on the fuck ups we never got to enjoy
 
Norvic said:
Don't suck his dick too hard. He only got 500 signatures. The rest Wu paid for.
Click to expand...

Just stating a fact. Lots of campaigns never happen because of the laws in place. He may have personally gotten 500 sigs, but someone had to organize the other people unless you are implying that Wu actually organized people. The idea that Wu organized people effectively is the thing I have difficulty believing.

I know of a town that gives its candidates a single week to complete a packet. There is a single packet you have to get. Only the candidate themselves can take the packet for their campaign. You can only get the packet on the earliest on the Monday of that week. You then have until the Friday of that week to turn in the packet. All the signatures and everything else have to be submitted on that Friday. The states aren't much better and often have even more arcane rules. Running for President is even worse than this because you have to jump through all of this for 50 unique states each with different laws and deadlines.

Obama used this to get his first seats.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121918996082755013

You have free reign to hate Warren for helping Wu or being progressive, but Wu didn't get disqualified. Stephen Lynch probably would have liked nothing more to be in a primary with no opponent.
 
SunLightStreak said:
Just stating a fact. Lots of campaigns never happen because of the laws in place. He may have personally gotten 500 sigs, but someone had to organize the other people unless you are implying that Wu actually organized people. The idea that Wu organized people effectively is the thing I have difficulty believing.
Click to expand...

Neither Warren nor Wu organised anyone. She paid a company to do it.
 
SunLightStreak said:
Just stating a fact. Lots of campaigns never happen because of the laws in place. He may have personally gotten 500 sigs, but someone had to organize the other people unless you are implying that Wu actually organized people. The idea that Wu organized people effectively is the thing I have difficulty believing.

I know of a town that gives its candidates a single week to complete a packet. There is a single packet you have to get. Only the candidate themselves can take the packet for their campaign. You can only get the packet on the earliest on the Monday of that week. You then have until the Friday of that week to turn in the packet. All the signatures and everything else have to be submitted on that Friday. The states aren't much better and often have even more arcane rules. Running for President is even worse than this because you have to jump through all of this for 50 unique states each with different laws and deadlines.

Obama used this to get his first seats.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121918996082755013

You have free reign to hate Warren for helping Wu or being progressive, but Wu didn't get disqualified. Stephen Lynch probably would have liked nothing more to be in a primary with no opponent.
Click to expand...

For what's it worth i agree but I have to ask who do you think Warren was organising?
He did have people coming out and helping him mostly as a result of him posting on facebook of how scared of people he was and on occasion Frank was out there as well.
This wasn't some sort of organised effort it was Warren going out and maybe bringing a friend for emotional support.

Again probably needing clarification on this (looking for you @AnOminous) but people were saying Warren needed signatures of registered Democrats and he was just going out getting signatures at random.
 
MMX said:
For what's it worth i agree but I have to ask who do you think Warren was organising?
He did have people coming out and helping him mostly as a result of him posting on facebook of how scared of people he was and on occasion Frank was out there as well.
This wasn't some sort of organised effort it was Warren going out and maybe bringing a friend for emotional support.

Again probably needing clarification on this (looking for you @AnOminous) but people were saying Warren needed signatures of registered Democrats and he was just going out getting signatures at random.
Click to expand...

Norvic said:
Neither Warren nor Wu organised anyone. She paid a company to do it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it would be nice to have some clarification on the moments Wu almost disqualified themselves. Having an insider willing to explain would be great.

I am always skeptical about out of area organizing groups. Often they come in just get signatures and have no idea of the area. Some will put anything together and call it a day. You have to have someone in your campaign watching them. A number of them have gotten into real trouble.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/02/michigan-law-petition-untruths/104244180/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.35c1532ffaef

https://www.richmond.com/news/virgi...cle_0c5b9365-3255-5feb-9546-57b5c2774996.html

Pay per signature is still a huge issue. A number of states having laws against it and California just joined them. Usually, this is for petitions and ballot initiatives, but some want it for candidates too. The Supreme Court has at times struck these laws down as have state Supreme Courts.

https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/article217249050.html

https://ballotpedia.org/Pay-per-signature

Trusting these companies and not having someone on your staff to watch them is a mistake. There are more articles about this going wrong out there too.
 
Winnie the Poohnani said:
A wise person would choose next time to work for someone who at least pays them enough to buy that candle.

Especially when that person presents as "progressive" and is "against exploitation".
Click to expand...

I judge John not by what he says, but how he actually has treated employees every time he has hired them. He has fucked them over, cheated them out of any credit for what they've done, lied about them like Emma Clarkson, and often outright stolen from them. Nothing "progressive" about that.

MMX said:
Again probably needing clarification on this (looking for you @AnOminous) but people were saying Warren needed signatures of registered Democrats and he was just going out getting signatures at random.
Click to expand...

That doesn't necessarily mean he was actually turning them in like that. You'd have to ask him what he actually did with those signatures.
 
AnOminous said:
I judge John not by what he says, but how he actually has treated employees every time he has hired them. He has fucked them over, cheated them out of any credit for what they've done, lied about them like Emma Clarkson, and often outright stolen from them. Nothing "progressive" about that.
Click to expand...
I agree and it’s why I don’t have any respect for John or use his preferred “pronouns” etc. John Flynt aka Brianna Wu is a lying scumbag who mistreats everyone who works for him. He’s lazy, a massive narcissist, incompetent, and a scammer.

If he had any shame he would have paid his campaign staff a living wage like actual progressive candidates do. John talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk. To anyone with a brain, that would be a red flag but thanks to low-info voters and a complicit media that didn’t investigate a damn thing about Brianna Wu, he managed to get 16% of the vote.
 
We're not trolls, Warren. "No trolling plans." Call us what we are: a humble New Zealand agricultural collective.

trolls.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom