Women's March - The feminist rally stacked with Islamists, Rapists, and other questionable people

  • Thread starter Thread starter RP 520
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Imagine how many MLP-referencing signs were at the march.
Most bronies/pegasisters likely don't care about the march because either a). they (rightfully) think it's stupid or b). they're introverted. Not even /mlpol/ cares to talk about it. If I were to expect any mention of pony at the march, it'd probably be from some mom who is unaware of the fandom and is trying to force her kids into her anti-Trump autism.
if you really wanted to make a trump pony joke though, this rich pony tried to run for mayor in a comic
 
Just popping in to state the obvious: the reason why these drooling fucktards choose Potter over LOTR for their shit-tier shipping metaphors is because J K Rowling is a woman and therefore superior to evil cishet Tolkien.

Uh, carry on.
 
Just popping in to state the obvious: the reason why these drooling fucktards choose Potter over LOTR for their shit-tier shipping metaphors is because J K Rowling is a woman and therefore superior to evil cishet Tolkien.

Uh, carry on.

Also Emma Watson brands herself as feminist in real life.

Are all women lolcows?
All men and women are lolcows until they learn to discipline themselves. And for some reason we expect less discipline coming from women.
 
Last edited:
Just popping in to state the obvious: the reason why these drooling fucktards choose Potter over LOTR for their shit-tier shipping metaphors is because J K Rowling is a woman and therefore superior to evil cishet Tolkien.

Uh, carry on.
As subjective and stupid as it would still be, they'd have a more legitimate point if they were praising JK Rowling herself for being an accomplished female author, but instead they choose to praise her fictional female characters in a fictional story that never happened in real life.
 
Probably because that was the big set of books when all of these "woke" people were kids.

Makes me wonder, actually, why these same people don't try to make more LOTR refs since those films were out around the same time.

LOTR is the complete opposite of woke. If they had their way, it would be banned or rewritten.

Also Emma Watson brands herself as feminist in real life.


All men and women are lolcows until they learn to discipline themselves. And for some reason we expect less discipline coming from women.

Emma Watson went to Brown and is the prototypical white feminist. She complained about the gender wage gap in Hollywood, despite making more money than most people who exist.
 
Just popping in to state the obvious: the reason why these drooling fucktards choose Potter over LOTR for their shit-tier shipping metaphors is because J K Rowling is a woman and therefore superior to evil cishet Tolkien.

Uh, carry on.

Or just because Harry Potter only requires a late elementary school reading level while LOTR is more in the high school range.
 
Since Rowling is vocally anti-Trump, maybe it’s less about her being a woman and more about her being a woman who thinks exactly like they do.
 
DUBWemxXcAE1oBf.jpg

Since Rowling is vocally anti-Trump, maybe it’s less about her being a woman and more about her being a woman who thinks exactly like they do.

Sounds right to me. I've seen feminist bloggers bitching about her because she didn't condemn Johnny Depp after the abuse charges, or something. She's now an "abuse apologist", which turned into her being "an abuser". Also there's some salt about her appropriating Native culture or some shit.

All of that's not enough to have the tide turn against her, though. Most feminists don't seem to jump on that bandwagon, presumably because they like the books/films too much.
 
DUBWemxXcAE1oBf.jpg



Sounds right to me. I've seen feminist bloggers bitching about her because she didn't condemn Johnny Depp after the abuse charges, or something. She's now an "abuse apologist", which turned into her being "an abuser". Also there's some salt about her appropriating Native culture or some shit.

All of that's not enough to have the tide turn against her, though. Most feminists don't seem to jump on that bandwagon, presumably because they like the books/films too much.
Yep, the "Not Woke Enough Witch Hunt".
 
It's obvious why they don't like LOTR tho. LOTR has this "hail Britannia / the darks are evil" subtext that makes them REEE, also it's harder for them to play escapism with. However it's very easy for them to imagine their black Mary Sue selves going to Hogwarts, being best buds with Harry and defeating evil Trump-demort.
 
IMG_3625.JPG


So what you're telling me is that she sat at home during the Jim Crowe era and during Vietnam War. She sat at home during the civil rights stuff that happened, said nothing about segregation... but Trump being president is what got her off her ass to protest?

Gotta love that privilege!
 
:offtopic:I've seen this sort of thing before. They'll ignore it and then insist that the homosexuality they read out of it is 1000% the correct way. Would even be canon if they could get their hands on it (which might happen anyways with J.K.).
Kiwifarms needs a thread on academic lolcows and the worthless drek they publish. You know, some ideologue's "analysis" that ignores the actual text in favor of shoehorning talk about gay people or minorities or something.
 
Bonus Dangerhair photobomb

8TTiCqZ.png


If you use 'yt', I guess you won't object to 'ngr', for negro. You know, because )))equality(((

rosIk6f.png


Don't worry, Super Indigenousblacklatinomuslimasianimmigranttrans Woman and xer sidekick, Soy Boy, will save us!

wZEFcRR.png
 
Back
Top Bottom