- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Surprised she could even recommend someone else to speak on the topic. Must've been painful.
"If you'd like to know some women analysts - you should meet
Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
-
⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
"If you'd like to know some women analysts - you should meet
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
lol what the fuck
Merry Christmas you fucking cunts
Merry Christmas you fucking cunts
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe
Kiwiminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
"filabuster" "an 12-hour speech"
I sometimes wonder if this eejit is a native speaker of English.
And Flynt/Wu is still sperging about conducting a filibuster in the House. There are children in elementary school who know that filibusters are limited to the Senate.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
Yeah, Gen X was the beta for the rigged economy. Fuck the days of literal slave labor or robber barons, it all started with Ma Bell and bundling web browsers with OSes.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
Yet again, John uses words the cool kids use, but doesn't know jack fucking shit.
git is very ill-suited to ensuring public accountability for a history of changes, because it allows users to edit its commit history under many circumstances. This is okay when you're trying to simplify a chaotic development process from the viewpoint of future developers, but it's not okay if you want to have an authoritative audit trail of what happened when.
Shut the fuck up, Johnny! You're out of your element!
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2017
That's John-tier sperging about something you don't know shit about. If you rewrite history in Git, it's immediately visible to everybody watching the repo, since everything is hashed and having a reference to any point in git history (smth like 0abdcf31adb...) ensures you are referring to same exact history. That's one of Git's core ideas.
Publishing history of law changes in Git is actually a good idea, these corrections and amendments are PITA to read.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
Not if you haven't committed to a branch shared on the public server, it isn't. And no sensible malefactor would share it until the skulduggery was done.
In any case, there is already a public record of the changes to a bill. You don't need git for that. This was mentioned in this very thread not that long ago.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2017
Not saying it'd store _all_ of discussion, but once law is accepted it'd be easy to see who added what and when
Yeah, in completely incomprehensible format with hard to verify integrity.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
So apparently "MOON ROCKS" is now taken out of context.
The original tweets, just to remind everyone that these were "taken out of context". Yup. Totally out of context with reality.
N
NQ 952
Guest
kiwifarms.net
So apparently "MOON ROCKS" is now taken out of context.
The original tweets, just to remind everyone that these were "taken out of context". Yup. Totally out of context with reality.
If I was so dumb that I was taken that far out of context I'd change my name and move to Alaska.
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2015
If she needs a lawyer to sue it means she doesnt have insurance
clearly hasnt played FF2
Troon surgeons.
Isnt Briana Gen X? Good job working on that beta Briana.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
You simply lack foresight. Moon rocks may not seem like an urgent issue *today,* but Sir Elon Drax is working to the world of his grandchildren's grandchildren's interplanetary dominance, not his own. He must be stopped before it's too late.So apparently "MOON ROCKS" is now taken out of context.
The original tweets, just to remind everyone that these were "taken out of context". Yup. Totally out of context with reality.
District 8 needs a congresswoman with the prescience to stop these dire threats to national security before they take root.
Brianna Wu will fight for adequate funding for research into preventative measures against these intergenerational, extraterrestrial familial syndicates. Because she knows, it's not just about us, it's about the world we're leaving to our children.
-------
I'm Brianna Wu, and I approve this message.
Last edited:
The Manglement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
This might be 
, but I really hope Wu doesn't ditch her political aspirations at the first sign of conflict. I really want to live in a world where she gets attack ads calling out all her shit. Like, imagine a political ad maker asking "Well, do we have any dirt on Brianna Wu?" and talking about her dog-killing, moon-rocking, shitty-game-making troon ass in an attack ad.
, but I really hope Wu doesn't ditch her political aspirations at the first sign of conflict. I really want to live in a world where she gets attack ads calling out all her shit. Like, imagine a political ad maker asking "Well, do we have any dirt on Brianna Wu?" and talking about her dog-killing, moon-rocking, shitty-game-making troon ass in an attack ad.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
I don't think she's going to poll high enough to rate one tbhThis might be
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
I had more time & curiosity than sense today, and wanted to see just how far gone Brianna "John Flynt also has two N's in it" Wu is with his fear of weaponized corporate moonrocks.
Answer: Very.
Answer: Very.
Lets put on our interesting physical deformities, grab our signature pets, head to the moon and hold the world ransom with our space rocks.
The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whalesor your mom. And this is all just to rattle some windows and put on one hell of a light show, mind you.
We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.
Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.
In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)
Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.
Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?
Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.
The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whales
We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.
Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.
In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)
Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.
Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?
Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
It's been stated before that Lynch would be a fool to ever address her. Unless through some series ofThis might be
- Joined
- May 25, 2014
Well, you couldn't exactly hack into a rock, or blast a large rock into pieces, since rocks are dumb and blasting it into pieces would result in, say, 11,000 one ton rocks hitting an area rather than just one large goddamn rock hitting one city.
Also, I'd be a tad concerned about the idea of the smaller rock fragments now being radioactive due to being nuked.
Granted, considering the closest thing we actually had to a space weapon was Nazi Germany's sun gun...
(Protip, if you haven't been melted by space Nazis with solar lasers, it didn't work. Mostly due to the lack of space travel, but they say they totally could have done it if nobody interfered with them for 20 years.)
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
The time it took you to type this, let alone do the research and required thought and comprehension, is more time than Brianna invested in the entire Moon Rocks idea.