Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Haha he does keep away from us. But he told Frank that he believes it. Probably because of our mutual acquaintance Rosemary making fun of the awkward turkey neck that we both have.

Why did you and Brianna think Stephen owed you an apology? Asking who your parents are is a totally reasonable question if you're claiming to be his cousin and he doesn't know you from Adam.

Do you know if Brianna attempted to write a blog post? Did Brianna tell you why she wasn't publishing the post, or did you both just forget about it?
 
Well this went downhill quickly. I'm surprised that Lynch is so beloved here. And that posters are so unwilling to believe that an Irish catholic democrat from Massachusetts might be a closet alcoholic. It's like you don't even know us.

Lynch himself has admitted he's had alcohol problems. He's not a closet anything.

I was just questioning the ludicrous assertion that he's currently some bulbous-nosed W.C. Fields caricature stumbling around slurring his words. This is just clearly not the case.
 
I'm surprised that Lynch is so beloved here.

Pretty sure it's almost all trolling IMO. Most of the time people can't even name their own representatives, let alone have enough info on them to love or hate them. I don't think anyone who lives outside of MA-8 (i.e. nearly everyone, to say nothing of non-Amerifats) actually gives a shit about @RepStephenLynch one way or another except in comparison to John.

Warren, did the panel with John and that other lady already happen or is it forthcoming? Did you/will you go?
 
Yes lol

Which is pretty basic information. Almost as basic is that so called "carpetbaggers" who run outside where they live and can easily talk to people every day, tend to lose. But whether it's a good or a bad idea to run for the 8th, whether it's legal to or not (it is legal), I'm not running for the 8th. If I run for something, it'll be in Malden. You'd think I'd have said the word Malden enough times for that to be clear.

(1) You don't even know what a carpetbagger is, despite having worked for one. A carpetbagger is someone who moves to a state or district to run for office or seek other political advancement. It is not someone who runs for a House seat while living outside the district.

(2) More than five percent of House members live outside their districts. It's not as rare an occurrence as you think it is.

For someone who sees himself as some kind of Political Adept, you are shockingly ill-informed.
 
Why did you and Brianna think Stephen owed you an apology? Asking who your parents are is a totally reasonable question if you're claiming to be his cousin and he doesn't know you from Adam.
No, Brianna thought he owed me an apology. I pretty much talked her out of it. Seemed kinda weird and shitty but could have been accidental. And I called him a murderer after so, y'know, fair's fair or whatever.
Do you know if Brianna attempted to write a blog post? Did Brianna tell you why she wasn't publishing the post, or did you both just forget about it?
I think I covered this a bit earlier up. She was all psyched about the blog post but I wasn't. Seemed shitty but sadly, not atypical for politician behavior in my experience, and "my staffer Warren" is probably not a story, was my opinion. We have two Malden politicians who make Stephen Lynch seem extremely tame, if the worst he does is poke somebody in the chest and ask them about their dead mom he didn't know was dead. Drama for me and my friends sure, but I didn't think the average reader would care. Who knows I could have been wrong about it not being a story, but she never wrote the blog.

Lynch himself has admitted he's had alcohol problems. He's not a closet anything.

I was just questioning the ludicrous assertion that he's currently some bulbous-nosed W.C. Fields caricature stumbling around slurring his words. This is just clearly not the case.
Haha but it's pretty funny though if you've been forced to hang out with him for your job. But humor varies by the person I guess. Probably what I think is funny is in left field sometimes. He does remind me of WC Fields. Or like, Elmer Fudd.

Pretty sure it's almost all trolling IMO. Most of the time people can't even name their own representatives, let alone have enough info on them to love or hate them. I don't think anyone who lives outside of MA-8 (i.e. nearly everyone, to say nothing of non-Amerifats) actually gives a shit about @RepStephenLynch one way or another except in comparison to John.

Warren, did the panel with John and that other lady already happen or is it forthcoming? Did you/will you go?
Not sure. I could look it up. I doubt I will go because Brianna will probably be mean to me if I go. I do like the other two ladies in it though. Both very progressive.

(1) You don't even know what a carpetbagger is, despite having worked for one. A carpetbagger is someone who moves to a state or district to run for office or seek other political advancement. It is not someone who runs for a House seat while living outside the district.
(2) More than five percent of House members live outside their districts. It's not as rare an occurrence as you think it is.
For someone who sees himself as some kind of Political Adept, you are shockingly ill-informed.
For somebody who's taken Civics 101, you sure are quick to declare yourself an expert. (No offense).
I'm sure you may be right on the correct definition of the slang term carpetbagger, but somebody who lives out of district is much more despised than even somebody who moves to town to carpetbag. Whether 5% get away with it or not, you may notice that the other 95% don't.
But yes, as you're hinting, moving to a town for the purpose of running isn't looked well on either. And we both know somebody who did that.

For the record I definitely do not see myself as any political adept. Heck I'm lucky if I can even win City Council next year. Or even get funding. I do know a fair bit about Malden by now, but only because of so much "sperging out" over it, as y'all put it. I'd say I know more about local politics than Brianna or Voehl, but that's like knowing more about golf than your cat does, or something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For somebody who's taken Civics 101, you sure are quick to declare yourself an expert. (No offense).
I'm sure you may be right on the correct definition of the slang term carpetbagger, but somebody who lives out of district is much more despised than even somebody who moves to town to carpetbag. Whether 5% get away with it or not, you may notice that the other 95% don't.
But yes, as you're hinting, moving to a town for the purpose of running isn't looked well on either. And we both know somebody who did that.

(1) Powerleveling is quite properly frowned on here, so we won't go into what courses more advanced than Civics 101 I may or may not have taken.

(2) Carpetbagger is not a "slang term." It is long-established word with usage dating to the Reconstruction period in the South following the War of Northern Aggression.

(3) More than five percent of the members of the House of Representatives do not "get away with" being elected to represent districts where they do not reside. The eligibility requirements for serving in the House are spelled out in a document that those of us who passed Civics 101 like to call the Constitution of the United States. Living in the district you represent is not one of those requirements.

If you ever want to escape your current role as a comic-opera politician manqué, you need to start devoting some serious study to your obsessive hobby.
 
Yes I know the eligibility requirements, and you know I know that, and we aren't talking about them, and you know that too.
We're talking about complacent idiots who run from out of district, and the reason why they're only 5% of Congress, and not everybody lives in some mansion in Beverly Hills phoning it in.
Joe Crowley might be some fancy House leadership guy, but he lost the primary largely because he doesn't live in district and doesn't go there, and Alexandria does. Her ideas might seem radical to some, but in the end it's about knowing your constituents. By talking to them. Which is hard when you're not even in the vicinity.
Tim Canova ran against Debbie Wasserman Schultz and raised millions of dollars to defeat her. He baited her about not debating for months. She finally agreed. He showed up to the debate and said "Here, I have pretty much clear evidence that you rigged the primary".
Host of the show: "Hey that sounds true."
She said "Okay sure but you're not EVEN FROM FLORIDA."
Host of the show: "HEY THAT'S TRUE TOO! HE'S NOT FROM HERE!"
He lost the debate and the election.

Of course, I also am this same kind of idiot because I tried to help Brianna win the 8th while living an hour away. But no more of that for me. I like Malden better.

But yeah, there's a lot more to winning a political office than meeting the eligibility requirements. Although, by the way, in Massachusetts, you *do* have to live in district if you want to get on the *ballot*. Not in New York and many places though.

Heck not only do you have to live in district in MA, you have to get 3 clerks in your town to sign a sheet certifying that you do. You could still be a write-in without that, but good luck winning a write-in race.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure. I could look it up. I doubt I will go because Brianna will probably be mean to me if I go. I do like the other two ladies in it though. Both very progressive.

Even if your not recording you should still go since you put the event together, you admire two of the guests so shouldn't be denied your chance to hear them speak.
Also if Brianna is focused on you maybe it will give the others are chance to speak unmolested.
 
Last edited:
Stephen Lynch once got so drunk he thought Iranians were pink ponies from a dimension inside a simpleton child from Virginia's mind and that's why he had to get clean. Don't pretend like you haven't been there yourself a time or two before, lesser Lynch.

I always go full knenglel and also what is a kengle

https://lolcow.wiki/wiki/Kenneth_Erwin_Engelhardt

...(2) More than five percent of House members live outside their districts. It's not as rare an occurrence as you think it is.

I'd say less than 44 out of 435 at the high end of the estimate of district representatives is a rare occurrence for house reps living outside their respective districts. It's a semantic distinction at best though so, whatever.
 
Not sure. I could look it up. I doubt I will go because Brianna will probably be mean to me if I go. I do like the other two ladies in it though. Both very progressive.

Are you really going to let an impotent snarling hobgoblin prevent you from supporting the candidates whom you actually respect? Go show love to people whom you actually like, and bring back intel for the New Zealanders. Win-win my dude.
 
Yes I know the eligibility requirements, and you know I know that, and we aren't talking about them, and you know that too.
We're talking about complacent idiots who run from out of district, and the reason why they're only 5% of Congress, and not everybody lives in some mansion in Beverly Hills phoning it in.
Joe Crowley might be some fancy House leadership guy, but he lost the primary largely because he doesn't live in district and doesn't go there, and Alexandria does. Her ideas might seem radical to some, but in the end it's about knowing your constituents. By talking to them. Which is hard when you're not even in the vicinity.
Tim Canova ran against Debbie Wasserman Schultz and raised millions of dollars to defeat her. He baited her about not debating for months. She finally agreed. He showed up to the debate and said "Here, I have pretty much clear evidence that you rigged the primary".
Host of the show: "Hey that sounds true."
She said "Okay sure but you're not EVEN FROM FLORIDA."
Host of the show: "HEY THAT'S TRUE TOO! HE'S NOT FROM HERE!"
He lost the debate and the election.

Of course, I also am this same kind of idiot because I tried to help Brianna win the 8th while living an hour away. But no more of that for me. I like Malden better.

But yeah, there's a lot more to winning a political office than meeting the eligibility requirements. Although, by the way, in Massachusetts, you *do* have to live in district if you want to get on the *ballot*. Not in New York and many places though.

Heck not only do you have to live in district in MA, you have to get 3 clerks in your town to sign a sheet certifying that you do. You could still be a write-in without that, but good luck winning a write-in race.

So Massachusetts has a residency requirement for House members that supercedes the U.S. Constitution. Why do I not believe you?

Edit To Add:

From the office of the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, here are the requirements for appearing on a primary ballot or special election ballot for the U.S. House of Representatives.

United States Representative
  • Must be at least 25 years of age.
  • Must be a registered voter.
  • Must be a U.S. citizen for at least 7 years prior to the date of the election.
  • Must be an inhabitant of Massachusetts when elected. [Emphasis added.]
  • Requires certified signatures of at least 2000 voters registered in the district.
And yes, Warren, you complete dumbass, to appear on a primary ballot you have to get the signatures of three clerks in the town where you live, but that town doesn't have to be in the House district where you're running, which would violate the Constitution.

Specifically:

"A candidate must prove party affiliation by filing with the Secretary of the Commonwealth a certificate of party enrollment signed or stamped by at least three local election officials of the city or town where the candidate is registered."

For someone who pretends to be knowledgeable about these matters, your ignorance is surprisingly vast..
 
Last edited:
So Massachusetts has a residency requirement for House members that supercedes the U.S. Constitution. Why do I not believe you?
Pretty sure I'm going to believe the elected politician rather than some troll on a hate site that literally kills transwomen on issues of politics ;)
 
Sigh. For the several-th time.
1) While running from out of district isn't *illegal* in some states, it's still a really BAD idea
2) In Massachusetts, you have to live in district to get on the BALLOT. It's literally the top requirement of about 15 in MA:
https://imgur.com/a/JhifOVr
My trust in elected public officials is vindicated once again!
 
Back
Top Bottom