Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
From what we know about Brianna, I don’t think she expected the closed doors she faced when she started the campaign. She’s a huge narcissist and thought she’d be welcomed with open arms. Instead Brianna whined about the dems in her district not willing to work with her against Lynch.

@W person cow correct me if I’m wrong but I’m guessing she thought this would be a piece of cake since you both assume Lynch is widely hated in the district and claim he hates LGTB and is a fake democrat.
 
W person cow said:
I'm boring. You should close my thread. I do have more stories but I'm not really that petty. Except when I am.
Click to expand...

Warning John's future victims that he is a lazy, incompetent, abusive con artist is about as far from pettiness as you can get.

Tell us a story, Uncle Warren. We want a scary one about the Lovecraftian Horror that brought darkness and missery to District Eight.
 
OldDayz said:
@W person cow : Warren, a question. If Brianna was so dedicated to making this work and actually beat Mr. Lynch, then what exactly did she do all day? I know Twitter and mobile games were a huge chunk of her day, but did she actually make any progress on actually running her campaign?
Click to expand...
She is not dedicated, and no.

Sissy Galvez said:
From what we know about Brianna, I don’t think she expected the closed doors she faced when she started the campaign. She’s a huge narcissist and thought she’d be welcomed with open arms. Instead Brianna whined about the dems in her district not willing to work with her against Lynch.

@W person cow correct me if I’m wrong but I’m guessing she thought this would be a piece of cake since you both assume Lynch is widely hated in the district and claim he hates LGTB and is a fake democrat.
Click to expand...
There is a strong groundswell of dislike for Lynch and even when he runs unopposed, about 18% of people leave their vote blank in protest.
But nothing like a piece of cake. You need way more than 18% to win.
She expected the Dem establishment to rally with her against a Dem incumbent, mostly because she is insane I guess. They almost NEVER help a primary challenger. So then she expected us "Bernie Bros" to support her because Lynch is indeed a real DINO. Except she does not understand, and probably lowkey hates, Bernie's movement. So I dunno.
If she gets less than 18% of the vote, that will be hilarious :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sissy Galvez said:
From what we know about Brianna, I don’t think she expected the closed doors she faced when she started the campaign. She’s a huge narcissist and thought she’d be welcomed with open arms. Instead Brianna whined about the dems in her district not willing to work with her against Lynch.

@W person cow correct me if I’m wrong but I’m guessing she thought this would be a piece of cake since you both assume Lynch is widely hated in the district and claim he hates LGTB and is a fake democrat.
Click to expand...

Kroster has mentioned this before. Brianna actually did manage to get into meetings with powerful Dems who gave her good advice at what she should do, but Brianna pissed them off by ignoring the advice they'd given her so she was just ignored after that.

I'm not entirely sure that Kroster and the powerful Dems are entirely in the right on this though. They give advice to normal people running normal campaigns. Brianna Wu's not normal though and if she'd tried being like every other politician then she'd have just screwed the campaign up by exposing her stupidity and incompetence. While Brianna hates Trump she really has tried to emulate him by campaigning in ways that fit her rather then the existing political system.

If Brianna truly was the tech leader she claims she is then she might have stood a chance of creating a unique campaign that won despite breaking campaign guidelines. She certainly managed to gain a ridiculous amount of positive press - probably way more than Lynch ever could. The problem for Wu is that her website proves she doesn't doesn't really know anything about tech and she's so addicted to being a fool on Twitter that she wasn't able to properly use Twitter to help her campaign.
 
KerryDixon9 said:
Kroster has mentioned this before. Brianna actually did manage to get into meetings with powerful Dems who gave her good advice at what she should do, but Brianna pissed them off by ignoring the advice they'd given her so she was just ignored after that.
Click to expand...
Yes. Such advice as: Go to Democratic Town Committees and City Committees and tell them who you are.
She ignored that advice for over a year, because "those people are the establishment".
Then she hired me, and asked me how to hook her up with progressive groups like Our Revolution. I set her up with some of those meetings, she showed up and was like "I will stop Russian hacking." Berniecrats facepalmed because obviously, Wikileaks played a large role in informing their movement, and they themselves get called Russian spies all day by the mainstream Dems, because they want peace with Russia like the peaceniks they are, which makes them "secret Trump supporters" or "spies" or whatever in the minds of certain militant Dems, and they're generally just so tired of it. They were like "Oh, not this again."
So I was like okay well, how about the special interest Democrats like Stonewall Dems. She showed up to that and was like "The Democrats are corrupt!" Super cold shoulder because, well, she was talking TO the Democrats, just a division of them.
I was like "Brianna, you want to do the opposite of that. Tell the Berniecrats the Democrats are corrupt, and tell the Stonewall Dems you will stop Russian hacking, if you must talk about that."
She was like "Wow, magic advice!" And she didn't do so bad with certain groups. Young Dems liked her for example.
DSA and Our Revolution Boston she was afraid to go to, but didn't say that, and sent me, and didn't return their calls. So then they didn't like her.
She was best with the in-between half-radical groups like Indivisible. But of course, Indivisible isn't allowed to endorse, because they're so wishy washy moderate that they filed as a 501c3 nonprofit which barred them from endorsing anyone. They just "fight the Trump agenda". And there are only so many groups of them.
So eventually Brianna gets the point that at DTCs and DCCs you get to get up on a *stage* and be treated like a *celebrity*. So then she finally starts going to those, but only if she gets to speak, a year and several months after she started the campaign. When she received that advice way back in the beginning before I ever met her.
It's madness. MADNESS!
Although meanwhile, Voehl did not go to any either, because he didn't know they existed. Meanwhile Lynch just lazily went to like one every 6 weeks and completely dominated the field, lol. When I came on, I was going to like 4-10 a week as soon as I could, and they were great places to get easy signatures and tons of contacts. But a lot of towns were eventually like "y'know, so where's Brianna?"
 
W person cow said:
So I was like okay well, how about the special interest Democrats like Stonewall Dems. She showed up to that and was like "The Democrats are corrupt!" Super cold shoulder because, well, she was talking TO the Democrats, just a division of them.
Click to expand...

Did you ever see any evidence that she prepared her remarks ahead of time, or was it always totally off the cuff? Did you ever offer or get invited to offer your input on what she was going to say at meetings where she was speaking?
 
Norvic said:
Did you ever see any evidence that she prepared her remarks ahead of time, or was it always totally off the cuff? Did you ever offer or get invited to offer your input on what she was going to say at meetings where she was speaking?
Click to expand...
Yes, she puts a lot of effort into her speeches. And after the Stonewall Dems situation, she asked my advice on what different groups will want to hear or not want to hear. Which worked pretty well, and I was proud that I helped her connect with people more.
You have to meet people where they are at.
But then she started calling it "code switching". Which, her Hispanic campaign manager was like "um, that's not code switching".
And there's a fine line between "speaking to the issues people care about" and "complete pandering". When I introduced her to Weymouth Friend, she was like "You have to have a private position and a public position."
I double facepalmed and was like "REALLY, BRIANNA?". But he's an optimistic guy and ended up working for her for a while anyway.
But not very long. Because, dang.
 
W person cow said:
Yes, she puts a lot of effort into her speeches. And after the Stonewall Dems situation, she asked my advice on what different groups will want to hear or not want to hear. Which worked pretty well, and I was proud that I helped her connect with people more.
You have to meet people where they are at.
But then she started calling it "code switching". Which, her Hispanic campaign manager was like "um, that's not code switching".
And there's a fine line between "speaking to the issues people care about" and "complete pandering". When I introduced her to Weymouth Friend, she was like "You have to have a private position and a public position."
I double facepalmed and was like "REALLY, BRIANNA?". But he's an optimistic guy and ended up working for her for a while anyway.
But not very long. Because, dang.
Click to expand...

So you did realize after all, she didn't stand for the issues: she stood for Brianna. Progressives and bernie bros and all that were just stepping stones to get her the power she so deserves. It's a mental illness, really.
 
Dimethyl Ketone said:
So you did realize after all, she didn't stand for the issues: she stood for Brianna. Progressives and bernie bros and all that were just stepping stones to get her the power she so deserves. It's a mental illness, really.
Click to expand...
Yes probably. I was starting to realize it when I met you charming folks, and y'all made me feel like I wasn't just imagining it.
So thanks for that. Despite all the mean memes and whatever.

Although I feel like with her, it's more about attention and a feeling of power than actual power. Actual power requires responsibility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
W person cow said:
Although I feel like with her, it's more about attention and a feeling of power than actual power. Actual power requires responsibility.
Click to expand...

She's like that kid you grew up with that never could understand what being cool was, yet still tried so hard to imitate and just failed miserably.
 
I have some questions. Guessing some have been answered in a roundabout way.

1) Does Frank back up her lies or does he shy away from them? He lives with her and knows most of the stuff she says about herself is a lie.

2) Is Frank a true believer that she can win or is he just doing this so she has something to do with her life while he pays the bills?

3) Do you know what happened to the office she was renting? They paid like $1300 a month for it and she bragged on Twitter. Did you see it? Was it ever used?

4) Bernie Sanders is made President for life and can enact his own policies without the need for Congress. America becomes the utopia that Bernie Sanders envisions. But there is a catch. You have to make love to Brianna or Frank. Which one do you choose?
 
Richard Stabone said:
4) Bernie Sanders is made President for life and can enact his own policies without the need for Congress. America becomes the utopia that Bernie Sanders envisions. But there is a catch. You have to make love to Brianna or Frank. Which one do you choose?
Click to expand...

So if I fuck neither than we don't end up in communist system? That's a win/win.

Otherwise, I would ram frank's asshole and make him cry like the little bitch that he is.
 
Richard Stabone said:
I have some questions. Guessing some have been answered in a roundabout way.
1) Does Frank back up her lies or does he shy away from them? He lives with her and knows most of the stuff she says about herself is a lie.
Click to expand...
He backs them up in a very honest-seeming way. I think he may actually believe most of them. I know you think it's gross to think about, but Frank really is deeply in love with Brianna, and sees her as this young hot trophy wife.
Richard Stabone said:
2) Is Frank a true believer that she can win or is he just doing this so she has something to do with her life while he pays the bills?
Click to expand...
Some of both. He knows she can't win this time around, but thinks she could win some day, maybe in 2020.
Richard Stabone said:
3) Do you know what happened to the office she was renting? They paid like $1300 a month for it and she bragged on Twitter. Did you see it? Was it ever used?
Click to expand...
I was allowed into the lobby but not the actual office. From what i can tell, the only purpose the office served was to make the campaign seem legit while she was hiring me, and maybe others before me.
Richard Stabone said:
4) Bernie Sanders is made President for life and can enact his own policies without the need for Congress. America becomes the utopia that Bernie Sanders envisions. But there is a catch. You have to make love to Brianna or Frank. Which one do you choose?
Click to expand...
I'm a huge fan of Bernie Sanders, but not huge enough that I would want him as a dictator. I prefer democracy, with checks and balances.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
W person cow said:
He backs them up in a very honest-seeming way. I think he may actually believe most of them. I know you think it's gross to think about, but Frank really is deeply in love with Brianna, and sees her as this young hot trophy wife.

Some of both. He knows she can't win this time around, but thinks she could win some day, maybe in 2020.

I was allowed into the lobby but not the actual office. From what i can tell, the only purpose the office served was to make the campaign seem legit while she was hiring me, and maybe others before me.

I'm a huge fan of Bernie Sanders, but not huge enough that I would want him as a dictator. I prefer democracy, with checks and balances.
Click to expand...

Warren, I'll be fair on Sanders with you. I liked him, he did seem like his heart was in the right place, and if Hillary hadn't made sure he wasn't an option, while I figured Trump was better than her, it would have been a much tougher decision had Bernie been running against Trump.

Regardless, at the time, I was worried more about Bernie's spine not being strong enough to stand his ground when things got tough, and considering how he got worked over by Clinton, can't say my fears were eased.

Still, at least compared to Clinton he was relatable and seemed to care about voters as people.

That said, it's surprising to me you at any point believed Brianna Wu gave a damn about others. Like Clinton, Wu sees voters as drones to prop up their ego, not people with fears and concerns who want a politician who appears to care like Bernie did.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom