The Root Magazine

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The great irony is that upon becoming independent, Haiti was actually significantly wealthier and more powerful than The Dominican Republic, and even ruled it for about 20 years. Even now, when NGOs have planted millions of trees to combat erosion in Haiti, they're almost immediately cut down for fuel.
Makes you wonder why would you bother helping a nation like that; unless you want to virtue signal. I'm black and I'm not helping those niggas.
 
White people half-assing it again.

The amount of money and effort needed to unfuck Haiti would be astronomical. The token relief efforts don't give very much long term help, especially considering how much aid is lost to corruption. I'd wager it's at last half, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it be higher than that.
 
Makes you wonder why would you bother helping a nation like that; unless you want to virtue signal. I'm black and I'm not helping those niggas.
If it's all going to be woefully mismanaged or stolen, then I don't see why anyone should.
The amount of money and effort needed to unfuck Haiti would be astronomical. The token relief efforts don't give very much long term help, especially considering how much aid is lost to corruption. I'd wager it's at last half, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it be higher than that.
Whose corruption takes more? Haiti's or the Clintons'?
 
The amount of money and effort needed to unfuck Haiti would be astronomical. The token relief efforts don't give very much long term help, especially considering how much aid is lost to corruption. I'd wager it's at last half, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it be higher than that.
Sadly, I have to wonder if something like a complete take over of the country might be their salvation.
 
The amount of money and effort needed to unfuck Haiti would be astronomical. The token relief efforts don't give very much long term help, especially considering how much aid is lost to corruption. I'd wager it's at last half, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it be higher than that.
Money would not fix the Haiti problems, unless that money went for a colonization involving ethnic cleansing, but doing that would be socially tricky.
maybe fund the Dominican Republic to help them annex and cleanse it the same way Haitians killed off their whites and mulattos.
let me find something a buddy said about the subject a while ago
I know, Haitians took kill whitey to a whole new level
you ever heard of Papa Doc?

he ran his election campaign by putting forward the narrative of a mulatto conspiracy against the pure blacks
when he got into power he formed some paramilitary that went around the countryside and killed people for kicks
named it after some voodoo boogeyman that would abduct misbehaving kids
Francois Duvalier himself would often equate himself with one of the voodoo spirits, Baron Samedi
he also claimed he was one with Jesus Christ and the spirits
his son then ruled for 15 years after his death
in Conclusion, Haiti is a little Africa in the Americas. donating money in efforts to save it is as futile as trying to solve hunger in Africa by donating tons of food, which we've been doing for about 100 years now thanks to bleeding heart Christians and Humanists
 
The only way countries like Haiti will ever improve is by dramatically increasing the literacy rate and improving schools. The country is poor and dumb. Giving them handouts in the form of money and food won’t solve anything long term. Either invest in infrastructure or let them be because keeping them as a welfare state does nothing to help them. Really it only helps the ngos because they’re all corrupt as fuck and pocket the aid.

edit: This is why I don’t donate to many charities unless they’re education related and score highly. Meaning more money goes to helping people vs increasing the bank accounts of those who run the charity. As we know there are a ton of charity scams out there.
 
Every article Damon Young writes just screams "look how black I am y'all!"

If I had to guess, I'd say he probably grew up in a mostly-white neighborhood and attended a series of lily-white private prep schools (and even there, he was likely considered kind of a dork).

Then he went off to some HBUC and realized he better blacken up quick if he wanted to score ANY pussy at all over the next four years. So all of a sudden, he starts raggin' on white people nonstop the same way that kid from middle school who was a MAJOR Hannah Montana fan back in seventh grade suddenly starts raggin' hard on Miley Cyrus once he reaches high school, in a desperate (and pitifully transparent) attempt to distance himself from his shameful, Disney Channel past.
 
Last edited:
IMG_1396.jpg

My favorite root headline. Even minorities aren't minority enough.
 
Big boy, wannabe journalist Michael Harriot published a hit piece on a historian who pointed out the factual inaccuracies in the 1619 project (there are a lot, it’s a poorly sourced pile of crap).

Harriot tried to turn it into a racial issue by calling the historian white when he is in fact black. It’s been pointed out but not corrected by Michael or the root and no apologies either.

That’s about as much as you need to know that the root is not a serious publication, it’s tabloid trash much like Michael Harriot.

And, as white people are wont to do, Kirsanow framed his argument in the context of Martin Luther King Jr. White people love to quote King because he is a mythical figure who has been whitewashed by the very version of America that Kirsanow wants to perpetuate.

This is Kirsanow, a well accomplished black republican lawyer which probably deeply upsets Michael Harriot since all he does is tweet and shit out garbage for the root.

9F95380C-2D38-4673-8522-7BB9B9FCE0E6.png

Anyway, read Kirsanow’s article and not Harriot’s.

 
Big boy, wannabe journalist Michael Harriot published a hit piece on a historian who pointed out the factual inaccuracies in the 1619 project (there are a lot, it’s a poorly sourced pile of crap).

Harriot tried to turn it into a racial issue by calling the historian white when he is in fact black. It’s been pointed out but not corrected by Michael or the root and no apologies either.

That’s about as much as you need to know that the root is not a serious publication, it’s tabloid trash much like Michael Harriot.



This is Kirsanow, a well accomplished black republican lawyer which probably deeply upsets Michael Harriot since all he does is tweet and shit out garbage for the root.

View attachment 1108206

Anyway, read Kirsanow’s article and not Harriot’s.


Harriot did flash this up on the comments where it’s of course almost completely hidden because kinja is shit.

0FE2A0AF-4E08-4D73-A6B4-8DAABC6B8D46.jpeg
Nice ad hominem Mike. Once again this idiot proves himself to be so thin-skinned he can’t even offer a neutral correction to his completely humiliating and hilarious fuckup.
 
Harriot did flash this up on the comments where it’s of course almost completely hidden because kinja is shit.

View attachment 1108244
Nice ad hominem Mike. Once again this idiot proves himself to be so thin-skinned he can’t even offer a neutral correction to his completely humiliating and hilarious fuckup.

Especially when it's one that shows him to be a racist, who attributes certain traits to people solely based on race, so if he encounters anyone outside of that race with those traits (like preferring historical accuracy to revisionism) he just instantly assumes they're white and sticks to his guns regardless of how stupid he looks doing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom