Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm waiting to Wu to blame her dog's death on a weaponized "cow-killer" asteroid.

LegoTugboat said:
Well, you couldn't exactly hack into a rock, or blast a large rock into pieces, since rocks are dumb and blasting it into pieces would result in, say, 11,000 one ton rocks hitting an area rather than just one large goddamn rock hitting one city.

Also, I'd be a tad concerned about the idea of the smaller rock fragments now being radioactive due to being nuked.

Granted, considering the closest thing we actually had to a space weapon was Nazi Germany's sun gun...

(Protip, if you haven't been melted by space Nazis with solar lasers, it didn't work. Mostly due to the lack of space travel, but they say they totally could have done it if nobody interfered with them for 20 years.)
Click to expand...

You'd want to blow the rock up before it hit atmosphere, then the 11,000 1-ton rocks would all burn up- or at least you'd create an aerodynamic flaw that might cause it to break up once atmospheric friction took over. The radioactivity from moonrocks being nuked would be a non-issue given the times and distances involved. Especially since you'd want max yeild from your asteroid killer, so you'd want to make sure it was a 3-stage at full power. The Tsar Bomba, the most powerful nuke ever detonated, was also one of the cleanest. The triple-stage warhead was allowed to fully react so almost all of the radioactive material was consumed and the fallout was minimal. :tmyk:



AnOminous said:
This is assuming they don't just see you when you go there to the Moon and start setting up shit to do this. This will take months. And I don't know if John has noticed this, but you can kind of look up and see the Moon and we have these things called "telescopes" and we routinely look at it. There is absolutely zero chance of anything like this getting started without the entire world immediately extremely curious as to what you're doing with these structures you're building on the Moon. And you'd better have a good answer if you're Dr. Evil or we're just going to retrofit a few nukes and nuke whatever it is off the face of the Moon.

I can't believe John is so bafflingly stupid that he'd fail to realize he completely got his ass kicked like this and made himself look like an even bigger moron than he already looked, and now he wants Moon Rocks 2: Electric Boogaloo?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I didn't bother addressing huge holes in Wu's Moonrocks paranoia because I even if you were a Bond villain who got your gigawatt nuclear reactors built and powered up with no one noticing because you said it was something else, and assuming you had a launch vehicle that could hoist 2000tons (11,000,000 Kg of mass) at enough velocity to escape lunar gravity, its STILL going to be almost impossible to launch rocks at the earth with any sort of accuracy. And again, with current technology, you'd need to use nuclear energy of some form. So you've got nukes, why not just use those?
 
GaryGrey said:
Wasn't there a court case about whether or not a politician can block a constituent on social media?
Click to expand...

Ruin said:
Yea it was some social justice activist judge reeeeeeing at Trump. It got tossed out in about five seconds for being stupid and having no real legal basis.
Click to expand...

It wasn't tossed. It's federal case 1:17-cv-5205 and has yet to be decided; both parties have moved for summary judgement on the filings as far as I know but no judgement has been reached.

That said, the basis of the argument is that Donald Trump is tweeting as the president and therefore a public official. The chances of Wu getting elected and being put in that situation are about nil. The reason I bring all this up is that it would be hilarious if he got elected only to find out he was legally obligated to unblock everyone 8)
 
Kosher Dill said:
I think from what our field agents were able to discern, the house had a doggy door, so Crash could go in and out on his own. It's fairly likely that the dog just crawled out to die, as dying animals sometimes do, and then crawled back in when his absentee owners came home.
Click to expand...

It doesn't really matter, because even if you could make that excuse for John, he was tweeting like his usual madman self while the dog was dying, and admitted it, and people were all caps YELLING at him to see a vet, and he blew them off and continued his tweet binge. By the time he took the dog to the vet, it was too late.
 
Now I just hate the fucker.

Norvic said:
Charity begins at home, and that's where it ends in the Wu household.
Click to expand...
Wu's charity begins at homeliness and goes no further.

Actually, even that is more positive than the truth. Wu is only homely if your home is where Cthulhu's mom knits samplers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mola Ram said:
I had either forgotten this tweet or never really grasped the psychosis permeating the incredibly obvious lie which runs through it. I'm no dog lover, but something like this has me thinking of John less as a laughable con artist and more of a fucking monster.
Click to expand...
Dog lover or no, it's despicable. He's saying that he was so busy tweeting constantly that he couldn't be bothered to check on the animal he owned, and let it fucking freeze to death.

Norvic said:
No. Nor does it have any genetic cause. More likely she didn't get the poor little thing its proper vaccinations.
She certainly didn't take it to the vet when it was showing definite signs of being in distress.
Click to expand...
You have to understand man, John was busy fighting those racist GGers that sent death threats his way. If he took the time to take care of the dog, who knows what might have happened. Gamers might have looked at sexy fighting game characters, or had fun, or sent 'lol u ugly' to a tranny on twitter. Or, god forbid, built moon bases to destroy the earth by tossing rocks.
 
AnOminous said:
No. Bizarrely, John actually admitted the dog contracted its fatal illness while he was out fighting goobergrabble. He just said it was somehow the goobers' fault that he let his dog die.

View attachment 338407

So his dog either got encephalitis from being left out in the cold by John, or he knew the dog had encephalitis, and still left the dog out to die.
Click to expand...

As no one ever wrote: "There are no words for how much he loved us, and vice versus (sic)." [Emphasis added.] Flynt/Wu's attempts to imitate an actual human being continue to fail in a ludicrous and laughable manner. Who uses the phrase vice versa when writing about love?
 
LegoTugboat said:
(Protip, if you haven't been melted by space Nazis with solar lasers, it didn't work. Mostly due to the lack of space travel, but they say they totally could have done it if nobody interfered with them for 20 years.)
Click to expand...
more like 50 to 100.
 
ZKWNordman said:
View attachment 338307

Every time? As in zero times? As in the same number of times you’ve volunteered at a District 8 construction site as you’ve promised? As in the number of true things you’ve said about yourself in your life?
Click to expand...

I didn't know how well funded Boston shelters are since John hasn't volunteered anywhere since cutting off his penis. That would require getting off Twitter for a few hours and going out in public.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
I didn't know how well funded Boston shelters are since John hasn't volunteered anywhere since cutting off his penis. That would require getting off Twitter for a few hours and going out in public.
Click to expand...
It's a mixed bag, and they'll always accept volunteers. While the funding can be tight with some of the shelters in the area, it's usually just the understaffing that can be a problem.

Unfortunately, the pay from working at a shelter is lacking, to say the very least, but thats how you come across some of the most passionate workers, because helping animals is what they want to do with their life.

But would I say that they're grossly understaffed or underfunded, not even remotely.
 
JSGOTI said:
But would I say that they're grossly understaffed or underfunded, not even remotely.
Click to expand...

I like animals of all sorts, so I once looked in to working as a volunteer for an animal shelter in my area and the process was basically like applying for a job. I got the impression that far from too few people wanting to do the work, they had far too many people and wanted to weed out the workshy and inconsistent. I guess it worked because it put me off from applying.

I'm guessing looking after animals is one of the more popular bits of philanthropy that people do. I bet there are all sorts of more unpleasant jobs that need doing in looking after the destitute/elderly/infirm humans that aren't nearly so popular.
 
JSGOTI said:
It's a mixed bag, and they'll always accept volunteers. While the funding can be tight with some of the shelters in the area, it's usually just the understaffing that can be a problem.

Unfortunately, the pay from working at a shelter is lacking, to say the very least, but thats how you come across some of the most passionate workers, because helping animals is what they want to do with their life.

But would I say that they're grossly understaffed or underfunded, not even remotely.
Click to expand...

I'm amazed John hasn't tried to say he's fostered animals before. It would be more believable than him working at a shelter.
 
Norvic said:
I'm guessing looking after animals is one of the more popular bits of philanthropy that people do. I bet there are all sorts of more unpleasant jobs that need doing in looking after the destitute/elderly/infirm humans that aren't nearly so popular.
Click to expand...

Hit the nail on the head there. I volunteered at a wildlife hospital for a few years and there was certainly no shortage of applicants. Lots of turnover, yes, because it was hard and depressing work, but you could always find someone.
It's easier in many ways than looking after people because the animals can't talk back, don't complain if you screw up, and it's much better to clean up bird shit than human.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
>compiled and statistically analysed my Twitter replies

the fuck :story:

View attachment 338377
Click to expand...

It's another example of John repeating the phrases he heard somewhere without even basic understanding what they mean. It's totally possible to statistically analyse Twitter replies, but it doesn't consist of just collecting them via bots. You need to a lot of data processing of the tweets, and then you need to detect the ones written by non-native speakers of English with a classifier.

I like the guy who neatly exposes John's ignorance :)
 
Last edited:
lol salt spill on aisle 6

salt1.png


salt2.png


salt3.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom